Former Cleveland Fed President Mester: The Fed should be waiting right now
Former Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the challenges facing the Federal Reserve, state of the economy, rate path outlook, and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fed is 'in a bind,' wants to avoid 2022 inflation mistakes
May's Consumer Price Index (CPI) will be an important piece of inflation data to gauge the impact of President Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs from April. The report is due out Wednesday morning, June 11. Comerica Bank Chief Economist Bill Adams comments on current CPI forecasts and why he thinks the Federal Reserve is "in a bind right now" around the US central bank's dual mandate of balancing inflation and the labor market. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Morning Brief here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why this strategist sees the S&P 500 hitting 6,500 this year
Stocks (^GSPC, ^IXIC, ^DJI) are nearing record highs as investors anticipate interest rate cuts and steady earnings. Federated Hermes chief market strategist Phil Orlando joins Market Domination to explain why he still expects the S&P 500 to hit 6,500 this year. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination here. And speaking of that, Phil, I'm looking at the SPX here, the S&P 500, you're knocking right on that February peak, Phil. When you talk to your clients, are you telling them, listen, we're going to move higher from here, near to intermediate term? And what does that depend on, Phil? So, we're not changing our our view. We we thought the S&P 500 would get up to the 6,500 level this year, uh, and 7,000 by the end of next year. So we're we're delighted that we've seen this 25% rebound, uh, and we're encouraging, you know, clients to hang on. We think, uh, we think things are going to go higher. We think the economy is not going into recession. Uh, we think corporate earnings are going to continue to grind higher. Uh, if we're right that inflation remains relatively benign and that the labor market is is loose, uh, is weakening a little bit here, that suggests that we may see a couple of rate cuts from the Federal Reserve at the back end of the year. Uh, lower interest rates likely will, uh, result in in in a slight expansion of price earnings ratios. And and that, you know, represents the base case for why we think stocks ought to be higher over the next 18 months or so. What could go wrong with that scenario? Well, there there are many things. Uh, you know, we we started this conversation talking about the progress we're making on trade. Suppose trade, suppose these discussions blow up, you know, by historic proportions and we don't have a trade deal and we're back to where we were, uh, you know, on liberation day, and that's certainly a problem. Uh, suppose the Federal Reserve, uh, decides that it it doesn't like what it sees. It's it it needs more information on tariffs and it uh, it opts not to uh, cut interest rates later in the year. Maybe they they turn and hike interest rates preemptively because they think that, uh, the the destruction of the tariff situation is going to result in higher inflation and the Fed is going to focus on, uh, trying to bring higher inflation down rather than cater to the fact that the labor market is weakening. So there there's any number of factors, you know, among our assumptions that could go wrong, uh, but, you know, at least for the last couple months, things have been, you know, falling into place and moving in the right direction. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Rising cost of homeowners insurance has scared away millions of Americans
Rising cost of homeowners insurance has scared away millions of Americans Show Caption Hide Caption Smoke drifting into US from Canada wildfires could impact health Smoke from wildfires in Canada has drifted into Montana, the Dakotas, Minnesota, Midwestern and East Coast states, and as far south as Florida. As homeowners insurance becomes more expensive, many Americans are choosing to go without it – even as risks that are prevented, or at least mitigated, by insurance coverage increase. The Federal Reserve's Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households of 2024, released in May 2025, is the latest analysis to document the trend. Across the country, 7% of all homeowners in the survey of more than 12,000 respondents had no insurance, the report found, although there were some discrepancies based on geography. When asked why they didn't have homeowners insurance, 43% said they 'couldn't afford it', while another 19% said 'it is not worth the cost.' And respondents with fewer financial resources were among the most likely to go without insurance. Roughly 3 in 10 homeowners with income less than $25,000 or those whose only asset was their home went without. The Fed's findings track almost exactly with a report published in early 2024 by the nonprofit watchdog group Consumer Federation of America. Approximately 7.4% of American homeowners are uninsured, that report found, representing 6.1 million homes. "Homeowners earning under $50,000 per year are twice as likely to lack insurance compared to homeowners in general,' CFA's authors wrote, adding that 22% of Native American homeowners, 14% of Hispanic homeowners, and 11% of Black homeowners have no insurance. The findings are concerning, the report adds, because it means those owners 'are at risk of losing their homes in the face of ever-escalating climate disasters and storms.' See also: Climate risk will take trillion-dollar bite out of America's real estate, report finds More recent research suggests the threat may be even more stark. An analysis from data analytics provider First Street, released in May 2025, found a direct correlation between lack of insurance and foreclosures. But First Street's findings also demonstrate it's not just the uninsured homes that suffer, but the broader communities as a whole. When storms hit and homeowners fall into delinquency, there's less tax revenue for municipal services like transportation and less demand boosting the local economy. Homes may be abandoned or not kept up, and the value of even undamaged homes may increase more slowly or decline outright. Still, there are good reasons why millions of homeowners say insurance is too expensive for them. 2025 data from CFA shows that in 2024, a typical homeowner – with a midrange credit score and a house with a $350,000 replacement value – faced an average premium of $3,303 per year – $275 per month. Those numbers have been growing. First Street has shown that premiums started to surge around 2013. As of 2022, insurance costs made up more than 20% of the typical mortgage payment, roughly triple the 7-8% that they made up in the decade or so before 2013. More: Homeownership used to mean stable housing costs. That's a thing of the past. Since 2019, foreclosures have ticked up in tandem with the cost of insurance, First Street has shown. 'The one thing proven to prevent foreclosures is getting so expensive that it is causing foreclosures,' the group said. To combat the problem, CFA has a few recommendations. The group believes that requiring insurance companies to publicly release data on homeowners insurance underwriting, pricing, coverage, and claims every year would be a helpful start, by making the industry more transparent. CFA also recommends investing federal and state dollars in housing resiliency, and requiring that insurance companies charge lower premiums of homeowners who make climate risk reduction upgrades to their homes. 'The pace of rapidly rising premiums is increasingly unsustainable,' CFA said.
