Tshwane BRT project faces R15 million irregular expenditure amid delays
Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers
A Tshwane council report has revealed that an ongoing bus rapid transit (BRT) project in Pretoria East has incurred a staggering amount of R15 million in irregular expenditure.
The DA first raised allegations of irregular expenditure on the project in March, but the city failed to respond to media inquiries about the claims.
However, a council report showed that the project's budget was increased by R15 million due to delays, which also led to a request for a time extension to complete the project.
The report cited specific delays, including late payment of the June 2023 payment certificate, prompting the contractor to request an extension.
Other delays were the relocation of a 700mm bulk water main pipeline, which halted work on a 400m road section, and the construction of a new retaining wall for a median slip lane due to level differences between the east and westbound roads.
The report noted that the project faced typical challenges for its scale, including delayed payments to subcontractors and labourers.
This, according to the report, caused work to slow down at the start of the month, only gaining momentum after payments were made.
The report was compiled after the Section 79 oversight committee for the municipal Department of Roads and Transport inspected the A Re Yeng Line 2B and 2C Lynwood Road Expansion project.
The committee was updated on the project's progress and challenges, learning that it was 82% complete with an expected completion date of April 2025.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The committee was informed that the outstanding work included walkways and a cycle lane, and despite challenges, the project timeline remained on track.
Councillor Brendon Govender questioned the project's 82% completion status given the remaining work, and requested a more comprehensive report with detailed information.
On the other hand, DA councillor Dikeledi Selowa asked questions about the project's expenditure, public participation outcomes, and the resurfacing of new roads.
The project consisted of two work packages, which included upgrading intersections along Lynnwood Road and Atterbury Road, from University Road to Justice Mahomed Road.
The work included upgrading the existing Kings Highway Culvert, sewer diversion, and water relocation.
The construction involved relocating existing services like waterlines, widening intersections, and adding lanes.
In March, the DA demanded a thorough investigation into the delays plaguing the construction of Line 2C, a BRT route in Pretoria East.
At the time, Selowa expressed concern that the Line 2C route project had allegedly accumulated R15 million in irregular expenditure.
She criticised the city for not fulfilling its promises, especially regarding replanting trees removed during the project.
She also said the DA plans to scrutinise the project's financials to assess whether the city got value for money spent on each item.
The city had previously approved an extension of time and variation of scope for the Line 2C project, pushing the completion date to April 18, 2025.
Municipal spokesperson Lindela Mashigo said the project missed the deadline due to persistent rains, 'and there is an extension of time until the end of June, which does not have cost implications'.
Regarding the claim that the city incurred R15 million in irregular expenditure, he said: 'There is no irregular cost that has been incurred.'
This decision was made due to changes in scope, including relocating a 700mm water pipeline and constructing a new retaining wall to prevent collapses.
Mashigo had not yet responded to the DA's allegations that the BRT project had incurred R15 million in irregular expenditure due to delays, nor had he commented on potential consequences for those responsible, or the city's planned consequence management measures.
He had also not confirmed whether the contractor met the April 18 deadline.
rapula.moatshe@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town's budget battle: Mayor defends fixed charges amid legal challenges
An aerial view of Cape Town's Atlantic seaboard, including Green Point, Green Point stadium, Mouille Point and Table Mountain. Image: Henk Kruger/Independent Newspapers The City of Cape Town has defended its amended Hope Budget for 2025/26, after the South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) took legal action over the City's decision to link certain fixed charges to property values. The City's budget has faced considerable criticism over its fixed charges and SAPOA will now be challenging this in court. In their court papers, SAPOA CEO Nilesh 'Neil' Gopal said they are seeking to challenge three items in the Budget, namely the Cleaning Tariff, the Fixed Water Charge, and the Fixed Sanitation Charge. They are hoping to have the budget declared unconstitutional and invalid. SAPOA's membership currently comprises more than 90% of the country's commercial and retail property industry, including some of the largest property-owning companies in South Africa. The City of Cape Town filed its answering affidavit where Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis explained that 'in substance this application questions the role of the City in the determination of a budget at all and whether the City, or any other municipality, can indeed forge ahead on any new or innovative path to ensure not only better service delivery for all now, but also in the future'. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He added that City understands the concerns raised about the Budget in the proceedings and in the engagements. He said the City is aware of the relentless increases residents face in administered costs, electricity costs, municipal bills, food, fuel and household necessities, but that this has been 'taken into account by the City at each step of the budget process'. The mayor explained that they received 15,210 comments through both the March and May public participation processes related to the tariffs. 'Residents and organisations opposed the overall increases in rates and tariffs. This is not unusual. Residents from affluent areas and organisations representing property developers argued that the increases were inequitable and amounted to excessive cross-subsidisation of subsidised services.' Hill-Lewis, in his affidavit, said that the City did not lightly decide to impose the three fixed tariffs which are the centre of SAPOA's litigation. 'Neither does the City have ready alternatives simply there for the plucking, to replace the budgetary shortfall that will ensue should they be set aside. This shortfall will be an amount of R4,233,768,467 if all three fixed tariffs are set aside. 'The 'best case scenario' is a shortfall of R1,912,533,115, if fixed tariffs based on property value bands only are set aside. In other words, the non-domestic customers' contribution remains in force, as it is not challenged, the tariffs were decided and calibrated consequently on this intensive process,' he said. The mayor said that the argument goes that, 'because they are linked to property values, the three fixed tariffs constitute rates,' but he highlighted that the tariffs are neither taxes nor rates. Cape Town Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis. Image: File He also explained that property value bands differ from the 'cent amount in the Rand' (being the basis of calculating property rates) as contemplated in the Rates Act. 'Property value bands are not applied or utilised under the Rates Act. The only commonality is that the Municipal Valuation Rolls used by both: (1) for property rates, the Rate-in-Rand (RiR) is applied to the municipal property valuation to compute the property rates payable; whereas (2) the property value band into which a particular property falls is determined by reference to its municipal property valuation. 'This Valuation Roll, however, exists as an independent data source; its use is not solely confined or limited to the determination of property rates in terms of the Rates Act. 'In fact, for example, whenever existing rebates etc. are to be determined or calculated, regard is had to the Valuation Roll to do this. Accordingly, the use thereof for any purpose outside of the Rates Act is not novel, unique or unlawful,' he said. He said that Cape Town's fixed charge serves as a deliberate and rational design intended to secure the revenue necessary to maintain and upgrade infrastructure, improve resilience and ensure reliable service delivery in the face of increasing climate-related uncertainty. 'The City decided that the fixed tariffs, as implemented, were the only rational decision. The only other alternative is to charge the same fixed tariff on everyone regardless of income levels. 'It is the City's view that lower-income and wealthy households should not be making equal contributions to infrastructure and fixed service costs. It is neither fair nor sustainable and, as I have publicly stated, the Budget is asking a little more from those who can afford it to protect essential services, than from those who can't.' The matter is expected to be heard in the Western Cape High Court in September.
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
US demands spark growing discontent amid tariff negotiations
The US has reportedly set conditions to restore relations. Ministers belonging to the two largest parties, ANC and DA, in the government of national unity (GNU) are said to be growing frustrated as the United States (US) continue to make more demands during ongoing tariff negotiations. South Africa is in talks with Washington in the hope of securing a deal that would see the steep tariff rate imposed by the US reduced. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump's administration introduced a 30% tariff on all South African exports. ALSO READ: US tariffs: Here's why talks over trade deal have been 'complex' Although Trump had initially delayed implementation for 90 days in April to allow for negotiations, the tariffs officially came into effect last week. The trade standoff comes amid broader tensions between the two countries. These include South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), policies such as broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) and the Expropriation Act, as well as claims of the persecution of Afrikaners. US makes further demands to SA amid tariff talks In June, Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) leader Corne Mulder travelled to the US and later returned claiming that the White House officials his party engaged with had set conditions to restore relations. The conditions allegedly set out by US officials included exempting US companies from B-BBEE, allowing land expropriation with compensation, a public condemnation of the 'Kill the Boer' chant and treating farm murders as a priority crime. According to City Press, the US has further requested that South Africa grant visas to 30 Kenyans linked to Resettlement Support Centre Africa (RSC Africa), an organisation that has worked with the North American giant for over two decades to assist prospective refugees. READ MORE: Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs 'tweaking' These individuals would reportedly help facilitate the resettlement of Afrikaners. This latest demand has added to South Africa's frustration, with government reportedly expressing its dissatisfaction informally. Ramaphosa's administration is also displeased with delays in receiving responses to its trade proposals. However, the government has reportedly remained firm in its refusal to get rid of any of its policies. New trade proposal South Africa recently submitted a revised offer to Washington aimed at reducing the 30% tariff. The proposal builds on one put forward in May and specifically addresses issues raised by the US in the 2025 national trade estimates report. Deputy President Paul Mashatile also announced that another delegation will soon be sent to the US to push for better terms. Earlier efforts included a high-profile May visit to the White House led by President Cyril Ramaphosa and joined by Cabinet ministers, Cosatu President Zingiswa Losi, businessman Johann Rupert, and professional golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. Ramaphosa also recently held a phone call with Trump in an attempt to ease tensions. In addition, government has introduced support programmes will help offset the 30% tariff. Thirty-five of South African exports will remain exempt. These include products like copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy-related products. NOW READ: Business confidence increases, but will come under pressure from US tariff
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Hlabisa is a lesson on getting things done behind chaos
While the GNU continues to be chaotic, Cogta Minister Velenkosini Hlabisa has kept calm and done the unthinkable. The GNU presents a laugh a day. In the last month, Andrew Whitfield got axed, setting an awkward precedent for President Cyril Ramaphosa's defence chief. While bus drivers are taking their own lives, having not been paid since January, a dialogue is on the go that increasingly seems to be evolving into a monologue. Gayton McKenzie has been doing his thing, whatever that might be on the day, and team DA is patting themselves on the back for outsourcing state work to the banks. And we all applauded it, such is our disdain of home affairs. Oh, and the ministers appointed to fix load shedding were busted doing what we already knew they were doing; burning diesel as ferociously as Christians burned Beatles albums. Amid all the chaos and lack of time to consider which connected cadre should feast on which deal, some real good has been done; Transnet even seems to be on the rise, Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's revelations are promising to unlock some gems and South Africa's economic kingpin, Thabo Mbeki, has finally found some guts to start saying some things. Amid the chaos, some things are improving The weather is perfect for sowing the seeds of ideas that may be great for the country and good for the fiscus, even if they aren't politically popular. In a country where a small minority are being squeezed for funding, it's difficult to make financially prudent decisions. But since that money isn't getting to the people it's supposed to, it makes it somewhat easier. Add to that the warring internal factions and it shouldn't be surprising that as the castle of patronage comes down, a couple of things can be improved with the resources. A minister who seemingly gets this and has largely kept a calm demeanor throughout the GNU is Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) Velenkosini Hlabisa. During lockdown, we learned just how much power Cogta has and Hlabisa has been wielding it pretty impressively. ALSO READ: IFP reaffirms GNU role, slams NPA and urges reforms within justice system Halbisa takes on municipal functionality On natural disaster management, he's done the unthinkable in South African terms; enhancing the implementation of a 10-year-old framework. It shouldn't be impressive, but since we tend to have a kink of jumping from one policy to the next, doubling down and anchoring a belief in a policy's execution is quite a brave and functional thing. When last have you heard a minister insistent on implementing the plan of a predecessor and making it work? Hlabisa genuinely seems to want to do what's good for the people and when it comes to preventing them from dying, that's quite nice. I'm not sure if it's because nobody knows how to get in his way or whether it's just not profitable to impose themselves on him, the minister has been given some room to manoeuvre and it appears he knows this. It shouldn't be surprising that he's taken on what is probably going to be the most difficult reform of this administration; municipal functionality. Ten years ago, you wouldn't dream of anybody in Jacob Zuma's cabinet thinking of claiming that the national government is bloated, let alone municipalities. ALSO READ: Cogta warns municipalities against wasting R1.2 billion disaster relief Now, the minister is having a right go at the state of municipal affairs and fairly so. It's not like John Steenhuisen is going to criticise anybody's literacy because it will come off poorly, but the way Hlabisa puts it makes it pragmatic in the eyes of the public. 'You can't monitor billions if you can't read,' he said. Why on earth we're even in a position where he's got to say that is beyond me, but thank goodness somebody has finally said it. What's most exciting about this shake up is that it's clearly a long term investment and he's set milestones allowing him to take his time on the matter. It shows a degree of seriousness rather than politricking and perhaps we don't see the results in his lifetime. It feels so good to hear a minister commit themselves to a long term solution to an issue that nobody has really tried to address in 30 years. There's a saying about great men planting trees and I really hope this one grows. We could do with the shade. READ NEXT: Almost 40 municipalities facing sanctions from Treasury over mismanagement
