logo
When US Sent Warships Against India: 1971 Flashback Resurfaces Amid Trump's Russia Rant

When US Sent Warships Against India: 1971 Flashback Resurfaces Amid Trump's Russia Rant

News1805-08-2025
Last Updated:
The 1971 Indo-Pak war ended with Pakistan's surrender and Bangladesh's birth, but not before the US sent warships to stop India
On Tuesday, the Indian Army's Eastern Command posted a newspaper clipping on X from the days leading up to the 1971 Indo-Pak war. The caption blared in block letters: 'US ARMS WORTH $2 BILLION SHIPPED TO PAKISTAN SINCE '54."
The timing of the post was unmistakable. Just a day earlier, US President Donald Trump accused India of helping fund Russia's war in Ukraine by buying discounted crude oil and selling it for profit. After already imposing a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, Trump threatened a further 'substantial hike". India hit back, calling the allegations 'unjustified and unreasonable." And then came the Army's quiet but pointed reminder of a very different American partnership, one that tried to block India's victory in 1971.
Behind the reminder lies a chapter in global history that still rankles: the United States' open support for Pakistan during the 1971 war, including the deployment of a nuclear warship, covert diplomatic manoeuvres to pressure India, and a disturbing disregard for the genocide unfolding in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh).
When Pakistan Attacked, The US Took Its Side
The Indo-Pak war broke out on December 3, 1971, when Pakistan launched pre-emptive air strikes on Indian airfields. India responded swiftly, and within 13 days, Pakistani troops surrendered in Dhaka, giving birth to the independent nation of Bangladesh. But between those two dates, the United States, then under President Richard Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, did everything it could to save Pakistan from military defeat.
Washington's Cold War loyalties were clear. Pakistan was a key US ally, both as a member of military alliances like SEATO and CENTO, and more crucially, as a bridge to China. India, on the other hand, was seen as leaning towards the Soviet Union, despite its non-aligned credentials. This ideological divide shaped one of the most fraught episodes in US-India relations.
The USS Enterprise And The 7th Fleet
As the Indian Army advanced toward Dhaka and the Pakistani military began to crumble, Nixon and Kissinger ordered a dramatic naval manoeuvre. On December 10, 1971, the US Navy's 7th Fleet, operating under the name Task Force 74, was deployed to the Bay of Bengal as a show of strength in support of Pakistan.
The task force was led by the USS Enterprise, the world's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, and included several other major assets:
USS Tripoli (helicopter carrier)
Guided missile cruisers and destroyers
Supply and support ships
The official rationale given by the US was to protect American citizens in the region. However, declassified documents, later published by the US National Security Archive, and accounts like Gary J. Bass's The Blood Telegram suggest the real objective was to intimidate India, break its naval blockade of East Pakistan, and bolster Pakistan's deteriorating military position.
The White House wanted to prevent a total Pakistani collapse. They hoped the show of strength would pressure India to back down, or at least create space for a negotiated ceasefire that could save face for Pakistan.
But India didn't flinch. Instead, it turned to its own ally.
India Had The Soviets, And They Delivered
Just months before the war, India had signed the Indo-Soviet Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation. When the USS Enterprise entered the Indian Ocean, the Soviet Union responded with a naval deployment of its own.
Multiple Soviet warships and nuclear submarines shadowed the US fleet. As military historians later recounted, the Soviet flotilla positioned itself between the American warships and Indian territory, creating a tense but decisive naval standoff. The American fleet did not escalate further. The war continued. And Pakistan surrendered in Dhaka on December 16.
Had the Soviets not intervened, the presence of the 7th Fleet might have changed the outcome, or at least the cost of the war.
US Double Game: Nudging China, Lying To India
While sending its own warships to rattle India, the Nixon administration also tried to involve China, another Pakistani ally, against India. According to declassified documents released in 2005 by the US National Security Archive, Kissinger encouraged Beijing to consider military action against India, offering a veiled security guarantee.
'If the People's Republic were to consider the situation on the Indian subcontinent a threat to security… the US would oppose efforts of others to interfere with the People's Republic," Kissinger reportedly told Chinese officials.
At the same time, Washington assured India that it would support New Delhi if China attacked.
In one communication, US officials told Indian Defence Minister Jagjivan Ram that Washington would 'take a grave view of any Chinese move against India." Kissinger also told India's ambassador L.K. Jha that the US would offer 'all-out help" in the event of a 1962-style Chinese aggression.
To critics, this was a duplicitous foreign policy, talking peace with India, while coordinating pressure with Pakistan and China.
The Nixon-Kissinger Hostility
The 1971 war wasn't just a policy divergence; it was also personal.
Declassified transcripts show that both Nixon and Kissinger held deeply racist and misogynistic views toward Indian leaders. After then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi visited Washington in November 1971 to urge American intervention against the genocide in East Pakistan, Kissinger dismissed her as a 'b*tch" and Nixon called Indians 'b*stards."
The White House's hostility to India extended even to its own diplomats. When the US Consul General in Dhaka repeatedly warned Washington about the atrocities being committed by the Pakistani Army, the Nixon administration ignored or downplayed those reports in favour of Cold War calculations.
A Legacy That Shaped India's View Of The US
Why did Washington back Pakistan so aggressively? In short: China.
At the time, the United States was secretly working to open diplomatic relations with communist China, a move that would reshape Cold War geopolitics. Pakistan's military ruler Yahya Khan was playing a key role as the intermediary between Washington and Beijing. To preserve that backchannel, President Nixon was determined to keep Pakistan on his side.
Backing India, which was seen as leaning toward the Soviet Union, would have risked that plan. Instead, the Nixon administration threw its weight behind Pakistan, even as it faced global criticism for human rights violations in East Pakistan.
That decision had long-term consequences. It damaged India's trust in the United States and contributed to a lingering sense of strategic caution in the relationship, even as bilateral ties improved in the years that followed.
A Reminder In The Present
The Indian Army's August 5, 2025 post comes not during a war, but a war of words.
India responded by highlighting how its oil imports from Russia only increased after traditional suppliers in the West diverted shipments to Europe. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) also pointed out that both the United States and European Union continue to import key goods from Russia, including uranium, palladium, and chemicals, while India's trade decisions are being singled out. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security," the MEA said in a statement.
Memory As Strategy
By invoking the 1971 betrayal, the Indian Army not only recalled a pivotal moment in history, but subtly underscored a consistent thread: India's sovereignty has often come under pressure not from enemies, but from supposed partners.
top videos
View all
Back then, it was the USS Enterprise. Today, it's tariff threats and accusations. The means have changed, but the instinct to challenge India's independent decisions hasn't.
And this time, India isn't just remembering. It's pushing back.
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
1971 India-Pakistan war donald trump India-US relations Indian Army
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 05, 2025, 16:22 IST
News explainers When US Sent Warships Against India: 1971 Flashback Resurfaces Amid Trump's Russia Rant
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India, US troops to undertake joint military exercise next month, first after Op Sindoor
India, US troops to undertake joint military exercise next month, first after Op Sindoor

The Print

time10 minutes ago

  • The Print

India, US troops to undertake joint military exercise next month, first after Op Sindoor

The joint exercise comes at a time when Pakistan and US have come closer than ever before under the Trump administration. The US President hosting Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House to undertaking joint anti-terror talks with Islamabad, both sides have a long way from 2018 when Trump had described Pakistan as a 'safe haven for terrorists'. Termed 'Yudh Abhyas', the annual exercise from 1 to 16 September in US' Alaska will see an all-arms contingent going from the Indian Army led by the Madras Regiment, ThePrint has learnt. New Delhi: Amid heightened tensions between New Delhi and Washington, and a growing synergy between the Pakistan government and US President Donald Trump, Indian and American troops will undertake a joint military exercise next month. 'The upcoming edition will see participation from both sides in high-altitude conditions in Alaska, a factor that adds operational complexity to the drills. Such settings will also allow troops to train in environments that mirror potential conflict zones,' said a source. Launched in 2004 under the framework of the Indo-US defence Cooperation Agreement, 'Yudh Abhyas' alternates annually between locations in India and the US, with the previous edition held in Rajasthan in 2024. In the exercise, the Indian Army and US Army typically take part in tactical field training which covers counter-insurgency, counter-terrorism and peacekeeping scenarios with command post drills that focus on mission planning, joint operations and coordination under United Nations mandates. Beyond such tactics, the exercise also serves as a platform for sharing military technology, operational best practices and disaster relief coordination methods. Separately, India and the US are also preparing to finalise the proposed 10-year framework for the US-India Major Defence Partnership, expected to be signed during the next meeting between Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. The plan aims to expand cooperation beyond arms purchases to include co-production of systems such as the Javelin ATGMs (anti-tank guided missiles) and the Stryker combat vehicle. Furthermore, amidst tensions with the US, the Ministry of Defence had last week dismissed media reports claiming India had paused talks for major US defence purchases. Calling such reports 'false and fabricated', MoD officials had said procurement cases 'are being progressed as per the extant procedures'. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: India sees the value of US defence ties, but MAGA-style tariffs threaten long-term stability

Watch: Trump calls India ‘dead economy'. Whose economy is more fragile right now?
Watch: Trump calls India ‘dead economy'. Whose economy is more fragile right now?

The Hindu

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Watch: Trump calls India ‘dead economy'. Whose economy is more fragile right now?

US President Donald Trump's recent jibe at India's 'dead economy' has drawn censure from Indian quarters. At the monetary policy committee 's press conference earlier this month, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra refused to comment on the statement but pointed out that India's contribution to global GDP growth was higher in percentage terms. Whose economy is now more fragile? How is the US doing? How is India poised for the US tariff impact? Script & Presentation: K. Bharat Kumar Production: Shibu Narayan

Daimler, Volvo, other truckmakers sue California to block emissions rules
Daimler, Volvo, other truckmakers sue California to block emissions rules

Time of India

time10 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Daimler, Volvo, other truckmakers sue California to block emissions rules

Four major truckmakers, including Daimler and Volvo, sued California to block the state from enforcing strict emissions standards that U.S. President Donald Trump declared void in June. Daimler, Volvo, Paccar and International Motors , formerly Navistar, said they have been "caught in the crossfire" after Trump reversed waivers issued during the Biden administration that let California set its own standards. In a complaint filed on Monday, the truckmakers said Trump's rescinding U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approval of California's plan to boost zero-emission heavy-duty truck sales and reduce nitrogen oxide emissions preempted the state's enforcement. They said this included enforcing the Clean Truck Partnership , a 2023 program giving the truckmaking industry flexibility to meet emissions requirements while advancing California's goal of lowering emissions. The truckmakers said the regulatory uncertainty has caused irreparable harm because they cannot plan production in advance without knowing which vehicles they will be permitted to sell. Monday's complaint names the California Air Resources Board and Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom as defendants, and was filed in the federal court in Sacramento, the state's capital. Newsom's office and the board did not respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. On Tuesday evening, the Federal Trade Commission ended an antitrust probe into the Clean Truck Partnership, and said Daimler, Volvo, Paccar and International Motors agreed to avoid future anticompetitive agreements with state regulators. "CARB's regulatory overreach posed a major threat to American trucking," Taylor Hoogendoorn, deputy director of the FTC bureau of competition, said in a statement. Trump, a Republican, is trying to curb California's power under the federal Clean Air Act to set tighter pollution limits than federal law requires, and Newsom's ability to promote electric vehicles as the governor fights climate change. California has received more than 100 waivers under the Clean Air Act since 1970. During his June signing of joint congressional resolutions, Trump also blocked California's effort to end sales of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. The state is also suing to undo Trump's actions. The case is Daimler Truck North America LLC et al v. California Air Resources Board et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, No. 25-02255.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store