logo
Rachel Reeves considers cut to tax-free pension lump sum

Rachel Reeves considers cut to tax-free pension lump sum

Times4 hours ago
Plans to cut the pension lump sum that can be claimed tax-free are understood to be under consideration as part of revenue-raising measures in Rachel Reeves's budget.
The chancellor decided against more than halving the threshold to £100,000 last year, but the policy is said to feature on a list of options being prepared by officials.
At 55, most people can take a lump sum worth 25 per cent of their pension tax-free, up to the value of £268,275. The age threshold is set to rise to 57 from April 2028.
Treasury civil servants are expected to suggest reducing the amount that can be withdrawn on retirement to raise a further £2 billion, according to The Telegraph.
Allies of Reeves have remained tight-lipped about the budget, to avoid ruling revenue-raising measures in or out.
Torsten Bell, the pensions minister and former director of the Resolution Foundation think tank, previously advocated cutting the tax-free cap to as little as £40,000.
The Treasury is preparing to present Reeves with options to help raise tens of billions of pounds and avoid her breaking her own fiscal rules. The chancellor left herself with just £9.9 billion of headroom in her last budget.
U-turns on moves designed to cut costs, including the winter fuel allowance and reforms to disability benefits, have eaten into that figure. Rising gilt yields and borrowing costs have added to the challenge.
The government is also grappling with inflation, which has risen to 3.8 per cent — nearly double the Bank of England's target.
Speculation about the budget could spark a repeat of last year, when there was a spike in savers taking their tax-free lump sum Reeves's fiscal statement in October. AJ Bell, an investment platform, said its customers took about £300 million extra from their pensions last year than was expected.
• Savers fear for the pension tax-free lump sum
Interactive Investor, another platform, said the value of tax-free lump sum withdrawals were more than 500 per cent higher in July last year, when Labour won the general election, than in July 2023.
Similar moves would be likely to reduce the amount of revenue raised, at least in the short term, if savers sought to get ahead of any possible changes to the cap by drawing down the lump sum early.
The Treasury refused to say this week whether the perk for pensions would be protected. A spokesperson said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy — which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8 billion and cut borrowing by £3.4 billion
'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why, at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Epping case could bring migrant hotel use to an end – where else can asylum seekers go?
As Epping case could bring migrant hotel use to an end – where else can asylum seekers go?

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

As Epping case could bring migrant hotel use to an end – where else can asylum seekers go?

A High Court Judge ruled that asylum seekers can no longer be housed at a hotel in Epping that has been the site of multiple protests in recent weeks. Epping Forest District Council won an interim injunction to stop asylum seekers being hosted at The Bell Hotel, saying it had become a 'feeding ground for unrest.' The judgement requires all migrants currently housed in the hotel – around 140 men as of last month – to leave by 4pm on 12 September. The Home Office is responsible for asylum and protection in the UK, and must now find somewhere else for these people to go. Reacting to the ruling, it warned it would 'substantially impact' its ability to house asylum seekers across the UK. Home secretary Yvette Cooper had unsuccessfully attempted to have the council's case dismissed shortly before the ruling. Other councils have also shown an interest in following suit in the wake of the ruling. However, none have initiated legal proceedings similar to Epping. Most experts agree that housing asylum seekers in hotels is not appropriate for a number of reasons. Cost, overcrowding and community tensions are amongst of the most commonly cited reasons. Border security minister Angela Eagle said the government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns', adding: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' The case raises the question of where the asylum seekers currently in the Bell Hotel will need to go come September and, should the widespread use of migrant hotels come to an end, where all people currently housed in them can be placed instead. Hotels The latest Home Office figures show that there were 32,059 asylum seekers in UK hotels at the end of June, up eight per cent on the same point 12 months ago. This is down slightly on the previous quarter, however, and far lower than the peak of 56,000 in September 2023. There are also now fewer than 210 hotels in use, down from 400 in summer 2023. These hotels only make up around 35 per cent of all people in asylum accommodation, according to a report from the National Audit Office (NAO) in May. But their cost is disproportionately expensive, making up 76 per cent of total government spending on asylum accommodation. And, as has been seen in recent months, they are also a hot-bed for protests which have oftentimes turned violent. Imran Hussain, director of external affairs at Refugee Council said: 'Asylum hotels have become a flashpoint for tension in communities, cost billions to the taxpayer, and leave people trapped in limbo. Ending their use is in everyone's interest, but the Government's current plan to phase them out by 2029 is far too slow. We need to reform the accommodation system so that councils can house people in the community.' Housing Moving more asylum seekers into houses or flats is one possible alternative to the use of hotels. These could be provided by private landlords or social housing groups. Around 66,000 migrants were housed in these kind of properties by the end of December 2024, compared to 38,000 in hotels at the same time. The main criticism of this approach is that it will add more demand onto the UK's already stretched housing industry. In the private sector, rising rents are making living costs unaffordable for many households. Moving more asylum seekers into these properties – funded by the government – may push up rental prices further and create less availability for UK residents. However, housing more asylum seekers in social housing would possibly create issues for residents who are struggling most in that local authority. The waiting list for council housing reached over 300,000 in 2024 – if more migrants are moved into social housing, the already-long wait times may increase further. Mr Hussain said: 'Housing people in communities is cheaper and more effective than hotels or military sites. Local authorities already manage housing for other groups and know their local areas best, so they're well placed to provide accommodation.' 'Ultimately, the only way to end hotel use for good is to resolve asylum applications quickly and accurately so people can either rebuild their lives here or return home with dignity. This will cut costs and allow refugees to integrate into their new communities, contribute, and play their part in Britain.' Military bases and boats Military bases have been used to accommodate asylum seekers in the past, but their use attracted widespread criticism. In 2022, the Conservative government said it would use 'large sites' like ex-military facilities, as well as barges and ferries to reduce demand on asylum hotels. The only two sites still in use are Wethersfield Airfield in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. As of December 2024, there were only 735 migrants living between them. The government said in March that Napier Barracks would be closing after multiple allegations of poor conditions and criticism from MPs. It was also found that former home secretary Suella Braverman acted unlawfully in accommodating three asylum seekers at Wethersfield who argued they were living in 'prison-like' conditions. However, despite pledging to close Wethersfield in opposition, Labour is set to continue and even expand its use, increasing its capacity from 800 to 1,225 in July. Most agree that the use of boats is not a tenable or humane solution. The last people left the Dorset-moored Bibby Stockholm in November after fierce criticism against the 'migrant barge'. Student accommodation The government purchased former student accommodation in Huddersfield in 2023 with the purpose of housing asylum seekers. As of February 2025, the property was under development, according to the NAO. The 405-bed block of flats will hold a maximum of 670 people, the Home Office has said. There were reports that 168 students had planned to live in the building and were told they had to make alternative arrangements, although the government denied this. Using this kind of accommodation – already built for temporary use – may be a strong option to replace the use of hotels in the coming years. However, Kirklees Council said in March that there were issues it would like to see addressed before the plans go ahead. Council leader Cathy Scott said: "The Home Office needs to commit to engaging properly with the Huddersfield community on its plans as well as addressing the many important issues the council and its partners have put forward before the site becomes operational. She added: "In Kirklees, we have a strong record of supporting people who are fleeing persecution. But the system relies on trust and confidence. We do not believe the Home Office has done enough to build trust over the past six months. That's why we will continue to raise our concerns on behalf of local residents and communities."

London Underground workers to strike in dispute over pay and conditions
London Underground workers to strike in dispute over pay and conditions

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

London Underground workers to strike in dispute over pay and conditions

London Underground workers are to stage a series of strikes next month in a dispute over pay and conditions. The Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT) said its members on the Tube will take industrial action at different times from September 5, for seven days. The union claimed management had refused to engage seriously with its demands on pay, fatigue management, shift patterns and a reduction in the working week. In a separate dispute over pay and conditions, RMT members on London's Docklands Light Railway will also be striking in the week beginning September 7. RMT general secretary Eddie Dempsey said: 'Our members are doing a fantastic job to keep our capital moving and work strenuous shift patterns to make sure Londoners get to their destinations around the clock. 'They are not after a King's ransom, but fatigue and extreme shift rotations are serious issues impacting on our members' health and wellbeing – all of which have not been adequately addressed for years by LU management. 'Coupled with the fact there are outstanding issues around staff travel arrangements, an atmosphere of distrust has been created, where our members feel like no-one is listening to them. 'RMT will continue to engage LU management with a view to seeking a revised offer in order to reach a negotiated settlement.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store