logo
Trump wants to cut deficits. Powell-bashing, stablecoins, and T-bills could help.

Trump wants to cut deficits. Powell-bashing, stablecoins, and T-bills could help.

Mint6 days ago
President Trump has been waging a campaign to oust Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
What do President Donald Trump's campaign to oust Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, legislation to regulate digital stablecoins, and the Treasury's debt-management practices have to do with one another?
All relate to holding down the rise of the interest cost on federal government debt, a major factor boosting the budget deficit from the recently passed Big Beautiful Bill.
Trump recently posted on Truth Social that if the Federal Reserve would slash its key federal-funds policy rate, now set in a range of 4.25% to 4.5%, by multiple percentage points, it could save the government billions in interest costs.
The yield on Treasury debt has turned higher as notes from the near-zero-interest-rate eras following the 2008-09 financial crisis and the Covid pandemic mature. They will be replaced with notes yielding nearly 4% or higher.
It's true, T-bills could be sold at lower rates if Powell & Co. would acquiesce to Trump's wishes. Meanwhile, BNP Paribas rate strategists Guneet Dhingra, Sebastian Mauleon, and Timothy High wrote recently that the Treasury should take a 'T-bill and chill" tack.
That would produce a 'significant cost saving" for the Treasury. It wouldn't reduce the deficit, but it would reduce the government's interest expense, which is already running at over a $1 trillion annual rate and exceeding the U.S. military budget, as I've noted previously.
The Treasury has kept T-bills to about 15% to 20% of its total issuance, but the BNP strategists argue that the department should think about upping that to 20% to 25%. Demand from money-market funds and overseas investors (buyers of some $336 billion of bills in the latest 12 months) should absorb the increased supply. Fewer notes and bonds, they note, should tend to reduce intermediate- and long-term yields.
Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was criticized for tilting the government's securities sales toward shorter maturities starting in late 2022. One of those critics was Scott Bessent, her successor, who hasn't changed the Treasury's financing mix since taking over this year.
However, Powell has said that the Treasury's financing costs don't enter into the Fed's interest-rate decisions. This past week, Kevin Warsh, widely viewed as a candidate to replace Powell, posited that the Treasury and Fed should coordinate their debt-management policies. 'We need a new Treasury-Fed accord, like we did in 1951 after another period where we built up our nation's debt and we were stuck with a central bank that was working at cross-purposes with the Treasury," he told CNBC.
Tilting Treasury borrowing to the short end is 'stealth QE," according to Dario Perkins, managing director for Global Macro. Quantitative easing describes central bank buying of securities to inject liquidity into the financial system. The idea behind QE is to reduce the supply of long-term government paper available to investors and force them to buy corporate and mortgage debt to stimulate the economy, as former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke explained back in 2010.
QE has mainly served to boost financial markets, Warsh said, as the S&P 500 index and Nasdaq Composite hit records again last week, corporate credit spreads historically narrowed, and initial public offerings picked up. On Main Street, however, credit is tight, owing to the level of short-term rates. (Small businesses borrowing from banks typically pay some spread over the posted prime rate, currently 7.5%.)
Now comes the crypto connection to all of this. The passage this week of the so-called Genius bill sets standards for stablecoins, which are digital currencies pegged to the dollar or another actual currency. Stablecoins would have to be fully collateralized by safe assets, notably U.S. government debt.
That would boost demand for Treasury bills, Torsten Sløk, Apollo Global Management's chief economist, wrote recently. He cites a recent Bank for International Settlements paper that estimates that an aggregate $3.5 billion flowing in stablecoins lowers the three-month T-bill rate by 2.5 basis points in 10 days and five basis points in 20 days. (A basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point.)
Circle July 30 on your calendars to see how these disparate forces come together. The Treasury is due to announce its quarterly financing plans that morning, while the Federal Open Market Committee will announce its rate decision that afternoon, followed by Powell's news conference.
The fed-funds futures market on Friday puts a 95% probability of no interest rate change then, according to the CME FedWatch tool, but Fed Gov. Christopher Waller late on Thursday argued for a quarter-point cut then. That may make him the new front-runner in the race to replace Powell, says Washington watcher Greg Valliere, chief U.S. policy strategist for AGF Investments, although he trails Warsh, Bessent, and Kevin Hassett, head of the National Economic Council, in the Polymarket betting.
Speaking for the likely majority, Fed Gov. Adriana Kugler this past week said no rate reduction is appropriate now, given that the economy is near full employment, inflation remains above the Fed's 2% goal, and tariffs are exerting upward price pressures. Kugler's term runs out in January; her replacement is certain to echo Trump's call for rate cuts.
Write to Randall W. Forsyth at randall.forsyth@barrons.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Volt face
Volt face

Time of India

time10 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Volt face

Grim results of EV makers raise a question about viability The future of mobility is electric, and it should have been here by now, considering that Morris & Salom's Electrobat cars were running on Philadelphia's streets in 1894. In 1909, an electric car beat a gasoline car in Boston's busy traffic by 15 minutes. But electric cars are still at the 25% sales mark globally, and like most averages that figure is misleading. When 70% of all electric cars are made in China, and 65% are sold there, the picture looks distinctly ICE-y – short for internal combustion engine – for the rest of the world. Then consider market leader Tesla's woes. Its quarterly revenue has slumped. Half-yearly sales in Europe are down 33%. But more worrying for it is the drying carbon credits market under Trump. So far, Tesla's made billions selling these credits to makers of ICE cars. It earned $2.1bn from them in just the first nine months of 2024. Tesla also has to worry about the phase-out of the $7,500 tax credit for EV buyers in Sept. Carbon and tax credits are nothing but subsidies for the EV business in US and Europe, and the Chinese EV miracle was also built on subsidies. By some accounts, China spent $231bn over a decade to prop up the industry, which now has spare capacity of 3mn cars, leading to cut-throat competition at home and dumping outside. That raises an important question. If EVs have truly come of age, why do they need state support? In 1900, US had only 8,000 cars. By 1915, there were over 2mn. Henry Ford's Model T – launched for $850 in 1908 and priced at just $300 in 1917, thanks to economies of scale – brought the horseless revolution without any state help. It's time electric cars learnt to stand on their own four wheels. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

American-born babies are American: Judge halts Trump birthright citizenship order
American-born babies are American: Judge halts Trump birthright citizenship order

India Today

time39 minutes ago

  • India Today

American-born babies are American: Judge halts Trump birthright citizenship order

A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration's attempt to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to undocumented or temporary immigrant parents, calling the move unconstitutional and legally ruling by US District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston marks the third federal court to stop the executive order in its tracks since the Supreme Court last month narrowed the authority of lower courts to issue nationwide Sorokin ruled that an exception applied in this case, where more than a dozen states demonstrated real financial harm tied to the order. 'A patchwork approach to the birthright order would not protect the states,' Sorokin wrote, noting the high mobility of residents between states and slamming the administration's failure to explain how a more limited injunction would function.'They have never addressed what renders a proposal feasible or workable The defendants' position in this regard defies both law and logic.'The decision maintains a nationwide injunction that preserves birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, pending further review by the courts. Sorokin added that his ruling is not the final word on the issue, but emphasized the constitutional implications of the executive action.'The President cannot change that legal rule with the stroke of a pen,' Sorokin said. 'Trump and his administration are entitled to pursue their interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment but for purposes of this lawsuit at this juncture, the Executive Order is unconstitutional.'The lawsuit was brought by a coalition of states led by New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin, who hailed the ruling as a critical defence of constitutional norms.'American-born babies are American, just as they have been at every other time in our Nation's history,' Platkin said in a statement. 'I'm thrilled the district court again barred President Trump's flagrantly unconstitutional birthright citizenship order from taking effect anywhere.'Government lawyers had argued that the injunction should be limited in scope to states' financial interests. Still, Sorokin rejected the idea, saying the administration failed to offer any coherent legal or administrative plan for how such limits would is the third time the executive order has been blocked. Earlier this month, a federal judge in New Hampshire prohibited the rule in a class-action lawsuit. That decision went into effect after no appeal was filed. On Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco also ruled against the order, upholding a nationwide injunction.A fourth ruling may be on the way. A Maryland judge said she would issue a similar decision if the appeals court agrees. - EndsWith inputs from Associated Press

Billions in frozen school grants to be released, says Education Department
Billions in frozen school grants to be released, says Education Department

India Today

time39 minutes ago

  • India Today

Billions in frozen school grants to be released, says Education Department

After weeks of uncertainty, the Trump administration said on Friday that it will release billions in previously frozen federal education grants, reversing a July 1 funding freeze that left educators scrambling across the Education Department confirmed it will begin sending the money to states next week, after the White House's Office of Management and Budget completed a review. The freeze had affected over $6 billion earmarked for programs like English language instruction, adult literacy, and summer enrichment activities — sparking lawsuits and bipartisan agreement ends an unnecessary distraction for school leaders and ensures students won't pay the price for political wrangling,' said a Department spokesperson. The freeze, aimed at aligning spending with White House priorities, had alarmed superintendents and nonprofits nationwide. In Maryland's Harford County, the withheld funds accounted for more than half of the budget for the district's annual summer camp for English learners. 'Without the funds, we couldn't have hired certified teachers or kept our summer programs alive,' one district official week, the administration partially reversed course by releasing $1.3 billion for after-school and summer programmes. The rest of the funding — covering everything from bilingual education to teacher development — will now Republican senators had urged the White House to act, calling the programmes 'longstanding' and 'bipartisan.' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito said, 'These programs let parents work while their kids learn. They help adults gain skills and boost local economies.'The Office of Management and Budget had initially argued that some of the affected programmes supported a 'radical left-wing agenda.' But in a sharply worded letter, GOP senators responded, 'We do not believe that is happening with these funds.'Sen. Patty Murray slammed the administration for the delay. 'Because of President Trump, communities across the country were forced to spend their time cutting back on tutoring options and sorting out how many teachers they will have to lay off,' she grants under review included:$2 billion for teacher development and class size reduction$1 billion for academic enrichment, including STEM$890 million for English learners$376 million for migrant education$715 million for adult literacyMajor districts stood to lose millions. Los Angeles Unified received $62 million from these programs in 2022–23. Philadelphia schools got $28 million, and Miami's received over $24 districts also faced big gaps. Schools in Burlington, Vermont; Pine Bluff, Arkansas; and Norristown, Pennsylvania received over $300 per student from the same the funds are finally unlocked, educators across the country are breathing a sigh of relief — and refocusing on classrooms instead of courtrooms- EndsWith inputs from Associated PressMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store