Court martial for soldier accused of covertly filming women during sexual encounters
He admits taking the videos and images - but says the women consented, or he genuinely believed they were consenting at the time.
The women reject this, saying they had no idea they were being recorded.
Court martial proceedings began today for Smith at Burnham Military Camp before Judge Tom Gilbert.
A court martial is a military court that tries members of the armed forces for violations of military law.
It is a structured legal process, similar to a civilian court, and a decision on guilt or innocence is made by a panel of military members - three in Smith's case.
If a defendant is found guilty, punishments can include fines, demotions, or imprisonment.
Until today, the Herald could not publish details of the allegations against Smith.
Between August and November 2020, he is accused of 'intentionally or recklessly' making an intimate visual recording of a woman.
He is further charged with deliberately making intimate recordings of a second woman in November 2020 and December 2020.
The alleged civil offences contravene the Armed Forces Disciplinary Act 1971.
Judge Tom Gilbert. Photo / Pool
The names of women have been suppressed. Both were in new relationships with Smith at the time of the alleged offending.
Judge Gilbert also suppressed the specific details of the content of the videos and images.
He said the Herald could only describe the content of the material and 'what was engaged in between parties' as 'intimate sexual activity'.
Anything outside that description was prohibited.
During the trial, the court will hear from both complainants via audio-visual link, and the panel deciding Smith's fate will be shown the intimate recordings in question.
A number of other witnesses will also be called.
Prosecutor Flight Lieutenant Hannah O'Byrne outlined the Crown case against Smith this morning.
Corporal Manu Smith at the Court-martial proceedings. Photo / Pool
She said the first woman met Smith in July 2020, and a sexual relationship 'progressed quickly'.
During sexual activity at her Christchurch home she 'felt something was off' and when she looked up Smith was 'pointing his cellphone at her'.
She told him to stop recording and delete the footage.
'She told him off for recording her and he played it off as a joke,' said O'Byrne.
The woman assumed the footage was deleted - but Smith later sent it to her via Snapchat.
Snapchat is social messaging app where messages are designed to disappear after being viewed or after a set time
'She told him off again, saying she told him not to do that and it wasn't ok,' said O'Byrne.
The woman stopped seeing Smith and reported the matter to the police.
The second woman was at Smith's defence house in Burnham when she was recorded.
O'Byrne said that during sexual activity,, Smith took three photos of the woman.
'Without her consent - or even time to discuss what was happening. At the time,the she did not realise (photographs were being taken),' said the prosecutor.
Prosecutor Flight Lieutenant Hannah O'Byrne. Photo / Pool
Smith sent her the images on Snapchat, and she took screenshots.
She told him to delete the photos, and he 'played it off as a joke'.
Smith sent her the images on Snapchat, and she took screenshots.
The pair engaged in sexual activity a few days later.
'She could not see what he was doing,' said O'Byrne.
'She did not realise she was being filmed.'
Later on, she received a message from Smith on Snapchat.
Given his messaging history, she decided to turn on screen recording before she opened it.
It was the footage of her taken during sex.
'She asked if he had sent it to anyone else. He played it off as a joke,' said O'Byrne.
The second woman reported the incident to police, handing over the screen recordings.
Defence lawyer Matthew Hague. Photo / Pool
The court heard that during their relationships with Smith, they had willingly and knowingly sent him explicit images and video, including naked photos. These were sent via Snapchat.
Both vehemently reject Smith's explanation that they consented to him filming and or photographing them.
The first woman began giving evidence before lunch.
'In the video, you can see me trying to swipe his phone away, telling him to put it away,' she said.
She said there had been no discussion before sex about whether Smith could record. When she told him off, he was 'very blase'.
'He just said 'no, it's all good',' she recalled.
She said she felt 'pretty gross'.
'My privacy had been invaded,' she said.
In a brief opening address, Smith's lawyer, Matthew Hague, told the panel that his client denied all the charges.
'Let me be clear… what you've heard… is just allegations,' he said.
'It is not evidence. At present… the accused must be presumed innocent."
The court martial is set to continue for at least three days.
Anna Leask is a senior journalist who covers national crime and justice. She joined the Herald in 2008 and has worked as a journalist for 19 years with a particular focus on family and gender-based violence, child abuse, sexual violence, homicides, mental health and youth crime. She writes, hosts and produces the award-winning podcast A Moment In Crime, released monthly on nzherald.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Soldier accused of filming sex with women acted like it was a joke — court martial
A soldier accused of filming women during sex without their permission laughed about the accusations when confronted about them, a court martial has heard. Corporal Manu Smith is facing three counts of making intimate visual recordings. He has pleaded not guilty. A hearing at the Burnham Military Camp began this morning and is expected to take three days. Smith has been accused of making the recordings of two civilian women, without their knowledge or consent. ADVERTISEMENT He has contended he thought he had permission. Prosecutor Flight Lieutenant Hannah O'Byrne told the court both women would say Smith recorded them without asking, and then sent the recordings via Snapchat. Where to get help for sexual violence. (Source: 1News) Smith treated it as a joke when confronted about the recordings, O'Byrne said. One woman complained she asked him if he had shared the images with others, which he also laughed off, O'Byrne said. One of the women – who had name suppression – gave evidence this morning via audio-visual link. Smith's lawyer Matthew Hague asked her about a chat group involving the woman and others who had dated Smith. ADVERTISEMENT The woman joined the group after she and the solider had broken up. She agreed the group's members did not like Smith. Hague asked if it was true the group discussed ways to cause trouble for Smith. The woman accepted the group had discussed it and she raised the sexual images as a way to get Smith in trouble. She wanted him to hurt as much as he had hurt her over the course of their relationship, she said. The woman consented to having sex with Smith, but not to him filming it, she said. Under questioning by Hague, she accepted she had worked with others in chat group on her complaint about Smith. But she said that was only because she was not very good with words. She denied making up the claims and said she thought if there were multiple complaints they were more likely to be believed.
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Erin Patterson accused of inconsistencies in mushroom trial
The woman at the centre of Australia's "mushroom murder" case has been accused of lying in the witness box, as prosecutors press her on inconsistencies in her story. Erin Patterson is on trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria, charged with murdering three people and attempting to murder a fourth, after serving them beef Wellingtons allegedly laced with deadly death cap mushrooms during a family lunch in July 2023. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to all charges, maintaining the incident was a tragic accident. But today, on her sixth day of cross-examination, prosecutors alleged she had misled the court on multiple fronts, including what she knew about mushroom poisoning, her internet history, and her hospital visit in the hours after the lunch. Hospital visit scrutinised ADVERTISEMENT During questioning, Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC suggested that Patterson was "shocked that the doctors were onto death cap [mushroom poisoning] so quickly." Patterson responded, "I was anxious at the idea that we might have eaten those things". When asked if she was worried about being caught, she replied: "Incorrect." The prosecution highlighted inconsistencies in Patterson's account of her hospital visit. While nurse Kylie Ashton testified that Patterson declined admission despite being warned of the seriousness of her condition, Patterson claimed there was "no conversation" about her children at that point and that she left to care for her animals. Discrepancies over plate usage Survivor Ian Wilkinson previously testified that Patterson served herself on a different, smaller plate compared to her guests. Patterson denied this, stating, "there was no smaller plate". ADVERTISEMENT She suggested that any differences in plates were due to her not owning a matching set, adding, "I did not deliberately choose which plates to serve my lunch guests with". Internet searches and medical appointments questioned The prosecution presented evidence that Patterson's computer accessed the iNaturalist website in May 2022, viewing a post about death cap mushrooms. Patterson claimed she didn't recall visiting the site, stating, "I don't remember ever visiting iNaturalist". When asked if she had an interest in death cap mushrooms at that time, she responded: "I have no idea." Rogers then questioned Patterson about an appointment she claimed to have had at Enrich Clinic for gastric bypass surgery. The prosecution noted that the clinic does not offer such procedures. Patterson expressed confusion, saying: "Well, I had an appointment with them, and that's my memory of what the appointment was for, so that's why I'm puzzled." ADVERTISEMENT Vomiting claims under scrutiny Patterson testified that she made herself vomit after the lunch due to feeling overfull, attributing it to a history of binge eating and purging. Rogers also challenged this, stating, "You did not tell a single medical person that you had vomited up after the lunch on the 29th of July?" Patterson said: "That is true, I didn't do that." The case revolves around a lunch hosted by Patterson on July 29, 2023, in Leongatha, Victoria. The meal resulted in the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson. Ian Wilkinson survived after intensive care. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges, asserting the incident was a tragic accident. The trial continues, with further cross-examination and testimonies expected in the coming days
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Meth-smoking man caught poaching pigs with teen
A Dunedin man who was caught poaching pigs with a 15-year-old boy has avoided a prison sentence. Steven Alan Roberts, 44, appeared in the Dunedin District Court yesterday after earlier pleading guilty to unlawful hunting, possessing methamphetamine and trespass under the Railways Act. The court heard that between 10pm on August 16 and 4am on August 17 the defendant was at Taieri Railway Gorge, which has a railway track running through it and is surrounded by farmland. Permission from the land owner or a permit is required to hunt on the land surrounding the railway tracks. Roberts was found in the Hindon area illegally hunting with another man and the 15-year-old. Police saw the trio walk along the railway tracks with dogs without permission. The group was stopped in a ute which had wild pigs on the back of it. The vehicle was searched and knives, GPS devices and dog collars were found inside. Roberts confessed he had been hunting wild pigs but did not know whose land he was on. He later told a probation officer he had recently met the man he was with and believed he had the appropriate permit. While on bail for that offending, the defendant bought 1g of methamphetamine. He admitted smoking it and scraping the residue out of the pipe to snort. Yesterday, counsel John Westgate said his client had addiction issues. "This is a man who has acknowledged that he has an issue with drugs, he's willing to get help," he said. The unlawful hunting was "a stupid thing to do" and he would have to 'pay the price' for it. Judge Emma Smith said the explanation Roberts gave the probation officer about believing his friend had a permit "might stretch belief". "It's pretty cynical offending by you," Judge Smith said. She noted he had no similar prior convictions but did have a significant history of drug-related offending. "You're too old to be using drugs ... you're just going to end up in prison," the judge said. Judge Smith said it seemed Roberts had not taken advantage of his previous community-based sentences. "I am going to give you that opportunity ... [but it's] probably your last chance." She sentenced Roberts to 150 hours' community work and nine months' supervision. She ordered the hunting equipment found be destroyed and that the defendant pay court costs of $143.
