Man accused of facilitating terrorism used quarry outside Quebec City for target practice
CBC's visual investigations unit has geolocated images posted to Raphaël Lagacé's Facebook pages where he poses with multiple high-calibre sniper rifles. The images were taken at a quarry in Saint-Joachim, Que.
The quarry is owned by Les Entreprises LT Ltée/Béton Lagacé. It overlooks the St-Lawrence River and is just south of Mont-Sainte-Anne, a ski resort.
In photos, Lagacé appears at the quarry with numerous rifles. Excavation equipment is visible in the background of some of the photos. Lagacé wears ear protection and lies prone, with his hands wrapped around the rifles, aiming at a target off-camera.
In the photos and other videos that CBC News has verified as being filmed at the quarry complex, it is not clear if Lagacé is firing the weapons, but there are boxes of ammunition positioned near the weapons.
In posts on his Instagram account, Lagacé said he was training for an "extreme long-range" shooting competition.
In another video posted to Lagacé's Facebook in 2013, he does fire at a target located in a sandpit. CBC News was unable to verify if that video was taken at the same quarry. The force of the gunshot shakes the camera, and a man uses an expletive off-camera when the gun is fired.
CBC does not know the context in which these photos and videos were filmed.
Lagacé has been charged with facilitating terrorist activity. The RCMP allege he and three other men hoarded weapons, engaged in military-style training and intended to forcibly take possession of land in the Quebec City area.
An RCMP news release issued Tuesday included a photograph showing a group of men engaged in "military-style training" that was taken in a quarry.
CBC News was unable to confirm if the quarry in the RCMP photo was located at the Les Entreprises LT Ltée/Béton Lagacé location, but the company's sand quarry site is extensive.
Les Entreprises LT Ltée/Béton Lagacé declined requests for comment and declined to answer questions, including whether there is a familial connection between the company and Lagacé.
A woman who answered the phone at Les Entreprises LT Ltée/Béton Lagacé said "no comment would be made. No response to any question." Yannick Lagacé, one of the shareholders of Béton Lagacé, said he would not comment.
Here is how we found the exact location of Lagacé's social media posts:
First, CBC reporters found, and confirmed, his social media profiles. Then, a scan of his Facebook feed revealed multiple images featuring LT Ltée/Béton Lagacé trucks and machinery.
A search of the company's website revealed that they operated multiple quarries in the Quebec City area. We tried to see if any of these quarries matched the locations where Lagacé appeared to be handling his weapons. We knew from the photographs that we were looking for a sandy area and, in some photographs, background hills and a river were visible.
One of the company's quarries was located on a hill, advertised on their website as having a vantage point over the north shore of the St-Lawrence River.
Using Google Earth and satellite imagery, we scanned the quarry and matched the terrain features to the features behind Lagacé.
Then, in another video posted to Lagacé's Facebook, we see a man handling a rifle. Again, we see features that seem to indicate a quarry.
This time, the video is taken from a different angle, and, in the background, we see Mont-Sainte-Anne, the ski resort.
Again, using Google Earth, we matched that same angle of the ski hill to the quarry.
The four men appeared in court virtually on Tuesday and remain in custody. Their next court date is July 14.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
7 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The Coldplay 'kiss cam' situation underlines a lesson I learned as a 15-year-old cheerleader
Coldplay "kiss cam" participants: Welcome to Gen Z's world. By now, I'm sure you've heard of the viral " Coldplay" kiss cam saga. We can tease out the ethics of living in a surveillance state, but the reality is: Astronomer's former CEO just learned a hard lesson about leadership, social media, and the blurry line between public and private. Even when you think you're not being watched, you're being watched — and social media makes it easy for people to find out what you do after dark. For me, it's a story that feels familiar. You're always representing, even out of uniform As part of a generation raised with social media (I'm literally three years older than Facebook), certain lessons about digital presence were hammered into me from a young age. This particular lesson — that you're always representing the organization you're a part of, even in plain clothes — came at age 15, when I was a sophomore on the cheerleading team at my San Diego public high school. One morning before class, I was goofing around with a friend and fellow cheerleader at her house near our school. My friend picked up a bottle of Grey Goose vodka her mom kept on display, made a kissy face, and posed for the camera. I snapped a quick pic and uploaded it to my " finsta" — a second, more private Instagram account that was followed by 30 or so of my friends. I captioned it, "The real reason we take a free period." I thought I was being clearly sarcastic — I was a good student, I took AP classes, and I rarely went to parties. Obviously, my friend and I were not day drinking before honors pre-calc on a random Tuesday morning. So imagine my shock when my friend and I got called into a "crisis" meeting with our head cheerleading coach, and the facts of our transgression were laid before us. Someone's mom had apparently also seen the photo, which was then reported to our coach. The punishment was swift: My friend and I were both suspended from the team for two weeks, which meant we couldn't cheer at any games or perform in that week's pep rally. Our cheerleading program had strict standards around conduct, especially when we were in uniform. We were told we could not hug or kiss boys — even if they were our boyfriends — because we were representing the program, and there were already too many stereotypes about boy-crazy cheerleaders. The rules governing our conduct out of uniform, however, were a lot less clear. Even though we weren't wearing any cheer-related clothing in the Grey Goose photo, we were still representing the team, and therefore the school. I learned, at 15, you'll be seen as a representative of the organizations you're a part of — no matter what you're doing. Gen Z grew up being watched Knowingly posting something on social media is different from inadvertently being caught by a kiss cam. But the same principle applies: Actions taken in your personal life have the potential to spill over into your professional world. That's nothing new, but social media makes it even more pronounced — and it's knowledge that Gen Zers like me have literally grown up with. For now-former Astronomer CEO Andy Byron, the whole kiss cam blowup resulted in resignation from the company. Neither he nor the company's head of HR, who was also pictured with him, has spoken about the incident, although the interim CEO has called the ordeal "unusual and surreal." For me, it ended a little better. I was eventually reinstated and cheered through my remaining years of school. The ordeal, however, continued to creep into the back of my mind. As a junior, my peers and I heard horror stories of kids who'd had their Harvard acceptances rescinded because of their digital footprints. Later, in college, many of my friends who joined sororities told of sky-high standards around social media posting. Given Gen Z's knowledge of how easy it is to be exposed online, it's not surprising that we're engaging in online behaviors that seek more privacy. In a survey of more than 600 Gen Zers by the Gen Z consulting and research firm dcdx taken last year, more than 60% of respondents said they wanted their online presence to be more private, not less. "Finsta" culture, which was all over my high school in 2017, is still alive in the form of " close friends" stories or secret second accounts, which create another level of exclusivity among those who can see what you post. Adam Mosseri, Meta's head of Instagram, recently said that much of the action on the app was happening in DMs — not on users' grids or feeds. The problem is that, as I've learned, even what you think is private isn't private. You can't control who screenshots and shares what they see. "Coldplaygate" is emblematic of a world Gen Z has been living in essentially since we were born: On social media, your public and private lives aren't separate. They're one post away from crashing head-on.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What is Zoom bombing? Ontario bans public attendance from virtual courtrooms citing rise in intrusions
An increase in cyber harassment and hijacking of court proceedings, known as 'Zoom bombing,' has prompted Ontario to ban the public from attending virtually. A memo was sent last Wednesday by the province's assistant deputy attorney general Katie Wood to court staff across Ontario saying the public will no longer be permitted to observe court proceedings virtually, according to a CBC report . 'If the public would like to attend, they will be required to do so in person,' the memo said, according to that reporting. This, according to the CBC report, was prompted by a spike in 'Zoom bombing incidents' that saw virtual intruders display 'offensive content and targeted behaviour' that interrupted proceedings. The province's justice landscape underwent a drastic transformation in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to courts switching to remote hearings using meeting platforms like Zoom. Despite the convenience, the move to online proceedings has raised concerns about increasing incidents of Zoom bombing. The report indicates the ban is in effect for the Ontario Court of Justice. Zoom bombing is the act of disrupting online meetings that have been shared publicly. It involves internet trolls crashing Zoom meetings with displays of pornographic or hate images and threatening language, according to the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In Ontario, virtual court proceedings and local government meetings have been derailed by participants who unmute themselves to make offensive comments or hijack screens to display disturbing images and words. A 2024 memo from Tribunals Ontario said disruptions during an event or proceeding 'which could include lewd or obscene behaviour such as shouting, screaming or making threats, broadcasting sexually explicit sounds, images, or videos' may lead the Tribunals Ontario adjudicators or staff to ban the intruder from rejoining and further actions if the disruption is perceived as a threat. Only the host or co-host can remove people from a meeting. To do this, the host can use the participant list within the meeting interface. Tap 'more' or the three dots next to the participant's name in the participant list to see additional actions. Then select remove, and confirm the removal when prompted. After reports of an increase in Zoom bombing from the University of Toronto community, U of T issued a list of best practices to protect against this type of disruption including: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Startup founder Christine Hunsicker accused of defrauding investors out of $300M
The founder of a fashion tech startup has been indicted for allegedly defrauding investors out of more than $300 million, authorities announced July 18. Christine Hunsicker, the founder of clothing tech company CaaStle, has been charged with wire fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, making false statements to a financial institution and aggravated identity theft, according to a press release from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The founder allegedly falsely promoted CaaStle as a growing business valued at more than $1.4 billion in order to secure more funding from investors. In reality, the company "was in financial distress with limited cash and significant expenses," according to the indictment. Hunsicker's attorneys, Michael Levy and Anna Skotko, said in a statement that Hunsicker has "been fully cooperative and transparent" with authorities, but they "nonetheless have chosen to present to the public an incomplete and very distorted picture." "There is much more to this story, and we look forward to telling it," the statement said. Startup founder gave fake documents to investors, officials say According to the indictment, Hunsicker falsified documents and lied to investors about the financial state of the company beginning in 2019. These allegedly documents included "falsely inflated income statements, fake audited financial statements, fictitious bank account records, and sham corporate records." On one occasion, according to the indictment, an audit firm confronted Hunsicker about a fake review she provided to an investor. She said she created the audit for a lecture at Princeton University and mistakenly sent it to the investor. But the lecture didn't exist, authorities say. After surrendering on July 18, Hunsicker pleaded not guilty and was released on $1 million bond, court records show. What is CaaStle? Fashion startup files for bankruptcy amid founder's arrest CaaStle promotes itself as "a catalyst for brands and retailers to propel digital growth and profitability across their business," according to its website. "We help creators launch their own clothing rental services," its Instagram account says. Hunsicker resigned from CaaStle and another company she owned, P180, in March after CaaStle's board of directors told its investors that she had falsified documents, per the indictment against her. It also said CaaStle filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in June. Attorney warns investors about fraud Jay Clayton, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, warned investors in a statement to "be aware" about potential fraud schemes tied to businesses that haven't issued an initial public offering. "The promise of pre-IPO technology companies can be fertile ground for fraudsters who play on investor euphoria," Clayton said. "Investors should be aware of these incentives and that pre-IPO companies are not subject to the rigors of SEC registration." More: Want to invest in an IPO? Here's what you need to know to profit on initial public offerings Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at
