logo
How to get the best bang for your (extra) buck in a three-paycheque month

How to get the best bang for your (extra) buck in a three-paycheque month

CTV News2 days ago
Canadians who get paid biweekly receive 26 paycheques spread across 12 months, which means there are two months in the year when they will get three paycheques. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward
Some extra cash may be about to land in your bank account. But don't label that third paycheque a bonus, experts warn.
'What happens a lot of time is when we have this extra come in, we treat it as extra,' said Christine White, a certified financial planner with Money Coaches Canada.
White said she typically sees two reactions from her clients: those who didn't realize an extra paycheque was coming, and those who get excited about it.
Canadians who get paid biweekly receive 26 paycheques spread across 12 months, which means there are two months in the year when they will get three paycheques.
This year, if your first paycheque was received on Friday, Jan. 3, the months of January and August will be your three-payday months. If your first paycheque was Jan. 10, you'll receive three paycheques in May and October.
White suggests it's important to have a plan for the money before it hits your bank account.
'If we know we're going to have these two three-pay months and we have a plan for them, then we can decide consciously and with intention what we want to spend it on,' White said.
For Sara McCullough, she says she generally ignores the two extra paycheques when building monthly budgets for her clients.
'I base their income and expenses on two paycheques a month,' said McCullough, a certified financial planner and founder of WD Development.
Then, she looks into what could be done with the additional cash. In her opinion, it could go under one of four categories: catch-up, buffer for upcoming bills, breathing room and future you.
The extra paycheque could be an opportunity for many Canadians to catch up on paying down credit card bills or a line of credit, she said.
McCullough said it could also just serve as a buffer amount in the bank.
'This might not be total bonus money,' she said. 'There's a known expense coming up.
'Your best option in that case is to let it stay in your account,' McCullough added.
If someone is already ahead on their catch-up and cash cushion needs, the extra money opens up room for getting ahead.
'The get-ahead breathing room is when you're not carrying high-interest debt, and your other months are functioning smoothly,' McCullough said.
This could be a chance for people to build up their emergency fund, or replenish amounts set aside for house repairs, vacations or their next vehicle, for example.
Then comes the 'future you' category, McCullough said.
'(If) you don't see any big expense that you would need money for, then we can look at a TFSA or first home savings account contribution,' she said.
White said this could also be an opportunity for Canadians hoping to build up savings for a down payment but stuck in the paycheque-to-paycheque cycle. She suggested putting that extra cash into savings twice a year automatically — helping build that nest egg.
But it doesn't always have to be tied to financial goals and debt.
'We have a lot of competing demands for our money, or a lot of things we want to do at the same time,' White said.
She often tells her clients to divide the extra paycheque across several goals — a third for debt, a third to have fun and a third for investing, for example.
'Then, you feel a little bit responsible, but also a little bit of joy from it,' White said.
---
Ritika Dubey, The Canadian Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 31, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada weighs retaliation cost against Trump tariffs as analysts warn hitting back isn't worth it
Canada weighs retaliation cost against Trump tariffs as analysts warn hitting back isn't worth it

Toronto Sun

time21 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

Canada weighs retaliation cost against Trump tariffs as analysts warn hitting back isn't worth it

Published Aug 02, 2025 • Last updated 10 minutes ago • 4 minute read Tractor trailers entering the U.S. from Canada at the Pacific Highway Border Crossing in Blaine, Washington, on Monday, March 3, 2025. Photo by David Ryder / Bloomberg Canada's decision to retaliate against U.S. tariffs earlier this year appears to be driving a divergence in how President Donald Trump is dealing with America's neighbours. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Until this week, Canada and Mexico received similar treatment in White House trade actions. Each was subject to a 25% base tariff, with a large exemption for goods shipped under the North American free trade pact known as CUSMA (or USMCA). That changed on Thursday, when Trump granted Mexico a 90-day pause on tariff hikes while jacking up its tax on Canadian products to 35%. The administration said Canada's higher rate was a response to fentanyl trafficking and its moves to hit back with counter-tariffs. The situation leaves Prime Minister Mark Carney with a political dilemma. On one hand, he won an election by promising a muscular approach to the trade war, saying the government would use tariffs to cause 'maximum pain' in the US. His voters remember that, and some want him to punch back. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Yet the retaliatory measures already undertaken failed to prevent further escalations. Instead, they appear to have emboldened Trump's team to hit even harder. U.S. administration officials including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick frequently talk about how only two countries retaliated against Trump's tariffs — the other was China. 'Canada's retaliatory trade measures against the United States further complicate bilateral efforts to address this escalating drug crisis,' the White House said in a fact sheet, referencing fentanyl. But Mexico is a much larger source of shipments of the drug into the U.S., according to Customs and Border Protection data. Carney, an economist and former central banker, has also made it plain he believes retaliation can only go so far. In fact, his government has watered down Canada's counter-tariffs with a number of exemptions, declined to increase them when the U.S. lifted steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% and scrapped a tax on technology services at Trump's request. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister in charge of trade talks, told Radio-Canada on Friday the government hasn't made any decisions about further retaliation. But Carney is clearly reluctant to do so — which 'reflects the reality that counter-tariffs are understood to be economically harmful to the country which imposes them,' said David Collins, a professor specializing in international trade at City St George's, University of London. The government's priority is to keep the CUSMA carve-out that dramatically lowers the real tax on Canadian goods. The effective U.S. tariff rate on Canada is about 6.3%, according to Bank of Nova Scotia economists. 'A more diplomatic approach is likely to bear more fruit with the Americans,' Collins said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada imposed two rounds of counter-tariffs in March, when Justin Trudeau was in his final days as prime minister. The first placed 25% levies on about $30 billion of imports from the U.S. that included food items, clothing and motorcycles. The second came when Trump put tariffs on steel and aluminum. Then, when Trump added tariffs to foreign automobiles, Carney essentially matched that move, imposing similar fees on U.S. cars and trucks. But in mid-April, the government unveiled a series of exemptions for business inputs — goods imported for use in manufacturing and food packaging, as well as things needed for health care, public safety and security. Automakers such as General Motors Co. and Honda Motor Co. that make vehicles at Canadian plants were also made eligible for relief from import taxes. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The large majority of U.S. products can still enter Canada tariff-free. U.S. companies and other entities exported about $440 billion of goods and services to Canada last year — more than to any other nation. For Canada, 'the logic for escalation over cooperation is just weak,' said Oliver Lavelle, global macro strategist at Thiel Macro LLC. Mexico's Way Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, in contrast, has never imposed counter-tariffs on the U.S. Sheinbaum's position is also supported by her high approval ratings, which have remained above 75% in most polls. 'It's worth saying: President Trump treats us with respect in all the calls we've had, and we do too,' she said during a new conference. 'We may not agree, but the treatment is respectful.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A statement issued late Thursday night by Carney's office expressed disappointment in Trump's tariff hike on Canada, but made no mention of retaliation. A spokesperson for Carney declined to comment further. LeBlanc said he met with Lutnick on Tuesday night, and that Canadian officials held other meetings throughout the week, but a deal acceptable to both sides 'was not yet visible.' In his statement, Carney acknowledged that lumber, steel, aluminum and autos are still subject to U.S. levies, and said his government 'will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in our industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian, and diversify its export markets.' 'Jitters' But while the CUSMA exemption gives Canada some breathing room, the sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminum are still harmful and will affect economic growth if they're in place for long, Collins said. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, said the idea that Canada is getting off lightly is 'both overstated and potentially premature.' Canadian industries are more reliant on U.S. exports than their overseas competitors, and Trump could also chose to weaken the CUSMA exemption at any time, he said in a note to investors. 'We are still hopeful for a deal that relieves at least some of the pressure on base metal exporters,' Shenfeld said. 'But whether any of this lasts will depend on Trump's word, and we've seen how shaky that foundation can be, leaving jitters that could impact business capital spending and confidence ahead.' —With assistance from Mario Baker Ramirez and Carolina Millan. Read More Toronto Blue Jays Columnists Columnists Toronto & GTA Canada

Canada Post is a case study in Canadian dysfunctionality
Canada Post is a case study in Canadian dysfunctionality

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada Post is a case study in Canadian dysfunctionality

Les Viner was managing partner at Torys LLP for 22 years and was seconded to Canada Post as interim general counsel from October, 2022, to June, 2023. He is a senior fellow with the C.D. Howe Institute. Canada Post, which predates Confederation, is a vital national institution, playing a particularly important role in serving rural, Northern and Indigenous communities across our vast country. But today, Canada Post is effectively insolvent. Indeed, it would have run out of cash had the government not recently extended a billion-dollar lifeline. This situation is no surprise, and it has been developing for a long time. Canada Post has been impeded from adapting to modern business realities because of long-standing labour inflexibility as well as oscillation by prior governments between political indifference and political interference. However Canada Post and its main union, CUPW, resolve their current impasse, a much bigger problem looms for the Crown corporation and the federal government. Explainer: What you need to know about the Canada Post contract dispute William Kaplan, a highly respected mediator and arbitrator, recently examined this stalemate as a commissioner appointed under the Canada Labour Code. In his report this month he described Canada Post as facing an 'existential crisis.' He recommended drastic changes to its operations. And these changes must be made. Our new government said that it will do things differently, promising to act decisively and urgently in charting a new path for our country. It now has a golden opportunity to meet the moment by accepting all of Mr. Kaplan's recommendations and if there is any pushback from any of the parties, by appointing him to do it for them. As letter-mail business continues to erode, the future of Canada Post lies in parcel delivery, which is intensely competitive. Customers expect and demand seven-day-a-week service at competitive prices without undue risk of disruption. Paradoxically, the stakeholders who would be expected to have the keenest interest in ensuring the corporation's viability are blocking the company's ability to succeed. CUPW refuses to allow Canada Post to hire a dedicated force of flexible weekend workers. Meanwhile, workers, who get overtime pay for weekend work, earn more – roughly $30 per hour to start – than their counterparts at unionized competitors and vastly more than their counterparts at non-unionized competitors. As the Kaplan report outlined, those workers with tenure have job security for life, a defined-benefit pension plan, and postretirement benefits indexed to inflation, a multitude of generous leave entitlements, and are paid for eight hours of work whether or not it takes eight hours to complete a route. All these factors make seven-day-a-week parcel delivery impossible to achieve at competitive prices, which means that parcel delivery competitors are taking over most of the market share. Indifference of and interference by prior governments have exacerbated the situation. For example, even though 30 per cent of the thousands of corporate postal outlets classified as rural are now urban or suburban, Canada Post is directed not to close or consolidate any of them. Further, although door-to-door delivery costs 75 per cent more than delivery to community mailboxes, Justin Trudeau's incoming government imposed a moratorium on community mailbox conversions in 2015. The Kaplan report threads the needle. His recommendations include ending the moratoriums on rural post office closings and community mailbox conversions, changing collective agreements to allow for the flexible use of well-paid part-time employees, requiring employees to work the hours for which they are paid, and introducing dynamic routing to adapt routes to daily volumes. His well-reasoned report lays out the path for a future that sustainably preserves the institution of Canada Post and respects labour and other key stakeholders in a fair and balanced approach. Absent urgent structural change, the future of Canada Post will be doomed by private competition, unsustainable demands of labour combined, and no clear directional oversight by the sole shareholder as represented by prior governments. As the world evolved from paper to digital, from letter mail to parcels, and from a relatively benign competitive landscape to an intensively competitive one, politicization of key issues impeded necessary reform, perpetuating a cycle of waste, inefficiency and financial recklessness. Canada Post now loses a billion dollars of taxpayer money each year, and the prognosis is materially worse, absent major change. The operational straitjacket imposed by the union, together with past governments' failure to address the underlying structural issues, mean that Canada Post has effectively been disabled from running an operation that is even remotely commercially sensible. The math simply doesn't work.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store