BBC 'received a complaint about Huw Edwards over a decade before sentencing'
The BBC are reported to have received a complaint about disgraced news anchor Huw Edwards over a decade before his sentencing, it has been claimed
A dossier of emails sent to the BBC has reportedly revealed that a complaint was made against shamed newsreader Huw Edwards all the way back in 2012.
Last September, the Welsh broadcaster was given a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, after he admitted charges of making indecent images of children.
It came months after the news broke that Huw was alleged to have paid a young person for sexually explicit photos.
Now, according to The Sunday Times, an email was sent to BBC director-general Tim Davie an hour before Huw was sentenced in September, which claimed that a complaint was made about Huw all the way back in 2012, in the aftermath of the Jimmy Savile scandal.
The email, which was obtained by the Times under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act, was from a former BBC employee. They are said to have detailed how a complaint had been made against the newsreader a decade before his suspension.
It reportedly read: "The reason for my email to you is just to flag that there is a high probability that this complaint was documented somewhere but was (by recollection) to have been deemed non-actionable.'
They added that the complaint was "Not necessarily a criminal allegation" and said "I have no real specifics I can offer you - other than it exists".
Tim allegedly responded three minutes later with an email thanking the ex-employee and explaining he would share it with the team.
The Times requested all of the email correspondence between the BBC's senior executives, dated from Huw's arrest to the day after he was sentenced. Six months later, they were granted the information and given access to nearly 200 pages of emails.
The emails are also said to have uncovered that Huw offered to pay back some of his salary from the BBC between the time of his arrest and his resignation from the broadcaster.
However, Huw is yet to repay any of the money back, with a BBC spokesperson confirming to Mirror, "The BBC believes that Huw Edwards should return the money paid to him by the BBC, covering the period between his arrest and his resignation.'
Huw, who was the presenter of the BBC News At Ten for two decades, was known as the corporation's highest-paid newsreader but later found himself at the centre of a scandal when The Sun claimed that a presenter had given payments to a young person for sexually explicit images.
Not naming Huw at first, many presenters such as Rylan Clark and Jeremy Vine were quick to clear up that the reports were not aimed at them.
Over a month after the news broke, Huw's wife, TV producer Vicky Flind, named him as the person behind the reports and issued a statement claiming that he was "suffering from serious mental health issues'.
Describing it as "difficult days" for their family, Vicky explained how Huw had been "treated for severe depression" in recent years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why isn't the BBC telling us what caused the Ballymena riots?
Does anyone know what's actually happening in Ballymena, in Northern Ireland? If you've just been following the news on the BBC, it's actually quite hard to work out what has led to the violence which has injured at least 32 police officers. The initial news bulletins told us that there rioting youths were protesting about a sexual attack on a girl and that two teenage boys were in custody facing charges. My first thought – reverting to the Troubles – was that there was a sectarian element to the whole thing. But we also learned that the police condemned the riots as racist thuggery; so, not sectarianism, it seems, but something to do with race. A few further details came to light yesterday. We found out that the rioters were still rioting. A local MP popped up on the news to say that people were unsettled by the number of immigrants in the area. And the BBC informed us that the 14-year-old youths – who deny sexual assault – confirmed their names and ages through a Romanian interpreter at Coleraine Magistrates' Court. But these glimmers of information still offered little clarity. Wouldn't it be easier and simpler if the BBC just said that two Romanian boys living in the area are accused of an offence? Instead, we're left to make informed guesses ourselves about what's actually going on. The coverage of events in Ballymena brings to mind that of the Southport murders last July. There were allegations that the murderer was an asylum seeker; these allegations were promptly dismissed as 'fake news' or misinformation. The BBC's reporters told us that the attacker was born in Britain and living in Southport. We know now, of course, that he is Axel Rudakubana, whose Rwandan parents came here after the genocide. That fact – that his parents were from Rwanda – wasn't irrelevant to the case; their son was, it seems, obsessed with the genocide and indeed with extreme violence of all sorts. Trying to pretend that he was just some random local wasn't helpful; people inevitably came to their own conclusions. If you've just been following the news on the BBC, it's quite hard to work out what is happening The Dublin riots in 2023 happened after an Algerian was charged with stabbing a school assistant and three children, seriously injuring a five-year-old girl. But the authorities – and the news – carefully glossed over the bad-taste question of the background of the alleged attacker; social media inevitably filled the vacuum, which is precisely why the riots had an anti-immigrant aspect. Riad Bouchaker is yet to stand trial and denies the charges. Won't state broadcasters ever learn that not telling us things isn't helpful? People work things out for themselves. And if they're not told clearly by the BBC, or whoever, what the background is of the alleged perpetrators in these cases, well, the public is going to arrive at its own conclusions. This was what I did, only amplified by social media, and presumably what the Ballymena rioters have done. The sense that elements of a story are being kept from us for our own good – that is, lest people get angry about it – only adds to the idea that we're not really grown up enough to be trusted with the truth. It's not a great way to calm things down, you know.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow council 'fails to enforce law' on dump site years on
The railway cutting in North Glasgow, behind Claddens Street, has been a fly-tipping site for more than two decades, causing a headache for locals. Emails obtained exclusively through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request revealed that the council has been in communication with Reigart Contracts Ltd - the owner of the site - since September 2017. Kenny Nisbet and Dorothy McFarland (Image: Colin Mearns) Glasgow council fails to enforce law on dump site years on (Image: Newsquest) (Image: Colin Mearns) The local authority first threatened to enforce Section 59 of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990 on February 8, 2018, saying it would make the move the next week. According to this law, the council can serve a notice to the occupier of the land to clean up the waste. Four days later, a Reigart representative called this action "unnecessary" and asked for a phone call. After this, there was a discussion between the parties about a cleanup. However, those who live in the area claim this never happened. The emails also revealed that council employees repeatedly admitted the dumping had "become an issue" and locals were pushing for action. Throughout this exchange, officials also stated they are keen to "maintain positive dialogue" with the firm. Since then, the local authority has also attempted to get in touch with the company multiple times without success. Residents are outraged at the lack of follow-through and say the emails are an "absolute waste of time and money" without any results. Parkhouse Community Council member Kenny Nisbet said: "It's just ridiculous. For 20 years, we have been going on about this. "We have been trying for a long time but they kept refusing to do it. "The maddening thing is, the company is not even based in Glasgow, they are from Coatbridge." In 2024, in an email to Mr Nisbet, an environmental health officer said the team has "taken the decision to also look at alternative solutions to enforcement for the disused railway". READ NEXT: We visited a notorious fly-tipping site - it's shocking what we found there 'It's appalling': Residents fume at lack of action on historic fly-tipping site (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) The community council has been asking for a proper cleanup for decades and said they feel like "hitting their heads off a brick wall" trying to force the council to serve the notice, which they are legally entitled to do. Mr Nisbet, a resident of more than 50 years, confirmed he has submitted several complaints to the council about the handling of the case and has contacted six local politicians and several public health groups and organisations. A major worry of the group is that, along with household items such as wardrobes, garbage and pieces of furniture, unknown and potentially dangerous substances are also being left at the site. When the Glasgow Times visited the area, which is a former railway cutting, it was littered with dumped objects, including an ironing board, a scooter, Christmas trees and more. (Image: Colin Mearns) (Image: Colin Mearns) A council spokesperson said: 'Fly-tipping has unfortunately been a long-standing issue at this disused railway line in the Parkhouse area. 'It appears that a number of residents in adjoining properties dump waste from their gardens into the former railway cutting and waste is also fly-tipped at other points along this space. 'Due to the steep embankment and the thick overgrowth, removing fly-tipped waste from this site raises highly challenging health and safety risks for staff. 'However, we have previously worked with the major owner of the site to remove waste from the railway line and would do so again in future. 'We understand the ambition of the major owner is to develop the site for housing but we are unaware of any proposals at this stage. 'We will continue to engage with residents to ensure their waste is disposed of properly. 'Where evidence is secured that identifies those responsible for any fly-tipping incident, including eye witness accounts, we will take enforcement action.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Shops in Yorkshire found to be flouting single-use vape ban
Nearly two weeks on from a ban on the sale of single-use disposable vapes in the UK, many shops have been found still to be openly selling the illicit items. Almost half of the 21 stores which an undercover BBC reporter visited in cities in Yorkshire continued to sell the vapes as though there had been no law vapes, in their bright-coloured packaging and variety of fruity flavours, had been a "key driver behind the alarming rise in youth vaping", the previous government had said as it first set its sights on a Labour administration followed through, with the disposables officially banned from sale from 1 June this year - the aim being to protect children's health and reduce damage to the the introduction of the ban, anybody selling the illicit items risks a £200 fine, with repeat offenders facing the prospect of our undercover investigation has revealed that while some shop owners in Sheffield, Bradford, York and Leeds have been found to be following the new rules, others are turning a blind eye. In some shops we visited in Yorkshire, the colourful packaging of single-use vapes was still very much visible on the in those premises seemed happy to offer them to customers, and many were even selling them at a reduced shopkeeper I spoke to told me he knew he was breaking the law by selling the single-use disposable vapes, but he added that he wanted to sell his remaining stock at a discount."It's banned," he said, pointing at the stack of vapes in his shop window."I'm not allowed to sell them. I'm finishing. I don't have a lot, so I'm just trying to [get rid of them]."This was despite the ban on such vapes having been announced in October last gave stores more than seven months to get rid of the disposable vapes they still had in stockrooms and on the shelves before the ban came into force in June. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said before the ban that vape usage in England had grown by more than 400% between 2012 and 2023, with about 9% of people now buying and using the disposable vapes helped get children hooked on nicotine and blighted high streets with waste, according to the government."It's why we've taken tough action and banned them," a Defra spokesperson that ban, another shopkeeper asked me if I wanted a "good deal" and offered to sell me an armful of the illicit vapes for £20, showing me a pick-and-mix of fruity flavours in the store's glass as part of our investigation in cities across Yorkshire to find out where such vapes were still being sold, we also visited traders regulated by North Yorkshire Council's Trading Standards shop workers approached by our undercover reporter there refused to sell the now-illegal Greg White, North Yorkshire Council's executive member for environment, said it was "disappointing" to see shops in other parts of Yorkshire were still prepared to break the law."There's been plenty of time to prepare and to try to get people to move from disposable vapes to reusable ones, and that would have been good for their business," he explained.A Defra spokesperson said: "Rogue traders will face serious penalties, up to and including criminal prosecution." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
