logo
The 6 Most Overlooked Red Flags in a Relationship, According to a Psychologist

The 6 Most Overlooked Red Flags in a Relationship, According to a Psychologist

Yahoo25-05-2025
Red flags aren't just for unsafe waters at the beach. Psychologists share it's important to notice red flags in relationships as well—but some are easy to overlook."Red flags point to behavior that chips away at safety, connection or identity," explains ., a licensed psychologist. "Ignoring them doesn't make them go away—it often leads to emotional burnout, chronic self-doubt and cycles that repeat in future relationships."Yet, she says people may miss red flags if they grew up in families where only positive vibes were allowed or if love came with strings attached. However, even people who had solid childhoods can fall into traps of missing relationship warning signs. It's natural to want to stick around, hoping things will improve. Ironically, flagging issues is a more effective way to give your relationship a fighting chance."Noticing red flags doesn't mean jumping to conclusions or cutting off all relationships where you see red flags," she explains. "It means listening to your body's cues and paying attention to patterns that don't sit right and then addressing these issues with your partner."Dr. McGeehan helps people play detective by sharing the six most overlooked red flags in a relationship—and what to do next.Related:
These are the warning signs that people often miss.
"Try not to laugh about this one," Dr. McGeehan says. While it may sound "typical," she stresses that nothing gets the alarm bells going in her head more quickly than a client in a long-term relationship with a guy who constantly puts his mother's preferences ahead of theirs. She says it's often a sign of "enmeshment," or a boundary-free relationship."The biggest relationship issues as a result of enmeshment include loyalty conflicts, avoidance of conflict and passive dependency, AKA putting the mental load on their partner," she explains. "It usually sounds like, 'I would love to come hang out with you like we planned, but my mom just asked if I would take her to lunch and she doesn't have anyone else, so I need to be there for her.'"Related:
While we're on the subject of boundaries (or lack thereof), Dr. McGeehan says it's easy to laugh off a partner who uses your boundaries as joke material. However, she warns that teasing about limits, such as a need for alone time, is a flag that your partner may not be a stand-up main squeeze. "It seems playful at first, but it's actually a sign that they don't take your needs seriously," she reveals. "That in and of itself erodes trust. However, it also indicates that your partner doesn't have boundaries themselves. It's challenging to be healthy in a relationship with someone who is not healthy and isn't aware they have work to do."
Dr. McGeehan explains that people often think confusion is a sign that things are on the right track, but chronic anxiety in a relationship isn't a good sign."Many people mistake anxiety for chemistry," she says. "If you're walking away from time together feeling unsure, overanalyzing what you said or [feeling] disconnected from yourself, that's a red flag."She stresses that healthy connections bring calm instead of confusion."A good way to test this one is to follow up about areas you have confusion on," Dr. McGeehan suggests. "For example, 'Hey, when you said you wanted exclusivity but didn't want to spend more time together, I felt confused. Can you tell me more about that?'"Related:
Actions speak louder than words, and a lack of follow-through says a lot."Say-do correspondence is huge in relationships," Dr. McGeehan explains. "It's how we build trust and signals to our nervous system that we are safe... I always tell my clients to listen to behavior over words."She acknowledges that we're all human, so occasional lack of follow-through is normal. However, it's toxic when it becomes a trend, even if they have a list of excuses."The reality is that if someone wants to do something, they will do it," Dr. McGeehan points out.Related:
Dr. McGeehan often sees people mistake this flake for "independence" and "bad luck.""If someone has no long-standing connections or constantly paints themselves as the victim in past relationships, it usually points to a pattern of avoiding accountability or conflict resolution," she explains. "Remember, we move toward what feels familiar—not healthy. So, if you notice this pattern with someone, be ready to inherit all that baggage and work if you get into a serious relationship with them."She says it's doable, but it can come with a hefty price tag (and a willingness to couple's and individual therapy will be 100/10 necessary).
Dr. McGeehan says you'll need to turn inward to come to terms with this one."You may say things like 'I'm probably overreacting' or 'They didn't mean it like that,'" she shares. "When you're constantly overriding your own instincts, you're signaling to your nervous system that your discomfort doesn't matter and the signals it sends aren't real. This creates a foundation of not trusting yourself within the relationship." Related:
It's understandable to want to hit the road the moment you notice relationship red flags—and that might be the best course. However, Dr. McGeehan suggests taking a beat."You don't need to confront or walk away immediately," she explains. "Just noticing the pattern is powerful."She suggests reflecting on what your feelings and whether the behavior was genuinely a one-off or part of a pattern. Journaling or voice-noting your reaction is useful in helping you determine the latter."Over time, you will have data to reflect back on when you are trying to tell yourself, 'It doesn't happen that often, though,'" she says.
"I statements" are clutch here because they keep conversations productive and reduce the need for one partner to get defensive."Instead of saying 'You're disrespectful,' try 'When you ignore what I ask for, I feel dismissed,'" Dr. McGeehan suggests.These conversations can feel loaded and nerve-wracking, though. Therefore, she says it's "game-changing" to bring an outline of what you want to say, and explains that an outline might include:
Writing out the behavior you observed
The story you told yourself about it
The emotions you felt
The request for the future (if applicable)
"Bring this written out on a sheet of paper and ask your partner not to interrupt," Dr. McGeehan suggests. "It can feel silly, but this is a grounding exercise in productive communication. Your partner may also want a sheet of paper to write down their thoughts or emotions as you are talking."
Sometimes, you just can't get a read on your gut instinct."When you're too close to the dynamic, it's hard to see clearly," Dr. McGeehan shares. "Talk to a therapist, coach or friend who knows your history and can reflect back what's healthy and what's not."However, she shares it's important to go through step one (reflection) first."Even a paid professional cannot tell you what your experience is at the end of the day," she points out. "Good ones will reflect it back, but ultimately, you know your experience better than anyone else."
Up Next:Dr. Brittany McGeehan, Ph.D., a licensed psychologist
The 6 Most Overlooked Red Flags in a Relationship, According to a Psychologist first appeared on Parade on May 25, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fire is still raging at a Nebraska biofuels plant where explosion left 3 missing
Fire is still raging at a Nebraska biofuels plant where explosion left 3 missing

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fire is still raging at a Nebraska biofuels plant where explosion left 3 missing

FREMONT, Neb. (AP) — Fire and heavy smoke were still pouring out of a Nebraska biofuels plant Wednesday morning, preventing firefighters from getting close enough to search for three people missing in a huge explosion a day earlier, officials said. Photos taken after Tuesday's blast at the Horizon Biofuels plant show its tall tower — marked by a distinctive sunbeam logo of the former owner, Golden Sun Feeds — torn off, exposing mangled metal and ripped siding. Debris littered the ground, and nearby residents say the blast shook their homes. 'We had a fire going all night, even through the rain,' Fremont Mayor Joey Spellerberg said early Wednesday in an interview with the radio station KFAB in Omaha. 'You have the feed mill area, you have the office area just under flames, basically it has not stopped,' Spellerberg said. He said authorities believe the three missing people might have been in the office when the explosion happened at around noon Tuesday. Fremont Fire Chief Todd Bernt said first responders were up against 'heavy smoke and a lot of flames' when they first arrived at the facility, which is surrounded by other manufacturing and food processing plants. The plant makes animal bedding and wood pellets for heating and smoking food, using tons of wood waste, and Bernt said they believe the facility stores wood and some alcohol-based materials. A 2014 fire at the building had damaged the electrical system but left the structure intact, according to reporting by the Fremont Tribune. Taylor Kirklin, who lives about a half mile (0.8 kilometers) from the building, said her whole house shook Tuesday. She said the explosion was so loud that she thought someone had crashed a car into her family's dog kennel business on the property. 'I got up and looked outside and there was a huge plume of smoke,' she said. 'We were really unsure when the explosion happened which plant it was, because there are so many in that area.' Dodge County Attorney Pamela Hopkins, who also serves as the county coroner, said law enforcement and first responders were busy securing the scene Tuesday afternoon and had not yet contacted her in her role as coroner. She added that she was hoping not to get that call. 'Right now, we're focused on the safety of the community and getting the situation under control — keeping the scene secure,' Hopkins said. She declined to comment further. Fremont, a city of about 27,000 and the sixth-largest in Nebraska, is 32 miles (52 kilometers) northwest of Omaha. Solve the daily Crossword

Pilots for Army Black Hawk Discussed Changing Course Before Crash
Pilots for Army Black Hawk Discussed Changing Course Before Crash

New York Times

time28 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Pilots for Army Black Hawk Discussed Changing Course Before Crash

In the final seconds of their flight in the Washington, D.C. area on Jan. 29, the pilots aboard an Army Black Hawk helicopter discussed turning east toward the bank of the Potomac River, a maneuver that, had they had time to complete it, could have saved scores of lives. The change might have removed the helicopter from the direct line of American Airlines Flight 5342 as it was trying to land at Ronald Reagan National Airport. 'Alright, kinda come left for me ma'am, I think that's why he's asking,' the instructor pilot said to the Army pilot flying the helicopter, referring to guidance from the air traffic controller. 'Sure,' the pilot replied, according to a transcript released by the National Transportation Safety Board on Wednesday morning. 'We're kinda —' the instructor said, without finishing. 'Oh-kay. Fine,' the pilot said. 'Out towards the middle,' the instructor said, likely referring to the Potomac River they were overflying. Approximately two seconds later, they crashed into the plane. Those statements, which were captured on a cockpit voice recorder that was recovered from the scene of the crash, were released Wednesday morning by the N.T.S.B. near the start of a three-day hearing on the facts of the midair collision, which killed the three soldiers aboard the helicopter as well as 64 civilians aboard an American Airlines flight that was en route to Washington from Wichita, Kan. The new documents, which include a transcript of the cockpit conversation between Capt. Rebecca M. Lobach, the pilot flying the Black Hawk, and Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, the instructor pilot, suggest that while Mr. Eaves understood that the air traffic controller wanted the pilots to veer left, to a safer position, the imminent danger of their predicament was not entirely clear. The commercial jet that Black Hawk was asked to avoid was landing on a trajectory bound for Runway 33, a rarely used runway for arrivals at National Airport and one that the helicopter crew may not have considered as part of their flight plan. The N.T.S.B. has noted that the helicopter route used on Jan. 29 places those aircraft in dangerous proximity to planes landing on Runway 33. On the board's recommendations, the Federal Aviation Administration has since suspended helicopter traffic along the route the Black Hawk took in January, when Runway 33 is in use. The N.T.S.B.'s preliminary findings, which were released in March in summary form, suggested, without nuance, that Capt. Lobach and Mr. Eaves noted different readings on their respective altitude measures in the cockpit and that Mr. Eaves indicated that Capt. Lobach should turn left shortly before the Black Hawk crashed into the commercial jet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store