US manufacturers are stuck in a rut despite subsidies from Biden and protection from Trump
The Institute for Supply Management, an association of purchasing managers, reported that manufacturing activity in the United States shrank in June for the fourth straight month. In fact, US factories have been in decline for 30 of the 32 months since October 2022, according to ISM.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'The past three years have been a real slog for manufacturing,' said Eric Hagopian, CEO of Pilot Precision Products, a maker of industrial cutting tools in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. 'We didn't get destroyed like we did in the recession of 2008. But we've been in this stagnant, sort of stationary environment.'
Advertisement
Big economic factors contributed to the slowdown: A surge in inflation, arising from the unexpectedly strong economic recovery from COVID-19, raised factory expenses and prompted the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates 11 times in 2022 and 2023. The higher borrowing costs added to the strain.
Advertisement
Government policy was meant to help.
Biden's tax incentives for semiconductor and clean energy production triggered a factory-building boom – investment in manufacturing facilities more than tripled from April 2021 through October 2024 – that seemed to herald a coming surge in factory production and hiring. Eventually anyway.
But the factory investment spree has faded as the incoming Trump administration launched trade wars and, working with Congress, ended Biden's subsidies for green energy. Now, predicts Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, 'manufacturing production will continue to flatline.'
'If production is flat, that suggests manufacturing employment will continue to slide,' Zandi said. 'Manufacturing is likely to suffer a recession in the coming year.'
Meanwhile, Trump is attempting to protect US manufacturers — and to coax factories to relocate and produce in America — by imposing tariffs on goods made overseas. He slapped 50 percent taxes on steel and aluminum, 25 percent on autos and auto parts, 10 percent on many other imports.
In some ways, Trump's tariffs can give US factories an edge. Chris Zuzick, vice president at Waukesha Metal Products, said the Sussex, Wisconsin-based manufacturer is facing stiff competition for a big contract in Texas. A foreign company offers much lower prices. But 'when you throw the tariff on, it gets us closer,' Zuzick said. 'So that's definitely a situation where it's beneficial.'
But American factories import and use foreign products, too – machinery, chemicals, raw materials like steel and aluminum. Taxing those inputs can drive up costs and make U.S producers less competitive in world markets.
Consider steel. Trump's tariffs don't just make imported steel more expensive. By putting the foreign competition at a disadvantage, the tariffs allow US steelmakers to raise prices – and they have. US-made steel was priced at $960 per metric ton as of June 23, more than double the world export price of $440 per ton, according to industry monitor SteelBenchmarker.
Advertisement
In fact, US steel prices are so high that Pilot Precision Products has continued to buy the steel it needs from suppliers in Austria and France — and pay Trump's tariff.
Trump has also created considerable uncertainty by repeatedly tweaking and rescheduling his tariffs. Just before new import taxes were set to take effect on dozens of countries on July 9, for example, the president pushed the deadline back to Aug. 1 to allow more time for negotiation with US trading partners.
The flipflops have left factories, suppliers and customers bewildered about where things stand. Manufacturers voiced their complaints in the ISM survey: 'Customers do not want to make commitments in the wake of massive tariff uncertainty,' a fabricated metal products company said.
'Tariffs continue to cause confusion and uncertainty for long-term procurement decisions,' added a computer and electronics firm. 'The situation remains too volatile to firmly put such plans into place.'
Some may argue that things aren't necessarily bad for US manufacturing; they've just returned to normal after a pandemic-related bust and boom.
Factories slashed nearly 1.4 million jobs in March and April 2020 when COVID-19 forced many businesses to shut down and Americans to stay home. Then a funny thing happened: American consumers, cooped up and flush with COVID relief checks from the government, went on a spending spree, snapping up manufactured goods like air fryers, patio furniture and exercise machines.
Suddenly, factories were scrambling to keep up. They brought back the workers they laid off – and then some. Factories added 379,000 jobs in 2021 — the most since 1994 — and then tacked on another 357,000 in 2022.
Advertisement
But in 2023, factory hiring stopped growing and began backtracking as the economy returned to something closer to the pre-pandemic normal.
In the end, it was a wash. Factory payrolls last month came to 12.75 million, almost exactly where they stood in February 2020 (12.74 million) just before COVID slammed the economy.
'It's a long, strange trip to get back to where we started,' said Jared Bernstein, chair of Biden's White House Council of Economic Advisers.
Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products said that it will take time to see if Trump's tariffs succeed in bringing factories back to America.
'The fact is that manufacturing doesn't turn on a dime,' he said. 'It takes time to switch gears.'
Hagopian at Pilot Precision is hopeful that tax breaks in Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill will help American manufacturing regain momentum.
'There may be light at the end of the tunnel that may not be a locomotive bearing down,' he said.
For now, manufacturers are likely to delay big decisions on investing or bringing on new workers until they see where Trump's tariffs settle and what impact they have on the economy, said Ned Hill, professor emeritus in economic development at Ohio State University.
'With all this uncertainty about what the rest of the year is going to look like,' he said, 'there's a hesitancy to hire people just to lay them off in the near future.'
'Everyone,' said Zuzick at Waukesha Metal Products, 'is kind of just waiting for the new normal."
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Padilla to propose bill easing immigrant residency rules
Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) is introducing a bill that would amend decades-old requirements for immigrants seeking permanent status — another long-shot proposal amid the Trump administration's immigration raids. The big picture: Congress has not passed a major immigration overhaul since 1986, resulting in residency requirements that are now over 50 years old. Zoom in: Under a bill that Padilla will announce Friday, the Immigration Act of 1929 would be amended so some immigrants may qualify for lawful permanent resident status if they have lived in the U.S. continuously for at least seven years. The current registry cutoff date is January 1, 1972 — more than 50 years ago. The change would provide a pathway to a green card for DACA recipients and those who had temporary protective status (TPS) State of play: The proposal comes as the Trump administration is letting TPS deals expire and going after what could be hundreds of thousands more immigrants who were given humanitarian "parole" under former President Biden. Many of those immigrants are being detained at immigration court hearings and are being placed in removal proceedings. What they're saying:"Roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants live in the United States today, yet most have no way to earn permanent legal status," Padilla's office said in a statement. "The overwhelming majority of these undocumented immigrants have established roots in the U.S. They work in essential jobs and pay taxes." His office said Padilla will formally introduce his bill on Monday. Reality check: Republicans control both chambers in Congress and such immigration proposals are hardly getting heard. Reps. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.) and Veronica Escobar (D-Texas) have introduced the DIGNITY Act of 2025, a bill that is lingering in the House, which focuses on border security, mandatory E-Verify, asylum reform and legal immigration reform. Zoom out: Padilla's latest bill comes after he and Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) introduced a bill that would ban federal immigration agents from wearing most face coverings but require them to wear visible ID during public enforcement operations. That long-shot proposal comes following images of masked, heavily armed immigration agents snatching people off the streets and taking them away in unmarked cars have shocked many Americans. What we're watching: The pressure to rein in some of ICE's enforcement tactics does have support among some conservatives worried over policing.
Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Sure, contractors can be hard to work with — but some clients are worse
The complaints about contractors hired to do work around people's homes are legion. They go something like this: 'The guy I hired to remodel my kitchen was never on time, didn't even show up for several days, and took forever to finish.' 'Yeah? Well, my contractor never finished the job at all. I had to get somebody else.' 'You think that's bad? My contractors did the work, but they did it all wrong. I had to hire someone else to rip out what they did and start over.' Yes, these kinds of things do happen. But contractors and tradespeople have tales of their own to tell. From their point of view, it's not always their fault when things don't go smoothly. Take the guy who said he usually starts work at 7:30 a.m. but was asked by the homeowners at one job if he could begin at 9:30 instead. The contractor agreed, but when he arrived at that time, he was asked to come back between 10:30 and 11. Again, he agreed, even though he'd lost almost half a day's work at that point. When he showed up the second time, 'everyone was still getting out of bed,' he said, and the room he was supposed to work in was full of stuff, including the bed. Two days later, the bed had yet to be moved, plus the owner's dogs were running around the contractor as he tried to work, he said. When he finally finished this 'nightmare of a job,' the owner made him wait another week to be paid. So, sure — there are a lot of lousy tradespeople out there, and you should do your best to sniff them out before signing a contract. But many contractors believe homeowners are the reason projects become problems. And some think it's gotten worse since the pandemic. 'Since COVID,' one contractor posted on Reddit last year, 'customers are becoming increasingly just awful people.' He said he'd been on a run of crummy customers and called the experiences 'exhausting.' Dozens of fellow tradespeople commented on the post, most of them agreeing with the exhausted contractor. One commenter wrote that the pandemic 'gave people too much time on Pinterest and HGTV. All those remodel shows that edit a four-month gut job into 45 minutes [give people] a warped sense of reality and completely unreasonable expectations.' Of course, the contractor should set the rules before a contract is signed: They should explain the process to the homeowner from beginning to end, including permitting, demolition, reconstruction and possible changes. They should also discuss how to bring up concerns when the project doesn't seem to be going right. But that doesn't seem to register with some clients. One landscaper had a customer who walked around the yard with a tape measure to make sure the new flower beds were 'exactly, to the inch, the size they were drawn on the plan.' But 'this isn't carpentry,' said the landscaper. 'I am digging dirt.' One contractor said some of their clients seem fine during the planning stages, but as soon as construction begins, 'all hell breaks loose.' They said clients often 'delay decisions that extend the project timeline and then act like it's our fault the project is taking longer.' Another worker told of the homeowner who taped down all four toilets in her house and placed signs on them that read 'DO NOT USE.' The contractor had to rent a portable toilet for the workers for the duration of the project. Other contractors complained of being micromanaged. 'Nobody leaves their houses anymore, so they are always in your business,' one posted. 'Every job this year has been 100% 'owner-occupied' for us.' 'I don't know where these people come from,' posted another. 'It's like they expect you not to make a living, do an incredible job, give them more than they paid for and then be grateful they didn't yell at you to tear it all out.' Many contractors have learned to nip that sort of thing in the bud. Call it bad-client radar, or just listening to your gut. Said one, 'I've walked away from three quotes this year because the alarms were screaming at me' that the clients would be awful to work with. 'When I go bid a job,' one contractor noted, 'I'm also interviewing the customer, for things like: Are they going to be watching me the entire time I work? Are they going to nitpick every little detail in material they picked out? Are they going to change their minds 100 times?' They said they either raise prices to reflect annoying customers or flat-out refuse the job. Another says they do a full background check, including social media, on all potential new clients: 'They do the same on us, so I feel it's totally fair.' And if things go south after the work commences, some tradespeople aren't afraid to walk away. Some use the 'I think it's best if we part ways' approach, while others just cancel contracts midstream. 'I've had to fire two customers this year,' one contractor posted. 'Overbearing, picky and obsessive.' Lew Sichelman has been covering real estate for more than 50 years. He is a regular contributor to numerous shelter magazines and housing and housing-finance industry publications. Readers can contact him at lsichelman@
USA Today
20 minutes ago
- USA Today
We're creating AI that could surveil US citizens. And the government is in on it.
Tech companies' lack of transparency and accountability in developing surveillance tools that governments can use is unacceptable. President Donald Trump recently gathered CEOs for a summit about renewing the United States 'spiritually and financially.' At the top of the agenda was a closer look at 'American values' such as faith and freedom. There is cause for alarm, however. Centuries after Americans declared independence from the British monarchy, our freedom and liberty are under threat − not only from foreign governments like China, but potentially our own. America's surveillance state is spreading as the federal government collects personal data of hundreds of millions of Americans. In the age of artificial intelligence, with data collection accelerating at an unprecedented rate, our privacy has never been more vulnerable. Who is the culprit? The data collectors range from the National Security Agency to Silicon Valley's cadre of data-hungry technology companies. Add to that list a new organization: Palantir. While it is not a household name like Google or Netflix, it is soon to be a common domestic concern. The technology company's surveillance operation has exploded in recent months, raising the possibility of creating a full-fledged surveillance state. Opinion: AI knows we shouldn't trust it for everything. I know because I asked it. Since January, Palantir has received more than $113 million in federal funds, according to The New York Times, not including a $795 million Defense Department contract awarded in May. While the federal government increased data sharing across agencies (with Palantir's help), the company continues to shop its technology to the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. AI technology could be repurposed for sinister uses We are talking about technology that can be weaponized. While Palantir's current focus is to identify people in the United States illegally, tracking movements in real time, the company is also building the infrastructure that could be used for a massive surveillance state. Former Palantir employees have warned about the potential for the company's AI tools to surveil American citizens with a disregard for personal privacy. It is not so far-fetched. Palantir's AI software is used by the Israeli Defense Forces to strike targets in Gaza. It is used to assist the U.S. Defense Department in analyzing drone footage. And it has been used by the Los Angeles Police Department to forecast crime patterns. This is called 'predictive policing.' If "Minority Report"was not a horror movie before, it is now. Given the government's penchant for abusing power (see: COVID-19 censorship or the NSA spying scandal), does this not seem like an obvious move against our civil liberties? For years, the NSA engaged in the mass surveillance of Americans' telephone records, as was exposed in 2013. Between 2001 and 2007, government wiretapping − executed without warrants − affected millions of U.S. citizens. Now, the same agencies are tapping into the power of AI to expand government surveillance in once unimaginable ways. Opinion: AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality? Of course, the federal government can already access a wide range of our personal data, but it is often separated by agency. Washington, DC, can create exponentially more detailed profiles on all of us by sharing data with the help of Palantir's AI tools. Even when surveilling noncitizens, the government's data collection inevitably tracks individual Americans based on their own interactions with these noncitizens. The government's data collection is based on information from police departments, financial institutions and other entities, like Palantir. Big government and big tech partnership raises concerns Even if the alliance between the government and Palantir works as intended, it is a potential threat to our civil liberties. Political dissidents could become targets. Not even those with limited public personas are safe from the state's detailed profiling machine. These systems are not perfect, and neither are our leaders. What happens when AI systems fail? What happens when data collection goes haywire? Palantir is hardly alone. OpenAI recently launched OpenAI for Government, which aims to equip federal, state and local leaders with advanced AI tools. OpenAI claims to serve the 'public good' and 'bolster national security readiness,' but why would private citizens take that at face value? What does 'readiness' actually mean, in practice? At the moment, many of our elected officials do not have answers to these questions, or they are just ignoring them. The same goes for OpenAI and Palantir, which are all too comfortable amassing ever-larger federal contracts and greater market share. This lack of transparency or accountability is unacceptable. The only thing worse than the overreach of Big Government is Big Tech in bed with Big Government. For those who care about freedom and liberty, now is the time to speak up, before it is too late. Peyton Hornberger serves as communications director at The Alliance for Secure AI, a nonprofit organization that educates the public about the implications of advanced artificial intelligence.
