U.S. House committee issues subpoenas for Epstein files and depositions with the Clintons
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation and is seeking depositions with the Clintons and former law enforcement officials, part of a congressional probe that lawmakers believe may show links to President Donald Trump and former top officials.
The Republican-controlled committee issued subpoenas for depositions with former president Bill Clinton, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials.
The committee's actions showed how even with lawmakers away from Washington on a month-long break, interest in the Epstein files is still running high. Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago, and he has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation. But lawmakers from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let it go.
Rep. James Comer, the Republican chairman of the oversight committee, noted in letters to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the former officials that the cases of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell 'have received immense public interest and scrutiny.'
'While the Department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell,' Comer said.
Epstein's circle
Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial for sex trafficking charges, conservative conspiracists have stoked theories about what information investigators gathered on Epstein -- and who else knew about his sexual abuse of teenage girls. Republican lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee nodded to that line of questioning last month by initiating the subpoenas for the Clintons, both Democrats, as well as demanding all communications between President Joe Biden's Democratic administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein.
Bill Clinton was among a number of luminaries acquainted with Epstein, a wealthy financier, before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them.
One of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre, once gave a newspaper interview in which she described riding in a helicopter with Clinton and flirting with Trump, but she later said in a deposition that those things hadn't actually happened and were mistakes by the reporter. Clinton has previously said through a spokesperson that while he travelled on Epstein's jet he never visited his homes and had no knowledge of his crimes.
The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last four presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Lawmakers also subpoenaed former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller.
However, it was Democrats who sparked the move to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein. They were joined by some Republicans last month to successfully initiate the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee.
'Today was an important step forward in our fight for transparency regarding the Epstein files and our dedication to seeking justice for the victims,' said Democratic Reps. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee, and Summer Lee, who initiated the subpoena, in a joint statement. 'Now, we must continue putting pressure on the Department of Justice until we actually receive every document.'
Will the subpoenas be enforced?
The subpoenas give the Justice Department until Aug. 19 to hand over the requested records, though such requests are typically open to negotiation and can be resisted by the Trump administration.
The committee is also asking the former officials to appear for the depositions throughout August, September and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on Oct. 9 and Bill Clinton on Oct. 14.
Multiple former presidents have voluntarily testified before Congress, but none has been compelled to do so. That history was invoked by Trump in 2022, between his first and second terms, when he faced a subpoena by the House committee investigating the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, riot by a mob of his supporters at the U.S. Capitol.
Lawyers for Trump resisted the subpoena, citing decades of legal precedent they said shielded an ex-president from being ordered to appear before Congress. The committee ultimately withdrew its subpoena.
The committee had previously issued a subpoena for an interview with Maxwell, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein but was recently transferred to a Texas facility.
However, Comer has indicated he is willing to delay that deposition until after the Supreme Court decides whether to hear an appeal to her conviction. She argues she was wrongfully prosecuted.
As the Justice Department has tried to appease demands for more disclosure, it has turned attention to Maxwell. Officials interviewed her for one and a half days last month.
But Democrats stressed the importance of gaining direct access to the investigative files, rather than relying on Maxwell's words.
'We need these files now in order to corroborate any claims she makes,' Garcia and Lee said, adding, 'This fight is not over.'
------
By Stephen Groves
Associated Press writers David Caruso and Eric Tucker contributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
2 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
When Don meets Vlad: World market themes for the week ahead
Geopolitics is high on the agenda, with a potential meeting between the U.S. and Russian presidents, trade deadlines and talks, and markets bracing for United States' inflation data and rates decisions in Australia and Norway. Here is your week ahead: Shuttle diplomacy is in full swing with U.S. President Donald Trump set to meet Russia's Vladimir Putin in the coming days - the first face-to-face summit between a sitting U.S. president and his Russian counterpart since Joe Biden met Putin in June 2021. Trump - who has veered between admiration and sharp criticism of Putin - is looking for a breakthrough to end the 3-1/2 year war in Ukraine after voicing mounting frustration with his Russian counterpart and threatening new sanctions. Ramifications of the encounter are likely to ripple through global markets with secondary tariffs set to hurt Russia and other nations around the world. Trump has imposed an extra 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing continued imports of Russian oil, and warned that China could be next. Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy is pushing for Europe to be involved in the peace process and talks. There has been further progress in the makings of a trade deal between Washington and Beijing, or so Trump and his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have said. But the August 12 deadline for a tariff truce between the world's two economic superpowers is closing in. Trump has yet to sign on the dotted line after both sides at talks in Stockholm agreed to seek an extension of a pause on tariffs. Still, things seem somewhat positive for now. Trump has said he would meet Chinese President Xi Jinping before the end of the year should a trade deal be struck. Investors, meanwhile, are craving more clarity, remaining largely on the sidelines and leaving Chinese markets range-bound for the most part, though stocks ended the week near a 10-month high. Firming bets that the U.S. Fed is primed to resume cutting interest rates will be tested by Tuesday's release of U.S. inflation data. The July consumer price index will also be watched for signs of the impact of Trump's tariffs deluge fueling more price hikes. June data showed the biggest rise in five months, as higher costs for some goods were starting to bite. A hot number could shake the narrative that the Fed will cut rates at its next meeting in September, which has gathered steam after a surprisingly weak employment report earlier this month. The inflation report is also one of the most significant U.S. economic data releases since Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after the weak jobs report - a move that stoked fears about data integrity and credibility. Australia's and Norway's central banks have been the two most cautious in developed economies in this cycle of rate cuts, but markets think their next moves could see them diverge. The Reserve Bank of Australia only started easing this year, and has made just two 25 bps cuts from its 2024 peak, compared to a cumulative 100 bps for the Fed, and 200 bps for the ECB. Norway's central bank has made just one 25 bps cut. In Australia, where inflation grew at its slowest pace in four years in the three months to June, markets expect a 25 bps reduction on Tuesday with one or maybe two more such cuts to follow this year. The Norges Bank, in contrast, is set to stay on hold on Thursday, with another cut not fully priced until November. Be nervous with market pricing though, at their last meetings both central banks confounded market expectations with Norway making its one cut, and Australia staying on hold. The middle of August is generally viewed as one of the dullest periods in the year. Lawmakers and central bankers are on a break, there is no big data and traders use the lull to ditch their screens. There's just one small problem. August is when volatility has a habit of exploding - and last year was a case in point. A sharp appreciation of the Japanese yen, combined with a drop in U.S. tech stocks ignited one of the biggest one-day bursts in volatility on record. The average daily percentage move in the VIX volatility index in August over the last 35 years is 0.55 per cent, the highest for any month. The least volatile month is April - even with this year's meltdown after Trump's announcement of his 'Liberation Day' tariffs - with an average daily move of 0.07 per cent. With stocks at record highs, and positioning in things like the dollar stretched, there is no shortage of tripwires. Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.
Globe and Mail
32 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
All Hail Louisiana, where left-lane hogs can now go to jail
Not all heroes wear capes. Some are Louisiana Democratic state senators. Senator Wendell Jay Luneau, who has represented District 29 since 2016, is my hero. A small-business owner and the senior partner at the personal injury law firm Luneau & Beck, LLC, he epitomizes everything that is right and just in the American political system. What has Louisiana Senator Luneau done to earn my boundless adulation? He made it possible to jail left-lane hogs who drive slowly and clog the passing lane (which Louisianans call 'left-lane camping'). If a motorist in the left lane of a four-lane highway (two lanes going each direction) drives even one single mile an hour below the speed limit, they can be fined. All thanks to Louisiana Senate Bill 11, which Luneau sponsored and championed. It was signed by the Governor and became Louisiana state law on Aug. 1. 'I saw first-hand a lot of people driving in the left lane and blocking traffic,' Luneau told the Louisiana media. 'It is dangerous because when you get up there people get aggravated, they get mad, they try to switch lanes.' This, he says, can lead to deadly crashes. Bill 11 is a beautiful piece of legislation, poetic in its simplicity. It states, 'Any vehicle proceeding on a multilane highway at a speed slower than the posted maximum speed limit shall be driven in the right hand lane then available for traffic, or as close as practicable to the right hand curb or edge of the roadway, except when overtaking and passing a vehicle proceeding in the same direction or when preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway. Persons in violation of this Paragraph shall be punished as follows: (a) A fine of $150 for the first offense. (b) A fine of $250 for a second subsequent offense within a 12-month period of the first offense. (c) A fine of $350 for a third subsequent offense within a 12-month period of the first offense or imprisonment for not more than 30 days, or both.' Shift over Shakespeare. Take a seat Emily Dickinson. Stand down Sappho. Cut it out Catullus. Put a sock in it Mister Keats. Senator Luneau's law, with passages such as 'imprisonment for not more than 30 days' is the most exquisite verse ever set to paper in the last three millennia. It was already illegal to left-lane camp in Louisiana; drivers who travelled less than 10 miles an hour below the speed limit in the left lane of a four-lane highway could be fined. The 10-mph leeway made it hard for police to enforce. 'So,' Luneau explained, 'What I did is just made this bill where it's a little easier for them to write the tickets, gave them some more discretion and increased the fines, so we can try to get some of those folks that insist on driving in the left lane side by side to stop doing that.' The fines are steep but what really sets this law apart is the fact that repeat offender left-lane hogs can be jailed. Jailed! Jailed! This is a dream come true. It is the Holy Grail. It is winning the Super Bowl, Wimbledon, the World Series and two World Cups combined. Oh, to hear the bars of the prison door clank shut on a left-lane hog who habitually crawled along in the passing lane. What sweet music they would make. Some people consider driving slow in the passing lane 'a pet peeve.' Regular readers know that, to me, it is a deep and abiding loathing. In past columns, I have suggested firing missiles at the offenders. It should therefore come as no surprise that I am already looking into applying for American citizenship and moving to the great state of Louisiana. The Louisiana Radio Network reports that Luneau's law already has a theme song. It was suggested by Senator Royce Duplessis on the senate floor. Duplessis: 'Have you heard of the artist, Ludacris?' Luneau: 'I have.' Duplessis: 'Okay.' Luneau: 'Met him, in fact.' Duplessis: 'Okay. Have you ever heard a song by Ludacris called 'Move, get out the way?'' Luneau: 'I have.' Duplessis: 'Okay.' Luneau: 'I think that would be a great song, man.' A great song for the world's greatest law.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada are making his party anxious ahead of 2026 midterms
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Politicians in conservative states most affected by U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods — and Ottawa's targeted retaliatory tariffs against key sectors in Republican strongholds — are increasingly concerned over the economic fallout from Donald Trump's trade agenda, especially with the 2026 midterm elections looming. Article content Last Friday, Trump imposed a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian goods not compliant with the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement, adding to existing high duties on steel, aluminum, autos, and copper. Though most Canada-U.S. trade remains USMCA-compliant, businesses dealing in affected goods had largely been waiting to see if tariffs would be lifted. Now, those industries must pass increased costs along to U.S. buyers, pushing prices higher on items ranging from groceries and clothing to cars and farm equipment. Article content Article content Combined with last Friday's weak U.S. jobs report, the trade concerns have GOP lawmakers worried about the political and economic impact ahead of the midterms, but only a handful dare to voice their concerns. Article content Article content 'It definitely is indicative of a weakened economy, an economy that's not acting in a robust fashion. I've all along felt like there's a lag between tariffs and actual economic downturn,' Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican, told the press this week, adding that retailers have told him they think they will have to raise prices this fall. Article content Kansas Sen. Jerry Moran also warned this week of rising costs for consumers and businesses. While noting that tariffs can be good for solving trade barriers, he said 'there's no question tariffs are a tax on the cost of a product.' He also noted that trade uncertainty is bad for business because it 'delays decisions to expand, to hire, to spend money.' Article content Earlier this year, Mitch McConnell, a Republican senator from Kentucky, also railed against Trump's tariffs. Article content Article content 'With so much at stake globally, the last thing we need is to pick fights with the very friends with whom we should be working with to protect against China's predatory and unfair trade practices,' he said in a statement. He and Sen. Paul, along with Sen. Susan Collins, of Maine, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, also voted in favour of a resolution to undo Trump's 25 per cent tariffs back in the spring, warning of impacts on their state economies and border communities. The Senate narrowly approved the joint resolution, 51-48, but it then died in the House. Article content Inu Manak, a fellow for trade policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, says inflated prices from the tariffs will be felt before the end of the year — and for some items, like clothing, as early as next month with back-to-school shopping. And while Republicans know these impacts are looming, they're not taking steps to mitigate the tariffs. Article content 'What we are starting to see,' she says, 'is that when they go back home to their constituencies on the weekends, they're getting a lot of questions and pushback on the tariffs themselves.' Article content Earlier this year, questions from voters during town hall meetings related mostly to the DOGE firings, Manak explains, but now tariffs are top of mind. Apart from the five senators mentioned above, however, these local chats are not being amplified by the majority of Republican lawmakers back in Washington. Article content 'Republicans are in a weird position right now because, on the one hand, they're trying to sell the president's signature economic policy, the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which is huge tax cuts,' Manak says. Tariff revenue is meant to help pay for those tax cuts, 'so they're having to sell this bill and also defend the tariffs, neither of which are popular right now.' Article content Polling has shown that the majority of Americans — and the vast majority of Democrats — oppose the tariffs. Article content So why are Republican lawmakers muted on an issue that's so concerning to their constituents? Clark Packard, a research fellow in the Cato Institute's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies, points to the 'shadow of Trumpism' and says few will risk drawing the ire of the president and his allies. Article content Manak agrees. She says it's unlikely that more Republican voices will push back on tariffs before the midterms. 'I just think that they're not willing to oppose the president, and they're very concerned about being primaried' and losing seats if Trump works against them, she says. Article content Privately, however, they are saying plenty. Manak says she has spoken with Republicans who are concerned about the economic impact on their states and on certain industries being affected. 'But they can't really do anything at this point,' she adds. Article content Many lawmakers likely hope they won't have to wait for the midterms for a reckoning. Last week, the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in challenges to Trump's use of IEEPA, and a decision could come as early as this month over the legality of the tariffs. Packard suggests that many Republicans are 'quietly hoping that a court will strike down the tariffs.' Article content A source close to the U.S.-Canada trade negotiations, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said they've had conversations with those in Congress who are concerned by the tariffs. They are 'literally sitting back and hoping that the courts do their job for them so they don't have to deal with this,' the source said. Article content Article content Barring a legal solution, it will be left to the voters to weigh in on Trump's tariffs. At the moment, economists are predicting slower growth, but few are talking about a recession in the coming year, despite the lower-than-expected employment report. But 'if that continues, if inflation ticks up, which it looks like it's potentially starting to do, then I think voters will punish the incumbents,' says Manak. Article content Today, Republicans hold the majority in the U.S. Senate, with 53 of the 100 seats, and a slim majority in the House with 219 of 435 seats. Twenty-two Senate seats are up for grabs next year, and while the Democrats only need to gain four seats to take control, most of the races are in states that went for Trump in 2024. As for the House, some experts say the Dems are likely to flip the chamber. Article content 'Polling suggests that people aren't so optimistic,' says Manak. 'If that continues, I do think there's a very solid chance that there will be some seat changes — barring some gerrymandering,' particularly in Texas.
