Alberta government appeals injunction of transgender health-care law
Send this page to someone via email
Share this item on Twitter
Share this item via WhatsApp
Share this item on Facebook
Alberta is appealing a temporary injunction of a law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth.
A judge ruled in June that the provincial law raises serious Charter issues that need to be hashed out in an ongoing court challenge of the legislation.
Court of King's Bench Justice Allison Kuntz ruled the law is likely to cause irreparable harm to gender diverse youth and contrary evidence submitted from the province wasn't overwhelming enough.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The government argues the injunction was premature, since the law wasn't fully in effect, and that the judge made a mistake in deciding it would cause irreparable harm.
It has said the law was passed to protect children from making potentially irreversible decisions about their bodies.
Egale Canada, one of the groups challenging the law, says it respects the province's right to appeal but believes the judge made the right decision.
Story continues below advertisement
— More to come…
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
15 hours ago
- Global News
Missing man remembered: 'He was a truly loved person.'
Ahead of Earl Moberg's celebration of life, Brenda Moberg asked friends and family for words that described her husband. Gentle. Friendly. Helpful. Loving. Kind. 'A lot of people said kind,' she said. 'That was the word that was repeated over and over again.' More than 100 of Earl Moberg's friends, family, and community members gathered at Rowandale Baptist Church Saturday to remember him. Earl Moberg was 81 and living with dementia when he disappeared on Dec. 12, 2023 after leaving home for a walk. He has never been found, but is presumed deceased. 'It's great to hear other people's memories of my dad and help really keep him alive,' said Britt Moberg, Earl's daughter. 'It was really, really healing to have this time today. I'm so glad that we were able to do that.' Story continues below advertisement Britt shared memories of his passion for fitness and adventure, his pride in his Swedish heritage, and his unwavering support for his four children. As an educator, he taught in remote communities for much of his career. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'He made me feel safe in the world,' Britt said. Brenda felt the same; she and her 'knight in shining armour' would have celebrated their 50th wedding anniversary this year. In the later years of his life, Earl Moberg was known to wander due to his dementia. The Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (WRHA) deemed his disappearance a critical incident in June 2024 following a review spurred by a letter Britt penned to the WRHA and health minister Uzoma Asagwara. A critical incident is an unintended event that occurs as the result of the provision of health services. The review found Earl and his caregivers did not receive the health supports needed to keep him safe. 'We can't change what happened to my dad, and all I can do is try to advocate to try to do what I can to prevent this from happening to someone else,' said Britt. 'When Earl went missing, the first thing I said was, to the police, 'Is there a silver alert issued?' and they said yes, but at that time I didn't know it was just to the media,' Brenda Moberg said. Story continues below advertisement Related News Moberg critical incident review the first of its kind, offers 7 recommendations The Moberg family is working to change how the public is notified of missing adults. A petition to the House of Commons, sponsored by Kildonan-St. Paul MP Raquel Dancho, calls on the Government of Canada to develop a National Silver Alert System, which would alert mobile devices and broadcasts in the area where a missing vulnerable adult was last seen, much like AMBER Alerts. It's their second time collecting signatures: The 2025 federal election and dissolution of parliament nullified their previous petition, which had collected 4,672 signatures. While collecting signatures at Garden City Mall, Brenda Moberg hears from people whose lives have also been affected by a dementia diagnosis. 'They have relatives… that have dementia that have wandered, or they're worried that they'll wander,' she said. 'We just want to get more signatures on the petition so then if other people, seniors or people with dementia get missing that they will be found.' The Mobergs thanked everyone who signed the petition so far, and who helped search for Earl since his disappearance. 'To us, he's our father, our husband, he is our loved one and there's just so much more beyond him than being the missing person in North Kildonan,' Britt said. 'He was a truly loved person, and a father, and a teacher, and I hope that he's remembered for those qualities as well, not just for being the person who is missing.' Story continues below advertisement The Silver Alert petition is collecting online signatures until Oct. 2, 2025.
Globe and Mail
2 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Alberta government appeals temporary injunction of transgender health care law
Alberta is appealing a temporary injunction of a law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth. A judge granted the injunction in June, ruling the provincial law raises serious Charter issues that need to be hashed out in an ongoing court challenge of the legislation. Court of King's Bench Justice Allison Kuntz said the law is likely to cause irreparable harm to gender-diverse youth and she didn't find the contrary evidence submitted by the province to be overwhelming. The government, in an appeal filed to the Calgary court last month, argues the injunction was premature, since it wasn't fully in effect. It also claims the judge made a mistake and 'mixed fact and law' in deciding the legislation would cause irreparable harm. The Decibel: The legal fight over gender-affirming health care in Alberta Justice Minister Mickey Amery's press secretary, Heather Jenkins, said the law was passed to protect children from making potentially irreversible decisions about their bodies. 'Alberta's government will continue to vigorously defend our position in court,' she said in an email Friday. Egale Canada, one of the groups challenging the law along with five transgender youth, says it respects the province's right to appeal but believes the judge made the right decision. 'The Court of King's Bench, relying on extensive expert testimony and evidence, affirmed what we have long argued – that denying gender-affirming care causes irreparable harm,' Egale's legal director, Bennett Jensen, said in an email. 'The context of this case remains clear: the government is interfering in the relationship between doctors and patients by seeking to ban medically necessary, evidence-based care for an already marginalized group of youth.' The law bans doctors from providing treatment such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to those under 16. Opinion: The real health care wait-time scandal? Political meddling Kuntz wrote in her decision that denying treatment could cause youth emotional and psychological harm and expose them to permanent physical changes that don't match their gender identity. She also said the ban would reinforce the discrimination and prejudice they already experience. 'Intentionally or not, the ban will signal that there is something wrong with or suspect about having a gender identity that is different than the sex you were assigned at birth,' the judge wrote. The province had argued against the injunction, saying claims the law would harm youth were speculative because the ban hadn't been enforced yet. The government also said any psychological harm would be a result of puberty, though the judge largely rebuffed that argument. The Canadian Medical Association and three Alberta-based doctors are also challenging the law's constitutionality in a separate case. The doctors argue the law violates their Charter right to freedom of conscience. MHCare demands AHS investigation results The law came from a trio of bills affecting transgender people that Premier Danielle Smith's United Conservative Party government passed last year. The other pieces of legislation ban transgender women from competing in women's sports and require children under 16 have parental consent to change their names or pronouns at school. Parents are also required to opt in their children for school lessons on sexuality, sexual orientation and gender identity. Alberta's law followed Saskatchewan, which passed its own law in 2023 that requires parental consent for students under 16 who want to change their names or pronouns. That government invoked the Charter's notwithstanding clause in response to a court challenge launched in part by Egale Canada as well. Despite Saskatchewan's use of the notwithstanding clause, a judge ruled that a challenge could continue on the legislation, though that decision was appealed by the province. A decision on Saskatchewan's appeal is expected Monday. Smith has said invoking the notwithstanding clause isn't off the table to ensure Alberta's gender-affirming care ban is enforced.
CBC
2 days ago
- CBC
Alberta government appeals injunction of transgender health-care law
Alberta is appealing a temporary injunction of a law banning doctors from providing gender-affirming care to youth. A judge ruled in June that the provincial law raises serious Charter issues that need to be hashed out in an ongoing court challenge of the legislation. Court of King's Bench Justice Allison Kuntz ruled the law is likely to cause irreparable harm to gender diverse youth and contrary evidence submitted from the province wasn't overwhelming enough. The government argues the injunction was premature, since the law wasn't fully in effect, and that the judge made a mistake in deciding it would cause irreparable harm. It has said the law was passed to protect children from making potentially irreversible decisions about their bodies.
