US tariffs could deepen Germany's recession, says bank
Tariffs on goods being imported into the US could tip Europe's largest economy into another recession, according to the president of Germany's central bank.
Germany economy has contracted for the past two years and with tariffs, the country "could expect a recession for this year" too, Joachim Nagel, the head of the Deutsche Bundesbank, told the BBC World Service in an exclusive interview.
Without tariffs, the bank forecasts the German economy will stagnate but still grow, by about 0.2%, he added.
He said "there are only losers" when imposing tariffs, and supported the EU's retaliatory measures against US President Donald Trump's 25% tariff on all steel imports from overseas.
Tariffs are a central part of Trump's overall economic vision - he hopes they will boost US manufacturing and protect jobs, but critics say in the immediate term they will raise prices for US consumers.
In response to Trump's move, the EU has hit back with import taxes on a range of US products, which are set to come into force on 1 April.
Mr Nagel called Trump's tariff policy "economics from the past" and "definitely not a good idea".
A global trade war is one of the concerns from tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, he said, but added it was a "necessity" for the EU to react "because if something is working against you, you can't accept a policy like this".
However, he suggested that when the US realises that the price that needs to be paid will be "highest on the side of the Americans", it will allow further opportunity for all sides to come to a different resolution.
"I hope that in the end, good policy will succeed," he said.
How will the latest Trump tariffs affect the UK?
Trump halts plan for 50% steel and aluminium tariffs on Canada
EU hits back at Trump tariffs and warns against trade war
Germany's export economy had been one of its strengths in past decades, and its cars such as BMW, Mercedes, Volkswagens and Audis are popular in the US.
Mr Nagel refuted claims that Germany was the "sick man of Europe", saying it had a "strong economic basis" and "strong small and medium sized companies".
"But nevertheless, when you are exposed to an export-oriented model, then you are more exposed in a situation when tariffs are going up and there are so many uncertainties, so many unknowns," he added.
He said Germany could overcome such challenges "over the next couple of years".
However, German consumers are set to face higher prices.
The head of Germany's BGA federation of wholesale, foreign trade and service, Dirk Jandura, warned on Wednesday that Germans might have to dig deeper into their pockets to pay for American products, such as orange juice, bourbon and peanut butter, in supermarkets.
Commenting on recent unprecedented changes in Germany's economic policy, which were altered allow the country to borrow more to spend on defence and infrastructure, Mr Nagel said it was an "extraordinary measure" for an "extraordinary time".
"The whole world is facing tectonic changes which makes the current situation very different from those seen in the past, hence the fiscal change," he said.
He added the policy change would allow Germany some financial breathing room for recovery in the next few years, adding it provided a "stability signal to the market".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How else could Iran retaliate over the ongoing Israeli strikes targeting the country?
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — As Israel pounds Iran with airstrikes targeting military facilities and its nuclear sites, officials in Tehran have proposed a variety of steps the Islamic Republic could take outside of launching retaliatory missile barrages. Those proposals mirror those previously floated by Iran in confrontations with either Israel or the United States in the last few decades. They include disrupting maritime shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, potentially leaving the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and attacks by allied militants. Here's a look at what those options could mean — both to Iran and the wider Middle East. Targeting the Strait of Hormuz The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf, through which some 20% of all oil traded globally passes. The strait is in the territorial waters of Iran and Oman, which at its narrowest point is just 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide. The width of the shipping lane in either direction is only 3 kilometers (2 miles). Anything affecting it ripples through global energy markets, potentially raising the price of crude oil. That then trickles down to consumers through what they pay for gasoline and other oil products. There has been a wave of attacks on ships attributed to Iran since 2019, following President Donald Trump's decision to unilaterally withdraw the U.S. from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and re-imposing crushing sanctions on Tehran. U.S. forces routinely travel through the strait, despite sometimes-tense encounters with Iran's Revolutionary Guard, a paramilitary force answerable only to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The U.S. Navy's Bahrain-based 5th Fleet conducts those operations, known as freedom of navigation missions, to ensure the waterway remains open to business. Iran views those passages as challenging its sovereignty — as if it operated off the coast of the U.S. Since the Israeli attacks began, Iranian officials have repeatedly raised blocking the strait — which likely would draw an immediate American response. Withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Experts fear Tehran could respond to the strike by deciding to fully end its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, abandon the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. As a member of the treaty, Iran is obligated to explain any radioactive traces outside of declared sites and to provide assurances that they are not being used as part of a nuclear weapons program. Iran insists its program is peaceful, though it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA assess Iran hasn't had an organized military nuclear program since 2003. There is precedent for the concern. North Korea said it withdrew from the treaty in 2003 and tested a nuclear weapon in 2006. However, again, if Iran withdrew from the treaty, it could draw the U.S. into the fight, something Tehran so far has been seeking to avoid. Asymmetric attacks by militants Iran could encourage more asymmetric attacks, targeting Jewish tourists, synagogues or Israeli diplomatic missions as it has done in the past. However, it's been a rough few years for those forces. Iran's allies, the self-described 'Axis of Resistance,' have been severely hurt by ongoing Israeli attacks since the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, particularly Lebanon's Hezbollah and Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Iran has long used those groups as both an asymmetrical way to attack Israel and as a shield against a direct assault. Iraqi groups backed by Iran so far haven't become involved, leaving just Yemen's Houthi rebels as the only member of the axis to launch attacks on Israel since its campaign against Iran began.
New York Times
5 minutes ago
- New York Times
Jordan Klepper Calls Trump Out for His ‘Irish Exit' at G7
Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous night's highlights that lets you sleep — and lets us get paid to watch comedy. Here are the 50 best movies on Netflix right now. 'Stay Tuned' President Trump left the G7 summit in Canada a day earlier than planned, flying back to Washington to deal with the Iran-Israel conflict, according to the White House. On Tuesday's 'Daily Show,' Jordan Klepper called Trump out for his 'Irish exit.' 'Now, this is an important G7 for Trump, because he had to prove that he had the discipline and wherewithal to fix the global economy after he [expletive] up the global economy.' — JORDAN KLEPPER 'We all know what this is, right? You're at an event, you have to rush home because 'something came up'? Look, I get it — none of us like to poop in an unfamiliar place. Sometimes, when you have a big matchup coming up, you just need that home-field advantage.' — JORDAN KLEPPER 'After a few days with Trump, the Canadian prime minister was like, 'I hate to see you go, but I also hate to see you here.'' — JIMMY FALLON 'When French president Emmanuel Macron told the press that Trump left the G7 to work on a cease-fire, Trump attacked Macron, posting, 'He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a cease-fire. Much bigger than that. Stay tuned!' Much bigger than that? Not a cease-fire? Maybe not the most subtle messaging from the commander in chief. It's like when F.D.R. said, 'Gotta get me some sleep. Tomorrow is Big D-Day. Can't say much more, but it rhymes with Shmormandy.' — STEPHEN COLBERT 'So either the United States is about to jump in or he just got bored during the G7 icebreakers.' — STEPHEN COLBERT ''Stay tuned.' Like it's the season finale of 'Celebrity Apprentice' or something.' — JIMMY KIMMEL 'Oh, great! Yeah, better than a cease-fire! Cease-fire plus! That's great — I hate watching ads.' — JORDAN KLEPPER The Punchiest Punchlines (Trade Deal Drop Edition) Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Most NATO armies likely 'could not meet Ukrainian standards' in combat effectiveness, retired US Army general says
A retired US Army general said it's most of NATO, not Ukraine, that has to learn from the other about combat. Ret. Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges was asked in a video interview with the Kyiv Post, published on Tuesday, about what Ukraine's NATO allies could do to help Kyiv's military reach Western standards. But Hodges flipped the question on its head. "Well, actually, it's not about meeting Western standards. Most NATO armies could not meet Ukrainian standards, in terms of actual combat effectiveness," said Hodges, who was the US Army's commanding general in Europe from 2014 to 2017. Hodges highlighted what he said was a gap in NATO capabilities, such as poor cohesion among fighting units from different member states. "We still cannot communicate securely with British or German units," Hodges said. "So I think the Ukrainians kind of look down their noses at us a little bit, you know, when they hear us go: 'We're going to come help train you.'" "We should be begging them to help us learn how to do what they're doing," he continued. NATO said in May that it has trained roughly 192,000 Ukrainian personnel so far. Some were sent to NATO sites to learn how to use Western equipment. At least a dozen brigades were also directly instructed outside Ukraine on tactics and maneuvers by European and American military trainers. Some units have criticized parts of that training, saying there were gaps between what they were taught and the battlefield's realities. The dominant use of cheap hobby drones as deadly weapons, for example, is a new development that's changed the face of war. In his interview, Hodges also cited Kyiv's naval operations in the Black Sea as an example of what NATO forces could learn. "They have shown the entire world that you can defeat a conventional navy, at least in an enclosed body of water like the Black Sea, without having to have capital ships of your own. Lots for us to learn there," he said. "That may not apply in the Atlantic Ocean, but certainly in the Baltic Sea, the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, these kinds of things. I hope we are paying attention," Hodges added. Romania and Bulgaria, he said, could benefit from building up fleets of uncrewed vessels the way Ukraine created and used its own to counter Russia's Black Sea Fleet. Hodges said he was also impressed by Ukraine's integrated air and missile defense to give it a clear picture of all the incoming aerial threats it's facing at any given time, such as fighter jets, missiles, or drones. "The Ukrainians have developed that for themselves. I would want to be confident that we have a shared picture between them, Poland, Baltic countries, Germany, the US, Romania, for example, Turkey," he said. He said the right system would help prevent NATO states from using the wrong weapons to take down targets. "You're not going to waste Patriots on drones," Hodges said. In February, NATO inaugurated a department in Poland called the NATO-Ukraine Joint Analysis, Training, and Education Center. The alliance said the center would focus on gleaning lessons from the war in Ukraine to "better position NATO's deterrence." Meanwhile, Hodges said that Ukraine does have to learn how to reshape its military as an institution. Much of the country's forces were built on a Soviet organizational culture that Ukrainian troops frequently bemoan as a source of poor decision-making and unnecessary bureaucracy. "That means that the government has got to earn the confidence of the people," Hodges said. "That their sons or daughters will not get sent off to the war until they are properly trained, properly equipped, and put into a well-trained, ready unit."
