Leading Pakistan rights group decries government crackdown – DW – 07/26/2025
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), an independent civil rights group, has warned that its operations are being affected due to pressure from Pakistani authorities.
"In the past few months, HRCP has faced a series of arbitrary, illegal and unjustified actions that have impeded the organization's ability to carry out its mandate," the commission said in a statement released earlier in July.
Harris Khalique, HRCP's secretary-general, told DW that the group has been facing "unprecedented pressure."
"Authorities prevent us from organizing events and create disruptions. They have sealed the HRCP's Lahore office, frozen our bank accounts, claiming it is involved in commercial activities, and have blocked our electricity meters while issuing inflated bills," he said.
Events organized in various cities were obstructed, and staff received threatening phone calls warning them against discussing topics considered sensitive.
"We are against both violence and militancy. Individuals claiming to represent security agencies, along with those identifying as officials from the Interior Ministry, are threatening our female staff," said Khalique.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The HRCP was co-founded in 1987 by late lawyer and activist Asma Jahangir, former Supreme Court Justice Dorab Patel and former Air Force Chief of Staff Zafar Chaudhry. It has since grown into Pakistan's leading human rights organization.
The HRCP has consistently acted as an independent and credible advocate for civil liberties, both within Pakistan and on the global stage. Amid pressure from authorities, the HRCP has voiced significant concern regarding the increasingly shrinking space for human rights advocacy in Pakistan.
The security situation in Pakistan has deteriorated in recent years, with militant attacks occurring regularly. In the southwest, security forces are engaged in a long-standing conflict with Baloch separatist militants.
Pakistan's foremost opposition party, Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), was not allowed to contest the 2024 election as a party, resulting in violent protests and a crackdown on its members and supporters. Khan remains imprisoned on various charges, which his party has said are politically motivated.
The government has denied pressuring the HRCP, and says it is taking measures to ensure security.
"The standard operating procedures are in place for events due to security concerns and there are ongoing protests in the country. We have put no restrictions on freedom of expression, " Talal Chaudhry, state minister of interior, told DW.
Chaudhry added that "online events are also being conducted without any limitations, and the state is not restricting them."
But Hina Jilani, a human rights advocate and member of the HRCP's council, disputes this claim.
"The government is employing tactics to silence the group activities. Our events are being obstructed and there are efforts to introduce laws that could impact our finances, hindering our ability to carry out the work," she told DW.
Jilani cited two examples of the government placing bureaucratic hurdles that prevented an HRCP community outreach event from taking place in the northern Gilgit-Baltistan region, and a roundtable discussion in Islamabad focused on the human rights situation in northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and southwestern Balochistan province.
Jilani said the government crackdown threatens the "HRCP's autonomy and poses a significant risk to the human rights of the people of Pakistan."
The human rights situation in Pakistan remains marked by inadequate judicial protection and rising authoritarianism.
According to Amnesty International's 2024 report on Pakistan, authorities "weaponized laws" on defamation and hate speech as the security situation deteriorated amid militant attacks.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Amnesty cited dozens of examples of legal measures to suppress opposition parties, particularly targeting Imran Khan's PTI following protests in May 2023. More than 80 people were imprisoned in connection with the protests after "secret trials."
Freedom of the press and freedom of assembly have also been severely curtailed.
"Enforced disappearances continued unabated, targeting journalists, activists, students, comedians, political opponents and families of political opponents," the Amnesty report said.
In 2024, Pakistan's democracy ranking fell six places, placing it among the "top 10 worst performers" in the Democracy Index released by the Economist Intelligence Unit.
Independent media outlets are facing increasing pressure, censorship and economic hardship. Social media platforms are often restricted during protests or political events.
"Pakistan has become a completely authoritarian regime, there are no courts, there is no media, they have broken the civil society," Imaan Mazari, a rights activist and lawyer, told DW.
"The human rights situation in Pakistan is deplorable and effectively we are living in a martial law," she added.
However, HRCP leader Khalique remains optimistic and said the commission will continue its work and "persist in efforts to advocate for the rights of the people of Pakistan."
On pressure from the government, Khalique said he hopes for more cooperation in the future.
"We are critical friends, not adversaries, and we aspire for a healthy society and a strong country," he said. "We are an independent organization that strives to remain neutral and evidence based. We cannot compromise our integrity."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
a few seconds ago
- DW
Taiwan imagines a Chinese invasion with TV and games – DW – 08/07/2025
Taiwanese creatives are creating fictional, yet plausible, depictions of a Chinese invasion. Some say the imaginary scenarios are helpful, others say they only create fear. A new Taiwanese series about a fictional Chinese invasion has sparked heated debate after its Saturday premiere topped drama rankings on public TV and multiple streaming platforms. The ten-episode drama titled "Zero Day Attack" is set in 2028, imagining China using a missing warplane as a pretext to launch a blockade when a newly elected Taiwanese president is about to take office. Some viewers praised the show for helping "every Taiwanese understand how the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] infiltrates us," while others accused it of "selling a sense of national doom." Taiwan is a self-governing democracy that Beijing claims is part of China, with the CCP vowing to "reunify" with the mainland by using force if necessary. For years, Taiwanese filmmakers largely avoided cross-strait conflict plots to avoid jeopardizing access to China's lucrative media market. Yu-Hui Tai, an associate professor of political economics of communication at National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University in Taiwan, said a trend is emerging where imagining a Chinese invasion is no longer taboo. "[The trend] reflects how we've broken the spiral of silence," she told DW. "It's gone from something we didn't want to talk about to something we can now imagine and even simulate." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Witnessing the severity of the war in Ukraine, I felt that if we didn't address this topic now, there might never be another chance," showrunner and screenwriter Cheng Hsin-mei told DW, adding that production on Zero Day Attack began in late 2022, the same year Russia invaded Ukraine. Taiwan has emerged as one of the globe's most contentious flashpoints as China intensifies its military presence in the region, and carries out regular exercises around the island. While most democratic countries including the United States — Taiwan's largest security backer – adhere to the "One-China Policy," which means they do not officially recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, they oppose any unilateral attempts by either side to change the current status quo. In May, Zero-Day Attack premiered at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit in Denmark, where it received a standing ovation. The series is also set to premiere at a debut event in Washington, DC in September and launch on a Japanese streaming platform in mid‑August. But before the series officially aired, its trailer already sparked controversy domestically. With about half the series' budget coming from government subsidies, Taiwan's main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) accused the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of using public funds to promote a "sense of national doom" — a charge echoed by many KMT supporters. Cheng responded that government subsidies are common for most local film and TV projects, arguing that "the sense of national doom" comes from "the reality that a powerful authoritarian regime continually warns it will not abandon the use of force against Taiwan." Unlike typical war dramas filled with epic battle scenes, Zero Day Attack focuses on Taiwan's internal struggles amid a potential war, portraying the political divisions and chaos on the island. The concept was developed through research and consultation with national security experts, Cheng said, as "modern warfare relies on various forms of infiltration to sow fear or prompt surrender." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Like the TV series, games that aim to bring about awareness and knowledge of China's political infiltration strategies have also emerged on the market. Earlier this year, the board game 2045 was officially released after a successful crowdfunding campaign. The game simulates a Chinese military attack in 2045, following which Taiwan divides into six different forces including self-defense units and pro-unification groups. Another board game even turned the story idea into a mobile game called Reversed Front. It created a virtual "Oriental Continent" that allows players to infiltrate the Chinese Communist Party from Taiwan, Hong Kong, or other surrounding areas. In June, Hong Kong authorities banned the mobile game for allegedly "violating the National Security Law." The ban, however, only fueled a surge in downloads. "We aim to present a realistic picture of the political landscape in East Asia," said Johnny, the spokesperson of Reversed Front, who used a pseudonym given the sensitivity of the topic. "Regardless of the threat or methods of infiltration from Beijing, we hope Taiwan can learn how to take countermeasures," he told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, concerns about the psychological impact of these works have grown, with critics warning they could increase public anxiety. A Taiwanese board game store told DW that while most customers visit to unwind and relax, playing 2045 can leave some feeling emotionally strained or under pressure. "There will inevitably be anxiety," said Tammy Lin, a distinguished professor at Taiwan's National Chengchi University who studies digital games and media psychology. "For Taiwan, this is a nightmare‑level topic that people would rather not mention or confront," she told DW. Tai, the professor for political economy of communication, said it is natural for the films and games to evoke a spectrum of emotions, given Taiwan's deep partisan divides over cross‑strait relations. "How we facilitate dialogue among these differing emotions instead of letting them clash is a real test of Taiwanese wisdom," she said. Tai also noted that Beijing is likely to see these TV shows and games as Taiwanese public sentiment drifting further away from China, which could prompt the Chinese government to "intensify its ideological efforts." China's Defense Ministry has already criticized Zero Day Attack, calling it a politically motivated production aimed at "forcing compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait into conflict and to harm and ruin one another." "Division is a fertile ground for information warfare and fake news," Tai said, "The question is: do we want to create fear or foster rational dialogue?" To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
a few seconds ago
- DW
Fact Check: Fake claim of UK officers 'captured' in Ukraine – DW – 08/07/2025
A demonstrably made-up story of British military officers being "captured" during a Russian raid in Ukraine has spread online this week, even being repeated by former British lawmakers. DW takes a look. The AI-generated images resemble cheap cartoons, the floating passport covers are illegible and there is no evidence that their alleged holders even exist. Nevertheless, an entirely fabricated story of three British military officers being "captured" in a Russian raid on a Ukrainian naval base has spread online in the past week – even being shared by two former British members of parliament and gaining traction from Norway to Pakistan. DW takes a look at a narrative which bears all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation and the channels via which such stories spread. Claim: "Russian Spetsnaz RAID and capture senior UK officers in Ochakov!" DW Fact Check: False A story appeared in Russian media last week that three British military officers – supposedly two colonels in the British Army and an officer from British military intelligence (MI6) – were captured in a Russian raid on a Ukrainian naval base in the small southern city of Ochakiv (known in Russian as Ochakov). One of the most prominent social media posts (screenshot above) regurgitating the story has accrued almost 500,000 views on X (formerly Twitter), another has almost 400,000 and another has over 222,000. The "colonels" were named as "psychological ops specialist Edward Blake" and "Richard Carroll – a Ministry of Defence official with Middle East experience" who were captured during a "lightning-fast" nighttime raid by elite (special forces) troops in an operation codenamed "Skat-12." A spectacular military and diplomatic coup were it true – which it's not; it's completely made up. As Craig Langford from the specialist UK Defence Journal (UKDJ) analyzed, there is no trace of "Edward Blake" or "Richard Carroll" in any recent British Armed Forces or Ministry of Defence (MoD) records. "In short, there is no proof these individuals exist, let alone that they were captured," wrote Langford, while a spokesman for the MoD refused to even acknowledge the story when asked by DW. What's more, four different images used to illustrate the story across various media outlets and social media channels don't only depict six different men (who don't exist); they have also demonstrably been generated using artificial intelligence. The AI image detection tool SightEngine puts the probability of the four images being AI-generated at between 91% and 99%, but obvious visual errors suffice: cartoonish faces, oversized limbs, upside-down rifles, illegible passport covers, gibberish documents and an officer's cap missing its peak. "The uniforms worn by the kneeling men also reveal the image as a fake," explained Langford for the UKDJ, referring to one of the main image at the top of this article, which appeared in some of the fake reporting. "While the camouflage superficially resembles British Army patterns, the details are wrong. Military clothing follows strict patterns and standards, especially in operational environments, and these deviations suggest that the uniforms were generated based on visual approximations rather than real references." But this didn't stop the story from appearing in several Russian outlets (here, here and here) before being reproduced in English on the Kremlin-controlled and Serbia's state-owned . DW is banned in Russia but B92 didn't respond to a request for comment on why they ran the story. For Roman Osadchuk, Director of Threat Intelligence at LetsData and Non-Resident Fellow at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, the whole story is typical of a Russian disinformation operation. "The Kremlin effectively has sub-contractors such as the Social Design Agency or Storm 15-16 who will have groups of people conceiving stories and drawing up options for dissemination," he tells DW from Kyiv, Ukraine. "The idea is simple: seed it on fringe or fake websites, forward it via Telegram channels until more outlets pick it up and begin to cite each other, a process known as media laundering. Then more mature Telegram channels with more followers will pick it up, and finally mainstream Russian media kick in, and the echo chamber grows. Then, there's a chance that certain foreign actors will pick it up." Indeed, the story soon found mouthpieces in western Europe, including the Norwegian communist and conspiracy theorist Pal Steigan – who later retracted the story after recognizing that it was "poorly fact-checked on our part." In the United Kingdom, the story was amplified by former members of parliament George Galloway – who worked as a presenter on the Russian state-owned RT broadcaster for nine years until 2022 and has blamed NATO and the West for Russia's invasion of Ukraine – and Andrew Bridgen, who was expelled from the center-right Conservative Party in 2023 for tweeting that the use of COVID-19 vaccines was "the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust." While DW approached both Galloway (who has over 825,000 followers on X) and Bridgen (over 300,000) for comment, requests which have gone unanswered, the story even made it as far as Pakistan. According to Osadchuk, the target audience abroad is "disgruntled people who believe that 'the mainstream media won't publish this.'" But he thinks the bigger audience is actually inside Russia itself, "to show Russians how mighty the military is." This is supported by an element of the story which would likely strike a greater chord among Russian readers than elsewhere; the idea of the United Kingdom as a shadowy geopolitical operator. "A key trope of Russian propaganda is that the 'Anglo-Saxons' are puppeteers conducting the war," explains Osadchuk. "It's the trope of the external enemy. It's not Ukraine resisting; the British must be behind it. The British in particular are often considered responsible for military intelligence and covert operations, hence the claim that they captured a 'psychological operations officer' specifically." So, when confronted with intentionally erroneous stories such as this, how best to respond? Is it best to simply ignore them to prevent them spreading? Or does there come a point when some engagement is necessary? "We can ignore disinformation until certain thresholds, which vary according to topic, platform and country," advises Roman Osadchuk. "If it's just a crazy comment beneath a social media post with five views, then just ignore it. But if a story starts to be disseminated on multiple platforms or if, in this case, former members of a country's parliament are sharing it, it starts to become more substantial and should be debunked."
DW
31 minutes ago
- DW
Ukraine updates: Zelenskyy calls for talks with Putin – DW – 08/07/2025
Ukraine's president has been seeking a one-on-one meeting with Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin. Meanwhile, Moscow says it is preparing for a meeting between the Russian and US leaders. Follow DW for the Volodymyr Zelenskyy says he wants a direct meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying real solutions can only come from talks between leaders. The push comes after US President Donald Trump's envoy met Putin in Moscow — a meeting Trump called "highly productive." It also follows Zelenskyy's own call with Trump and EU leaders. The Ukrainian president plans further talks with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and others, insisting that Russia must take concrete steps to end the war it started. Meanwhile, the Kremlin says preparations for Trump-Putin summit have to DW's coverage of the latest developments in the Russian war on Ukraine. You join us with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pushing for a direct meeting with Russia's leader, Vladimir Putin, saying meaningful progress can only happen when leaders talk face-to-face. The call came after Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow — a meeting Trump said had produced results, though US sanctions are still on the table. Stay tuned for the latest news and analysis from the ongoing war.
