LDP executives to hold decision-making Joint Plenary Meeting soon
The move comes as Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, who heads the party, faces pressure to take responsibility for the LDP's losses in the recent Upper House election.
Ishiba and other LDP executives decided on Tuesday to hold the Joint Plenary Meeting of both houses of the Diet.
Ishiba referred to harsh criticism of him at a meeting of party lawmakers the previous day. He said he will accept the opinions in good faith, and make appropriate decisions on the management of the party and his administration.
LDP Secretary-General Moriyama Hiroshi later told reporters that party members have called for the Joint Plenary to be held, and such calls should be respected.
The party's mid-ranked and young lawmakers have been collecting signatures to seek the Joint Plenary. Moriyama said it is possible to convene the meeting without going through such procedures.
Moriyama said the Chair of the Joint Plenary will listen to the opinions of the lawmakers who have been calling for the meeting.
Asked if the Joint Plenary could decide to bring forward the date of the party's presidential election, Moriyama said the issue is extremely complicated.
He suggested that the party's presidential election management committee would be involved in the issue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
15 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Japan must pass relief bill for WWII civilian air raid victims on 80th anniv.
The Japanese government has yet to provide relief to people who suffered damage from air raids and other atrocities across the country during the Pacific War, and the Diet once again failed to act on this issue during the ordinary session that closed in late June. These people are victims of a war initiated by the state. Nevertheless, the government has done nothing to compensate them. Such absurdities can no longer be left unaddressed. A cross-party group of lawmakers drew up a bill over the issue. It includes a uniform lump-sum payment of 500,000 yen (approx. $3,300) to those who suffered physical and psychological wounds and disabilities. The bill also incorporates a fact-finding survey by the government over the damage wrought by air raids. Due to stalled coordination within the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, where some lawmakers have strong reservations, the multiparty parliamentary group was unable to submit the bill to the Diet. The victims of aerial bombings and other damage were significantly disappointed, as they had hoped for legislation this year, the 80th anniversary of the war's end. The Japanese government has paid pension and other benefits to former military personnel and civilian military employees, as well as their bereaved families. However, it has not compensated other civilians except for survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The rhetoric employed to justify this was the "doctrine of endurance obligation" -- that members of the public must equally endure sacrifices and damage from the war. The Supreme Court in 1987 tapped this doctrine to dismiss a lawsuit over the great Nagoya air raids of late World War II, and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba recently stated in response to a Diet question that this precedent cannot be contravened. There have, however, been changes in the judiciary's line of thought. In lawsuits filed in 2007 and 2008 by victims of the 1945 Great Tokyo Air Raids, the court did not cite the endurance doctrine as a reason for ruling against the plaintiffs, and urged a solution through legislation. Regardless, the government has been slow to act. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare has emphasized a 2005 agreement by the government and ruling parties that all postwar settlement measures would end with a project to provide consolation gifts to former Siberian labor camp internees. Yet a system to pay special benefits to former Siberian internees was later established. The agreement cannot serve as a basis for denying any new postwar compensation programs. The government's stance seems to betray its true concern: That providing relief to strategic bombing victims could expand the scope of compensation. The cross-party bill does not cover bereaved families and war orphans, because it prioritizes Diet passage over truly sufficient provisions -- a painful decision by the victims of air raids and other wartime damage. While those entitled to the lump-sum payments was expected to be around 4,600 people five years ago when the bill's outline was drafted, the number has now dwindled to about 3,200. As the victims age, we have no time to lose. The relief bill must be passed swiftly into law.
Japan Times
15 hours ago
- Japan Times
Is this the end of Japan's 'big tent' parties?
In Japan's recent Upper House election, four traditional parties — the Liberal Democratic Party, Komeito, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan and the Japanese Communist Party — suffered the most significant losses. The LDP and Komeito together lost 24 seats, saw a sharp drop in the national vote and lost their Upper House majority. The CDP lost one seat but, as the largest opposition party, still placed a surprising fourth with just 12.5% of the national vote. The JCP lost four seats. The LDP and the CDP are considered the "big tent" parties because both have clear conservative and liberal wings. The big winners of the day were newer conservative parties — the Democratic Party for the People, Sanseito and the Conservative Party of Japan — along with the far-left Reiwa Shinsengumi. Sanseito picked up 14 seats and finished third with 12.55% of the national vote. The DPP gained 12 seats and placed second with 12.88%. The CPJ, contesting its first election, won two seats, and Reiwa added one. If you add the national vote totals by conservative leaning and liberal leaning, you find something quite interesting. Conservative parties gathered over over 35 million votes, while liberal parties only gathered around 17 million. Most commentary in Japan speaks in terms of the ruling parties versus the opposition. But there is an argument that the current turmoil in Japanese politics comes from the fact that the LDP and CDP lack clear policies because they constantly try to balance the conflicting views of their conservative and liberal wings. Today's Japanese voters are seeking clarity on issues vital to them, not an outdated homogenized message. The LDP and CDP are losing to newer parties that have clear policies and sharper messaging. Some advocates of political reform in Japan lament the fact that the country's opposition parties are unable to coordinate their activities effectively to defeat the ruling LDP-Komeito coalition. A coalition of the opposition, comprising strongly conservative parties alongside extreme liberal parties, has always been more challenging to manage than even the traditional big tent parties. It is no wonder that they cannot coordinate an election strategy after the most recent Upper House election or agree whether to file a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, which they are struggling with today. Of course, there is no credibility that they could run a government. Other reformers have complained that Japan lacks a system of rotating ruling parties between the conservative and liberal camps. Perhaps that is what comes next if the big tent parties break up. Is that conceivable? After losing three primary elections in the past 10 months under the leadership of Ishiba, there is now a war under way within the LDP to force him to resign. With the full support of the liberal wing, Ishiba won the LDP leadership role in 2024, which handed him the prime ministerial chair, an inconceivable event had conservative wing leader Shinzo Abe not been murdered in 2022. Ishiba's election came on the heels of what should have been a minor political funds reporting scandal that involved members of the conservative wing. However, even former Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's group had reporting issues. Since then, the liberal wing, first under Kishida and then Ishiba, has used the scandal at every opportunity to sideline conservative members. The conservative wing is ready to revolt if Ishiba refuses to resign and accept accountability. So, while not certain, the LDP is as close as it has been since 1955 to a split. CDP members have never really gotten along, given all the splits and mergers since the party emerged from the remnants of the Democratic Party of Japan. Before the recent election, public accusations and demands from former party leaders that others should leave the party surfaced. The CDP now seems ripe for more change. A recent poll by the Yomiuri of all the opposition parties' preferences for the next prime minister, assuming they came from the LDP, might provide some insight. Sanae Takaichi of the LDP's conservative wing was the favorite among members of the more conservative parties such as the DPP, Sanseito and the CDP. Ishiba seemed more popular among the members of the liberal parties. Birds of a feather? The Yomiuri poll is interesting on two fronts: It may signal how feasible it will be for Ishiba, assuming he remains, to create a new ruling coalition with the addition of one of the conservative parties, an absolute necessity now that he has lost the majority in both houses of the parliament. Would Takaichi not find it easier? Secondly, it also signals how feasible it would be for a Takaichi-led conservative wing of the LDP, not only to split off from the LDP, but also to assemble a new majority under a new conservative party banner made up of the four conservative parties and perhaps a conservative group that splits off from the CDP. After the election results, Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya suggested that the LDP is losing power because no one can understand what the LDP stands for anymore, given the differing views of the conservative and liberal wings. The same thing could be said for the CDP. Perhaps the era of big tent parties has come to an end and a realignment along ideological lines is where Japanese politics is headed. Edo Naito is a commentator on Japanese politics, law and history. He is a retired international business attorney and has held board of director and executive positions at several U.S. and Japanese multinational companies.
Yomiuri Shimbun
16 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Extraordinary Diet Session Kicks Off; Opposition Parties Call for Clarification on Japan-U.S. Tariff Agreement
The 218th extraordinary Diet session convened Friday. It is the first Diet session since last month's House of Councillors election, where the ruling coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito lost its majority in the upper house, having already done so in the House of Representatives last year. Elections for the upper house's president and vice president were held. As is custom, the president was picked from the largest member party, and the vice president was picked from the largest opposition party. LDP lawmaker Masakazu Sekiguchi was reappointed as upper house president at the plenary session on Friday and Tetsuro Fukuyama from the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan was elected vice president. The session will last for five days until Tuesday. This post-election session is normally limited to such formalities as the house presidential and vice presidential elections. At a request from opposition parties, however, discussions on the Japan-U.S. tariff agreement will be held during the current session at the budget committees of the lower house on Monday and of the upper house on Tuesday. At the committees, Ishiba and economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa will explain the details of the agreement and the course of the negotiations. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said Friday at a press conference, 'We will thoroughly explain our policies including on the Japan-U.S. tariff agreement and respond sincerely to the Diet deliberations.' Bill on gasoline tax submitted Seven opposition parties jointly submitted a bill to the lower house Friday to scrap the provisional add-on gasoline tax rate. The ruling and opposition parties have agreed to abolish the tax rate within this year and plan to pass the bill at the extraordinary session scheduled for autumn, instead of voting on it at the current session. Under the terms of the bill, the add-on gasoline tax rate of ¥25.1 per liter would be abolished from Nov. 1. The seven parties that submitted the bill were the CDPJ, the Japan Innovation Party, the Democratic Party for the People, the Japanese Communist Party, Sanseito, the Conservative Party of Japan and the Social Democratic Party.
