
Starmer hails ‘common sense' EU deal as Brexiteers condemn ‘surrender'
But the Prime Minister faced accusations of betraying Brexit over the extension of fishing rights for European vessels for a further 12 years and closer ties to EU rules.
Sir Keir met European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa at a summit in Lancaster House, London, to seal the deal.
The Prime Minister said: 'It's time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.
'We're ready to work with partners if it means we can improve people's lives here at home.
'So that's what this deal is all about – facing out into the world once again, in the great tradition of this nation.
'Building the relationships we choose, with the partners we choose, and closing deals in the national interest. Because that is what independent, sovereign nations do.'
Measures include:
– A 12-year extension of fishing arrangements when the current deal ends, allowing European vessels to operate in UK waters under the same terms until 2038.
– An open-ended new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement to slash red tape on food and drink exports and imports between the UK and EU.
– Some routine checks on plant and animal products will be removed completely and British burgers and sausages will once more be allowed into the EU.
– Linking UK and EU emissions-trading schemes which will mean British firms will not be hit by Brussels' carbon tax next year.
– A security and defence partnership will pave the way for UK arms firms to bid for work under the EU's proposed new £150 billion security action for Europe (Safe) fund.
– The UK and EU have agreed to co-operate on a 'youth experience scheme', but British officials insisted numbers would be capped and stays would be time-limited.
– British steel exports will be protected from new EU rules and restrictive tariffs, saving the beleaguered industry £25 million.
In striking the deal, the Prime Minister has had to balance the Government's desperate search for measures to grow the economy with the backlash he will inevitably face from Brexit-supporting voters and political opponents.
The deal requires 'dynamic alignment' – the UK following rules set by Brussels – in areas covering the SPS deal, emissions trading and potential co-operation in the electricity market.
That would mean the UK complying with rules over which, outside the EU, it would have a very limited influence.
The acceptance of some form of youth mobility programme, allowing young EU citizens to live, work and study in the UK and vice versa, has been politically controversial because of the Government's drive to cut net migration.
Officials insisted the scheme being proposed would not breach the Government's red line of not allowing the return of free movement, pointing to similar deals with Australia and New Zealand.
The 'reset' deal also respects the Government's other red lines of not returning to the customs union or single market, officials said.
But Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'We're becoming a rule-taker from Brussels once again.
'And with no details on any cap or time limits on youth mobility, fears of free movement returning will only increase. This is very concerning.'
Shadow farming minister Robbie Moore accused Sir Keir of 'surrendering access to our British waters to European fishermen'.
'Whose side is he on? When Labour negotiates, Britain loses,' he added.
Reform UK's Nigel Farage said the 12-year deal on access for European boats 'will be the end of the fishing industry'.
Mr Farage's deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'Labour surrenders. Brussels bureaucrats win again.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
5 minutes ago
- Spectator
Who's on JD Vance's Cotswolds guest list?
Well, well, well. The US Vice President has taken a family trip to the UK this summer, to enjoy a stay at an 18th-century Georgian manor in the Cotswolds. But although this getaway was supposed to provide some leisure time for JD Vance, the VP has made space to meet with a stream of British politicians and, er, at least one wannabe politico. So who is on Vance's guest list? First up was Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who took a fishing trip with Donald Trump's second in command at the weekend to discuss the war in Gaza and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick – and onetime Tory leadership contender – met with the Vice President on Tuesday, for a tête-à-tête before a drinks event. Jenrick wasn't the only shadow cabinet member to get the call up, however, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp also invited to see Vance on Tuesday. His boss, Kemi Badenoch has not been so fortunate – although a Conservative spokesperson insisted that the VP and Tory leader 'just couldn't make it work with schedules'. Vance's press secretary, Taylor Van Kirk, added: The Vice-President met with a number of people during his trip to the United Kingdom. He specifically tried to see Kemi Badenoch, a friend of his, but a meeting was not possible due to their conflicting schedules. Any suggestion otherwise is false. That's that then! Reform leader Nigel Farage didn't manage to meet President Trump during his visit to Scotland last month, but he has been luckier this time. The Clacton MP secured an eleventh-hour meet with the VP, and is seeing Vance this morning for breakfast in the Cotswolds. And there's more: Vance met with his friend (and Spectator writer) James Orr on Monday for a barbecue, alongside Tory MP Danny Kruger and, er, even one Thomas Skinner – who befriended Vance online. It's certainly not the first time the Apprentice and MAGA have crossed paths, eh? Bosh.


The Herald Scotland
8 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Coalition push for ministers answers after energy project summit snub
It comes after both Scottish energy secretary Gillian Martin and UK energy minister and Rutherglen MP Michael Shanks 'snubbed' an invitation to attend a summit in Inverness on Tuesday attended by around 300 people. Ms Martin's office told the convention in a letter that "in terms of the ministerial code, it would not be appropriate to discuss matters pertaining to live applications or proposals which could come before a live application for consent". A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero source said Mr Shanks had turned the convention down as planning of development was devolved to the Scottish Government, although the convention wanted to talk about policy. The convention's 'unified statement' calls for a pause on all major applications, " given the impact upon our communities which may hasten depopulation in some areas until a clear national energy policy is in place and an economic impact assessment is undertaken given that tourism is currently the backbone of The Highland economy". It opposes "unjust and unnecessary industrialisation of the Highlands" and says the Scottish Government should undertake an inquiry to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments. The group also called on elected members to urgent support and protect communities at national level "given that community consultation is inadequate and local democracy is being overridden..." The group of 11 MPs and MSPs have now signed off on an undertaking to move to secure parliamentary debates on the statement. There were estimated to be 700 live applications in the Highland Council area alone earlier this month ranging from wind and hydro projects to energy storage and transmission grid plans. The signed agreement (Image: Helen Crawford) Highland councillor Helen Crawford, who is chairman community council convention and is a former lawyer said parliamentary debates would force ministers to defend policies. "This is a way to get ministers to address the issues when they previously have not," said Ms Crawford. "Of course not everyone shares the same view, but this is a growing movement because people want this and need this conversation to happen. "The statement is not perfect. But it's a real attempt to address where the whole process has gone wrong and, let me be frank, this is not simply a local failure, it's a national failure to address what's going on.! She added: "This clearly needs to go to Westminster and it needs to go to Holyrood." Those signing off on the undertaking also included SNP MP Graham Leadbitter, Scottish Conservative MSPs Jamie Halcro Johnston, Edward Mountain, Tim Eagle and Douglas Ross as well as Liberal Democrat MPs Jamie Stone and Angus MacDonald and Independent MSP Fergus Ewing. Among the most controversial of the energy plans is a so-called 'super-pylon' proposal which was to run for over 100 miles across some of Highlands and Aberdeenshire's most picturesque areas to enable 'significant' growth of renewable energy and support transition away from fossil fuels. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks Transmission, which owns, operates and develops the high voltage electricity transmission system in the north of Scotland and islands unveiled the strategy three years ago which it says was a 'critical project of national significance' as it has been identified as 'essential' to deliver government targets for offshore wind. The project at that point was to involve building a new 400kV overhead line connection - or energy motorway - between Beauly, Blackhillock, New Deer and Peterhead to enable the transmission of renewable power into the network for onward transmission to 'areas of demand further south'. Mr Eagle said: "It really is well past time that ministers and other decision-makers in Holyrood started listening to people here in the Highlands. We have been ignored for far too long."


New Statesman
19 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Mothin Ali: 'There's a lot of racism on the left'
Leeds councillor Mothin Ali is set to run for deputy leader of the Green Party. Photograph by Craig Gent, courtesy of Mothin Ali Within weeks of being elected as a Green Party councillor in May 2024, Mothin Ali was criticised for saying Allahu Akhbar ('God is great') in his victory speech, faced down rioters and was targeted by far-right disinformation. It was a very public and literal baptism of fire for the accountant and permaculture gardener who knows that in his garden he can be alone and away from online and offline hassle. Now he wants to become deputy leader of the Green Party. Ali and I speak via Zoom straight after his councillor surgery at the Compton Community Centre in Harehills, West Yorkshire. He seemed weighed down by some of the problems he had heard about, but quickly became energised when talking about the issues. 'Housing's the biggest problem,' he said. Among the people who have been to see him this morning are a family of five living in a two-bed home. It's a common problem, along with disrepair and the long wait for social housing. 'It's just unbelievable,' he said. Ali, 43, represents Gipton and Harehills, a working-class, racially mixed community in the north-east of Leeds. It's where he grew up and first stood as a 'paper' candidate (without a chance of being elected) in 2022. It took Ali two years to turn a meagre 22 per cent of the vote into 52 per cent and a majority of 750 votes driven by a grassroots campaign. 'One thing I think that's missing is that connection between the grassroots activists and the leaders,' Ali said. What he wants for the Greens is to connect their local strength to a 'presence on a national scale in the mainstream media'. He contrasts his party's action-orientated approach to Reform, which is, 'getting the votes from media hype'. 'Inner-city areas feel let down, but for a long time it's been the Labour Party who've had free rein over these areas. And no one's really challenged them,' he said. He dismisses any idea that British people are apathetic: 'People are disenfranchised,' he observed. Ali has recently come under scrutiny for deciding not to sign any internal pledges from the party's various interest groups, particularly the LGBTIQA+ Greens. His reasoning was, firstly, that politicians regularly sign and break these types of pledge so they are not an effective way to effect change and, secondly, that pledges can subvert the party's member-led policy process. This stance prompted criticism and praise from inside and outside the party, much of which incorrectly assumed that he was unsupportive of LGBT rights when he is on the record expressing support for these communities. Amid the discussion online, Adnan Hussain, independent MP for Blackburn asked on X, 'Is there space on the left to create a broad enough church to allow Muslims an authentic space, just as it does all other minority groups?' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe 'First and foremost, I've got to say I'm an unapologetic Muslim. I make no apology for who I am,' Ali said when I asked him if there is a place for practising Muslims in progressive spaces. 'A lot of our [Islamic] mindset, a lot of our thinking is predominantly left wing. It's predominantly socialist based,' he responded, 'we've got a lot of natural home here. 'But, just as the racists exist on the right, they exist on the left – and that's a conversation that's very rarely had.' Ali said that one prominent Green Party member described him of being 'sinister' while another said it was right to be 'suspicious' of Muslims. These are, frankly, not uncommon attitudes in British society, but Ali highlights how the Green Party does not yet have an anti-racism policy – something that he and others hope to change at the Party's autumn conference. 'There's a lot of that [racism] that goes on in left-wing spheres that, because it's done with a level of politeness and a level of niceness, it's not that visceral hate that you get on the right,' he said. At a protest outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in Leeds earlier this month, Ali encountered some of that visceral hate when was challenged on camera by far-right activists. It's a compelling watch as he calmly engages with the 'auditor' and puts across his points defending asylum seekers, migrants and refugees. 'Someone was actually swearing at me while I was having the conversation,' he remembered. 'I think it's important to be empathetic,' Ali said. 'They're looking for answers, looking for hope as well. And what they've found or what they've been fed is a narrative where immigrants are to blame or Muslims are to blame.' Ali believes the far right can be countered through dialogue. 'We've got to create a safe space where people can discuss things,' he said. 'So people can have robust discussions. They don't have to agree on everything. We can't all think the same.' In the aftermath of the riots in his ward last year, sparked by the removal into foster care of four Roma children, Ali organised a series of meetings to help the different communities hear and understand each other and the challenges they had. 'We created a space where there was understanding, where we're going to have some positives out of it,' he said. It's an approach Ali has used recently to gather opinion on the more quotidian local issue of roadworks, but reflects his belief that people have to be more directly involved in the decisions that affect them. His other method to bridge divides is doing the practical work of community activism. Ali recounts knocking on the door of a man who swiftly dismissed him, using the P-word for good measure. Instead of walking away, Ali pressed for the reasons why this person was so unhappy. 'His problem was fly-tipping and some anti-social behaviour,' Ali explained. The councillor got the fly-tipping cleared and went back to see him, but he was 'still very angry'. Months went by and Ali went back for another chat to see how things were going. This time the conversation was more 'civilised', Ali recalled. After election day the man told Ali that he had voted for him. 'That's how we change hearts and minds,' Ali said. [See also: Visions of an English civil war] Related