
A good deal or a good deal of waste? How to be more conscious about your consumption during sales periods
'Temporary sales events are aimed at leveraging FOMO,' says Jason Pallant, a senior lecturer in marketing at RMIT University. 'The idea is to make consumers feel like they will miss out on a great bargain if they don't buy something right away.'
While it can feel good to click 'buy now' in the moment, ending up with piles of barely used impulse purchases leads to a particular kind of shame, regret (and clutter). With the end-of-financial-year sales period upon us, here are some strategies to ensure you are being conscious about your on-sale consumption.
Believe it or not, our brains are wired to encourage us to buy things at a reduced price, especially when there is a sense of urgency – ie during sales and promotions.
Cathrine Jansson-Boyd, a professor of consumer psychology at Anglia Ruskin University, says this is because of three things. 'When we see a price tag that we perceive as a good deal, the part of our brains that deals with pleasure is activated,' she says. Then, when we make a purchase, we get a dopamine hit that makes us feel good and, finally, when there is a time limit on the availability of the discounted price, it triggers heightened adrenaline. This combination means sales shopping can make people 'feel giddy with excitement'.
Being aware of this dynamic and recognising it when temptation arises is the first step to exercising self-control and resisting the urge to make an impulse purchase.
The second step is to take 'a calm pause between looking at an item and purchasing', says Dr Kate Luckins, the author of Live More With Less. This should help to 'counter the frenzy of the sale'.
If you're shopping in store, one way to do this is by holding on to the item while you continue browsing and delay heading to the checkout. Or, if you're shopping online, stand up and walk away from your computer or put down your phone and do something else to see if the shine of the product wears off. Alternatively, sleep on it.
'In that pause, you will either obsess over the item you're considering, or you will move on and forget about it,' Luckins says.
So as not to miss out on the savings promotional periods offer, Stephanie Atto from Australian Consumer and Retail Studies recommends keeping a list of products you are looking to buy and sticking to the list during sales periods. 'To resist sales pressures, consumers should focus on being informed and assertive,' she says. 'Be prepared by understanding your needs, doing your research and setting a budget.'
The popularity of this strategy is borne out by data. Pallant says the increased frequency of sales periods has trained consumers to wait to make purchases. 'A recent shopper survey from Mailchimp suggests 76% of consumers use these events to buy products they were planning to buy anyway.'
Although it might feel like being increasingly online gives retailers an advantage, Pallant suggests inverting this dynamic by keeping track of what you want to buy, what a good price is and gathering your own data.
'Do your research about how often these brands or products go on sale and what a good discount really is,' he says. 'There are so many sales events now that if you miss out on one, you might only have to wait a couple of weeks for another.'
Given the frequency of email and social media marketing, you can do yourself a favour ahead of time by 'setting tech limits', Atto says. This can be as simple as running through your inbox and unsubscribing from brands and retailers that always seem to be communicating promotions, or unfollowing social media accounts that do the same.
As the designer and poet William Morris said: 'Have nothing in your houses that you do not know to be useful or believe to be beautiful.' Regardless of how much your dopamine-hungry brain is calculating you will save with the purchase of an item, once you've bought it, it's yours – so it's worth assessing whether it is a good investment.
Try exercising some reverse Marie Kondo (the decluttering expert) and ask before the purchase: Does this item truly bring me joy? In six months, when I am cleaning out my cupboards, is its quality so good that I will still be proud to own it?
The flip side of this is that shopping on sale can be an opportunity to buy something of beautiful quality or craftsmanship that might normally be out of your budget. 'Buying one piece or product we love rather than a bunch we kind of like at a discount is much more satisfying in the long term,' Luckins says.
If you're having trouble using the form, click here. Read terms of service here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Commonwealth Bank bosses are forced to admit to making major mistake
The Commonwealth Bank has admitted it was wrong to axe 45 jobs and replace them with artificial intelligence - and has now walked back the cuts. In July, the bank announced it would scrap 45 call centre positions in favour of a new AI voicebot designed to handle customer enquiries. At the time, executives argued the technology would ease pressure on staff by reducing call volumes. But the move backfired and instead, call volumes surged after the rollout, forcing Commonwealth Bank bosses to jump on the phones themselves to deal with the overflow. The bank has apologised to affected employees and is now scrambling to keep them in the jobs. 'We have apologised to the employees concerned and acknowledge we should have been more thorough in our assessment of the roles required,' a spokesperson told Daily Mail. 'We are currently supporting affected employees and have provided them with choice regarding continuing in their current roles, pursuing redeployment within CBA or to proceed with leaving the organisation.' When Daily Mail asked the CBA if AI would threaten more jobs in the future, the bank refused to answer the question. Financial Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano said the damage was already done for the 45 workers who endured weeks of stress, not knowing if they would be able to pay bills and support their families. 'This is a massive win for workers, proving what can be achieved when members stand together, but let's be clear, this is no victory lap,' FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said in a statement sent to Daily Mail. 'CBA has been caught out trying to dress up job cuts as innovation. Using AI as a cover for slashing secure jobs is a cynical cost-cutting exercise, and workers know it. 'CBA likes to talk about being a digital leader, but real leadership means investing in your people, not tossing them aside and blaming the technology.' When the job cuts were first announced last month, before the plan was scrapped, a CBA spokesperson insisted the company was 'investing in the future'. 'To meet the changing needs of our customers, like many organisations, we review the skills we need and how we're organised to deliver the best customer experiences and outcomes,' a CBA spokesman said in July. 'Our investment in technology, including AI, is making it easier and faster for customers to get help, especially in our call centres. By automating simple queries, our teams can focus on more complex customer queries that need empathy and experience. Commonwealth Bank also sparked backlash in July for sending 100 jobs to India after retrenching hundreds of local staff with a union accusing it of offshoring work for cheaper labour. The Commonwealth Bank said that 304 Australians would be made redundant in technology and retail roles. This occurred as 110 jobs, affected by redundancies in Australia, were created at the Commonwealth Bank's Bangalore-based subsidiary, CBA India. These new jobs in India included job titles that had existed in Australia including staff data engineer, senior software engineers, staff software engineer, engineering manager, software engineer and senior data engineer. The Commonwealth Bank, Australia's biggest home lender, has doubled the number of staff in India in just two years. The Commonwealth Bank's number of staff in India more than doubled in two years, growing from 2,854 employees in June 2022 to 5,630 by June 2024, its most recent annual report revealed. This occurred as the number of staff in Australia fell from 38,153 to 36,572, with many retrenchments related to bank branch closures in big cities.


Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Brambles launches share buyback after profit surge; shares scale new high
Aug 21 (Reuters) - Australian logistics firm Brambles ( opens new tab unveiled a $400 million share buyback programme and increased its dividend payout after reporting a 15% jump in full-year net profit on Thursday, sending its shares soaring to a record high. The world's largest pallet pooling company logged $896 million in profit attributable for the year ended June 30, up from $779.9 million a year earlier, as its "transformation programme" delivered improved margins. Shares of the company rose as much as 11.3% to a record A$25.86, making them one of the top 10 gainers on the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 index (.AXJO), opens new tab, which was trading 1.1% higher. Brambles declared a final dividend of 20.83 cents per share, up from 19 cents paid last year. It also announced a $400 million share buyback programme for the new financial year. Brambles forecast 8%-11% growth in underlying profit for fiscal 2026, broadly in line with Visible Alpha consensus estimates of 9% rise, according to Citi analysts. "Looking forward, the consumer environment appears to be impacting revenue guide, however better operating leverage than usual is driving an inline/modestly ahead underlying profit," Citi said in a research note.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Where were you? Atlassian billionaire Scott Farquhar turns up THREE HOURS late to Albo's economic roundtable meeting to reshape Australia... and then wears a T-shirt
He's been campaigning to loosen Australian AI laws - but tech bro billionaire Scott Farquhar skipped the first session of Anthony Albanese's economic roundtable in Canberra this week, according to sources in the room. The Atlassian co-founder, who is also the founding member and chair of the Tech Council of Australia, was one of 24 core invitees to the Canberra talkfest aimed at turbocharging Australia's economy. The two dozen business bigwigs, union barons and civil service mandarins have all been sharing their big ideas for boosting the country's faltering productivity over the course of the three-day talk-fest. Farquhar, 45, has attracted criticism in recent days for his calls to allow AI companies free rein to use copyrighted material without compensating the original creators. But Farquhar, who is Australia's fourth richest person with an estimated personal fortune of $21.4 billion, was not there to hear Prime Minister Anthony Albanese or Treasurer Jim Chalmers ' opening remarks on Tuesday morning. Nor was he there for the opening address from Reserve Bank Governor Michele Bullock about some of the productivity challenges facing the economy. He also missed the first session, which started at 9am, about the international risks, opportunities and trade led by National Farmers' Federation president David Jochinke and Australian National University professor Shiro Armstrong. Farquhar finally joined the oval table in the Cabinet room at 11.20am for the second session on 'skills attraction, development and mobility'. It is unclear whether he had a prior engagement. The only other two core invitees not in attendance were representatives from the Australian Council of Trade Unions. The Daily Mail approached the Tech Council of Australia for comment. On Wednesday morning Farquhar turned up in a grey herringbone suit jacket over a black t-shirt to hear Chalmers thank attendees for the 'spirit' they brought to the discussion the day before. 'I do think there are large swathes of what we need to do together where there is a consensus emerging, and that's very welcome,' the Treasurer said. Farquhar was sat between Teal MP Allegra Spender and Bran Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Business Council of Australia. Later in the day, he was sat beside the most senior public servant in the country, Steven Kennedy, Secretary of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. Farquhar's appearance at the productivity summit comes hot on the heels of another headline-grabbing trip to Canberra. Last month, he addressed the National Press Club in his role as chair of the Tech Council of Australia. He made an impassioned plea for lawmakers to capitalise on the AI revolution - an opportunity that could boost the economy, he claimed, to the tune of $115billion per year by 2030. 'The scoreboard of the AI era is blank,' Mr Farquhar said. 'The race is still on, and Australia has everything to play for.' However, it was his call for the government to change copyright laws to give exceptions for AI text and data mining that provoked a firestorm of criticism. This was later echoed in an interim report by the Productivity Commission, which suggested Australia's tight regulations around copyright and intellectual property rights could stifle AI advancements. But artists, writers, performers and media organisations united to oppose any change, arguing that it represented 'wholesale theft' of their creative work. For example, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance labelled it 'a blueprint for the wholesale theft of Australia's art, media, and cultural heritage that will do nothing more than further enrich the billionaires in Silicon Valley'. Farquhar was taken to task on the issue by the ABC's 7.30 host Sarah Ferguson last week. Ferguson repeatedly pressed him on his call for the government to grant exemptions to AI companies to override copyright laws She asked him how he would have felt if a business rival stole his intellectual property before he made his billions. 'You would've been happy to yield your intellectual property for no reward?', Ferguson asked. Farquhar responded: 'As a society, we say that everyone gets copyright.' But Ferguson was not finished. 'What about you Scott Farquhar, at that time?', she asked. 'With something that you had created through your own skill, blood, sweat and tears. If someone had come along and taken that from you and used it to benefit themselves with no benefit to you, you would've thought that was fair?'