Here's how much money New Yorkers need to retire comfortably: new study
GOBankingRates gathered national average annual expenditures data for people 65 and older from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center in order to calculate the eye-popping figure.
Thus, for a comfortable 25-year retirement, New Yorkers need a total of $1.27 million in savings.
Advertisement
3 for a comfortable 25-year retirement, New Yorkers need a total of $1.27 million in savings.
Daniel – stock.adobe.com
A 2024 study revealed many Americans believe they should have about $1.46 million stashed away before giving up work — and that figure isn't far removed from reality if you live in the Empire State.
However, most Americans have less than $89,000 saved for retirement, according to a Northwestern Mutual study released last year.
Advertisement
New York is the fifth most expensive state in which to retire, according to the study.
3 New York is the fifth most expensive state in which to retire, according to the study.
Monkey Business – stock.adobe.com
New Yorkers looking for cheaper places to retire will have to go further than the tri-state area, because your money won't stretch much further there.
New Jersey retirees need $45,829 per year after Social Security to cover expenses, while Connecticut residents should budget $43,697 annually.
Advertisement
Hawaii is the most expensive state for retirees, where an eye-popping $87,770 is needed for annual expenses after factoring in Social Security.
There, $2 million in savings won't even stretch for 23 years of retirement.
Meanwhile, Massachusetts and California came in as the second and most expensive states for retirees, respectively.
3 Rochester, New York is pictured. Retirement costs differ wildly between and within states, but New York ranks as the fifth most expensive state in which to retire.
SeanPavonePhoto – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
On the other end of the spectrum, West Virginia was crowned as the cheapest state in which to retire.
In the Mountain State, annual expenditures after Social Security are estimated to be just $27,803 — nearly half the estimated costs incurred in New York.
Kansas was named the second least expensive state for retirees, followed by Mississippi, Oklahoma and Alabamba.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are we getting a $5000 DOGE dividend or $600 rebate? Fourth stimulus check eligibility
If you're wondering about a fourth stimulus check in 2025 from President Donald Trump or the IRS, here's what to know about eligibility and the reality of it happening. On July 25, Trump floated the idea of a tariff rebate check for American taxpayers in response to questions about all the new tariff revenue being generated, "We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate." A few days after the president's tariff rebate comments, Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley announced the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025 aimed at sending checks to Americans. Note that a few months back, in February, Trump also said he would consider a plan to pay out a portion of the savings identified by the Department of Government Efficiency in the form of a $5000 dividend check as payback to taxpayers. The DOGE dividend proposal, authored by Azoria investment firm CEO James Fishback, was meant to give back or refund taxpayers a savings from Elon Musk's DOGE related cuts and reductions in government spending. Here's what to know about Trump's two proposals this year, what the amounts would be, qualifications and status. Are we getting a fourth stimulus check in 2025? While speculation about a of $2,000 has surfaced on social media and unverified websites, there has been no official confirmation of any additional economic relief package in 2025 from Congress or the IRS to support this claim. Any such news should be taken with caution as it could be misinformation or attempted fraud. Either of Trump's ideas for a tariff rebate or DOGE dividend this year would be similar to a fourth stimulus check, if approved. Albeit, there are differences between a stimulus check versus a dividend, refund or rebate. By definition, a dividend is a distribution of profits by a corporation to its shareholders and refund is a payment made back to a user that previously paid for something. While a rebate is a partial refund of the purchase price that a consumer paid, often upon meeting certain conditions — more like a discount that is refunded after the purchase versus a discount that is applied at the point of sale. A stimulus check on the other hand, is a direct payment to encourage spending and stimulate the economy by putting money directly into the consumers' hand. Also similar to the stimulus checks sent during the pandemic, these proposals would require congressional approval. What is the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025? Hawley's bill, called the American Worker Rebate Act of 2025, would provide a minimum of $600 per adult and dependent child, or $2,400 for a family of four, according to news officials. The benefit would be reduced by 5% for joint filers with an adusted gross income above $150,000 or single filers earning more than $75,000 individually. According to an analysis from the Budget Lab at Yale released July 28, Trump's tariffs could cost U.S. households an average of $2,400 in 2025 through higher prices passed on from companies paying higher tariff taxes. The Treasury Department said on July 25 that the U.S. government posted a $27 billion surplus in June, following a $316 billion deficit in May. Customs duties totaled approximately $27 billion for the month, up from $23 billion in May and 301% higher than in June 2024. On an annual basis, tariff collections have totaled $113 billion, or 86% more than a year ago. The bill would allow for a larger rebate if the tariff revenue exceeds projections. What is the status of the DOGE dividend check proposal? Fishback announced that he was stepping away from the DOGE dividend check movement after Musk lashed out at the president in June, although he also said he would continue working with the administration "to return savings to taxpayers." The latest update on DOGE dividend came from Fishbacks tweet on June 6, "I believed in Elon Musk's vision to shrink government and make it work better for Americans. I'm proud of the DOGE Dividend proposal I developed and will keep working with the administration to return savings to taxpayers." He added, "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the President, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but okay." According to Fishback's proposal, the DOGE dividend check was described as tax refund check to be sent to every taxpaying household, funded exclusively with a portion of the total savings delivered by DOGE. The potential refund would be sent only to households that are net-income taxpayers — people who pay more in taxes than they get back — with lower-income Americans not qualifying for the return, according to news reports. The Pew Research Center cites most Americans who have an adjusted gross income of under $40,000 pay effectively no federal income tax. According to the DOGE website, it cites an estimated $205 billion — approximately $1,273 per individual federal taxpayer — in savings and proof in their "Wall of Receipts." Albeit, only half the amount is itemized thus far, raising doubts about accuracy. Amy Gleason is the acting administrator and head of DOGE. Musk's departure from the federal government will likely do little to change DOGE's work carrying out Trump's vision of downsizing the federal government or eliminating the 'fraud and waste.' Maria Francis is a Pennsylvania-based journalist with the Mid-Atlantic Connect Team. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: How to check your stimulus check status? Trump $600 - $2400 rebate Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's why an alarming number of workers cash out 401(k) plans
A 401(k) retirement account is supposed to be hands-off. It's not your money, in theory, but savings for the future you. And yet, when Americans leave jobs, one-third of them cash out their 401(k) accounts. That's called 401(k) 'leakage,' and it costs workers untold billions of dollars in lost retirement savings. In a recent paper, Vanguard ponders why so many Americans liquidate retirement accounts when they exit jobs – about 33%, by their estimate -- and what employers and employees can do about it. The 401(k) was designed to help American workers build retirement savings, using tax breaks as an incentive. Nearly $9 trillion sits in 401(k) accounts nationwide, according to the Investment Company Institute. Half of all private-sector workers now participate in the plans, a record high. But 401(k) dollars don't always end up funding someone's retirement. At least $1.7 trillion sits in lost or forgotten 401(k) accounts, according to research by Capitalize, a financial services firm. A new Vanguard research note focuses on another problem: Workers cashing out retirement accounts when they leave jobs. Cashing out a 401(k) is often the worst option When you depart a job, you have several options with a 401(k). You can do nothing, keeping the money in the account. You can execute a 'rollover,' transferring the funds to another 401(k) or Individual Retirement Account. Or, you can cash out. And if you're exiting a job, a cashout might sound alluring. You may not have another job lined up. Perhaps you're planning a move. Maybe a new child has arrived. 'It can be very tempting. You're having this big decision in your life,' said Rob Williams, managing director of financial planning at Charles Schwab. 'Especially if it's not a large amount, your first instinct is to take the money.' But cashing out a 401(k) is generally the worst option, at least in financial terms. If you liquidate a 401(k) before age 59 ½, you generally pay income taxes on the amount, plus a 10% penalty for early withdrawal. Moreover, you miss out on the chance to collect years of compounded returns on your 401(k) investments. If you cash out a $7,000 retirement account at age 40, you may net as little as $4,270 in actual cash to spend, after penalties and taxes, Fidelity estimates. But if you leave the same $7,000 invested for 20 more years, and the investments increase at an annual rate of 8%, the sum will grow to nearly $35,000, according to a NerdWallet calculator. 'You think it's a small amount of money. You take it out. But if it stayed invested, it could have grown to a much larger sum,' said Anqi Chen, associate director of savings and household finance at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Why do departing workers cash out their 401(k)s? Exiting workers cash out 401(k) accounts for several reasons, retirement experts say. Vanguard researchers theorize that financial need, more than anything else, drives workers to liquidate retirement accounts. Hourly workers are more likely than salaried employees to cash out 401(k)s. The reason, Vanguard says, may be that hourly workers have more income fluctuations. Those ups and downs can leave them short of cash. Workers with lower incomes are more likely to cash out than those with higher incomes. That data point, too, suggests financial need. 'It's really short-term cashflow liquidity challenges that are explaining a lot of these early withdrawals,' said Aaron Goodman, an economist at Vanguard. Vanguard found that workers with emergency savings were much less likely to cash out a 401(k) when leaving a job. Thus, Vanguard urges workers to save for emergencies. Even $2,000 in rainy-day funds, researchers found, allowed workers to leave jobs without raiding retirement funds. Employees are also much more likely to cash out a 401(k) account with a small balance. The typical cashout involves 'a few thousand dollars,' Goodman said. Some workers, especially younger workers, cash out retirement accounts because the sum seems too small to bother with. 'It's easy for them to fall into this mindset, 'It's not a lot of money,'' said Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments. 'If you do that every other year in your 20s, that starts to add up.' Rolling over a 401(k) can be 'incredibly hard' Cashing out a 401(k) is relatively easy. Rolling it over into another retirement account, by contrast, can be 'incredibly hard,' said Chen of Boston College. That's another reason why many workers cash out retirement plans. In a rollover, you move your retirement savings to another 401(k) account at your new company, or into an IRA, a personal retirement savings account. Rollovers can get complicated, especially when the funds are going into a new 401(k) account managed by a different firm. Research by Capitalize, a retirement savings platform, found rollovers 'outdated and painful': Only 22% of savers managed to roll over an account without help, and 42% said the process took them at least two months to complete. In many cases, rollovers involve laborious forms and old-fashioned paper checks. Some employers encourage departing workers to cash out low-balance retirement accounts, "just because it's easier for them," said David John, a senior strategic policy advisor at the AARP Public Policy Institute. The ability to move a 401(k) from one employer to the next is called 'portability,' and the lack of it has thwarted workers from preserving retirements savings, according to Chen and others. When exiting employees contemplate rolling over a 401(k) account, 'they're just a little bit overwhelmed by the process,' said Shamrell of Fidelity. 'They feel it's going to be time-consuming and complex.' A recent initiative in the retirement-savings industry aims to solve the portability problem. In 2022, a consortium of private retirement-plan providers announced a collaboration to boost the portability of small retirement accounts. When someone leaves a job, the network of providers will make sure that retirement funds 'move seamlessly from one job to another,' said John of AARP. The auto-portability program applies to accounts valued at $7,000 or less, which are more likely to be cashed out or forgotten. Most big retirement-plan providers participate in the effort. 'I do think there's an evolution, as there should be, in terms of making this more of a point-and-click exercise,' said Williams of Schwab. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Workers cash out 401(k)s at an alarming rate. Why? Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 12/08/2025
On Monday, local time, U.S. President Trump nominated E.J. Antoni, Chief Economist of the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation, to serve as the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This move comes shortly after Trump criticized the unfavorable U.S. employment data as being manipulated and subsequently dismissed the previous commissioner. The market has been closely watching who would take over the position and whether this change would impact the statistical reporting of U.S. economic data. Antoni's appointment still requires confirmation by the U.S. Senate before he can officially assume the role. He has long been a critic of the BLS, advocating for a comprehensive, top-to-bottom review of the bureau. Prior to Trump's public criticism and the dismissal of the previous commissioner, the BLS had been a relatively low-profile agency, rarely entering the public eye. It operates under the U.S. Department of Labor but maintains a degree of independence. The BLS is responsible for collecting crucial data on employment, inflation, and wages, which serve as vital references for business and policy decisions, emphasizing the importance of being free from political interference. In addition to the change in leadership, the BLS is also facing challenges and controversies due to budget cuts. Some analysts have noted that due to insufficient staffing, the BLS has ceased collecting inflation data in certain cities, relying more on estimation methods. Recently, concerns about the credibility of the BLS economic data have also begun to emerge on Wall Street. This raises questions about the potential impact of these changes on the accuracy and reliability of the data that businesses and policymakers depend on. Prominent figures, including Jeffrey Gundlach, known as the "Bond King," and Michael Gapen, an economist at Morgan Stanley, have expressed concerns that U.S. economic data has become unreliable. They argue that this could lead to skepticism about the quality of data released by U.S. government agencies. Currently, the market is closely watching the upcoming release of the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for July, scheduled for Tuesday local time. This inflation report is expected to provide critical insights into the state of the economy. Analysts point out that concerns over inflation data performance led to a decline in the three major U.S. stock indices overnight. Market forecasts suggest that the July CPI will show a monthly increase of 0.2% and a yearly increase of 2.8%. When excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI is expected to rise 0.3% monthly and 3.1% yearly. The market is also hoping to glean signals from the latest inflation data regarding the Federal Reserve's potential rate-cut path. However, Wall Street remains divided on the timing of rate cuts. One camp believes the Fed will cut rates as early as September, arguing that such a move is overdue. This divergence in expectations highlights the uncertainty surrounding monetary policy and its impact on the economy. 'I think the rate right now is modestly because rates are lower, therefore stocks must go higher, but the damage that perhaps modestly restrictive rates are doing to the economy and eventually corporate profits would be reduced." However, another camp believes that the Federal Reserve will continue to wait and see, monitoring the impact of tariffs on inflation before making any decisions. "We don't think it'd be September, so the Fed will take this time. Powell, if he doesn't have too much pressure, will continue at his path, which we believe is the case, and we'll likely see the Fed act in December and then aggressively act next year. " Morgan Stanley and Bank of America both predict that the Federal Reserve will not cut rates this year, while JP Morgan Chase anticipates three rate cuts in 2025.
