Hong Kong finance chief revises 2024-25 deficit to HK$80.3 billion, down 8%
Advertisement
Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po on Wednesday also revealed that the government would take 'careful consideration' before deciding on the launch of the proposed boundary facilities fee imposed on cross-border private cars amid criticisms from lawmakers, as they gave the green light to his belt-tightening 2025-26 budget.
His latest budget blueprint, unveiled in February, contained a string of measures to tap new sources of revenue and ease a HK$87.2 billion deficit, starting with a pay freeze for all public servants, a downsizing of the civil service and a cut in education spending.
Addressing lawmakers before the vote on Wednesday, Chan said the deficit for the 2024-25 financial year had been revised to HK$80.3 billion, HK$6.9 billion less than the original estimate.
'It was mainly due to the rise in stamp duty revenue on stock trading and the lower-than-expected departmental expenditure,' he explained.
Advertisement
He added that fiscal reserves remained at a level equivalent to eight months of government expenditure and that the city's economy had achieved 'steady growth' for the first quarter of this year. But Chan stopped short of offering further details.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
an hour ago
- RTHK
Apple to invest US$100b more locally to avoid tariffs
Apple to invest US$100b more locally to avoid tariffs Donald Trump shake hands with Tim Cook at the White House after announcing the additional US$100 billion investment undertaking by Apple. Photo: Reuters US President Donald Trump has announced that Apple will invest an additional US$100 billion in the United States, a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iPhones. The new pledge raises Apple's total domestic investment commitment to US$600 billion over the next four years. The company announced earlier this year it would invest US$500 billion and hire 20,000 workers across the country. The announcement centres on expanding Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing footprint in the US, but still falls short of Trump's demand that Apple begin making iPhones domestically. "Companies like Apple, they're coming home. They're all coming home," Trump said in the Oval Office, moments after Apple chief executive Tim Cook gave him a US-made souvenir with a 24-karat gold base. "This is a significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhones sold in America also are made in America," Trump added. Asked if Apple could eventually build entire iPhones in the United States, Cook noted that many components such as semiconductors, glass and Face ID modules are already made domestically, but said that final assembly will remain overseas "for a while". While the investment pledge is significant, analysts say the numbers align with Apple's typical spending patterns and echo commitments made during both the Biden administration and Trump's previous term. In May, Trump had threatened Apple with a 25 percent tariff on products manufactured overseas, a sharp reversal from earlier policy when his administration had exempted smartphones, computers and other electronics from rounds of tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump's effort to reshape global trade through tariffs cost Apple US$800 million in the June quarter. "Today is a good step in the right direction for Apple, and it helps get on Trump's good side after what appears to be a tension-filled few months in the eyes of the Street between the White House and Apple," said Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. Apple has a mixed track record when it comes to following through on investment promises. In 2019, for instance, Cook toured a Texas factory with Trump that was promoted as a new manufacturing site. But the facility had been producing Apple computers since 2013 and Apple has since moved that production to Thailand. Apple continues to manufacture most of its products, including iPhones and iPads, in Asia, primarily in China, although it has shifted some production to Vietnam, Thailand and India in recent years. (Reuters)
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
What US tariffs mean for Malaysian businesses and workers
When the US tariffs finally landed on July 31, the 19 per cent rate came as some relief in Malaysia . But in the days since, Malaysia's government, businesses and confused public are still unpacking the fine print in a deal that gives US companies wide open access to their home market – while restricting its own giant economy to Malaysian exports. The tariff rate puts Malaysia on equal footing with Indonesia Thailand and the Philippines , and slightly better off than Vietnam 's 20 per cent. At face value, that means Malaysia retains a comparative advantage over its Southeast Asian peers with its higher base of performance in mature industries, including the semiconductor sector. But it is still a slap in the face for a country which sent a record 198.7 billion ringgit (US$47 billion) in shipments to the US last year. Export businesses are bracing for plummeting demand from US clients as prices are likely to soar when the tariffs take effect from August 7. The deal also raises questions as to whether Malaysia gave up too much, especially with its pledge to spend US$240 billion on US products and investments over the next decade. While it is still early days – finer details of the deal will be known after Malaysia and the US officially sign a trade agreement later this year – many are already preparing for the worst. Here's what we know … and some of what we do not. 1. Who will hurt the most?
AllAfrica
3 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Trump-Putin face-to-face meeting could happen very soon
The big news is that US President Donald Trump has pronounced the Special Envoy Steven Witkoff's talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as very productive. He has further announced he will meet with Putin face-to-face as soon as next week. He spoke to Putin by telephone today (August 6). Trump also says that he intends to follow up on his meeting with Putin with a three-way meeting between himself, Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. We have no official word from Russia, but the Trump announcement is in line with predictions coming from Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that there will be 'big surprises.' We have no readout from either side on the terms discussed between the parties, only that there were two subjects: Ukraine and US-Russia strategic cooperation. It may be that the Russians are uncertain about how much political or strategic support they can expect from China, suggesting maybe the Chinese leadership is in flux. Likewise, we also know, at least in part, that preliminary talks took place between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Lavrov and between Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu, acting as a mediator with Trump, and Putin. The Russians have promised a readout of the conversation, although I am not sure it will be enlightening. Certainly, this is a very big development, but it carries plenty of risk for all sides, especially for Trump. The US president will need to control Zelensky, a difficult task because Zelensky has nowhere to go, as he cannot easily make significant concessions. Washington allegedly wants to get rid of him because he is an obstacle to a deal, so we can't rule out a melodrama involving Zelensky's status. Meanwhile, Trump slapped India with a 50% tariff, in part because of its purchases of sanctioned Russian oil. This is a mistake because India will have to fight back and the US will find itself in a position of strengthening the military alignment between India and Russia. Ideologically, it is also counterproductive, as India is a strong democratic country and the US is treating it as a pariah. India will likely quickly make a deal to buy Russia's new Su-57 fighter jets instead of the F-35, something that has been trending anyway. There are other potential 'disrupters.' One potential is the UK. I doubt the UK and French, along with Estonia and some others (maybe not the Germans) will be enthusiastic in supporting a brokered deal on Ukraine. The Russians report the UK is planning a so-called shadow-fleet incident (probably in the Baltic or Sea of Finland) that will trigger a UK and potential NATO response, forcing the US to support a hard anti-Russian position. So some sort of provocation can't be ruled out, notwithstanding whether the Russians have real intelligence on UK planning, or if they are faking it. The 'shadow fleet' are ships carrying Russian oil that are not insured by the London exchange. However, other insurance instruments are available in the maritime trade, so the terminology is intended to characterize these ships in a pejorative manner and does not describe the status of these tankers. Meanwhile, the Estonians and Finns have attempted to thwart the transit of these tankers and have tried to pull them into port for 'inspections.' The Russian Navy is now escorting them, putting a stop to these provocations. More yet may happen. There are many other wild cards, including moves that Ukraine may make. The last time there was a ceasefire that stopped flights of aircraft and drones, the Ukrainians kept up attacks anyway on Russian territory. There are plenty of other possibilities. Even so, it looks like the diplomatic track may, at last, be leading to concrete results in ending the conflict in Ukraine. Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.
