logo
A staggering 40% of Gen Zers plan to splurge more on non-essentials this year. Is it time for a reality check?

A staggering 40% of Gen Zers plan to splurge more on non-essentials this year. Is it time for a reality check?

Yahoo19-04-2025

As Trump's trade policies continue to send shockwaves through the economy — creating fears of rising prices, layoffs and a potential recession — investors are bracing for impact. With markets in flux and uncertainty in the air, financial anxiety is mounting.
While no one can control the stock market, The Washington Post's personal finance columnist Michelle Singletary says there's one thing people can take charge of: their spending. But according to new data, Generation Z isn't exactly slamming the brakes.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
In fact, 40% of Gen Zers plan to spend more on non-essential purchases in 2025 compared to last year, according to Northwestern Mutual's latest Planning & Progress Study — earning the title 'Spend Z.' Their intention to spend outpaces every other generation and persists despite credit card bills (22%) and personal education loans (16%) being their main sources of outstanding debt.
While many in this position might choose to cut back on non-essential spending, Gen Z as a whole doesn't seem to want to make any sacrifices. On a recent episode of the Post Reports podcast, Singletary didn't mince words when offering advice to young adults navigating these choppy waters: 'You have to put your adult hat on and say, 'You know what? I wish I could eat out, but I can't.''
That may be easier said than done in an age where Uber Eats orders and late-night Shein scrolls feel like self-care rituals. But experts warn that trading savings for short-term splurges could leave young consumers vulnerable — especially with the economy on shaky ground.
There's a good chance you may have found yourself uttering the phrase, 'I really shouldn't be spending this much' — mid trip to the mall with an oat milk latte in hand. But despite headlines warning of an economic slowdown and the not-so-soft whisper of a recession, a growing number of young adults are choosing indulgences over budgets.
According to a 2023 Morning Consult report, Gen Zers and millennials are spending more than $400 a month on non-essential purchases like travel, recreation and dining out. That's significantly higher than the $250 Gen Xers spend and double the nearly $200 boomer benchmark.
The economy as a whole is still banking on consumer resilience. The National Retail Federation projects 2025 retail sales will hit $5.42 trillion, perhaps driven in part by younger generations keeping their wallets open, even as their savings shrink.
While the impact of economic uncertainty may not yet be visible in your day-to-day life, it's likely on the horizon. And when it arrives, you'll want more than just a closet full of trending accessories. A well-padded emergency fund will offer the kind of value fast fashion can't.
Read more: The US stock market's 'fear gauge' has exploded — but this 1 'shockproof' asset is up 14% and helping American retirees stay calm. Here's how to own it ASAP
Prioritizing wants over needs during economic uncertainty can leave young consumers vulnerable to debt, with little to fall back on when the unexpected hits. 'Now that you're a young adult, you've got bills to pay. You have to save for retirement. You have to save for an emergency fund. Maybe you've got young children yourselves,' Singletary said on the podcast.
You can start by building a budget. Not just a mental tally of your spending — but a written, trackable plan that accounts for fixed expenses, savings goals and the real cost of lifestyle choices. Even small changes can have a lasting impact. For example, swapping food delivery for planned grocery runs can save hundreds each month while teaching discipline in spending.
Next, it would be a good idea to create an emergency fund. You could aim to save up three to six months' worth of your essential expenses and make each contribution non-negotiable, like rent. This cushion can help cover job loss, medical bills or even the inevitable life hiccup — all without reaching for a credit card.
Aside from an emergency fund, you could also start contributing to a retirement account — whether it's a Roth IRA or 401(k). Putting even a small amount away now allows compound interest to do the heavy lifting long term.
And if you're still craving that big splurge, you can budget for it by setting aside a small amount regularly and make it a conscious reward — not a spontaneous swipe.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic congressman steps up his work to pull Musk toward his party
Democratic congressman steps up his work to pull Musk toward his party

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democratic congressman steps up his work to pull Musk toward his party

Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., talked with one of Elon Musk's 'senior confidants' on Thursday about whether the ex-DOGE leader, now feuding with Donald Trump, might want to help the Democratic Party in the midterms. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna told Semafor on Friday. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.' Khanna, who has known Musk for more than a decade, has long argued that Democrats unwisely pushed him away from their party. Now the world's wealthiest man, Musk benefited from the Obama administration's clean energy investments, defending them against Republican attacks in the 2012 election. He supported Democratic nominees for president until 2024, when he endorsed Trump for president — and spent more to help elect him than he had for any Democrat. Since Musk began attacking the Trump-backed GOP tax bill as an 'abomination' this week, Democrats in Congress have amplified his criticism and even adopted some of his language. But few besides Khanna have gone as far as talking about bringing Musk back into the Democratic tent; most Democrats are furious at Musk's DOGE work to dismantle parts of the federal government and are confident that he is a political liability for Trump. 'How great is it that that dipshit Elon Musk is out?' Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota said at last Friday's Democratic fish fry in South Carolina, after Musk left the administration. 'The decisions he was making were literally killing people, so he could dance around and act like he was doing something.' Musk was a 'historic villain' whose unpopularity had helped Wisconsin Democrats win the state's April 1 supreme court race by 10 points, said state Democratic Party chairman Ben Wikler. At their 'Fighting Oligarchy' rallies, the largest political events since Trump was sworn in, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., torched Musk as the embodiment of what Democrats and fair-minded Americans should be against. Some Democrats believe that Musk could have stayed in their coalition, had they paid him a little more respect — specifically, had Joe Biden invited Musk to the White House electric vehicle summit early in his presidency. Khanna is in that camp. Others counter that the party's overall shift leftward after 2016 alienated Musk, who was never coming back. He clashed with Elizabeth Warren ('Senator Karen') over the idea of a wealth tax, and with progressives over the 'woke mind virus' that he blamed for the gender transition of his third child. That's the camp where most Democrats are, although some — like Walz — see this as a political opportunity. Still, the idea of an irate multibillionaire making problems for Republicans is enticing to plenty of Democrats, who have not been above meddling in GOP primaries to help weaker candidates win nominations. What if Musk made Republicans burn money to defend their incumbents, as he slammed them with TV ads? That's all theoretical, as Musk said last month that he would do 'a lot less' political spending now that he'd achieved his goal of electing Trump. If Musk is sincere about the political views he posts about on X, he is completely at odds with the Democratic Party, and the best they could hope for is him making trouble for Republicans out of spite. In Politico, Holly Otterbein and Lisa Kashinsky about the Democrats who hoped that Musk would have a 'villain-to-hero' arc, and help them beat Trump. But Khanna was the only voice in the party who fully believed it could happen.

Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin
Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin

Bloomberg

time24 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Crypto-Wallet Spat Ends With World Liberty Buying Memecoin

Eric Trump signaled that the tension between the competing factions of Donald Trump's crypto empire has cooled and the family's World Liberty Financial will buy a 'substantial' amount of the memecoin at the center of the dispute. The president's son said in a post on X on Friday that the company responsible for the Trump memecoin isn't moving forward with a digital-wallet offering that has caused a fissure with World Liberty Financial, the crypto company owned in part by the Trump family.

DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says
DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says

Los Angeles Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the DOGE team that had been led by Elon Musk to examine Social Security records that include personal information on most Americans. Acting by a 6-3 vote, the justices granted an appeal from President Trump's lawyers and lifted a court order that had barred a team of DOGE employees of freely examining Social Security records. 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances,' the Social Security Administration, or SSA, 'may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in an unsigned order. In a second order, the justices blocked the disclosure of DOGE operations as agency records that could be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The court's three liberals — Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — dissented in both cases 'Today, the court grants 'emergency' relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans,' Jackson wrote. 'The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful.' The legal fight turned on the unusual status of the newly created Department of Governmental Efficiency. This was a not true department, but the name given to the team of aggressive outside advisors led by Musk. Were the DOGE team members presidential advisors or outsiders who should be not given access to personal data? While Social Security employees are entrusted with the records containing personal information, it was disputed whether the 11 DOGE team members could be trusted with same material. Musk had said the goal was to find evidence of fraud or misuse of government funds. He and DOGE were sued by labor unions who said the outside analysts were sifting through records with personal information which was protected by the privacy laws. Unless checked, the DOGE team could create highly personal computer profiles of every person, they said. A federal judge in Maryland agreed and issued an order restricting the work of DOGE. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, Obama appointee, barred DOGE staffers from have accessing to the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. But her order did not restrict the Social Security staff or DOGE employees from using data that did not identify persons or sensitive personal information. In late April, the divided 4th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to set aside the judge's order by a 9-6 vote. Judge Robert King said the 'government has sought to accord the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) immediate and unfettered access to all records of the Social Security Administration ('SSA') — records that include the highly sensitive personal information of essentially everyone in our country.' But Trump Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer appealed to the Supreme Court and said a judge should not 'second guess' how the administration manages the government. He said the district judge had 'enjoined particular agency employees — the 11 members of the Social Security Administration (SSA) DOGE team—from accessing data that other agency employees can unquestionably access, and that the SSA DOGE team will use for purposes that are unquestionably lawful. ... The Executive Branch, not district courts, sets government employees' job responsibilities.' Sauer said the DOGE team were seeking to 'modernize SSA systems and identify improper payments, for instance by reviewing swaths of records and flagging unusual payment patterns or other signs of fraud. The DOGE employees 'are subject to the same strict confidentiality standards as other SSA employees,' he said. Moreover, the plaintiffs 'make no allegation that the SSA DOGE team's access will increase the risk of public disclosure.' He said checking the personal data is crucial. 'For instance, a birth date of 1900 can be telltale evidence that an individual is probably deceased and should not still receive Social Security payments, while 15 names using the same Social Security number may also point to a problem,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store