Is Massachusetts about to legalize online casinos on your smartphone?
Advertisement
For those already in the gambling business, the stakes are high, and the politics of it all have made for strange bedfellows.
On one side is homegrown sports betting behemoth DraftKings and arch rival FanDuel, which support the bills and stand to benefit by providing the digital platforms that power these games. Joining their camp: MGM Resorts International, which operates a casino in Springfield and online gaming platform BetMGM.
Advertisement
A DraftKings employee in the lobby of their Back Bay offices.
Lane Turner/Globe Staff
On the other side is Encore Boston Harbor, the Everett casino operated by Wynn Resorts, and UNITE HERE
Local 26, the politically influential hospitality union with many members who work at Encore; they oppose the bills, saying online gaming would cannibalize the brick-and-mortar casino business and reduce jobs in the industry. And then there are those who are wary for fear it will create more problem gamblers
by making it even easier to bet on your phone.
Supporters and opponents of online casinos squared off during a
DraftKings and FanDuel argued that online casinos should be legalized because there's already a robust illegal market, so why not regulate and tax it? According to the
mostly on websites based outside the United States.
It's the same argument that's been made to legalize sports betting in many states, including Massachusetts, ever since the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban in 2018. Since sports betting began in Massachusetts in early 2023, it has flourished here with billions of dollars wagered, generating more than $300 million in taxes and assessments, according to the
Advertisement
Type 'online casino in Massachusetts,' and you quickly realize how we're all one Google search away from trying our luck.
Seven states, including Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, have legalized internet casino gaming, and proponents estimate that if Massachusetts levied a 20 percent tax, the state could generate $230 million to $275 million a year
in new revenue. (That's the same tax rate
as online-only sports betting, while land-based resort casinos are assessed at 25 percent.)
And with state lawmakers facing tough budget decisions this year, David Prestwood, a government affairs manager at DraftKings, knew exactly what to tell the Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.
'This money may be especially critical for Massachusetts in the face of anticipated federal funding cuts and reductions in state and local aid,'
he
said at last month's hearing.
Online casinos may seem no different than sports betting, but their appeal runs broader and deeper than placing a bet on a baseball game. And internet gambling is far different than going to a brick-and-mortar casino, which requires getting there and interacting with staff. Online, you can gamble in your pajamas.
'There's all these friction points where the player has the chance to think twice with about placing the next bet,' said Mark Stewart, a board member of the
Advertisement
Stewart, who is general counsel of The Cordish Companies, a Baltimore real estate and casino developer, testified virtually at the hearing, while Encore Boston Harbor president Jenny Holaday provided written testimony opposing online gaming and warned how it could result in a 'dramatic reduction in the associated taxes that Encore pays to the Commonwealth,' a sum that has totaled nearly $1 billion since the casino opened in 2019.
The owner of Encore Casino in Everett is pushing to stop a bill on Beacon Hill that would broadly legalize online gambling on slots and poker games.
John Tlumacki/Globe Staff
Encore employs about 3,300 workers, about a third of whom are part of Local 26.
A union representative also testified against the bills, citing an independent research analysis funded by the
(A
It's shaping up as a test of who has more clout on Beacon Hill — Encore and its coalition of boots-on-the-ground supporters in the unions and Everett, or tech companies that have deep pockets.
Brick-and-mortar casinos
could get in on the game, too. The legislation sets aside licenses for the state's existing casino operators, along with four licenses for internet gaming platforms. Along with slots, they'd allow poker, blackjack, craps, and even games with a live dealer.
But what about the
I can't imagine state Treasurer and Lottery chair, Deb Goldberg, being happy about online casinos, which could eat into lottery profits. The lottery in fiscal 2024 netted nearly
Advertisement
'If online gaming expands, we must ensure the Lottery is supported and stays competitive,' Goldberg said in a statement. 'Every dollar spent on private platforms could mean less for our cities and towns and early childhood education.'
Then there are concerns about addiction, with calls to the
surging
since sports betting was legalized.
Lia Nower, director of the Center for Gambling Studies at Rutgers University said what drives up the risk of problem gambling is giving people more options.
'There's a cumulative effect,' she said. 'The more things that you gamble on, the more often you gamble and the more venues in which you gamble, the higher your risk.'
In this digital era, online casinos may feel inevitable, yet internet gambling
is so new we don't really know how addictive it could be, especially among young bettors. Remember how we initially thought social media was just fun and games?
Critics of online gaming say it reduces barriers to problem gambling, compared with going to a brick-and-mortar casino.
Steve Helber/Associated Press
Yet the pressure will be intense from a gaming industry that's keen to keep expanding online. Boston-based
Why? Just follow the money, explains Nower.
'It's the cash cow for the industry,' she said.
State Senator Paul Feeney — who is sponsoring the online casino legislation with state Representative Daniel Cahill — said lawmakers are well aware the need to carefully weigh all the costs and benefits, in particular the investments made by land-based casinos which he described as 'sacrosanct.'
Advertisement
Yet there's also an urgency with the state facing budget pressures.
'I wouldn't say that anything is on a fast track,' said Feeney. 'There's a renewed interest in looking at how we can maximize tax revenue without broad-based tax increases on residents.'
We tend to give the Legislature a hard time for moving too slowly, but this time we shouldn't. At the very least, the state should conduct its own independent analysis, rather than relying on industry-funded studies to weigh the impact on existing land-based casinos and the lottery, and whether it would create a new class of problem gamblers.
Online gaming is too big of a gamble to not get this right.
Shirley Leung is a Business columnist. She can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
House panel votes to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton over possible links to Ghislaine Maxwell
A House Oversight panel subcommittee voted to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton Wednesday over their alleged ties to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) introduced the motion for subpoenas during a Federal Law Enforcement Subcommittee hearing, and it was approved by the Republican-led panel via voice vote, with no roll call taken. The Clintons and several former top Justice Department officials – ex-FBI Director James Comey, one-time special counsel Robert Mueller and former attorneys general Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Merrick Garland, Bill Barr, Jeff Sessions and Alberto Gonzales – were included in the list of subpoenas sought by Perry in order to 'expand the full committees investigation into Ms. Maxwell.' Advertisement 3 Epstein was a frequent White House visitor when Clinton was in office. The William J. Clinton President / MEGA House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) would need to formally issue the subpoenas to the Clintons and the others for them to be compelled to provide testimony or documents to the panel. 'Subpoenas will be issued in the future,' a spokesperson for the House Oversight Committee told The Post. Advertisement The former president acknowledged in his 2024 book 'Citizen: My Life After the White House' that he flew aboard Epstein's private plane – nicknamed the Lolita Express — in connection to his work with his Clinton Global Initiative nonprofit. 'I wish I had never met him,' Clinton wrote of Epstein, adding that traveling on his plane was 'not worth the years of questioning afterward.' The former president, who has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the Epstein case, claimed that he had no idea Epstein and Maxwell were sex trafficking minors. According to visitor logs, Epstein visited the White House at least 17 times, beginning shortly after Clinton was sworn into office in 1993. Advertisement 3 Epstein and Maxwell met with the former president during a 1993 tour of the White House. William J. Clinton Presidential Library 3 Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison after her 2022 conviction on sex trafficking conspiracy charges. SDNY The subcommittee also approved a measure directing Comer to subpoena the Justice Department for the release of all communications between Biden administration officials – including former President Joe Biden – and the DOJ related to the Epstein case. Advertisement The subcommittee's actions come after Comer subpoenaed Maxwell, who has been serving a 20-year prison sentence since 2022, to sit for a deposition with the Oversight Committee. The deposition has tentatively been scheduled for Aug. 11, at the Federal Correctional Institution Tallahassee, where Maxwell has been incarcerated since her conviction on sex trafficking conspiracy charges.
CNET
20 minutes ago
- CNET
Trump's AI Action Plan Is Here: 5 Key Takeaways
The Trump administration on Wednesday laid out the steps it plans to take to ensure "global AI dominance" for the US, with an AI Action Plan that calls for cutting regulations to speed up the development of artificial intelligence tools and the infrastructure to power them. Critics said the plan is a handout to tech and fossil fuel companies, slashing rules that could protect consumers, prevent pollution and fight climate change. Though the plan itself isn't binding (it includes dozens of policy recommendations), Trump did sign three executive orders to put some of these steps into action. The changes and proposals follow how the Trump administration has approached AI and technology over the past six months -- giving tech companies a largely free hand; focusing on beating China; and prioritizing the construction of data centers, factories and fossil fuel power plants over environmental regulations. It's seizing on the moment created by the arrival of ChatGPT less than three years ago and the ensuing wave of generative AI efforts by Google, Meta and others. "My administration will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the United States can build and maintain the largest and most powerful and advanced AI infrastructure anywhere on the planet," Trump said during remarks Wednesday evening at a summit presented by the Hill and Valley Forum and the All-In Podcast. He signed the three executive orders at the event. The administration and tech industry groups touted the plan as a framework for US success in a race against China. "President Trump's AI Action Plan presents a blueprint to usher in a new era of US AI dominance," Jason Oxman, president and CEO of the tech industry trade group ITI, said in a statement. Consumer groups said the plan focuses on deregulation and would hurt consumers by reducing the rules that could protect them. "Whether it's promoting the use of federal land for dirty data centers, giving the FTC orders to question past cases, or attempting to revive some version of the soundly defeated AI moratorium by tying federal funds to not having 'onerous regulation' according to the FCC, this is an unwelcome distraction at a critical time for government to get consumer protection right with increasing AI use and abuse," Ben Winters, director of AI and privacy at the Consumer Federation of America, said in a statement. Here's a look at the proposals in the plan. Slashing regulations for AI infrastructure The plan says AI growth will require infrastructure, including chip factories, data centers and more energy generation. And it blames environmental regulations for getting in the way. In response, it proposes exemptions for AI-related construction from certain environmental regulations, including those aimed at protecting clean water and air. It also suggests making federal lands available for data center construction and related power plants. To provide energy for all those data centers, the plan calls for steps to prevent the "premature decommissioning of critical power generation resources." This likely refers to keeping coal-fired power plants and other mostly fossil-fuel-driven infrastructure online for longer. In his remarks, Trump specifically touted his support for coal and nuclear power plants. The administration also called to prioritize the connection of new "reliable, dispatchable power sources" to the grid and specifically named nuclear fission and fusion and advanced geothermal generation. Earlier this month, the president signed a bill that would end many tax credits and incentives for renewable energy -- wind and solar -- years earlier than planned. Wind and solar make up the bulk of the new energy generation being added to the US grid right now. "This US AI Action Plan doesn't just open the door for Big Tech and Big Oil to team up, it unhinges and removes any and all doors -- it opens the floodgates, continuing to kneecap our communities' rights to protect ourselves," KD Chavez, executive director of the Climate Justice Alliance, said in a statement. "With tech and oil's track records on human rights and their role in the climate crisis, and what they are already doing now to force AI dominance, we need more corporate and environmental oversight, not less." Fewer rules around AI technology Congress ended up not including a moratorium on state AI rules in the recently passed tax and spending bill but efforts to cut regulations around AI continue from the executive branch in the action plan. "AI is far too important to smother in bureaucracy at this early stage, whether at the state or Federal level," the plan says. The plan recommends that several federal agencies review whether existing or proposed rules would interfere with the development and deployment of AI. The feds would consider whether states' regulatory climate is favorable for AI when deciding to award funding. Federal Trade Commission investigations and orders would be reviewed to determine that they don't "advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation." Those rule changes could undermine efforts to protect consumers from problems caused by AI, critics said. "Companies -- including AI companies -- have a legal obligation to protect their products from being used for harm," Justin Brookman, director of tech policy at Consumer Reports, said in a statement. "When a company makes design choices that increase the risk their product will be used for harm, or when the risks are particularly serious, companies should bear legal responsibility." Ideology and large language models The plan proposes some steps around ensuring AI "protects free speech and American values," further steps in the Trump administration's efforts to roll back federal policies around what it refers to as "diversity, equity and inclusion," along with references to the problems of misinformation and climate change. It calls for eliminating references to those items in the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework. Federal agencies would only be allowed to contract with AI developers who "ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias." The Trump administration has recently announced contracts of up to $200 million each to developers Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI. Grok, the model from Elon Musk's xAI, has recently come under fire for spouting antisemitism and hate speech. Dealing with workforce challenges The plan acknowledges that AI will "transform how work gets done across all industries and occupations, demanding a serious workforce response to help workers navigate that transition" and recommends actions by federal agencies including the Department of Labor intended to mitigate the harms of AI-driven job displacement. The plan calls for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis to monitor how AI affects the labor market using data already collected. An AI Workforce Research Hub under the Department of Labor would lead monitoring and issue policy recommendations. Most of the actual plans to help workers displaced by AI involve retraining those workers for other jobs or to help states do the same. Other jobs-related recommendations are aimed at boosting the kinds of jobs needed for all those data centers and chip manufacturing plants -- like electricians and HVAC technicians. These plans and others to encourage AI literacy and AI use in education drew praise from the Software & Information Industry Association, a tech industry trade group. "These are key components for building trust and ensuring all communities can participate in and benefit from AI's potential," Paul Lekas, SIIA's senior vice president of global public policy, said in a statement. More AI in government The plan envisions more use of AI by the federal government. A talent exchange program would allow employees with experience or talent in AI to be detailed to other agencies in need. The General Services Administration would create a toolbox of AI models that would help agencies see models to choose from and use cases in other parts of the government. Every government agency would also be required to ensure employees who could use AI in their jobs have access to and training for AI tools. Many recommendations focus specifically on the Department of Defense, including creating a virtual proving ground for AI and autonomous systems. AI companies have already been signing contracts with the DOD to develop AI tools for the military.
Business Insider
21 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Google CEO Sundar Pichai shrugs off Silicon Valley's raging AI talent wars
Google CEO Sundar Pichai brushed off concerns about the company's ability to attract and keep top AI talent during the tech giant's second-quarter earnings call, calling its retention metrics "healthy." On Wednesday, Pichai publicly addressed the latest wave of AI talent wars raging across Silicon Valley. These wars have been supercharged by Meta's announcement of a 'superintelligence' division and the poaching of some researchers with multimillion-dollar pay packages. The competition has become so intense that some analysts worry it could increase the growing costs of staying at the cutting edge of AI. Bernstein analyst Mark Shmulik asked Pichai about recruiting top researchers in the context of "AI-related resource costs" at Google, and how the competition affects the company's ability to retain talent. In response, Pichai said that Google has been through moments like this before and touted that its core metrics remain "healthy." "We continue to look at both our retention metrics, as well as the new talent coming in, and both are healthy," Pichai said on the earnings call. "I do know individual cases can make headlines, but when we look at numbers deeply, I think we are doing well through this moment." Business Insider asked Google if it could share some of those metrics; the tech giant didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Several members of Meta's new superintelligence team used to work at Google. For example, Meta poached Pei Sun, a researcher who worked on improving Google's Gemini AI assistant and its self-driving car, Waymo. It's not just Meta poaching Googlers. Newer AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic have also siphoned top talent from Google's DeepMind division, according to a SignalFire report. For example, the report found that it's 11 times more likely that a researcher leaves Google for Anthropic than the other way around. During the earnings call, Pichai said that Google knew what it took to keep top AI researchers happy — and it wasn't all about the money. For example, Pichai said Google is investing more in access to compute, meaning the latest and greatest computer chips. Also, top researchers want to be "at the frontier driving progress, and so the mission, and how state-of-the-art the work is, matters. So that's super important to them," he said.
