
India Plays Hardball With ASEAN After $45 Billion Trade Disaster
There's a tectonic shift incoming in global trade and this time, it's not from Donald Trump, but from India. India may be considering terminating its trade pact with ASEAN. The ASEAN trade deal has turned into a $45 billion problem for India, flooding our markets with rerouted Chinese goods while leaving Indian exporters in the dust. For fifteen years, India played by the rules – now, the Modi government is rewriting them.
Nine rounds of negotiation, endless promises, but ASEAN still dodges our core demands on unfair trade practices and market access. With Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal calling out the bloc as 'China's B-Team," India stands at a crossroads: fix the imbalance, or walk away. If the tenth round of review talks is as ineffective as the rest, India may pick the second option.
India signed its landmark Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) which has ten members Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. The pact was signed in 2009 with the promise of prosperity, not pain.
Yet, today, the statistics tell a story starkly at odds with those early hopes: while trade rose to $123 billion, India's trade deficit with ASEAN exploded from a manageable $5 billion in 2010-11 to a jaw-dropping $45 billion in 2024-25. This deficit is now in the same league as India's $46 billion trade surplus with the United States which is being aggressively targeted by Trump with tariffs. And then there is the chronic deficit of almost $100 billion India faces with China. Plus, this is not the only bad deal that India is coping with. It also has FTA's with Japan and South Korea to fix. In a world rapidly hardening on trade, can India afford to play by old, one-sided rules? Obviously no, and recalibrating trade with ASEAN is right at the top on India's list.
From the outset, the ASEAN FTA was a 'gentleman's agreement" negotiated by the UPA government with a spirit of free trade and global integration, but lacking the hard-nosed pragmatism a deal of this scale demanded. The negotiators at the time overlooked the fact that the agreement left out India's strongest suit—services—giving away vital market access on goods, but securing no meaningful opening for Indian IT, consulting, or skilled labour. Worse, non-tariff barriers multiplied on India's exports to ASEAN, even as the region's goods breezed, tariff-free, into Indian markets.
The negotiation table saw further sleights of hand. ASEAN cleverly played an averaging trick to make the deal look fairer than it really was. For example, Singapore claimed it eliminated tariffs on 100 per cent of its products, but since it already had zero import duties, India gained nothing new. Countries like Cambodia (85 per cent tariff elimination), Brunei (81 per cent), and Laos (78 per cent) also made high commitments to tariff elimination, but they account for only a tiny share of India's trade with ASEAN. Meanwhile, Indonesia, a major economy, removed tariffs on just 50.1 per cent of its tariff lines, and Vietnam on 69.7 per cent. When these figures were averaged together, along with Singapore's inflated 100 per cent, the official ASEAN average jumped to 76.4 per cent – giving the impression of big market openings.
In reality, India opened up 74.2 per cent of its market to ASEAN goods, but mostly received high tariff cuts from ASEAN's smallest economies, while the big players kept many barriers in place. As a result, Indian exporters struggled to access key ASEAN markets, while India faced a flood of duty-free goods from across Southeast Asia.
Meanwhile, ASEAN found loopholes, twisting rules of origin to allow Chinese goods safe passage into India's economy under ASEAN's flag, turning the FTA into a backdoor for Beijing's industrial might. No surprise, then, that Union Minister Piyush Goyal called the ASEAN bloc what everyone's been whispering – China's 'B-Team." As Goyal bluntly stated at the India Global Forum, 'Many of these countries are, practically, proxies for Chinese goods. We are not going to keep our doors open to such practices."
This remark landed harshly on ASEAN, but it must be recognised that India's grievance is genuine and its patience is running out. This lopsided deal hurts even more, given India's ongoing struggle to tame its ballooning deficit with China, the very country whose shadow now looms over the ASEAN pact as well. Meanwhile, the United States under Trump, never shy about tough love, has slapped tariffs on partners including India over its own deficits, which are comparable in size to India-ASEAN's gap. The winds of economic nationalism are intensifying globally, and the ASEAN trade deal's moment of reckoning is looming.
Since 2023, India has demanded a comprehensive review pushing back against what industry calls 'a one-way street." The results so far have been nine unproductive negotiation rounds with much rhetoric, but few genuine fixes. Negotiators are raising the fact that Indian companies utilise only 30-40% of the FTA's 'benefits," while ASEAN competitors exploit 65-70%, often through creative paperwork and weak checks on rules of origin.
Indian exporters complain of mounting non-tariff barriers and quotas. Entire sectors from steel and chemicals to electronics, voice their frustration as duty-free imports batter domestic manufacturers and dilute investment, all while ASEAN members trap India in endless talks. This cannot go on.
Moreover, with ASEAN in the middle of talks with China, its largest trade partner, to expand their FTA, the problem will only grow larger. ASEAN's trade with China is growing fast, standing at around $982 billion in 2024 with a deficit of $190 billion pegged against Southeast Asia.
Senior government and industry leaders now openly say, enough is enough. If the upcoming 10th review round delivers no real corrections on import barriers, rules of origin, or a fair shake for Indian services, India may invoke the termination clause: one written notice, and the FTA dies in 12 months. This should not be mistaken for sabre-rattling. The pressure on India is real, and walking away from the pact is a tangible option. This points to India's growing reputation as a tough negotiator.
India's newfound confidence at the global trade negotiating table is unmistakable, as seen in its willingness to challenge partners both east and west. Nowhere is this more evident than in its tough, high-stakes talks with the United States, widely regarded as the hardest trade partner, where India has refused to be hurried or strong-armed into a deal that doesn't serve its national interest. The Modi government is also pushing back against China's economic tactics, battling for access to rare earths, confronting non-tariff barriers, and standing firm on restricting Chinese investments even as China pressures India to reopen its markets.
top videos
View all
At the same time, India has already secured major wins, sealing a historic free trade deal with the UK this year and a powerful CEPA with the UAE in 2022, while actively negotiating with the European Union and Australia for stronger, more balanced agreements. All of this signals a shift: under Modi, India is not swayed by free trade idealism, but is recognised as a sharp, strategic negotiator that puts national interest front and centre, rewriting its trade playbook amidst a global churn in trade relations.
India's new approach is neither protectionist nor isolationist – it's simply pragmatic. It means playing by the rules, but ensuring those rules are fair. If ASEAN wants continued access to India's booming market, it must show real progress on services, on imports, and on closing the loopholes.
About the Author
Shubhangi Sharma
Shubhangi Sharma is News Editor - Special Projects at News18. She covers foreign affairs and geopolitics, and also keeps a close watch on the national pulse of India.
tags :
ASEAN finepoint pm narendra modi tariffs
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 21, 2025, 11:58 IST
News opinion Finepoint | India Plays Hardball With ASEAN After $45 Billion Trade Disaster
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
TCS layoff: Should TCS investors be concerned as company plans to hand pink slips to 12,000 employees? Explained
TCS layoff: A trend majorly seen in large global IT tech giants like Meta, Google and Microsoft, has spread to India too, as domestic IT bellwether Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has announced plans to hand pink slips to almost 2% of the workforce. TCS layoff, expected to impact 12,261 employees, will largely target those belonging to middle and senior grades. In response to the news, not only just TCS share price tumbled, but its ripple effects were seen on other IT companies as well. Wipro, HCL Technologies and Infosys too felt the impact, declining up to 2% — sending the Nifty IT pack down over 1%. The IT stocks have been out of favour for some time now, given global macro uncertainty and geopolitical tensions are weighing on global tech demand and delaying client decision-making. Analysts believe that TCS layoffs signal deep organisational changes driven by artificial intelligence (AI) and slow global demand rather than a short-term cost cut. "TCS' decision to layoff ~12,200 employees, which is ~2% of its global workforce during FY26 is reflation of both cost optimisation measures and deeper industry challenges. Shifting technology demands can be also a major reason for the layoff," said Rajesh Sinha, Sr. Research Analyst at Bonanza. While TCS has insisted that the layoffs are not primarily AI-driven job cuts or immediate cost-cutting, Sinha said it is an indication that there is significant pressure to stay competitive amid tighter client budgets, demand softness and rising price pressures requiring efficiency improvements. "Growing requirement of automation and evolving client expectations are reshaping workforce structures, forcing companies like TCS to rebalance employee costs and skill sets to maintain margins and becoming "future-ready" through skill re-alignment," said Sinha. During the June quarter of the ongoing fiscal, Indian IT companies have delivered single-digit revenue growth. TCS' consolidated sales in the first quarter rose 1.3% to ₹ 63437 crore, missing analysts' average estimate of ₹ 64666 crore, according to data compiled by LSEG. TCS's revenue in four out of its six verticals fell compared to the same period last year, while banking and financial services' revenue grew 1% and tech services rose 1.8%, according to a Reuters report. Its total order bookings stood at $9.4 billion during the quarter, versus $12.2 billion in the previous quarter and $8.3 billion in the year-ago period. Meanwhile, TCS MD and Chief Executive K Krithivasan recently said the company is experiencing a "demand contraction" due to the continued uncertainties on the macroeconomic and geopolitical fronts, and added that he does not see a double-digit revenue growth in FY26. Harshal Dasani, Business Head, INVasset PMS, is not as concerned about the TCS layoff and sees it as a strategic move and less of a red flag. With a workforce of over 6 lakh, TCS has already slowed hiring considerably in the last year, reflecting shifting demand patterns in its key markets. "This move signals a broader shift in Indian IT — away from headcount-led growth toward efficiency and AI-led delivery models. Rather than signalling stress, this recalibration positions TCS to navigate a lower-growth environment while staying operationally agile," opined Dasani. Given that TCS is the trend setter for the industry, analysts believe that other IT companies could follow suit. Dasani said that performance and profitability will now take precedence over headcount growth now. "It challenges the long-standing perception that Indian IT offers unconditional job security, and it underscores that operating leverage, not just revenue growth, will define sectoral winners in this cycle. Other firms may follow suit, especially as pricing pressure and AI-led delivery transformation gather pace," he added. Sinha also believes that the TCS layoff is expected to increase fears of job insecurity not only in TCS but also across other IT companies, highlighting long-term career stability in IT industry. It also reflects industry challenges like less tolerance for bench time, strict billable day requirements, and increased automation, he opined. According to Sinha, as far as investors are concerned, this challenging sector-wide environment will create pressure on the stock price of major IT companies, including TCS, for a shorter time horizon. However, in the longer term, the implicit growth opportunity of the company will determine prospects of the company. Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.


Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Euro area yields drop after US-EU trade deal, Fed, BoJ, data in focus
July 28 (Reuters) - Euro area government bond yields dropped on Monday after a trade agreement between the U.S. and the European Union introduced a 15% U.S. import tariff on most EU goods, broadly in line with economists' forecasts. Expectations of a tariff deal and a hawkish tilt from the European Central Bank prompted investors to scale back bets on future rate cuts last week, pricing in just a 60% chance of a 25 bps easing move by December. However, ECB policymakers appeared to temper market bets on no more rate cuts the day after the central bank meeting. Investors were staying on the sidelines at the start of a week packed with central bank policy meetings — including the Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan — and key economic data releases from the U.S. and the euro area. Germany's 10-year government bond yield, the euro area's benchmark, was down 2 basis points (bps) at 2.70%, after rising more than 10 bps in the last two sessions. While roughly in line with reports from last week, the U.S.-EU trade deal removed near-term "no deal" and higher tariff scenarios. "Mutually disruptive escalation and retaliation between two global trade heavyweights will be avoided," said Mark Wall, chief euro area economist at Deutsche Bank. Some economists argued that the deflationary impact of a 30% tariff on EU goods - the rate U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened to impose without a deal - could have prompted the ECB to cut its deposit rate to 1.5% from the current 2%. Markets are pricing an ECB depo rate at 1.84% by December -- implying a 65% chance of a rate cut by December -- from 1.85% late Friday and 1.78% before the ECB statement on Thursday. They indicated a depo rate at 1.73% early last week, before a U.S.-Japan trade deal helped ease fears over the recessionary impact of a trade war. The Bank of Japan is set to hold off raising interest rates on Thursday but may signal rate hikes later this year, after the trade agreement. Trump said on Friday he had a good meeting with Fed Chair Jerome Powell and got the impression that the head of the U.S. central bank might be ready to lower rates. Markets still expect rates unchanged. German 2-year government bond yields – more sensitive to expectations for European Central Bank policy rates – fell 1.5 basis points (bps) to 1.92%. Italy's 10-year government bond yields were down 3 bps at 3.55%, with the spread between BTP and Bund yields - a market gauge of the risk premium investors demand to hold Italian debt - at 85.5 bps. It hit 84.20 bps in June, its lowest since March 2015. (Reporting by Stefano Rebaudo, editing by Ros Russell)


Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Valterra Platinum First-Half Profit Falls on Rain-Hit Output
(Bloomberg) -- Valterra Platinum Ltd. said first-half profit fell 91%, after flooding at a key mine cut production and the company incurred costs during its recent spinoff from Anglo American Plc. The Johannesburg-based miner slashed its interim dividend to 2 rand per share, a drop of 79% from a year earlier, according to results released on Monday. Valterra completed its separation from Anglo at the start of June when it also added a secondary listing in London. While the flooding curbed first-half output at its Amandelbult operation by 45%, Valterra still expects to meet its annual target for refined production of 3 million to 3.4 million ounces of platinum-group metals. The impacted mine is the second largest in the South African company's portfolio, after Mogalakwena. The section of Amandelbult that was most impacted by heavy rains in February resumed operations in June and is expected to reach normal production in the current quarter, Valterra said. The company said production of refined platinum-group metals was down 22% to 1.4 million ounces during the first six months of the year, due to lower availability of concentrates and a stock count that takes place every three years. While Valterra and its peers in South Africa – which is by far the world's largest platinum producer – have been tackling a prolonged slump in PGM prices, there have been recent signs of improvement. Platinum and palladium have risen 56% and 37%, respectively, this year – with most of those increases occurring since the beginning of May. Platinum's gains in the first half of the year 'were underpinned by a more favorable macro-backdrop,' while 'strong Chinese buying, attributed to renewed interest from local jewelry manufacturers and investors, met underwhelming supply given relatively low South African production earlier in the year,' Valterra said. (Updates with information throughout) More stories like this are available on