Hegseth to remove 2000 National Guard troops from LA
Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said the decision owed to the success of the mission.
"Thanks to our troops who stepped up to answer the call, the lawlessness in Los Angeles is subsiding," Parnell said in a statement.
"As such, the Secretary has ordered the release of 2000 California National Guardsmen from the federal protection mission."
Trump deployed the California National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June, against the wishes of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, to quell protests triggered by immigration raids on workplaces by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
He also sent about 700 Marines.
Despite legal challenges, a US appeals court let Trump retain control of California's National Guard.
But his decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on US soil and inflamed political tension in the country's second-most-populous city.
The Pentagon has defended the deployment, saying safeguarding ICE agents ensures they can do their jobs.
Even after the withdrawal of those military personnel from Los Angeles, 2000 National Guard troops would remain in the city along with the roughly 700 Marines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
29 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Trump administration raises ‘high jump bar' for Australia with AUKUS commitment
Former Howard government minister Peter McGauran says hardliners within the Trump administration have 'raised the high jump bar' for Australia to meet its commitments with the AUKUS pact. 'They are now asking potentially for commitments from Australia,' Mr McGauran told Sky News Australia. 'What are you going to do with those submarines? Supposing China invades Taiwan, will you support America in a conflict with China?'
The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
America's shame is that Trump can remain shameless
A few days earlier a separate Journal story reported on a sexually suggestive letter it said Trump had sent the financier for the occasion of Epstein's 50th birthday. The letter refers to secrets and has a sketch of a naked woman on it. Trump denies he wrote it and is suing the Journal for defamation. Loading On Wednesday, The New York Times published a piece titled 'I Covered the Epstein Case for Decades. These are 9 Questions We Actually Need Answered.' Among the unanswered questions journalist Barry Levine lists are queries about how Epstein made so much money (his estate was worth $600 million), whether he might have been an intelligence asset (which was claimed as an unverified excuse for the leniency of a 2008 plea deal that ended a federal investigation into Epstein), questions over the nature of Epstein's relationship with former US president Bill Clinton (who also appears in the Epstein private jet flight logs), and queries over why the autopsy on Epstein was never made public (many people doubt the report's finding that he died by suicide while in prison). The MAGA heartland has long held as an article of faith that Trump would release the Epstein files when he was in a position to do so. Trump has responded with a frenzy of social media posting, apparently to distract from pressing Epstein-related matters, and has reacted angrily when asked questions about Epstein by reporters. In an apparent concession, Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche interviewed Epstein's convicted accomplice and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. But Blanche was previously Trump's private attorney for his hush-money trial and two federal criminal cases. Suspicions inevitably arise that he might be predisposed to protect the interests of the president. Loading It is a scenario worthy of a political thriller – The Da Vinci Code set in the post-#MeToo era. Trump's history of sexual misconduct is well known, spans decades and has been successfully tested in court. Comedian Stephen Colbert calls it the president's 'long public history of pervitude'. Paramount cancelled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert last week, with many commentators concluding it was at least partly due to the host's mockery of Trump. Undeterred, Colbert – who will continue to present the show until May – played a tape of Trump talking to US radio shock jock Howard Stern in 2006. After boasting he could easily bed a 24-year-old, the then-60-year-old Trump was asked if he had an 'age limit' when it came to women. 'No, I don't have an age limit,' Trump told Stern, before correcting himself – slightly. 'You know, I don't want to be, like … with 12-year-olds.' It is a truism that Trump has redefined the terms of shamelessness in public life with his sexual exploits, brags about sexual assault, and the judicial findings against him of sexual assault. None of it has made any difference to his popularity among his base. If anything, the moral outrage over Trump's doings only galvanises his fervent supporters in his defence. Loading Whatever is in the Epstein files regarding Trump may indeed be shameful for the president by any objective measure, but that measure no longer exists in American public life. Few observers of American politics believe Trump could be damaged substantially by further revelations of sexual misconduct. Those in his base who are pressuring Trump to release the files are not suspicious about the president's potential sexual wrongdoing. They are piqued by a betrayal of faith – they believed Trump was the guy who would work to unmask the deep-state Democrat paedophiles on their behalf. On Friday, The Australian Financial Review published a long interview with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Lewinsky has become a latter-day feminist heroine, whose public shaming following her affair with then-president Bill Clinton was epic and unprecedented. Her notoriety was such that, for a decade or so after the event, Lewinsky struggled to get a date or a job interview. The affair was consensual but the exploitative power dynamics at play – she was a 22-year-old intern, he was the world's most powerful man – are undeniable in the contemporary context. Clinton lied about the affair and it almost ended his presidency. But I do not think you could say any substantial moral shame adheres to him, all these decades later, from the affair. Meanwhile, Lewinsky has spent the rest of her life – she is now 52 – trying to expunge her shame and to make amends for it in the court of public opinion. It seems likely that the public has not been told the whole story about the people and institutions that enabled Epstein to offend against vulnerable girls, at such scale, over decades. But you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that whatever comes out, the shame of it all will defy gravity and bounce off some, while sticking to others.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
America's shame is that Trump can remain shameless
A few days earlier a separate Journal story reported on a sexually suggestive letter it said Trump had sent the financier for the occasion of Epstein's 50th birthday. The letter refers to secrets and has a sketch of a naked woman on it. Trump denies he wrote it and is suing the Journal for defamation. Loading On Wednesday, The New York Times published a piece titled 'I Covered the Epstein Case for Decades. These are 9 Questions We Actually Need Answered.' Among the unanswered questions journalist Barry Levine lists are queries about how Epstein made so much money (his estate was worth $600 million), whether he might have been an intelligence asset (which was claimed as an unverified excuse for the leniency of a 2008 plea deal that ended a federal investigation into Epstein), questions over the nature of Epstein's relationship with former US president Bill Clinton (who also appears in the Epstein private jet flight logs), and queries over why the autopsy on Epstein was never made public (many people doubt the report's finding that he died by suicide while in prison). The MAGA heartland has long held as an article of faith that Trump would release the Epstein files when he was in a position to do so. Trump has responded with a frenzy of social media posting, apparently to distract from pressing Epstein-related matters, and has reacted angrily when asked questions about Epstein by reporters. In an apparent concession, Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche interviewed Epstein's convicted accomplice and former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. But Blanche was previously Trump's private attorney for his hush-money trial and two federal criminal cases. Suspicions inevitably arise that he might be predisposed to protect the interests of the president. Loading It is a scenario worthy of a political thriller – The Da Vinci Code set in the post-#MeToo era. Trump's history of sexual misconduct is well known, spans decades and has been successfully tested in court. Comedian Stephen Colbert calls it the president's 'long public history of pervitude'. Paramount cancelled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert last week, with many commentators concluding it was at least partly due to the host's mockery of Trump. Undeterred, Colbert – who will continue to present the show until May – played a tape of Trump talking to US radio shock jock Howard Stern in 2006. After boasting he could easily bed a 24-year-old, the then-60-year-old Trump was asked if he had an 'age limit' when it came to women. 'No, I don't have an age limit,' Trump told Stern, before correcting himself – slightly. 'You know, I don't want to be, like … with 12-year-olds.' It is a truism that Trump has redefined the terms of shamelessness in public life with his sexual exploits, brags about sexual assault, and the judicial findings against him of sexual assault. None of it has made any difference to his popularity among his base. If anything, the moral outrage over Trump's doings only galvanises his fervent supporters in his defence. Loading Whatever is in the Epstein files regarding Trump may indeed be shameful for the president by any objective measure, but that measure no longer exists in American public life. Few observers of American politics believe Trump could be damaged substantially by further revelations of sexual misconduct. Those in his base who are pressuring Trump to release the files are not suspicious about the president's potential sexual wrongdoing. They are piqued by a betrayal of faith – they believed Trump was the guy who would work to unmask the deep-state Democrat paedophiles on their behalf. On Friday, The Australian Financial Review published a long interview with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Lewinsky has become a latter-day feminist heroine, whose public shaming following her affair with then-president Bill Clinton was epic and unprecedented. Her notoriety was such that, for a decade or so after the event, Lewinsky struggled to get a date or a job interview. The affair was consensual but the exploitative power dynamics at play – she was a 22-year-old intern, he was the world's most powerful man – are undeniable in the contemporary context. Clinton lied about the affair and it almost ended his presidency. But I do not think you could say any substantial moral shame adheres to him, all these decades later, from the affair. Meanwhile, Lewinsky has spent the rest of her life – she is now 52 – trying to expunge her shame and to make amends for it in the court of public opinion. It seems likely that the public has not been told the whole story about the people and institutions that enabled Epstein to offend against vulnerable girls, at such scale, over decades. But you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that whatever comes out, the shame of it all will defy gravity and bounce off some, while sticking to others.
