Is India a weak country or can it stand up to Trump? What Ian Bremmer said
Can India assert itself on the world stage — particularly in its dealings with Washington? In an interview with India Today Consulting Editor Rajdeep Sardesai, President of the Eurasia Group and geopolitical analyst Ian Bremmer said that India, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, still lacks the geopolitical clout to firmly stand up to a transactional Trump-led United States.'India is not China. India is not the United States. It is geopolitically much weaker,' Bremmer said.advertisementDespite being the world's most populous nation, the fourth-largest economy, and a nuclear power, India finds itself in a tricky position when engaging with a leader like Trump, who is known to pressures allies with tariffs and threats, Bremmer noted.
'Trump says, 'I want to work with you, you're part of the QUAD, I like you.' But then he says, 'I'm going to hurt Apple if they decide to move their iPhone production from China to India. I'm going to tariff them.' He says there are going to be trade consequences and other consequences if you don't have a ceasefire with Pakistan,' Bremmer said.According to Bremmer, powerful countries are able to prioritise their own interests and push back when Trump imposes demands.'Trump puts major tariffs on China. China puts tariffs back on the United States. Trump says we're going to hurt you. China says, we can take the pain more than you and Trump is the one that blinks,' he said. 'When it comes to Russia, so far Trump has been completely unwilling to put tough sanctions on Russia. They continue to engage in their war with impunity in Ukraine.'advertisementIn contrast, countries like Mexico, Panama, and Iran have capitulated under Trump's hectoring.'Look at the tariffs the Mexicans have immediately moved to do everything he's demanded on fentanyl, on border security. Look at Panama, how they try to force the sale of the Hong Kong firm to a American firm, take away the fees on American ships... Even the Iranians are much more willing to talk about stopping highly enriched uranium stockpiling,' Bremmer pointed out.India, he said, has shown signs of both resistance and vulnerability. While it rejected Trump's offer to mediate talks over Kashmir and publicly denied that any foreign power brokered its ceasefire agreement with Pakistan, it still ended up in what Bremmer described as an 'uncomfortable position' following Operation Sindoor.'There's still a lot of uncertainty about to what extent Indians can and will really stand up to Donald Trump,' he said.Bremmer praised PM Modi's ability to shape domestic and foreign policy at will, calling him 'the most powerful domestic leader of a major democracy in the world today'. But that may not be enough when it comes to dealing with the Trump administration.'At a time when other leaders around the world—the Germans, the French, the Japanese, the Americans, the South Koreans—have much more divided governments, much weaker, not lasting for as long, Modi is in a position to do everything he says he's gonna do. He can follow through on it,' he said.In future, if the US makes demands that India doesn't like, will it be strong enough to say no? That's an interesting question, said Bremmer.Tune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Donald Trump#Narendra Modi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center
LEAVENWORTH, Kan. — A judge on Wednesday barred a major U.S. private prison operator from housing immigrants facing possible deportation in a shuttered Kansas City area detention center unless it can get a permit from frustrated city officials. Leavenworth County Judge John Bryant agreed after a packed hearing to grant the city of Leavenworth's request for a temporary restraining order against CoreCivic, one of the nation's largest private prison operators. CoreCivic had claimed in legal filings that halting the opening of the 1,033-bed facility on the northwest outskirts of the Kansas City area would cost it $4.2 million in revenue each month. City officials said they anticipated the arrival of detainees apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was imminent under a Trump administration crackdown on illegal immigration. Leavenworth isn't the first city where controversy has surrounded the reopening of a private prison as an ICE detention facility. In Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Ras Baraka sued the state's top federal prosecutor on Tuesday over his recent arrest on a trespassing charge at a federal immigration detention facility in that state, saying the Trump-appointed attorney had pursued the case out of political spite. Scott Peterson, the city manager for Leavenworth, said he didn't know if the case in Kansas marked the first time a municipality had prevailed in court. 'I would point out that maybe the reason we have seen some success here today is this is not about immigration,' Peterson said. 'This is not about private prisons. This is about land use.' In late 2021, CoreCivic stopped housing pretrial detainees for the U.S. Marshals Service in the Leavenworth facility after then-President Joe Biden called on the Justice Department to curb the use of private prisons. In the months leading up to the closure, the American Civil Liberties Union and federal public defenders urged the White House to speed up the closure, citing inmate rights violations there along with stabbings, suicides and even one homicide. But with President Donald Trump pushing for mass deportations under a wide-ranging crackdown on illegal immigration, the facility that CoreCivic now calls the Midwest Regional Reception Center is in demand again. It is located just 10 miles west of the Kansas City International Airport. As part of his crackdown, Trump has vowed to sharply increase detention beds nationwide from the budgeted 41,000 beds this year. Tennessee-based CoreCivic initially applied for a special use permit from the city in February but then withdrew that application the next month, arguing in court filings that it didn't need the permit and that the process would take too long. 'It became clear to CoreCivic that there was not a cooperative relationship,' said Taylor Concannon Hausmann, an attorney for the private prison operator, speaking in court. The city sued CoreCivic, the lawsuit claiming that CoreCivic impeded the city police force's ability to investigate sexual assaults and other violent crimes. The lawsuit contended that the permitting process was needed to safeguard itself from future problems. 'Just follow our rules," an attorney for the city, Joe Hatley, said in court. 'Go get a permit.' The first version of the lawsuit, filed in March in federal court, was tossed out in May on technical grounds. But Bryant sided with Hatley in the case refiled the same month in state court, finding that the proper procedures weren't followed. Concannon Hausmann, CoreCivic's attorney, declined to comment as the crowd filtered out of the courtroom Wednesday. Norman Mallicoat held a sign reading, 'CoreCivic Doesn't Run Leavenworth' as he left. 'I see this as basically a large company trying to bully a small city into getting what it wants and not having to follow the rules and ordinances of the city,' Mallicoat said.
Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Columbia University's accreditation under threat says Trump Admin amid allegations of ignoring Jewish students
The US Department of Education announced on June 4 that Columbia University violated federal anti-discrimination laws, failing to protect Jewish students amid pro-Palestinian protests on campus. The department said this breach places Columbia in violation of the standards required by its accrediting agency, the Middle States Commission on Higher Education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon issued a strong statement, saying, 'The school's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus' following the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. The Department formally notified the Middle States Commission, stressing that Columbia's actions violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Federal law requires accreditors to notify member institutions of such violations and implement a plan to restore compliance. 'If a university fails to come into compliance within a specified period, an accreditor must take appropriate action against its member institution,' the department stated. 'Accreditors have an enormous public responsibility as gatekeepers of federal student aid. They determine which institutions are eligible for federal student loans and Pell Grants. Just as the Department of Education has an obligation to uphold federal antidiscrimination law, university accreditors have an obligation to ensure member institutions abide by their standards,' she said. Columbia already lost $400 million in federal grants and contracts earlier this year, prompting layoffs of nearly 180 staff. The potential loss of accreditation could have far-reaching impacts, particularly for students who rely on federal aid. According to Columbia's website, 21% of undergraduates at Columbia College and Columbia Engineering receive Pell Grants. Trump escalating his confrontation with Harvard University on May 29 accused the institution of disrespecting the country and singling it out as a hotbed of antisemitism linked to anti-Israel protests. But, Trump praised Columbia University for being cooperative, despite also calling it 'very, very bad.' 'Harvard has to understand the last thing I want to do is hurt them. They're hurting themselves. They're fighting,' Trump said. 'Columbia has been very, very bad — what they've done, they're very antisemitic and lots of other things — but they're working with us on finding a solution.'
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
LOS ANGELES — The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
