
Minister tells NA: US, others can participate in offshore oil, gas bidding round
Responding to a calling attention notice, the Federal Minister for Petroleum, Ali Pervaiz Malik, stated that the second offshore bidding round was proceeding according to a formal and transparent process, scheduled to conclude on 2nd October this year.
He noted that several international firms from the United States, China, Turkey, Kuwait, and other countries had expressed interest in the bidding rounds.
The calling attention notice was moved by PPP lawmakers Nafeesa Shah, Naveed Qamar, and others, who sought clarification following a 31st July social media post by US President Donald Trump.
Trump's post referred to a 'new deal' between Pakistan and the United States for joint oil development, which caused confusion owing to the absence of any official statement.
In his reply, Malik confirmed that while resource assessments were ongoing, the government had not entered into any exclusive arrangement with any country.
'All decisions regarding block awards will be made after the completion of the offshore bidding process,' he assured the House, adding that Pakistan was engaging with multiple countries to modernise its energy policies and adopt advanced technologies.
The minister emphasised the government's renewed commitment to energy exploration, particularly in the hydrocarbon sector, which had been largely neglected in recent years.
'Pakistan resumed oil and gas exploration earlier this year, launching an onshore bidding round in April that resulted in the award of 13 blocks, including one to Turkish Petroleum,' Malik said.
He added that a second onshore bidding round, covering 23 blocks, was currently underway, with results also anticipated in October.
Regarding the ongoing offshore round – the first in several years – he revealed that it covers 40 blocks, including those along the Indus Basin and near Gwadar. Applications have been submitted by companies from Turkey, China, Kuwait, and the United States.
Details of successful bidders, block allocations, and investment commitments will be disclosed once the process concludes.
On the financial side, Malik said developing a single onshore exploration well requires an investment of approximately $20-25 million, while offshore wells can cost over $120 million.
Turning to unconventional resources, the minister cited a 2009 assessment by Italy's ENI estimating Pakistan's tight gas reserves at around 35 trillion cubic feet – roughly equivalent to three Sui gas fields.
He added that the tight gas policy was updated in 2024 during a meeting of the Council of Common Interests (CCI), with nine new assessments currently underway.
Regarding shale resources, Malik noted Pakistan's estimated shale oil reserves at approximately 14 billion barrels – more than ten times the country's cumulative oil production to date.
He said a pilot shale gas recovery project by the state-owned Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDCL), near Hyderabad, had completed its technical evaluation. A commercial study is now underway, which will inform a revised shale oil policy.
Malik also referred to a 2015 USAID-backed study estimating substantial shale oil and gas potential in the Lower Indus Basin – far exceeding the country's total hydrocarbon extraction since independence.
'American collaboration remains a key component in assessing and developing these unconventional resources,' he affirmed, underlining Pakistan's interest in attracting US investment and expertise to diversify its energy portfolio.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US proposed NATO-style joint defence guarantees for Kyiv: source
KYIV: The US has proposed security guarantees for Ukraine similar to – but separate from – those enjoyed by NATO member countries, a diplomatic source told AFP on Saturday. The suggestion was raised during a call US President Donald Trump held with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders earlier on Saturday, the source said. 'As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-NATO Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with (Russian leader Vladimir) Putin,' the diplomatic source said on condition they not be identified in any way. NATO's collective security is based on its Article 5 principle: if one member is attacked, the entire alliance comes to its defence. Trump says Ukraine needs to make a deal after summit with Putin ends without ceasefire Trump, Zelensky and European leaders – who included NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte – spoke early Saturday to discuss Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin held on Friday in Alaska. Before that joint call, Trump also had a call with Zelensky as flew back from Alaska. 'The American side voiced this (joint security proposal) during a conversation with the president (Zelensky) and then repeated it during a joint conversation with the Europeans,' the diplomatic source said. Another source with knowledge of the matter confirmed the NATO-like guarantees had been discussed. But that source added: 'No-one knows how this could work and why Putin would agree to it if he is categorically against NATO and obviously against really effective guarantees of Ukraine's sovereignty.' Kyiv has long aspired to join NATO – but Russia has given that as one of its reasons for its war in Ukraine, and some Western circles have expressed resistance to the idea. Trump has repeatedly ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. Zelensky is due in Washington on Monday for talks with Trump. The second source told AFP that Zelensky is to discuss what form a possible Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit would have, the role of Kyiv's European allies in peace talks, territories, and security guarantees.


Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Zelenskiy to visit US, Trump speaks with European leaders after Putin summit
WASHINGTON: Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he will visit Washington on Monday to meet Donald Trump, who spoke at length with the Ukrainian president and with NATO and European leaders after the U.S. president's summit in Alaska with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. The highly anticipated Trump-Putin summit yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Russia's war in Ukraine, although both leaders described the talks as productive before heading home. Trump held the calls with Zelenskiy and U.S. allies on his way back to Washington, where he landed in the early hours of Saturday morning, the White House said. Zelenskiy described the over 90-minute call with Trump as 'long and substantive.' Zelenskiy said Ukraine supported Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the U.S. and Russia. He also said he discussed with Trump the 'positive signals from the American side regarding participation in guaranteeing Ukraine's security.' Trump-Putin summit ends with no ceasefire in Ukraine war 'Ukraine emphasizes that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this. On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington, D.C., to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war,' Zelenskiy said on X. Axios reporter Barak Ravid said, citing a source, that Trump told Zelenskiy and European leaders during the phone call that Putin was not interested in a ceasefire but in a comprehensive agreement to end the war. 'I think a fast peace deal is better than a ceasefire,' Trump said in the call, according to Ravid, who cited a source on the call without identifying that person. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron and leaders from Germany, Finland, Poland, Italy and Britain joined the call in which Trump briefed allies about the summit with Putin.


Express Tribune
12 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Oil and gas output hits 20-year low
Amid renewed hopes of US investment in Pakistan's oil sector, spurred by recent tweets from former US President Donald Trump hinting at greater American involvement in local exploration and implying potential crude supply to India, Pakistan has recorded its weakest oil and gas production in more than two decades. Industry data for fiscal year 2025 (FY25) shows a steep double-digit drop in both crude oil and natural gas output, deepening concerns over energy security and foreign exchange pressures. Analysts warn the downturn, driven by structural imbalances, regulatory measures, and surplus imported LNG, could deepen in the year ahead, adding pressure to the country's foreign exchange reserves and energy security. Pakistan's oil and gas sector recorded its weakest output in more than two decades during fiscal year 2025 (FY25), as surplus regasified liquefied natural gas (RLNG) in the system forced a curtailment of local production. According to a report by Topline Securities, hydrocarbon output fell sharply, with crude oil volumes down 12% year-on-year (YoY) and natural gas output slipping 8% YoY. The downturn accelerated in the final quarter, with oil production dropping 8% quarter-on-quarter (QoQ) and 15% YoY, while gas production contracted by 7% QoQ and 10% YoY, underscoring persistent strain on the sector. The surplus RLNG was driven in part by a policy shift that diverted captive industrial users from natural gas to the national power grid. Compounding the pressure, the government imposed an "off-grid levy" on captive gas consumption at a rate of Rs791 per million British thermal units (mmbtu), pushing the total cost to Rs4,291/mmbtu. This made electricity generation via gas more expensive than grid supply, further discouraging industrial gas use and reducing demand for domestic production. Oil output averaged 62,400 barrels per day (bpd) in FY25, with volumes falling across major fields by between 3% and 46%. Key producers such as Makori East, Nashpa, Maramzai, Pasakhi, and Mardankhel all saw declines. The Tal Block, which accounts for roughly 17% of Pakistan's total oil production, posted a steep 22% YoY decline in the fourth quarter alone. Within the block, production from the Maramzai and Mardankhel fields plunged by 54% and 52% YoY, respectively, highlighting the severity of the downturn. Gas output averaged 2,886 million cubic feet per day (mmcfd) in FY25, with major fields also under pressure. Qadirpur and Nashpa recorded the steepest contractions in the fourth quarter, down 36% and 34% YoY, respectively, largely due to curtailment by the Sui gas companies. Even the Sui field itself, Pakistan's largest gas producer, reported consistent declines, reflecting the sector-wide impact of the RLNG oversupply and shifting demand patterns. The cutback in domestic production has had significant macroeconomic consequences. Topline Securities estimates that the increased reliance on imported fuels, necessitated by the reduced local output, placed an additional strain of more than $1.2 billion on Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves during FY25. Analysts warn that this not only inflates the import bill but also exposes the country to greater vulnerability from global fuel price swings and potential supply disruptions. Looking ahead, the outlook remains challenging. Topline projects that oil production will hover between 58,000-60,000 bpd in FY26, while gas output is expected to remain in the range of 2,750-2,850 mmcfd. Without a reversal of current policies or new investment in exploration and production (E&P), FY26 could mark the third consecutive year of declining hydrocarbon volumes. There is, however, a potential opening for recovery. The government is set to renegotiate its long-term RLNG supply agreement with Qatar in March 2026. Industry observers believe that more flexible contract terms could give domestic E&P companies the space to ramp up production, provided field maintenance and capital expenditure remain on track. Balancing imported LNG supply with the need to sustain indigenous production, they note, will be critical to ensuring Pakistan's energy security and protecting its fragile foreign exchange position.