Cannes Awards Predictions: Who Could Take the Palme d'Or — and Everything Else?
Based on critical reception, audience ovations, and speaking with several sources on the ground and close to the jury members, a handful of films have clearly separated themselves from the pack — none more so than 'Sentimental Value,' Joachim Trier's incisive father-daughter drama that's become the buzziest title on the Croisette.
More from Variety
Leonardo DiCaprio, Jeff Bezos, Kevin Spacey Spotted at amfAR Cannes Gala as James Franco and Adrien Brody Auction Their Art for Over $300,000
'Love Letters' Review: A French Lesbian Couple Navigates Pregnancy in Alice Douard's Beautifully Realized Directorial Debut
Norwegian Director Joachim Trier Talks 'Sentimental Value': 'People That Deny Emotions Make Terrible Choices'
Distributed by Neon, which is aiming for an unprecedented sixth consecutive Palme win — after 'Parasite,' 'Titane,' 'Triangle of Sadness,' 'Anatomy of a Fall' and 'Anora' — 'Sentimental Value' received the most enthusiastic standing ovation of the festival. Trier, a Cannes veteran whose 'The Worst Person in the World' nabbed Best Actress in 2021, seems poised for a coronation.
However, could it be that easy?
Let's break it all down of the major contenders and predictions for the top awards based on jury dynamics, critic scores and on-the-ground buzz.
Palme d'Or
Prediction: 'Sentimental Value' (Joachim Trier)
Remember, this is a game of chess. Typically, the jury doesn't hand out more than one major prize to a movie, so we're trying to figure out what can win a certain category, if it's not in contention in another.
Trier's emotional drama about a woman reconnecting with her estranged father has moved audiences and critics. The jury, led by Juliette Binoche, includes emotional storytellers who might warm to this type of film such as Jeremy Strong and Halle Berry. Stars Elle Fanning, Renate Reinsve and Stellan Skarsgård could find themselves in contention for acting prizes, and the film's rare blend of intimate storytelling and themes could resonate with jury members like Payal Kapadia and Leïla Slimani.
Runners-up:
'Sound of Falling' (Mascha Schilinski) – A multigenerational German saga that has stuck with viewers long after its early screening. Mubi's acquisition and strong reviews suggest it's a real contender. (predicted Grand Prix)
'Nouvelle Vague' (Richard Linklater) – Vintage Linklater in the best way. Critics have lauded its warm, cerebral portrait of artistic reinvention. Zoey Deutch's performance and the tight script keep it in contention. (predicted Jury Prize)
'It Was Just an Accident' (Jafar Panahi) – Panahi's first film since his release from prison is politically charged, subtle and devastating. It might sneak to the top with Neon behind it and global relevance baked in.
'Die, My Love' (Lynne Ramsay) – A $24 million Mubi pickup and emotional knockout, with Jennifer Lawrence earning career-best reviews. Even with divisive reviews, don't count this one out.
Best Director
Prediction: Richard Linklater, 'Nouvelle Vague'
Linklater's meticulous structure and narrative flow in 'Nouvelle Vague' is said to be nothing short of masterful. This could be the year Cannes acknowledges his brilliance. Still, Jafar Panahi's understated hand in 'It Was Just an Accident' is right behind, if the jury doesn't give him a special award or screenwriting.
Also in contention: Jafar Panahi, 'It Was Just an Accident' and Joachim Trier, 'Sentimental Value'
Special Jury Prize
Prediction: 'Eddington' (Ari Aster)
Though divisive (with a low average from critics), 'Eddington' seems like the type of headscratching flick to win the Special Jury Prize just to acknowledge its ambition and experimental edge — an award Cannes has previously used to honor polarizing work.
Best Actress
Prediction: Jennifer Lawrence, 'Die, My Love'
Oscar winner Lawrence ('Silver Linings Playbook') is said to deliver what many call her career performance in Lynne Ramsay's feverish love story. Will the jury fall for her raw, vulnerable, and unforgettable turn?
Also in the running:
Renate Reinsve and Elle Fanning, 'Sentimental Value' – A dual win is possible, especially if the jury wants to reward the ensemble.
Zoey Deutch, 'Nouvelle Vague' – Said to be a charming, razor-sharp performance that could bring levity and soul to the ceremony.
Best Actor
Prediction: Paul Mescal, 'The History of Sound'
At 29, Mescal wouldn't be the youngest winner in Cannes history (that remains Yuya Yagira when he won at 12 years old for 'Nobody Knows' in 2004). Still, the Oscar-nominated actor is said to bring a stirring portrayal of a sensitive soul navigating music and intimacy during wartime what many are saying is this year's most affecting male performance. This could also give him a great headstart for Chloe Zhao's 'Hamnet' later this year.
Other potentials:
Robert Pattinson's 'Die, My Love' – A volatile, magnetic turn that says to match Lawrence beat-for-beat. Perhaps this year's Jesse Plemons or Joaquin Phoenix?
Stellan Skarsgård, 'Sentimental Value' – Cannes juries don't tend to reward supporting turns but the veteran could be a dark horse.
Best Screenplay
Prediction: 'It Was Just an Accident' (Jafar Panahi)
Panahi's layered script weaves political commentary into an escalating series of small events.
Close contenders: 'Nouvelle Vague' (Gent, Palmo Jr., Pétin, Masson) and 'Sentimental Value' (Joachim Trier, Eskil Vogt)
Final Thoughts
With Neon holding distribution rights to three likely prize-winners — 'Sentimental Value,' 'It Was Just an Accident' and 'The Secret Agent' — the distributor has already played its hand expertly once again. Mubi, meanwhile, is making a strong case with the crowd-pleasing 'Die, My Love' and early favorite 'Sound of Falling.'
And then there's the question of who will buy Linklater's movie.
If history is any indicator, this jury — composed of artists who lean toward global storytelling, and a touch of rebellion — will spread the love across the field. But if there's one film to bet on, 'Sentimental Value' holds the strongest hand. The awards will be handed out on Saturday.
Full predictions at a glance:Palme d'Or: 'Sentimental Value'Grand Prix: 'It Was Just an Accident'Jury Prize: 'Nouvelle Vague'Best Director: Richard Linklater, 'Nouvelle Vague'Best Actress: Jennifer Lawrence, 'Die, My Love'Best Actor: Paul Mescal, 'The History of Sound'Best Screenplay: 'It Was Just an Accident'Special Jury Prize: 'Eddington'
Best of Variety
Emmy Predictions: The Art of the Submission Creates New and Viable Contenders
Emmy Predictions: Writing (Drama, Comedy, Limited) - Pilots, Finales and Everything In Between Fuel the Competition
Emmy Predictions: Directing (Drama, Comedy, Limited) - Will Ben Stiller, Philip Barantini and Seth Rogen All Become Award-Winning Auteurs?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Leonardo DiCaprio tells Paul Thomas Anderson that turning down 'Boogie Nights 'is his biggest regret
Mark Wahlberg famously led the film that is largely regarded as one of Anderson's best works. It's been almost 30 years since Paul Thomas Anderson released his disco-era porn fantasia Boogie Nights, and Leonardo DiCaprio still can't get over not being part of it. In a new interview for Esquire, the 50-year-old Oscar winner admits to the prolific director that he still regrets turning down the film set and shot in the Valley, where the adult-film industry took root. When asked by Anderson — who interviewed DiCaprio for the outlet while promoting their upcoming film, One Battle After Another — if he has any regrets over his 35+ years in the entertainment industry, the actor doesn't hold back his truth "even though you're here." "My biggest regret is not doing Boogie Nights. It was a profound movie of my generation," DiCaprio responded. "I can't imagine anyone but Mark [Wahlberg] in it. When I finally got to see that movie, I just thought it was a masterpiece." He added, "It's ironic that you're the person asking that question, but it's true." Wahlberg played porn star Dirk Diggler in Anderson's 1997 film, which earned him a Screen Actors Guild nomination for best ensemble alongside Burt Reynolds and Julianne Moore. The actor's role in Boogie Nights remains a formative part of Wahlberg's acting career, as it essentially put him on the map in the industry when he transitioned into acting after his rap career. It isn't the first time DiCaprio has revealed this particular regret, but it's the first time he's told Anderson that to his face. In an interview back in 2008, he revealed that he turned down a role in Boogie Nights to lead Titanic. Of course, the James Cameron helmed film launched DiCaprio's career into the stratosphere, so some would say he made the right choice. At that time, DiCaprio couldn't say he would have rather done Anderson's film instead of Titanic, but he was adamant that he would have loved to have "done them both." "I'm not saying I would have. But it would have been a different direction, careerwise...I would have been happy to do them both," he explained. "And the truth is, if I'd not done Titanic, I wouldn't be able to do the types of movies or have the career I have now, for sure. But it would have been interesting to see if I had gone the other way." While DiCaprio missed his chance to work with Anderson back in the '90s, he isn't missing his shot now. The Killers of the Flower Moon star leads a star-studded ensemble cast in the action thriller film as Bob Ferguson, a former revolutionary who is being hunted by Sean Penn's police character, Steven Lockjaw, and must reunite with his ex-revolutionaries after his daughter, played by Chase Infiniti, is taken. "I know One Battle After Another has been on your desk for a long time," DiCaprio told Anderson. "It was a personal story for you in a lot of ways and certainly pertinent to the world that we're living in right now. But ultimately, wanting to do this movie was pretty simple: I've been wanting to work with you — Paul — for something like twenty years now, and I loved this idea of the washed-up revolutionary trying to erase his past and disappear and try and live some sort of normal life raising his daughter." One Battle After Another also stars Teyana Taylor as Perfidia Beverly Hills, Bob's former lover and the mother of his daughter, Benicio del Toro, Wood Harris, Alana Haim and Regina Hall. In the film's trailer, Perfidia is apprehended by law enforcement prior to the start of the movie's events, leaving Bob and Willa (Infiniti) to go on the run and seek refuge with an ally, Sensei Sergio (del Toro). DiCaprio previously described One Battle After Another as "an incredibly epic movie [that] has such scope and scale" when he appeared at CinemaCon 2025 in April to tease the film. He went on to praise Anderson as a "master" who is open to allowing his actors to improvise. "A lot of writer-directors are incredibly rigid, but his ability to work with actors is so unique," DiCpairo said, calling it an "honor" to work with the filmmaker. One Battle After Another premieres in theaters Sept. 26. Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly

an hour ago
Weinstein could be sentenced next month, if no retrial on unresolved rape charge
NEW YORK -- NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein faces sentencing and a possible retrial in his New York City sex crimes case, but when they'll happen — and whether he'll be back in front of another jury — is still up in the air. Manhattan Judge Curtis Farber said Wednesday he could sentence Weinstein on Sept. 30 — but only if there's no retrial on a rape charge that the last jury failed to reach a verdict on. Weinstein, 73, was convicted in June of forcing oral sex on TV and movie production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006. The charge carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years in prison. At the same time, the jury acquitted him of forcing oral sex on another woman, one-time model Kaja Sokola, but couldn't decide a charge that he raped hairstylist and actor Jessica Mann in 2013. Manhattan prosecutors told Farber that they're ready to take Weinstein to trial for a third time on the rape charge, which is punishable by up to four years in prison. That's less time than Weinstein has already served. Mann is on board to testify again, they said. Prosecutors requested a January trial date, citing witness availability and their own caseload. Farber balked at that, saying a January date is too far away and conflicts with another, unrelated trial he's already scheduled. He proposed having the trial in the fall. 'The case needs to be tried this year,' Farber said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala agreed, telling Farber he'd prefer a trial at 'the earliest the court can accommodate us.' Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg said she would ask Mann and other witnesses about their availability for a trial in the fall. If a fall trial happens, it would likely put Weinstein's high-profile #MeToo case back in court as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in the final throes of his reelection bid. Bragg, a first-term Democrat who made prosecuting sex crimes cases a priority, has expressed satisfaction with Weinstein's conviction on a criminal sex act charge in the Haley assault and has been resolute in wanting the Oscar-winning studio boss retried on the Mann rape charge. 'The jury was not able to reach a conclusion as to Ms. Mann, and she deserves that,' Bragg said in June. 'This work, first and foremost, is about the survivors and that's why we're prepared to go forward.' Aidala told reporters outside court that, in his view, it's on prosecutors to resolve the rape charge — either by dropping it and clearing the way for sentencing, or promptly taking it to trial again. Weinstein sat in court in a wheelchair while wearing a blue suit and black-rimmed glasses. The 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Shakespeare in Love' producer is committed to fighting the rape charge at another trial, Aidala said, though the lawyer didn't rule out the possibility of reaching a deal with prosecutors to end the case. For now, the trial date remains unresolved, leaving Weinstein's possible Sept. 30 sentencing in limbo. At Weinstein's first trial in 2020, jurors convicted him of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on production assistant and producer Miriam Haley. Then an appeals court overturned those convictions and sent the case back for retrial because of legal issues involving other women's testimony. This spring, a new jury convicted him again of sexually assaulting Haley and acquitted him of doing the same to another woman who wasn't part of the first trial. But amid fractious deliberations, the majority-female jury got stuck on the charge related to Mann. Mann has testified that she also had a consensual, on-and-off relationship with the then-married Weinstein, but that she told him 'I don't want to do this' as he cornered her in the hotel room. She said he persevered with advances and demands until she 'just gave up.'


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Weinstein could be sentenced next month, but only if there's no retrial on an unresolved rape charge
NEW YORK (AP) — Harvey Weinstein faces sentencing and a possible retrial in his New York City sex crimes case, but when they'll happen — and whether he'll be back in front of another jury — is still up in the air. Manhattan Judge Curtis Farber said Wednesday he could sentence Weinstein on Sept. 30 — but only if there's no retrial on a rape charge that the last jury failed to reach a verdict on. Weinstein, 73, was convicted in June of forcing oral sex on TV and movie production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006. The charge carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years in prison. At the same time, the jury acquitted him of forcing oral sex on another woman, one-time model Kaja Sokola, but couldn't decide a charge that he raped hairstylist and actor Jessica Mann in 2013. Manhattan prosecutors told Farber that they're ready to take Weinstein to trial for a third time on the rape charge, which is punishable by up to four years in prison. That's less time than Weinstein has already served. Mann is on board to testify again, they said. Prosecutors requested a January trial date, citing witness availability and their own caseload. Farber balked at that, saying a January date is too far away and conflicts with another, unrelated trial he's already scheduled. He proposed having the trial in the fall. 'The case needs to be tried this year,' Farber said. Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala agreed, telling Farber he'd prefer a trial at 'the earliest the court can accommodate us.' Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg said she would ask Mann and other witnesses about their availability for a trial in the fall. If a fall trial happens, it would likely put Weinstein's high-profile #MeToo case back in court as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in the final throes of his reelection bid. Bragg, a first-term Democrat who made prosecuting sex crimes cases a priority, has expressed satisfaction with Weinstein's conviction on a criminal sex act charge in the Haley assault and has been resolute in wanting the Oscar-winning studio boss retried on the Mann rape charge. 'The jury was not able to reach a conclusion as to Ms. Mann, and she deserves that,' Bragg said in June. 'This work, first and foremost, is about the survivors and that's why we're prepared to go forward.' Aidala told reporters outside court that, in his view, it's on prosecutors to resolve the rape charge — either by dropping it and clearing the way for sentencing, or promptly taking it to trial again. Weinstein sat in court in a wheelchair while wearing a blue suit and black-rimmed glasses. The 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Shakespeare in Love' producer is committed to fighting the rape charge at another trial, Aidala said, though the lawyer didn't rule out the possibility of reaching a deal with prosecutors to end the case. For now, the trial date remains unresolved, leaving Weinstein's possible Sept. 30 sentencing in limbo. At Weinstein's first trial in 2020, jurors convicted him of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on production assistant and producer Miriam Haley. Then an appeals court overturned those convictions and sent the case back for retrial because of legal issues involving other women's testimony. This spring, a new jury convicted him again of sexually assaulting Haley and acquitted him of doing the same to another woman who wasn't part of the first trial. But amid fractious deliberations, the majority-female jury got stuck on the charge related to Mann. Mann has testified that she also had a consensual, on-and-off relationship with the then-married Weinstein, but that she told him 'I don't want to do this' as he cornered her in the hotel room. She said he persevered with advances and demands until she 'just gave up.'