NY to release incarcerated people early from state prisons. How will the releases work?
The early release policy came after state officials last month fired 2,000 prison workers who refused to return to work following the resolution of an illegal, three-week strike.
The incarcerated people eligible for early release were already approved for release within the next roughly 90 days, state Corrections Commissioner Daniel Martuscello said, noting the final figure of people getting released early would likely be less than 700 because cases are still being evaluated to ensure they meet eligibility requirements.
Incarcerated people are not eligible for the early release program if they have been convicted of sex crimes, violent felonies or more serious felonies like murder, terrorism, and arson, Martuscello said during a media briefing in Albany.
Those being released early must also have an approved residence, which is not a shelter or Department of Social Services placement.
Details of the early release program were released in a memo directing state prison leaders to identify incarcerated people who met the eligibility requirements. The list of early release candidates was to be finalized by Friday, the memo noted.
The details of the early release memo included:
The incarcerated person is within 15 to 110 days of an approved release date, and has identified an approved residence for them to use upon release.
The memo prohibits the early release of anyone serving a sentence for an A-1 or A-1 non-drug offense, a class B through E violent felony offense, or a sex offense.
Lawsuits: 2 upstate NY counties sue to overturn Gov. Hochul ban on hiring prison workers who struck
The early release program aims to help ease the strain on about 10,000 workers across the state's 42 prisons since the firing of thousands of workers. The state has also in the process of beginning to demobilize the thousands of National Guard members who were deployed to staff prisons during and after the strike, Martuscello said.
Overall, the state's prison population is down about 55% from its high in 1999, with the number of incarcerated people falling from 72,773 to 32,400, according to statistics provided by the state.
Mass firing: NY prison strike ends after three weeks with most workers returning and 2,000 being fired
New York Republicans slammed Gov. Kathy Hochul's administration and other Democratic state lawmakers for releasing incarcerated people early, calling it potentially dangerous.
"This desperate measure highlights many of the concerns raised by correctional officers regarding inadequate staffing and the safety of inmates, staff and visitors at facilities statewide," Assembly Republicans said in a statement.
This article originally appeared on Rockland/Westchester Journal News: NY state prison early release: What to know
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Red states lead push for MAHA soda bans
Republican-led states are leading the charge to ban soda and candy from their food stamp programs, as Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement flips traditional partisanship on its head. Colorado is the only blue state to seek and have a soda ban waiver approved, and the only waiver state to propose expanding SNAP benefits in conjunction with limiting its scope. Both parties at times have expressed interest in eliminating soda from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), but the Trump administration is the first to encourage states to do so. Recent attempts at soda regulation have mostly been concentrated in blue cities. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg (D) infamously tried to ban the sale of supersized sugary drinks in 2013, prompting Republicans to decry his 'nanny state' tactics. With the healthy-eating push now under the MAHA branding, GOP states are jumping aboard. Kennedy doesn't run SNAP — that falls under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). But as the face of MAHA, Kennedy has been alongside Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to promote soda and candy bans. In just the first six months of the new administration, 12 state waivers have been approved by USDA that restrict SNAP recipients from purchasing some combination of soft drinks, sugary beverages, energy drinks and candy 'We all believe in free choice, we live in a democracy … if you want to buy sugary soda, you ought to be able to do that. The U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said during a recent press conference. The states that have claimed waivers are Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. SNAP dollars can be used to buy any food or beverage from a grocery store except alcohol, nutritional supplements or hot food. The idea of policing the shopping carts of low-income Americans has never sat well with anti-hunger advocates, who've argued it's paternalistic and stigmatizing for low-income Americans. Additionally, while federal data show sugary drinks are the leading source of added sugars in the American diet, nutrition experts said there is limited evidence that shows SNAP soda bans lead to better health outcomes. There's even less evidence that banning candy and dessert foods from SNAP can positively impact a person's diet. 'Claiming that implementing these restrictions will absolutely lead to a curb in diet-related diseases, you cannot confidently say that. There is no evidence to support that statement,' said Joelle Johnson, the deputy director for Healthy Food Access at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a group that advocates for stronger nutrition regulation. The SNAP waivers are for pilot programs only, so they won't immediately lead to long-term policy changes. They are a chance for states to conduct the research that's been missing — if they want to find out. Barry Popkin, a professor of nutrition at the University of North Carolina School of Global Public Health, said he thinks waivers are toothless ways for states to show their MAHA bonafides. 'None of these states are doing more than pleasing MAHA, doing what's easy. They can do this internally. They don't have to go to the politicians [and pass laws],' Popkin said, 'Waivers do nothing except allow a state to say you can't buy junk food.' Experts said historically, Republicans who have wanted to ban soda from SNAP also viewed it as a way to trim spending on the program. Some advocates continue to view the latest push with skepticism. One of the groups pushing hard for state SNAP waivers is the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank based in Florida that's been working for over a decade to reshape the nation's public assistance programs and significantly cut spending. Johnson said she is worried about a slippery slope. If fewer items are eligible for SNAP, she's concerned GOP leaders will use that as an excuse to cut back on people's monthly benefits. Priya Fielding-Singh, director of policy and programs at the George Washington University's Global Food Institute, said there could be benefits in trying to focus SNAP purchases on healthy food. But it's hard to look at a soda-and-candy ban in isolation, she said. The Agriculture Department slashed about $1 billion in funding that let schools and food banks buy food directly from local farms and ranchers. The White House is proposing deep cuts to fruit and vegetable benefits under the WIC program (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children). The GOP's new tax cut law is projected to cut $186 billion from SNAP in the next decade and disqualify millions from eligibility. 'It's hard to separate the soda ban from the larger political efforts to shrink SNAP overall. So are these bans about promoting health or are they about shrinking SNAP? And I think the distinction really matters,' Fielding-Singh said. She added that any moves to restrict what people can buy with SNAP should be paired with efforts to give people the 'means and access and resources to eat more healthfully.' But so far, none of the red state waivers does that. Gov. Jared Polis (D) in a statement on Colorado's waiver, called it 'a big step towards improving the health of Coloradans, and reducing obesity rates, diabetes, and tooth decay' that 'will help to ensure that more Coloradans participating in SNAP have access to healthy foods.' The Trump administration has not yet given them the green light on a separate waiver to cover hot foods from grocery stores like rotisserie chicken or soup. Democratic Govs. Laura Kelly (Kan.) and Katie Hobbs (Ariz.) each vetoed bills that called for their states to submit waivers to ban candy and soda. 'I support the idea that Kansans should eat healthier. However, changes to the SNAP food assistance program should be made at the federal level, not on a patchwork, state-by-state basis,' Kelly wrote in her veto message. She also noted the language in the bill would have mandated businesses to stop accepting food assistance benefits for 'healthy' items like protein bars and trail mix while continuing to allow Twix, Kit Kat, and Twizzlers. Kennedy this week said he expects more blue states to be filing waivers. 'I was at the governors' conference in Colorado last week, and I met with a whole string of Democratic governors and they all committed to filing SNAP waivers,' Kennedy said. Kennedy also said those governors also committed to put forward other 'MAHA legislation' but he acknowledged they may not want to be associated with the term because it's become 'kind of a partisan brand.' As she signed Colorado's waiver, Rollins said healthy eating should be bipartisan. 'This is not red or blue, Republican or Democrat,' Rollins said. 'We are discussing and working with every state, so really excited to continue to work with Gov. Polis.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Pritzker on GOP's FBI arrest threats: ‘Texas law does not apply' in Illinois
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) said Sunday it would be illegal for President Trump to order the FBI to arrest Texas state Democratic officials for fleeing their state to halt Republican redistricting efforts, 'Well, first of all, Texas law does not apply in the state of Illinois, and there's no federal law that would allow the FBI to arrest anybody that's here visiting our state. So, it's a lot of grandstanding,' said Pritzker to Kristen Welker on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Pritzker vowed to protect Texas Democrats who fled the Texas to Illinois, to prevent a quorum in the Texas legislature necessary to vote on the new gerrymandered voting map. After the legislators fled, Texas Gov Gregg Abbott (R) ordered their arrest because they 'abandoned their duty to Texans.' Since the lawmakers are out of state, Texas law enforcement cannot go get them or arrest them. In consequence, Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R) sent a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel asking for the FBI's assistance. When asked whether the FBI should get involved, Trump answered, 'Well, they may have to.' The Illinois governor has been highly critical of the Trump administration, saying that the president is trying to 'steal five seats from the people.' On NBC, he reiterated that he will protect the fleeing lawmakers and ranted against Abbott over these mid-decade redistricting efforts. 'We're providing them a safe haven, a place for them to visit and stay, breaking quorum, because they're heroes that are standing up not just for their own constituents and for the people of Texas and their rights but also for the rights of people all across the country,' he said. 'Because what Greg Abbott is doing and what Donald Trump is attempting to do is to cheat mid-decade here. This is — they're attempting to change the map. They know that they're going to lose in 2026 the Congress, and so they're trying to steal seats.' In an effort to keep a Republican majority after the 2026 midterms, Trump asked the Commerce Department to conduct a new census ahead of the one scheduled for 2030, not counting anyone who is in the country illegally. In normal times, the census is conducted every ten years, and redistricting occurs after that. Pritzker is accusing Abbott of violating the Voting Rights Act, which ensures fair representation for minorities in election maps. 'He's attempting to thwart federal law and take away five seats that are in the hands of Black, Brown, minority Congress people and the people that they represent,' said Pritzker. 'He's violating the Constitution. And all of us need to stand up and speak out and make sure that it's understood across the country that what they're trying to do in Texas is illegal.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pat Dugan will run against Larry Krasner again for Philadelphia District Attorney
The Brief Pat Dugan says he will be running for Philadelphia's district attorney in the General Election. He will be facing incumbent Larry Krasner for a second time. The former judge and registered Democrat will be running as a Republican. PHILADELPHIA - Former Municipal Court Judge Pat Dugan has announced that he will file to run for Philadelphia district attorney in November's General Election, challenging Larry Krasner a second time. What we know Incumbent Larry Krasner defeated Dugan in the democratic primary election back in May after securing about 60 percent of the votes. Dugan, a registered Democrat, says he will appear as a Republican in the General Election after receiving over 6,000 write-in votes. Philadelphia Republicans had failed to back a candidate for the first time in decades, which all but ensured Krasner would remain the city's top prosecutor. The backstory Krasner is running for his third term as district attorney. After securing the democratic primary win in May, Krasner shared a message for any would-be Republican challenger who emerges before Election Day. "If it should turn out that I have a Republican opponent…I have a question for that opponent and his rich friends from far away, and that question is: Which part don't you like? The safety or the fairness," Krasner said in his victory speech back in May. Dugan, a municipal court judge for 17 years, previously said he ran for district attorney because he believes "the city needs to be much safer than it has been." "I care about the city as a lifelong Philadelphian," he said. "I want my grandbabies to feel safe, I want the citizens of Philadelphia's children to feel safe." The Source Information from this article was provided by the Pat Dugan campaign and previous reporting by FOX 29 Philadelphia.
