Rift deepens within Japan's ruling LDP as Ishiba stays as PM
The LDP held a meeting of lawmakers from both houses of the Diet on Monday, following the loss in the election earlier this month.
Discussions continued for four and a half hours, even though the meeting was originally scheduled to last two hours.
Ishiba said at the meeting that he would do his utmost to see that the agreement reached in tariff negotiations with the United States gets implemented without fail.
He said he should watch over future agricultural policies, social security and tax systems, and he wants to fulfill his responsibility to the state and the Japanese people and avoid creating a political vacuum.
LDP Secretary-General Moriyama Hiroshi expressed readiness to clarify his responsibility for the election results when a report analyzing them is drawn up.
More than 60 out of about 240 participants commented during the meeting. Some showed support for Ishiba staying in power, but others disputed it.
One said Ishiba's intention goes against the opinion shown by voters in the election and creates a political vacuum, and is calling on him to step down after the party finishes its election analysis. Others called for a snap party presidential election.
After the meeting, Ishiba said he will make a proper decision based on various opinions, but reiterated his intention to remain in office, saying that he would fulfill responsibilities that should be fulfilled.
Meanwhile, the party leadership plans to convene a meeting of executives on Tuesday to favorably discuss holding the LDP Joint Plenary Meeting, for which mainly mid-ranking and young lawmakers are petitioning.
The gathering is the party's decision-making meeting, and those who want Ishiba to resign are trying to step up pressure on him by holding it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
4 hours ago
- NHK
LDP executives to hold decision-making Joint Plenary Meeting soon
Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party has decided to convene a key decision-making meeting soon. The move comes as Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, who heads the party, faces pressure to take responsibility for the LDP's losses in the recent Upper House election. Ishiba and other LDP executives decided on Tuesday to hold the Joint Plenary Meeting of both houses of the Diet. Ishiba referred to harsh criticism of him at a meeting of party lawmakers the previous day. He said he will accept the opinions in good faith, and make appropriate decisions on the management of the party and his administration. LDP Secretary-General Moriyama Hiroshi later told reporters that party members have called for the Joint Plenary to be held, and such calls should be respected. The party's mid-ranked and young lawmakers have been collecting signatures to seek the Joint Plenary. Moriyama said it is possible to convene the meeting without going through such procedures. Moriyama said the Chair of the Joint Plenary will listen to the opinions of the lawmakers who have been calling for the meeting. Asked if the Joint Plenary could decide to bring forward the date of the party's presidential election, Moriyama said the issue is extremely complicated. He suggested that the party's presidential election management committee would be involved in the issue.
NHK
5 hours ago
- NHK
US survey: 35% of Americans say US atomic bombings justified
A recent US survey has found that Americans have mixed views about whether their country's use of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Pew Research Center surveyed about 5,000 people aged 18 or older between June 2 and 8, ahead of next month's 80th anniversary of the bombings of the two Japanese cities. The results were released on Monday. Thirty-five percent of the respondents said the bombings were justified, while 31 percent said they were not. Thirty-three percent said they were not sure. The approval rate was higher for older Americans. Among respondents aged 65 or older, 48 percent said the bombings were justified. The figure was 40 percent for those aged 50 to 64, followed by 29 percent for those aged 30 to 49, and 27 percent for those 18 to 29. By contrast, the number of respondents who said the bombings were not justified was higher among younger age groups, including 44 percent for those aged 18 to 29. The survey also asked Americans whether the development of nuclear weapons has made the world safer. Sixty-nine percent of respondents said it has made the world less safe, far exceeding the 10 percent who said the world has become safer.
Japan Times
6 hours ago
- Japan Times
Who buys the F-150s, and more Japan deal mysteries
The long-awaited trade deal between the U.S. and Japan has investors celebrating after months of uncertainty. But as the song goes, nagging questions always remain. Who is going to buy the "cars, SUVs and trucks' that U.S. President Donald Trump has promised to sell? Who is going to purchase the 100 Boeing jets? And what possible structure could the $550 billion fund, allegedly financed by Tokyo with 90% of profits going to U.S., actually take? Answers are sorely needed, not just because of an already growing comprehension gap between the countries over what was actually agreed, but to inform South Korea, the European Union and other close U.S. allies who are trying to wrap up similar deals before Aug. 1. Let's start with autos, long the main source of Trump's dissatisfaction with Tokyo, as well as the largest single cause of the trade deficit. The White House fact sheet (if indeed it can so be called) declared that "long-standing restrictions on U.S. cars and trucks will be lifted, granting U.S. automakers access to the Japanese consumer market.' Of course, U.S. carmakers have enjoyed unlimited access to the Japanese market for decades. As I noted in April, the problem is that U.S. cars just aren't good enough for the local consumer — and Detroit largely isn't interested in trying to muscle its way into a hyper-competitive market dominated by domestic players. Tokyo can try making it a little easier to import U.S. vehicles, such as simplifying inspection procedures. But it can't rebuild cities to fit the bloated models U.S. automakers favor. Around 84% of streets in Japan are municipal roads with an average width of just 3.7 meters (about 12 feet). Even if Tokyo gave everyone a Ford F-150 pickup, its 2.4-meter width would prevent two from passing on narrow streets. Hence cute minivans and kei-cars dominate while, as my colleague Liam Denning said this week, "U.S. automakers do not, in general, make an adorable little anything.' In any case, Japan's auto market has been shrinking for years, with new cars sold down about 20% from a 1990s peak. Automakers constantly fret that young people are losing interest in learning to drive, while the growing numbers of elderly citizens are encouraged to return their licenses. But more significant is what form the $550 billion investment fund will take. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the "innovative financing mechanism' was the key to Tokyo getting a deal at all. But neither side seems to agree on what it looks like. The idea first surfaced in May when the Financial Times reported that SoftBank Group founder Masayoshi Son had suggested a joint sovereign wealth fund. The White House calls it an "investment vehicle' that will "rebuild and expand core American industries.' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, however, refers to a combination of equity, loans and guarantees that will be led by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and guarantees by Nippon Export and Investment Insurance. That sounds more like overseas development aid than a wealth fund — though few could argue American infrastructure might actually benefit from that. Trump now promises Japan will "give us 90% of $550 billion!' Tokyo is saying that applies to projects where 90% of investment is from the U.S. — in other words, profits are proportional. Does the figure include funding already pledged, such as SoftBank's promised $100 billion? Who knows?! Indeed, a leaked photo from the talks shows what looks like a proposal from Japan for a $400 billion fund, crossed out with $500 billion handwritten on top. That proposal also suggested a 50% profit share. Is this just repackaged existing spending into a simple PowerPoint slide? After all, Japan already invested $783 billion in the U.S. in 2023 and Ishiba pledged in January to boost that to $1 trillion in the future. The problem is that at some stage, this needs to be worked into actual policies. And this is where Ishiba's rush to agreement might come back to bite, especially if he's no longer in the job when the talks get down to details — something that, despite his denials, still seems all but certain after the drubbing his Liberal Democratic Party took in recent Upper House elections. There are plenty of parts of the deal that do make sense. The 100 Boeings can find a home at the country's airlines, though Japan has admitted the number includes at least some already-planned purchases. As the world's largest buyer of liquid natural gas, Tokyo's participation in the Alaska project always seemed logical. Even if the two sides don't seem to agree on what they decided on defense, Japan needs to spend more and the U.S. is the logical seller. Above all, it's encouraging to see the White House, after all these months of tense relations, again describe its ally as the "cornerstone of peace in the Indo-Pacific.' But with all these questions — and Washington continuing to hold the threat over Japan's head with a quarterly evaluation of its compliance with the deal — the market's sigh of relief might still be premature. Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas.
