
‘Commerce not chaos:' Trump remakes the foreign trip
The first multi-day foreign trip of President Donald Trump's second term bucked the norms of presidential travel, demonstrating just how swiftly and drastically his transactional approach to foreign policy has reshaped the way other countries interact with the United States.
Trump's whirlwind journey this week through three wealthy Arab Gulf states appeared more like a governor's economic development mission — with corporate leaders and investment pledges — than a typical presidential trip. Usually, those highly choreographed missions are geared toward affirming alliances, engaging in tough diplomatic negotiations and advancing American foreign policy priorities. Trump did all of that, but his chosen allies and priorities were strikingly different.
'This was a trip not on alliances, this was a trip on doing business and doing transactions,' said Dennis Ross, a career diplomat and top Middle East adviser in the George H.W. Bush, Clinton and Obama administrations. 'In the modern era of American foreign policy, we haven't seen American presidents for whom that's been the unmistakable priority.'
The royal families of Riyadh, Doha and Abu Dhabi rolled out the lavender carpet for the president, escorting Air Force One over the Arabian dunes with sleek fighter jets and hosting him — and his entourage of American titans of industry — in their ornate, marbled presidential palaces.
The White House said Trump secured more than $2 trillion in investment agreements in the region, including nearly $150 billion between Saudi Arabia and American defense contractors, an order by the Qatari government for 160 Boeing planes and a $60 billion partnership between American energy companies and Abu Dhabi's state-run oil firm.
'The economy and national security are inextricably intertwined, and the bumper sticker for what the president is doing now is very clear,' Sebastian Gorka, a top White House counterterrorism official, said Thursday at the POLITICO Security Summit.
Offering a brash new brand of American mercantilism, Trump was explicit about seeking cooperation based 'on commerce, not chaos,' emphatically breaking from a decades-long foreign policy orientation in favor of cooperation with traditional allies based, at least rhetorically, on shared values. He mocked his predecessors — without naming them — as sanctimonious, and promised that he would not deliver any lectures about democracy or 'look into the souls of foreign leaders and use U.S. policy to dispense justice for their sins.'
Instead, he lavished his counterparts with compliments, describing the Qatari ruling family as 'tall, handsome guys' and Syria's new leader — whom the U.S. once labeled a terrorist — as 'attractive' and 'tough.' In particular, Trump expressed his admiration for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
'I like him a lot, I like him too much,' the president said during a speech in Riyadh as the crown prince beamed from the front row. Trump presented his decision to lift sanctions on Syria as something of a favor to his host, remarking after announcing the decision, 'Oh, what I do for the crown prince.'
The flattery was all the more remarkable just seven years after the assassination of the Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, which U.S. intelligence officials concluded came at the direction of Bin Salman.
When former President Joe Biden was running in 2020, he promised to treat Saudi Arabia as a 'pariah' for its human rights violations — though he later met with the crown prince and offered him an infamous fist bump.
Trump 'was saying 'However you treat your own people is your business. It's not our business. Our business is doing business,'' Ross said.
Trump flew to Doha the next day for a state visit with the Qatari royal family, from whom he has agreed to accept a $400 million jet to be gifted to the Defense Department for use as Air Force One, then donated to Trump's presidential library at the end of his term.
One White House ally who took part in the trip, granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly, pointed to the large group of American business magnates who tagged along, some attending the investment conference organized by Saudi Arabia and then traveling on and taking part in additional ceremonial events in Qatar and UAE.
'They know where the new economic powerhouse is,' the person said, pointing to the developing synergy between the U.S. government and these Arab nations with sovereign wealth funds that have hundreds of billions of dollars invested worldwide. 'It's a seismic shift of the Gulf region becoming the go-to for Trump on economic and security issues.'
The White House acknowledges that Trump's focus on the trip 'is on investments into America,' as one senior official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, put it. But for the Art of the Deal author, the people around him argue, trade and policy go hand in hand.
Gorka asserted at the POLITICO summit that the U.S.-Ukraine mineral deal would help end its war with Russia, and that Trump's first-term Middle East policy had set the stage for the 'prosperity' of the deals he was announcing in his second.
While touting the region's economic potential as he racked up investment commitments, Trump also plowed ahead with several audacious foreign policy moves, unilaterally shifting America's posture in the region. Not only did Trump announce he was lifting sanctions on Syria at the behest of Saudi and Turkish leaders, he met personally with its new president, Ahmad al-Sharaa — a former jihadist who, until recently, had a $10 million bounty on his head.
And he offered what he called an 'olive branch' to Iran, urging the country's leaders to agree to scale back its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, suggesting that such a deal could be finalized in short order.
Republicans widely celebrated the moves — and even some Democrats admitted that Trump's norm-defying foreign policy approach, while jarring, is proving effective.
'I'm not in the habit of praising Donald Trump, but I've got to tell you, in the last week or so in the Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, it's a different story,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, said during the POLITICO Security Summit .
'I've got to tell you, I think the president has, in this last week or so, played the Middle East pretty darn well,' Himes added.
Others were more skeptical.
'He does deals. He doesn't have a philosophy, he doesn't have a national security grand strategy, he doesn't do policy,' John Bolton, Trump's first-term national security adviser turned ardent critic, said during the POLITICO event. 'When people describe him as transactional, that's what it is.'
Brett Bruen, who served as White House director of global engagement under former President Barack Obama and now leads a consulting firm, conceded that Trump has 'showcased sizeable sales and investments.' But, citing patterns from the president's first term, he wondered if they would be 'short-lived.'
'I worry that we may see more than that out of this trip,' Bruen said. 'He has also sent a pretty clear message to other countries that the show, lavishing him with the luxurious, can get you a long way.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal appeals court refuses to lift ruling halting mass layoffs at Department of Education
A federal appeals court declined on Wednesday to lift a judge's ruling that blocked the Trump administration from effectively shutting down the Department of Education. The unanimous decision from the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals is another significant legal setback for President Donald Trump, whose efforts to rapidly shrink the federal government – including through dismantling entire agencies – have been tied up in numerous court challenges. Cutting the Department of Education has been of particular interest to Trump in his second term. Earlier this year, he moved ahead with mass layoffs at the agency, which is tasked with distributing federal aid to schools, managing federal aid for college students and ensuring compliance with civil rights laws. The administration, 1st Circuit Chief Judge David Barron wrote for the panel, has not 'shown that the public's interest lies in permitting a major federal department to be unlawfully disabled from performing its statutorily assigned functions.' The court also said that the administration had not demonstrated that it was likely to ultimately win in the case, with Barron writing that Justice Department attorneys had not put forth evidence showing how the widespread layoffs at the department would not prevent it from carrying out its core functions. Last month, US District Judge Myong Joun of the federal court in Boston indefinitely halted Trump's plans to dismantle the agency and ordered the administration to reinstate employees who had been fired en masse. The ruling came in a lawsuit brought by a teachers' union, school districts, states and education groups. Noting that the department 'cannot be shut down without Congress's approval,' Joun, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, said that the planned layoffs at the agency 'will likely cripple' it. 'The record abundantly reveals that Defendants' true intention is to effectively dismantle the Department without an authorizing statute,' he wrote in the 88-page ruling. Attorneys for the Department of Justice quickly asked the Boston-based appeals court to pause Joun's ruling while they appealed it, writing in court papers that it 'represents an extraordinary incursion on the Executive Branch's authority to manage its workforce.' 'Beyond that, it requires the government to indefinitely retain and pay employees whose services it no longer requires, and the government cannot recoup those salaries if it prevails on appeal,' the DOJ attorneys wrote.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' Michael R. Blood, The Associated Press Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's World Is 'Fracturing,' Former Giuliani Associate Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lev Parnas, a former associate of Rudy Giuliani, is warning that President Donald Trump's world is "fracturing" amid Elon Musk's rebuke of his sweeping spending bill and other recent policy moves. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for comment on Wednesday. Why It Matters The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is a key avenue for Republicans to advance the White House's agenda following the widespread GOP victories in the November election. Key Republican holdouts in the House and Senate have voiced opposition to the bill, citing concerns that it would increase the national debt, among other worries. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday, former Department of Government Efficiency chief Musk bashed the piece of legislation, saying, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk doubled down in another X post on Wednesday: "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS." What To Know In a Substack article published on Wednesday, Parnas mentioned Musk's recent shift against the president's beloved legislation. "I've been warning you for months now — there are real cracks forming inside Trump's world. And not just little disagreements behind the scenes," Parnas wrote. "The latest — and loudest — break came from Elon Musk." Parnas said that Musk was "paraded around the White House" in the first few months of Trump's second term, but the Tesla billionaire is no longer "playing" along. The former Giuliani associate is a Ukrainian American businessman who was convicted in 2021 of fraud and campaign finance crimes. He was then sentenced to 20 months in prison. "I've seen how this works from the inside," Parnas wrote. "When loyalty turns to silence, and silence turns to defiance — it's over. The myth of Trump's control starts to collapse." "But Elon is just the loudest crack. The truth is, Trump's empire is fracturing on every front," he added. Parnas went on to note that policy decisions, such as tariffs, praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin, and the acceptance of a Qatari airliner, are also causing cracks in Trump's world. "And I'm telling you now: the very foundation of Trump's power — fear and obedience — is crumbling," Parnas wrote. "Elon might be the first to break publicly, but he won't be the last. There are lawmakers. There are donors. There are insiders. I promise you, they are rattled. And some of them are looking for a way out." Lev Parnas testifies during a House Oversight and Accountability Committee hearing on March 20, 2024, in Washington, D.C. Lev Parnas testifies during a House Oversight and Accountability Committee hearing on March 20, 2024, in Washington, People Are Saying President Donald Trump, Monday on Truth Social: "So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,' but what nobody understands is that it's the single biggest Spending Cut in History, by far! But there will be NO CUTS to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid." Trump continued: "In fact, they will be saved from the incompetence of the Democrats. The Democrats, who have totally lost their confidence and their way, are saying whatever comes to mind — Anything to win! They suffered the Greatest Humiliation in the History of Politics, and they're desperate to get back on their game, but they won't be able to do that because their Policies are so bad, in fact, they would lead to the Destruction of our Country, and almost did." The president concluded, "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse, something that should have been done by the Incompetent, Radical Left Democrats for the last four years, but wasn't." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday: "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion." What Happens Next Trump has set a deadline for Senate Republicans to pass the bill and have it on his desk before July 4. It is unclear whether Republican senators will garner enough votes to get it done.