
Japan decries China threat after string of risky encounters – DW – 07/16/2025
The Japanese government called out China as posing "an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge" for Tokyo and its allies, using a notably sharper language than usual in its latest defense white paper.
The annual document focuses on the current threats Japan is facing and the country's defense efforts. According to the 2025 paper, Beijing is expanding the areas in which it operates and becoming increasingly assertive.
"International society is in a new crisis era and faces the biggest challenges since the end of World War II," Japanese officials said in the report issued this week, adding that China's "intensified military activities" are likely to continue and could "seriously impact Japan's security, which is a cause of grave concern."
The document also highlighted the growing offensive capabilities of North Korea and its deepening security and economic alliance with Russia.
"Russia has also been observed engaging in joint activities with China involving aircraft and vessels," according to Defense Minister Gen Nakatani.
Analysts say the wording of this year's white paper reflects a string of military incidents in the last 12 months.
"In the last year, there has been a lot more activity involving China, North Korea and Russia so it is no surprise that Japan is expressing its concerns more explicitly," said Ryo Hinata-Yamaguchi, an associate professor at Tokyo International University's Institute for International Strategy.
He added that the security environment was "constantly changing."
These changes are also illustrated by increasingly frequent confrontations between Chinese and Japanese troops.
On July 7, a Japanese YS-11EB electronic surveillance aircraft operating in international air space over the East China Sea was intercepted by a Chinese JH-7 fighter-bomber, with the Chinese aircraft closing to within 30 meters (100 feet), according to the Japanese Defense Ministry. Another Chinese aircraft performed a nearly identical maneuver the following day.
Through diplomatic and defense channels, Tokyo expressed "serious concerns" at the "abnormal approaches." Beijing refused to accept the complaint and accused Japan of "coming close and spying on China's normal activities."
A similar incident took place in mid-June, when Chinese fighters operating from the aircraft carrier Shandong in the Pacific took up station around 45 meters from a Japanese P-3C reconnaissance aircraft for about 120 minutes.
Over the last year, Chinese coast guard vessels and aircraft have been seen on hundreds of occasions operating in waters around the uninhabited Senkaku Islands, also known as the Diaoyu Islands, which Tokyo controls but China claims. A large Chinese buoy was also found inside the waters around the East China Sea archipelago.
In August 2024, a Chinese military reconnaissance plane intruded into Japanese airspace over the Danjo Islands, part of Nagasaki Prefecture in the far southwest, causing Japanese fighters to scramble to intercept the aircraft. Tokyo also responded to the incident by summoning the charge d'affaires at the Chinese embassy to the Japanese Foreign Ministry.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"As well as these acts, China is being even more assertive in the South China Sea and in the Taiwan Strait and that is a pattern that we have also seen increasing year-on-year," said Hinata-Yamaguchi.
Beijing was quick to hit back against the white paper, with its Foreign Ministry saying the Japanese document "reflects a wrong perception of China, interferes in China's internal affairs and peddles the false 'China threat,'" according to Chinese paper.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian also reminded reporters in Beijing that 2025 marks the 80th anniversary "of the victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression."
"We urge Japan to deeply reflect on its historical crime, draw lessons from history and stop finding pretexts for its military buildup by talking up 'tensions' in the neighborhood," he was quoted as saying by the state-run daily.
The Japanese white paper did mention that Tokyo is on course to meet its goal of increasing defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2027, up from 1.8% at present.
And while that figure is still significantly below the 5% that the US is presently demanding that its allies spend on defense, Hinata-Yamaguchi said the white paper also contains a message for Washington.
"Reading through the document it is clear that there is new concern about the alliance," he said. "It is not stated overtly, but reading between the lines you can see that Tokyo is telling the US that it is doing everything that it can to take greater responsibility for its own defense and that it wants the US to have confidence in it as an ally and a partner."
Yakov Zinberg, a professor of international relations at Tokyo's Kokushikan University, said the latest white paper also hints at deepening concerns that China is building military alliances with North Korea and, more importantly, Russia in Northeast Asia.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"China and Russia have carried out a number of maritime and aerial military exercises in the last couple of years and I think it is very likely that there will be more such joint drills in the future," he said, suggesting that the intention is to demonstrate the nations' combined power and deter Japan from a more active resistance.
In one maritime drill last year, a joint fleet of Chinese and Russian warships circumnavigated the Japanese archipelago in what was widely interpreted as a show of force.
"Japan is extremely worried about this US administration and its commitment to the security alliance because President [Donald] Trump is simply so unpredictable," Zinberg said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
Are Trump's tariffs the new sanctions? – DW – 07/21/2025
Donald Trump is betting that tariffs rather than sanctions will fix economic and geopolitical imbalances. But does the threat of rising US inflation and retaliation make sanctions a safer choice? US President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs rather than sanctions has been described as both the "world's worst bet" and "a powerful proven source of leverage" to protect the national interests of the United States. While tariffs essentially are taxes on imports primarily used to protect domestic industries, sanctions are penalties imposed on another country to punish and its government. Sanctions typically put restrictions on trade or his return to the White House in January, Trump's tariff threats against dozens of countries have created great uncertainty among US businesses and global trading partners. What's become known as "tariff tango" — bold pledges of steep duties on foreign goods, followed by abrupt reversals — suits Trump's shifting political or economic goals. Yet, financial markets remain on edge, not knowing how or when the president may deploy tariffs next. The tariff on China, the biggest economic and military rival to the US, reached historic highs in April, soaring to 145% before being significantly cut the following month after trade talks in London. Trump's sudden increase and later rollback of tariffs show how he uses them as a flexible way to fix what he sees as unfair trade, based on past trade disputes. "What shapes the president's views is the rapid rise of Japan in the 1980s, and the feeling that the Japanese were out-competing the iconic American car industry because the US has been too generous in its trade terms," Jennifer Burns, associate professor of history at Stanford University, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tariffs are Trump's preferred weapon to tackle the massive US trade deficit, particularly with China, which amounted to $295 billion (€253 billion) in 2024, according to the US Census Bureau. They also align with his "America First" agenda to protect domestic industries and boost US job creation. The White House has defended the president's approach, insisting that tariffs can be quickly deployed and, unlike sanctions, don't completely shut foreign markets to US firms. "[Trump] can add this pressure when he wants and then bring it back when markets start to freak out or it stops serving his purpose," Sophia Busch, associate director of the Geoeconomic Centre at the Atlantic Council think tank, told DW. "This is much easier with tariffs than with sanctions." Although tariffs have been widely criticized for their potential to stoke inflation, they do raise revenue for the US Treasury, unlike sanctions. US tariff revenues are up 110% to $97.3 billion in the first half of the year, compared to the same period last year. Tariffs are expected to raise $360 billion next year, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Tariffs give Trump direct, unilateral control, using executive orders without needing approval from the US Congress. Sanctions, on the other hand, often require complex legal frameworks and cooperation with international partners, like the European Union. The preference for tariffs over sanctions reflects Trump's aim for rapid, visible economic leverage, but raises concerns about the destabilizing effects of such policies on global trade and peace. "The reason [tariffs] have such a bad reputation is because they're linked to these episodes of de-globalization, and in the 20th century, they were linked to armed conflict," said Burns. "If low tariffs and open markets knit countries together in a way that forestalls armed conflict, does it mean that we might be moving away from that?" Trump's second-term policies suggest he is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions, such as pressuring countries like Canada, Mexico and China on nontrade issues like immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures or threats, which have intensified global trade tensions. Similarly, Colombia was threatened with tariffs after it rejected US deportation flights, while threatened levies on the European Union were partly announced as a response to EU privacy and climate regulations. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil, which were framed as retaliation for the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally. The far-right politician faces trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss, including plans to assassinate political rivals. Previous US administrations have preferred sanctions over tariffs as a punitive tool to bring rogue countries into line. Since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US has imposed more than 2,500 sanctions on Russia, targeting individuals, entities, shipping and aircraft. The US has also imposed sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and North Korea. "These economies are not crucial trading partners for the US," the Atlantic Council's Busch said, adding that Trump's tariffs on the "top US trading partners" were "more of an economic threat domestically." Trump has recently expressed more openness to deploying sanctions. Referring to a bill proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham for additional penalties on Moscow if it fails to negotiate a peace deal in good faith with Kyiv, Trump said he was "very strongly" considering fresh sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video If passed, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 will target key Russian officials and oligarchs, financial institutions and the energy sector, aiming to curb Russia's ability to export oil and gas. The bill, which has bipartisan support, also proposes secondary sanctions on third countries and foreign companies, which Trump has termed "secondary tariffs" of up to 500% on countries importing Russian energy. Trump's similar "secondary tariffs" of 25% on buyers of Venezuelan oil, which took effect in March, were also designed to pressure energy importers to align with US foreign policy, a role typically reserved for sanctions. Secondary sanctions usually include blacklisting individuals and entities, asset freezes and banking restrictions. The threat of US criminal charges and travel bans is also often used. "Sanctions are more about punishing countries for violating international norms," Burns told DW. "They're in response to specific actions, and if those actions cease, the sanctions can be undone." Noting how the uncertainty around Trump's tariff policy had left US firms and global trade partners reeling, Burns warned that "years of tariff uncertainty" may cause a "serious economic slowdown, as businesses and investors wait for a more predictable landscape."


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
What's next for Japan after far-right election surge? – DW – 07/21/2025
Despite losing his parliamentary majority after a strong showing by right-wing populists, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba wants to remain in office. Japan's coalition government led by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba lost its parliamentary majority in Sunday's election after large gains made by right-wing populist parties, in a sign that right-wing populism and polarization are now also undermining political stability in Japan. For now, Ishiba has vowed to hang on as prime minister, despite the second election debacle in nine months. His Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost a snap election last October, making it a minority party ruling with a coalition. Ishiba has said he would "humbly accept" the result and "continue to take responsibility for national affairs." However, Ishiba's continuation as prime minister no longer depends on him alone. A strengthened opposition could topple him at any time with a vote of no confidence, even if these parties are not united enough to forge a governing coalition themselves. Ishiba also faces the threat of a rebellion within the LDP, which has governed Japan almost continuously for 70 years and has always controlled at least one chamber of parliament. Conservative LDP heavyweight Taro Aso has said he "could not accept" Ishiba as prime minister. However, potential successors appear to be staying under cover for the time being. "Nobody wants to replace Ishiba in these difficult times for the LDP," political scientist Masahiro Iwasaki from Nihon University in Tokyo told DW. The ruling coalition of the LDP and the Buddhist Komei Party missed its self-imposed target of retaining a majority in the upper house of parliament, with 125 of 248 seats up for reelection. The coalition missed by only three seats, which was an unexpectedly close result. The LDP is now likely to try to win over some independent MPs to its side. Even if this succeeds, the government is still on shaky ground. One of Ishiba's options would be to expand his governing alliance. However, the major opposition parties have already declared that they would not enter into a grand coalition. Apparently, they doubt that Ishiba will remain prime minister and LDP leader in the medium term. This leaves the 68-year-old politician with the option of selective cooperation with individual opposition parties, which he has been doing since losing his majority in the more important lower house at the end of October. However, this will not succeed without painful concessions, for example, on tax issues. Before the election, Ishiba rejected opposition demands for a reduction in VAT on food. Instead, he promised every citizen a cash payment of 20,000 yen (€116/$135) by the end of the year to compensate for the loss of purchasing power due to high inflation. According to Japanese media, the LDP's election debacle comes as many voters are dissatisfied with the three-year decline in real wages caused by high inflation, along with a sharp increase in foreign workers and tourists. Two young, right-wing populist parties benefited the most from this, but the largest opposition group, the Constitutional Democratic Party of former Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, hardly benefited at all. The Sanseito party, which is only five years old, increased its number of seats in the upper house from two to 14 and the Democratic Party for the People from nine to 17. The Sanseito party went into the election campaign with the openly xenophobic slogan "Japanese First" and has accused the government of pursuing a "policy of concealed immigration." The number of foreign residents in Japan grew by 10% in 2024 to just under 4 million. The Sanseito Party claims that recruiting foreigners as workers to address an ageing and shrinking population will disrupt Japan's social harmony. Founder Sohei Kamiya has said his party has been modeled after Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and other European far-right parties. The Democratic Party for the People, with its charismatic leader Yuichiro Tamaki, is now the third strongest force in the party system, which lends political weight to its main demand for tax cuts. "Both right-wing parties were able to capitalize on the anger of the younger generations towards the political system," analyst Tobias Harris told DW, citing percieved gerontocracy, inflation and stagnant wages as key factors.


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
China begins construction on world's largest dam in Tibet – DW – 07/21/2025
China is building the world's largest hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, which starts in the Himalayas. However, India and Bangladesh have both expressed concerns over the dam's potential impact. China's Premier Li Qiang announced that construction has begun on what will be the world's largest hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river, at the eastern rim of the Tibetan Plateau. The announcement was made at the ceremony on Saturday, as reported by the Chinese media. However, the planned dam has sparked concerns from India, Bangladesh and NGOs. The Yarlung Tsangpo river, which is 2,900 kilometres long, starts in the Himalayas and winds through what is said to be the world's deepest land-based canyon. At one section, the river drops 2000 meters (6561 feet) in elevation within 50 kilometers (31 miles). China has cited expanding renewable energy, reducing carbon emissions, and economic goals in the Tibet region as reasons behind the estimated $170 billion (€147.4 billion) project. "The electricity generated will be primarily transmitted to other regions for consumption, while also meeting local power needs in Tibet," state media reported. The dam will reportedly consist of five cascade hydropower stations with capacity to produce 300 billion kilowatt hours of electricity each year — equivalent to the amount consumed by the UK last year. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As the Yarlung Tsangpo flows south, it becomes the Brahmaputra river in India and Bangladesh. Millions rely on the river as a water source and for agriculture. Both countries have expressed concerns over the dam's impact on millions of people living downstream. NGOs have also warned of risks of irreversible damage to the ecologically sensitive plateau. In January, India's Foreign Ministry raised concerns with China, saying it will "monitor and take necessary measures to protect our interests." The ministry stressed that China has been "urged to ensure that the interests of the downstream states of the Brahmaputra are not harmed by activities in upstream areas." A 2020 report from the Lowry Institute, an Australian think tank, reported that "control over these rivers gives China a stranglehold on the Indian economy." Chinese authorities have not said how many people would be displaced by construction of the Yarlung project. In December, China's Foreign Ministry said that the project would not have any "negative impact" downstream, adding that Beijing "will also maintain communication with countries at the lower reaches" of the river. This is not the first time geopolitical issues have been raised by rivers which cross international borders. The Yarlung Tsangpo dam is expected to be operational in the 2030s. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video