logo
Airline etiquette: Should you keep shoes on during flights?

Airline etiquette: Should you keep shoes on during flights?

NZ Herald28-04-2025

Foot skirmishes are becoming a regular problem on planes. Most of them are low-level, resulting in a complaint to the airline. But sometimes, people go too far when they remove their footwear. Back in 2018, Spirit Airlines diverted a New York-Fort Lauderdale flight to Myrtle Beach after the odour of smelly feet developed in part of the aircraft. They even had to call a hazmat team, which failed to find the source of the smell.
Should you leave your shoes on when you fly?
Passengers have been debating whether it's acceptable to remove shoes on aeroplanes. Some argue it's a matter of personal comfort, while others cite hygiene and safety concerns. But there's some agreement on the question of whether to remove your shoes on shorter flights.
'It's a non-issue,' says Jodi R.R. Smith, an etiquette expert with Mannersmith Etiquette Consulting. 'On short flights, you should keep your footwear on for the entire flight.'
For longer flights – anything over four hours – it's okay to take off your shoes, especially if you're trying to sleep.
'But only if your feet have zero odour,' she says.
But one group of passengers should never remove their shoes, says Rosalinda Oropeza Randall, an etiquette expert.
'If you are seated in the emergency exit row, your shoes should always be on,' she says. 'You have elected to take on the responsibility of calmly and expeditiously being ready to assist. There's no time for a shoe search, untying the shoelace knot, and putting them on.'
Also, always, always keep your socks on. And if you need to use the bathroom, put your shoes back on. Because that's not necessarily water on the floor of the lavatory. But you already knew that.
So, bottom line: keep your shoes on if you can. But if you can't, then keep your socks on. Absolutely no bare feet on the plane!
What if you have foot odour?
So let's say you're on a plane on a marathon flight. The guy next to you steps out of his sneakers, releasing noxious gases strong enough to choke you.
How do you know if, you know, it's you?
'You know your feet and you know if they smell,' says etiquette expert Nick Leighton, who co-hosts the weekly podcast Were You Raised By Wolves?
If you have a foot odour problem, or think you might have a foot odour problem, you'll want to keep your footwear on at all times or find a way of neutralising the smell, for the sake of other passengers.
Advertisement Advertise with NZME.
Susan Sherren, who runs the travel agency Couture Trips, says the recent confrontations are no surprise to her. Airlines just don't give passengers enough guidance on footwear etiquette.
'These days, people need more specific instructions on how to behave,' she says. 'We are guests aboard these flights. With specific rules of engagement spelled out, we all could have more enjoyable and civilised flights.'
Or at least, a better-smelling one.
What to do with a passenger whose feet smell
Confrontations between passengers who violate the unspoken rules of footwear and those who are having trouble breathing are never, ever easy.
I've been stuck sitting next to a passenger whose foot odour was strong enough to summon a hazmat team. It was an attractive young woman whose shoes smelled like rotten eggs.
'A brief, polite question, such as, 'Can you please move your shoes?' Or, 'Would you mind putting your shoes back on?', might be all you need,' says Clara Burke, who teaches business management communication at Carnegie Mellon University's Tepper School of Business 'Focus on the outcome you want: getting their shoes back on.'
But I did what most polite airline passengers did; I quietly endured the trip. But I shouldn't have, according to etiquette experts.
'I would contact the flight attendant to handle it,' says Rachel Wagner, an etiquette trainer.
What would a flight attendant do? Your cabin crew has been trained to handle situations like this. They can calmly request that the passenger put the offending footwear back on, putting a cork on the smell, at least until the plane lands.
That usually works, although in Gautam's case, it did not. You'll recall that he was on a marathon flight to Japan when his seatmate dropped his shoes next to him and then moved seats. Gautam asked the flight attendant for help, but for some inexplicable reason, the airline employee refused, saying the customer was a 'regular' with the airline and that it was okay.
Only, it wasn't okay.
'I avoid flying on the airline now,' he says.
Good call.
Look for more shoe confrontations this year
With the northern hemisphere summer travel season coming up, and many Kiwis flying long-haul to Europe to escape the NZ winter, it wouldn't surprise me to see more fights over footwear breaking out in midair. I'll try to remember the advice of the etiquette professionals – keep my shoes on, especially when I'm using the bathroom. Take them off only if it's safe (and by safe, I mean it doesn't affect the cabin air quality).
But maybe a solution is up to the airlines. Instead of blanket bans on bare feet, perhaps it's time to tell us what is – and isn't – allowed when we're flying. Isn't that what in-flight announcements are for?
Christopher Elliott is an author, consumer advocate, and journalist. He founded Elliott Advocacy, a nonprofit organisation that helps solve consumer problems. He publishes Elliott Confidential, a travel newsletter, and the Elliott Report, a news site about customer service.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aircraft back in blue
Aircraft back in blue

Otago Daily Times

time24-05-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

Aircraft back in blue

Callum Smith with the Beech D-17S Staggerwing VH-BBL. PHOTO: SUPPLIED Engineer Callum Smith has restored a Beech D-17S Staggerwing VH-BBL at the Wānaka airport, and in a dashing blue. Mr Smith and his team of engineers at Twenty24 Ltd finished returning the Staggerwing VH-BBL to flying condition for Australian owner Allan Arthur. The aircraft was built for the United States Navy during World War 2 but ended up in Britain as part of the lend-lease programme. After short stints back in the US and Norway after the war, the aircraft was sold to Australia where it remained until it was shipped to Wānaka a few years ago. Following the completion of a major overhaul, the aircraft has been test flown at Wānaka and will soon be flown home to Australia. Mr Arthur has history with Warbirds Over Wānaka. His Curtiss P-40N Kittyhawk NZ3125 was displayed at the 2006 airshow by legendary New Zealand airshow pilot John Lamont, who has flown at every Wānaka show since 1988. The restoration team at Twenty24 Ltd has no time to rest on their laurels as work cranks up on another Staggerwing — Tracey and Cam Hawley's "Antarctic Staggerwing". This aircraft was taken to the ice by Admiral Richard Byrd as part of his 1940 US Antarctic Service expedition. The couple own another Wānaka-restored Staggerwing, which has been a regular performer at Warbirds Over Wānaka since 2014. — APL

Plane ready to fly home to Australia
Plane ready to fly home to Australia

Otago Daily Times

time24-05-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

Plane ready to fly home to Australia

Callum Smith with the Beech D-17S Staggerwing VH-BBL. PHOTO: SUPPLIED Engineer Callum Smith has restored a Beech D-17S Staggerwing VH-BBL at the Wānaka airport, in a dashing blue. Mr Smith and his team of engineers at Twenty24 Ltd have finished returning the Staggerwing VH-BBL to flying condition for Australian owner Allan Arthur. The aircraft was originally built for the United States Navy during World War 2 but ended up in Britain as part of the lend-lease programme. After a few short stints back in the US and Norway after the war, the aircraft was sold to Australia where it remained until it was shipped to Wānaka a few years ago. Following the completion of a major overhaul, the aircraft has been test flown at Wānaka and will soon be flown home to Australia. Mr Arthur has history with Warbirds Over Wanaka. His Curtiss P-40N Kittyhawk NZ3125 was displayed at the 2006 airshow by legendary New Zealand airshow pilot John Lamont, who has flown at every Wānaka show since 1988. The restoration team at Twenty24 Ltd has no time to rest on its laurels, as work cranks up on another Staggerwing — Tracey and Cam Hawley's "Antarctic Staggerwing". This aircraft was taken to the Ice by Admiral Richard Byrd as part of his 1940 US Antarctic Service expedition. It crashed in 1963, and Mr Smith said it was "quite far gone" when it arrived in Wānaka. The couple own another Wānaka-restored Staggerwing, which has been a regular performer at Warbirds Over Wanaka since 2014. — APL

Travel dilemmas: Should airlines limit or ban alcohol on flights?
Travel dilemmas: Should airlines limit or ban alcohol on flights?

NZ Herald

time05-05-2025

  • NZ Herald

Travel dilemmas: Should airlines limit or ban alcohol on flights?

The flight didn't end well. For the sake of our family audience, let's just say it involved a lot of noise, agony and the discharge of bodily fluids. Smith, an etiquette expert, still has one question about the incident. 'Bartenders are legally obligated not to overserve,' she says. 'Why doesn't this also apply to those serving drinks in the air?' Everyone's talking about alcohol on planes She's not the only one asking. Earlier this year, Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary blamed most of the air rage incidents in Europe on overconsumption and suggested a two-drink limit at airport bars. Since then, there have been a string of embarrassing incidents involving alcohol on planes, including inebriated passengers, crew members and even pilots. It's not so much a question of whether drink limits are a good idea – it's more an issue of what limits make sense. A new survey by Global Rescue found some travellers support limits on alcohol. About one in five passengers say airlines shouldn't serve more than one drink every 30 minutes, while 17% favoured a limit of one an hour. A majority say serving alcohol should be left to the discretion of the crewmember or bartender. Dan Richards, Global Rescue's CEO, says there was one takeaway, no matter how travellers voted. 'While travellers should always be responsible for their consumption, airports and airlines also have a duty to ensure the safety of all passengers,' he told me. The problem is complicated Imposing a drink limit sounds like an easy solution. But this issue is surprisingly complex. For starters, on airlines that charge for drinks, alcohol is by far the biggest source of onboard revenue, so cutting off passengers would make a dent in the airline industry's profits. (During the pandemic, some airlines stopped serving alcohol amid an epidemic of in-flight violence, but they quickly resumed beverage service in an effort to reclaim lost revenue.) It's common knowledge that limiting alcohol can improve the quality of the flight. Recent research by the University of Texas found that consuming alcohol was a 'significant contributor' to passenger misconduct. And German researchers also discovered that drinking on planes can harm your health. But the problem is, neither passengers nor airlines want limits. There's yet another layer of complexity. Many passengers board their flights already intoxicated because they've been hanging out at the airport bar. And those watering holes in the terminal selling overpriced cocktails would, of course, go out of business without nervous flyers who order a few drinks before their flights. So you can't just limit or ban drinking on a plane. You have to apply sensible rules to airports as well. And if you were cheering for a new drink limit rule, consider this: in the US, there already is a federal law that limits alcohol consumption on planes. It forbids airlines from serving anyone who appears to be intoxicated or who has a deadly or dangerous weapon accessible to him, among other things. So why did Smith's seatmate get so many rum and cokes? Perhaps the flight attendant had to make her sales quota. Should you drink on a plane? The decision about whether to drink or not on a plane is a personal one. Here are a few things to consider: Don't forget – you're on a plane. I know, it sounds obvious, but most people don't think about the effects of being in a pressurised cabin. 'Unfortunately, sometimes the effects of alcohol don't show until the plane is in the air or the passenger has their next drink,' says Beth Blair, a former flight attendant. She remembers serving a passenger a Bloody Mary – only one! – and the next thing she knew, he was knocking on the door of the flight deck, demanding to speak to the captain. 'The FAA and FBI met our flight,' she recalls. 'There were severe consequences.' If you drink, do it in moderation. That's the consensus of the behavioural experts I talked to for this story. 'If we get the little bottle of wine or beer in economy class with our meal, that should be enough,' says etiquette expert Adeodata Czink. 'No more alcohol than that. This way we would have our wine and there would be much less intoxication.' You're really better off avoiding alcohol on flights. That's especially true if you take any prescription medications. 'The vast majority of medical emergencies our team have been asked to intervene in with other passengers have involved alcohol,' says Bob Bacheler, managing director of Flying Angels, a medical transportation service. 'It's usually a combination of alcohol and sedatives. I can't stress how dangerous the combination of sedatives, alcohol and decreased cabin pressure is.' Ultimately, the choice is yours, of course. But ask yourself: do you want to end up getting hauled off the plane in handcuffs, like the guy on Blair's flight? Maybe you can wait until you land to have that drink. So how do you fix this problem? I've been writing about problem passengers since the '90s, and in almost all cases, alcohol is involved. Airlines have had plenty of warnings, from the drunken passenger who defecated on a meal cart to the epidemic of air rage during the pandemic. Take away the alcohol, and you remove some of the fuel that powers these outbursts of antisocial behaviour. I've also seen the destruction alcohol can wreak on the ground. I've watched relationships get ripped apart, and I've lost friends to alcohol. And by 'lose' I mean they are dead. It affected me so profoundly that I stopped drinking a decade ago. The debate over alcohol consumption on flights is more nuanced than it might initially seem. While limiting or banning alcohol could improve passenger behaviour and reduce incidents of air rage, it's not a decision airlines can make lightly. After all, alcohol sales contribute significantly to their bottom line, and many passengers look forward to that glass of wine or cocktail during their flight. But the consequences of excessive drinking onboard – from unruly behaviour to safety risks – can far outweigh the temporary pleasure of a drink. Abstaining from alcohol while in the air is a simple and responsible choice. After all, a few hours without a drink isn't too much to ask. And for airlines, perhaps it's time to prioritise passengers over profit and consider following the lead of some carriers in the Middle East who have adopted a dry policy altogether. Maybe the real question isn't whether alcohol should be limited on flights, but whether the convenience of a drink is worth the potential risks it brings to the flight experience. As for Jodi Smith's seatmate, the rum-and-coke binge wasn't just a bad decision – it was a reminder that when alcohol is involved, it's not just the passengers who are at risk, but everyone onboard.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store