Nets torn 'all to hell': Port Canaveral fishermen worry about increasing rocket launches, debris
Rockets continue lifting off at an unprecedented rate. The Cape remains on track to surpass 100 annual orbital rocket launches for the first time this year. And looking ahead, SpaceX seeks environmental and regulatory approvals to soon add up to a whopping 190 additional rockets to the Eastern Range manifest per year — including enormous Starship-Super Heavy two-stage tandems.
That's why the Southeastern Fisheries Association and other groups recommend that Congress and/or SpaceX establish a space-operations compensation program "for all domestic fishers, processors, and distributors who suffer economic losses or equipment damage."
SpaceX increasing launches: Environmental groups concerned about SpaceX's bid to launch 120 Falcons per year at Cape Canaveral
"If these fishermen lose a day's catch, they've lost several thousand dollars in income. They're typically historical families that have passed the fishery on from generation to generation," SFA Executive Director Bob Zales II said.
What's more, Zales said shrimpers and other fishing operators should receive compensation for damaged equipment and lost income after they snare underwater rocket pieces and space junk and "tear their nets all to hell." He wants state officials to organize a commercial-fishing town hall in Brevard County to discuss space-related economic concerns.
The SFA represents Florida's commercial seafood industry, ranging from shrimpers, fin fishers and crabbers to restaurants, processors, retail markets, distributors and for-hire charters. As of 2022, Brevard trailed only Duval among Florida's 12 East Coast counties with nearly 4.5 million pounds of seafood landed on the docks.
Zales said seafood cost increases are borne along the chain "from the net to the plate."
"We, on a routine basis, encounter (space) debris out in the ocean. The bottom trawlers are picking up debris, and it's impacting their fishing time, impacting their fishing gear," Mike Merrifield, co-owner of Cape Canaveral Shrimp Co. and Wild Ocean Seafood Market at Port Canaveral, told Air Force officials during a July 8 Starship public hearing in Titusville.
In an interview at Wild Ocean Seafood Market, Merrifield stood alongside an iced retail case displaying a cornucopia of seafood for sale: snapper, grouper, tilefish, brown tail shrimp, white tail shrimp, red shrimp. Fishing vessels offload catches at his companies' docks for sale to seafood processors and restaurants ranging from Orlando to West Palm Beach.
Merrifield said Port Canaveral shrimpers have snared aging space junk from Delta rockets and NASA's space shuttle program for many years — but he is worried about the Cape's unparalleled projected launch cadence, particularly the arrival of SpaceX's massive Starships. He said shrimpers can lose a day or two of fishing time repairing damaged nets, and a full set of nets can cost more than $10,000.
Zales said navigational restrictions particularly harm Port Canaveral's small-boat Spanish mackerel fleet. These fish, which are aggressive feeders, follow baitfish throughout the day. The SFA supports establishment of a designated nearshore north-south vessel transit corridor during Spanish mackerel season, citing lost catch, income and market supply.
SpaceX media personnel did not return messages seeking comment for this story. Officials with Space Florida declined comment, though the authority delivered a presentation and discussed fisheries topics during a June 2023 South Atlantic Fishery Management Council meeting.
Designated offshore security zones prevent fishermen, both commercial and recreational, from entering during rocket launches. During some missions, Coast Guard marine safety bulletins warn that mariners who enter, pass through or remain in a security zone can face up to $117,608 in civil penalties — with "willful violation" punishable by up to $250,000 in fines and up to six years of jail time.
'We're not anti-rocket or anti-Space Force or anything like that. But at the same time, we want the people over there to be harmed as little as possible,' Zales said.
Fishermen concerned about increasing launch rates
As August approaches, Florida's Space Coast remains on track to set a new annual rocket launch record for the fourth straight year from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center.
Previous Cape annual records were set with 57 launches in 2022, 72 launches in 2023, and 93 launches in 2024. Looking to the future, runaway industry leader SpaceX is planning tremendous growth:
Increase annual Falcon rocket launches from 50 to up to 120 from Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
Start launching up to 76 enormous Starship-Super Heavy rocket tandems per year from Launch Complex 37 at the Space Force installation.
Start launching up to 44 Starship-Super Heavy launches per year from pad 39A at KSC.
"The Council has received multiple fishermen's public comments from Florida regarding their concerns about the impact these closures will have on their business and the surrounding economy. Specifically, this area is extremely important for the Rock Shrimp fishery that is concentrated off the shore of Cape Canaveral," SAFMC Chair Trish Murphey said in an April letter to the Federal Aviation Administration about SpaceX's proposed increased liftoffs.
Murphey noted that "fishermen in this region and the tackle shops and marinas they use rely on every good weather day to operate" — and scrubbed launches still trigger offshore closures.
According to a 176-page Air Force draft environmental impact statement, the Starship-Super Heavy flights and landings proposed at Launch Complex 37 alone would generate an estimated maximum of 488 hours — or 20⅓ days — of maritime restrictions per year. Half would occur at night, when commercial fishing is less prevalent.
"SpaceX would seek to minimize interruption by reducing the duration of closure times for launch operations and opening the closure areas as soon as a launch is scrubbed," the Air Force statement said.
"Local commercial fishing operations should be able to temporarily adjust their routes or find other suitable locations to fish to avoid revenue loss during these restricted activities," the statement said.
"SpaceX intends to reuse all launch vehicle components, limiting debris in the ocean and minimizing the potential for damage or loss of commercial fishing gear and equipment resulting from contact with debris," the statement said.
State officials project Starship operations will generate at least $1.8 billion in capital investment and about 600 new full-time jobs by 2030. Beyond SpaceX, Blue Origin's hulking New Glenn rocket may launch on its second flight as early as Aug. 15. And United Launch Alliance's Vulcan rockets are contracted for 38 future launches for Amazon's Project Kuiper internet satellite constellation alone.
Trying to gauge cumulative losses to fishing industry
Kathleen Howington is a habitat and ecosystem scientist with the SAFMC. She is working to gather statistics regarding navigational closures and cumulative fishing impacts from space-industry activities. A key question: Which agencies and organizations keep track of such information?
"Space activities have become increasingly talked-about. They are having very large impacts on our habitats and our fisheries. Specifically off the east coast of Florida, with those closures, at this amount," Howington said July 15 during a SAFMC Habitat and Ecosystem Advisory Panel meeting in North Charleston, South Carolina.
"And I don't foresee this slowing down," Howington said.
Space Florida estimates the state must prepare to support launching 5,000 metric tons of cargo per year by 2035. That equates to 219 Falcon 9 launches, 194 ULA Vulcan launches, 111 New Glenn launches or 40 Starship launches.
In its letter to the FAA, SAFMC concerns with space operations off the Florida coast included loss of revenue and disruption of activities stemming from launch restrictions, damage to fishing gear after snaring rocket debris, oceanic environmental consequences from launches and debris, and timely communication of navigational restrictions.
Howington said the panel discussion recommended that the SAFMC create a working group to analyze data related to frequency of launches, hazard zones and space debris and their impacts on local fisheries.
Laurilee Thompson, whose family has worked in the seafood business for four generations, co-owns Dixie Crossroads in Titusville. Two years ago, she was named Restaurateur of the Year by the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association.
Thompson objected in writing to a summation from Page 82 of the Air Force's Starship-Super Heavy draft environmental statement. That's where military officials said fishing activity that could be affected by Port Canaveral-area vessel restrictions "would be a small fraction of the amount of fishing within the South Atlantic Region and would have a minimal effect on southeastern U.S. fishing operations."
"But if you're that fisherman who lives here and has fished out Port Canaveral for your entire life, the increase in rocket launches will not have a minimal impact on you. It will be major!" Thompson wrote.
For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit floridatoday.com/space. Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter.
Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@floridatoday.com. Twitter/X: @RickNeale1
Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here.
This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Port Canaveral fishermen: Increasing rocket launches will cost us money
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $329 million in Autopilot crash
FacebookTweetLink A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla liable in the 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S, and ordered Elon Musk's automaker to pay $329 million to the family of a deceased woman and an injured survivor. Jurors in Miami federal court ordered Tesla to pay $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages to the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and to her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. The plaintiffs had sought $345 million. Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. A judge rejected Tesla's efforts to dismiss the case earlier in the summer, and experts said this may encourage other litigants against the EV maker. 'I think it's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a professor at Marquette University Law School, who said this may make future settlements more expensive for Tesla. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its auto-pilot technology.' Friday's verdict could impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. Shares fell 1.8% on Friday. Tesla plans to appeal, according to published reports. The Austin, Texas-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to several requests for comment. The trial concerned an April 25, 2019, incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. 'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. 'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software. That's a big deal.' Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. 'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added. Last month, Tesla posted its biggest quarterly sales decline in more than a decade, and profit fell short of Wall Street forecasts.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Buy and Hold Investors Shouldn't Overlook Roper Technologies' (ROP) Consistency
Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) is included among the 10 Best Dividend Stocks to Buy and Hold Forever. A software developer looking out a window while confidently typing away on their laptop. Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) is a group of technology businesses that hold strong positions in specialized niche markets. Its portfolio includes application software, network software, and technology-enabled products, all designed to deliver essential solutions that become deeply integrated into customers' operations. These offerings typically lead to high switching costs and generate steady, recurring revenue. In the second quarter of 2025, Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) reported a 13.2% increase in revenue, driven by 7% organic growth and a 6% boost from recent acquisitions. GAAP net earnings rose by 12%. Management pointed to balanced growth across all major segments, crediting strong product innovation, successful integration of past acquisitions, and ongoing demand for recurring software solutions. Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROP) has garnered investor attention because the company has a strong dividend policy. On June 11, the company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.825 per share, which was in line with its previous dividend. Overall, it has raised its payouts for 33 consecutive years, which makes ROP one of the best dividend stocks to buy and hold. The stock has a dividend yield of 0.60%, as of July 31. While we acknowledge the potential of ROP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Business of Football: John Textor's new grand plan, and Premier League made to fork out for lawyers
You would be forgiven for thinking that news of John Textor quitting all positions of authority at Lyon, selling his stake in Crystal Palace to Woody Johnson, and putting his Florida mansion on the market might suggest that this self-styled cowboy was riding off into the sunset. For the Multi-Club Kid, however, these apparent setbacks are mere flesh wounds. He is getting a new posse together to buy Botafogo and RWDM Brussels, his Brazilian and Belgian clubs, from his partners at Eagle Football Group. He is also trying to rope in a new English club, mix in his facial-recognition turnstile technology, and then drive the whole herd to market in New York to make a killing. Advertisement As well as all this, on July 4, Textor filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Iconic Sports, the group of investors that gave him $75million (£56.5m) to help him buy Lyon in 2022 in exchange for a minority stake in Eagle. Textor's complaint is against Iconic and its two principals, American investors James Dinan and Alexander Knaster, and it is for alleged securities fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation in connection with a put option — the right to sell something at a fixed price by a certain date — they agreed with Textor in 2022. This Florida action came after Iconic hit Textor with a similar claim in London the day before; a claim it had been unable to publish as it sent it to the Jupiter Island property Textor bought from Microsoft founder Bill Gates for $4m in 2018 and is now selling for $23.5m (because he has built an even bigger one nearby). Under English law, you cannot publish unserved lawsuits. Iconic says it informed Textor of its desire to get out via the put option in July 2023, reminded him and Eagle's board about it in December 2023, and then again in March and July of 2024, by which time Textor was meant to have completed the buy-back. He did not, which is why Iconic believes it is owed nearly $94m and has written to Eagle's board with share-transfer documents for Textor's 65 per cent holding in the whole shebang. Textor, on the other hand, says Dinan and Knaster breached first. He says they knew they would never be able to meet the conditions because they had been unable to get any banks to underwrite the transaction. Textor's initial counter-suit was thrown out by the Florida court on July 10 because of some shoddy work by his legal team, but he was allowed to refile it a day later. And following Iconic's letter to the Eagle board on July 15, Textor hit back with a request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against Iconic on July 22. Advertisement On July 28, the court rejected Textor's request for the simple reason that the original Textor/Iconic agreements make it clear that any disputes between them should be hammered out in the English courts, as Eagle is an English company. In the meantime, Lyon have finally filed some partial accounts for last season, which show they are going to make another huge loss despite selling all of their best players. This, understandably, has greatly upset the rest of Eagle's initial investors, including Ares Management Corporation, the huge American investment firm that loaned Eagle $425m to complete the Lyon purchase. Ares has already snaffled nearly all of the proceeds from Textor's sale of his Palace stake, but is still owed about $300m. Given the collapse of French football's latest domestic TV deal, Textor's sale of Lyon's indoor arena and women's football teams, and Rayan Cherki et al, can Lyon cover that amount? The answer is probably 'non'. Textor, however, is nothing if not resilient. He also genuinely likes football, and in Botafogo, the 2024 Brazilian and South American champions, can point to a success story. His response to all of the above is to buy Botafogo and RWDM Brussels from Eagle. He would then move these clubs into a new Cayman Islands-registered Eagle entity, throw in his Facebank technology company that has moved into facial recognition ticketing systems, and push for his long-promised New York IPO. Oh, and he will try to add a new English club (teams like QPR, Southampton, or Watford, as opposed to Sheffield Wednesday) to the mix to make something that should fly off the New York Stock Exchange's proverbial shelves. Football plus tech, a unicorn combo. And, just to complete the vision, he may hold onto his two-thirds share in the old Eagle — Lyon, in other words — or be open to suggestions from Ares and Co as to how much those shares are worth (about the same as Botafogo, perhaps?). Advertisement Or, as has been reported in Brazil this week, he might just merge his new Eagle with Greek billionaire Evangelos Marinakis' multi-club group (Olympiacos, Nottingham Forest, and Portugal's Rio Ave), although he might not have run this past the Greek billionaire properly, as it has come as news to Forest. No spoilers, I promise, but the Brad Pitt character in the film F1 (great fun, by the way, much better than the actual sport) has a line that becomes part of the plot, 'sometimes when you lose, you win'. For the Premier League, it seems the opposite can be true, as it found itself almost £1m out of pocket on fees related to its successful prosecution of a profit and sustainability case against Nottingham Forest in March 2024. Ordinarily in these circumstances, the losing party would pay for the winner's legal costs, or at least a big portion of them, and the cost of the PSR hearing. And that is certainly what the Premier League had in mind when it sent Forest a bill in excess of £1.4m. The majority of this was a fixed fee the league negotiated with Linklaters, the global law firm it has used for all of its recent PSR cases. For the Forest case, the league agreed to pay the firm £1.1m, but that was reduced to £985,000 because Linklaters did not need to put in quite as many hours as initially estimated. And there was also a bill of just over £140,000 for a report from an expert. The club, however, said words to the effect of 'that's a bit steep, isn't it?', as their bill from their well-known legal firm, Squire Patton Boggs, was about half as much, and their expert report cost a third of the Premier League's. After all, Forest noted, we confessed to the PSR breach pretty fast, so did the Premier League need to 'lawyer up' for this one at all? Long story short, Forest lawyered up for the costs row, calling in Nick 'The Wolf' De Marco for a costs hearing in May. Advertisement And despite failing on his attempt to argue that Forest did not really lose the PSR hearing, he successfully argued that the Premier League's legal bill was too high and it did not need the expert report at all. So, when the three-person panel's result was published last month, it revealed that the league had been awarded only £530,000 of its claim, 37 per cent, and had been ticked off for overspending on lawyers and experts. This would be only mildly embarrassing if it were a one-off, but it was not. The league also only got about a third of its £4.9m legal bill for successfully prosecuting Everton's two PSR breaches in 2023 and 2024. For those keeping count, that is more than £4m in unrewarded legal costs for cases the Premier League actually won. The mind boggles as to how much a defeat would cost them. No pressure, then. There should be no giggling about the Premier League's legal bills over at the English Football Association, as it has recently been dumped on its backside by De Marco, too. I am not talking about his win in the high-profile Lucas Paqueta case. No, this was an appeal by the FA to an earlier decision by a disciplinary panel into a case involving Accrington Stanley's inadvertent use of an unlicensed agent in a transfer deal in 2024. The unnamed agent was representing the player but had recently failed his agent's exam, so had lost his licence. When the FA got wind of this, it charged the League Two club and Accrington initially admitted the charge, asking only for a personal hearing to discuss mitigation. But while they waited for this hearing, they reconsidered. After all, the rules state that nobody should 'engage or appoint' an unlicensed agent and they did not hire the agent. The player might have a case to answer, they thought, but we did not 'engage' the agent, he did. So, they changed their plea and won. Advertisement The FA then appealed against this ruling, saying 'engage' really means 'engage with', as in have any dealings with someone. That is why there is an 'or' between 'engage' and 'appoint' — they mean two different things. But, as we learned in the Leicester City case, words matter, especially prepositions. The appeal panel, and it is all explained in their written reasons, decided that 'engage' is not the same as 'engage with', handing Accrington a reprieve and De Marco another head for his trophy cabinet.