EU unveils long-delayed 2040 climate target with contested flexibilities
After months of tough negotiations with EU member states, Brussels announced it would stick to the objective announced last year of cutting emissions by 90% by 2040, compared to 1990 levels. The proposal comes as much of Europe roasts in an early summer heatwave, which scientists say are becoming more intense, frequent and widespread due to human-induced climate change.
The 2040 target – which needs the sign off from the EU's member states and parliament – is a key milestone toward the bloc's goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050. Brussels says the EU has cut climate-warming emissions by 37% relative to 1990, but its green agenda faces mounting pushback with a rightward shift and rising climate skepticism in many European countries.
EU climate chief Wopke Hoekstra acknowledged the "sensitive" debate, saying Brussels was keeping an "ambitious" goal while being "pragmatic and flexible on how to achieve it." To sway resistant capitals, the European Commission proposes that from 2036, the bloc's 27 countries can count carbon credits purchased to finance projects outside Europe, for up to 3% of their emission cuts.
Climate groups are fiercely opposed to such a measure. Backed by scientific studies and the commission's own science advisers, they say factoring in international credits – for things like tree-planting or renewable-energy projects – risks undermining the EU's own efforts to shift away from fossil fuels.
'Don't strain ourselves'
EU environment ministers will discuss the objective at a meeting in mid-July, ahead of an expected vote to approve the measures on September 18. It will only become law after EU lawmakers also sign off on the target. The commission's hope is that the 2040 objective will be approved before the UN climate conference (COP30) in November in the northern Brazilian city of Belem. But that gives little time for negotiations with skeptical nations, with whom Hoekstra has already spent months trying to build a compromise.
For some countries, including the Czech Republic, the 90% target is unrealistic. Meanwhile, others including Italy and Hungary worry about the burden of decarbonizing heavy industry at a time when Europe is working to strengthen its industry in the face of fierce competition from the United States and China. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has suggested a target of 80 or 85%, while France has expressed doubts over how the EU will reach its objective. French President Emmanuel Macron wants guarantees for the decarbonization of industry and support for nuclear energy, the largest source of power in France.
But the commission can count on the support of other countries including Spain and Denmark, which took over the rotating EU presidency this week. And the three-percent "flexibility" – which mirrors demands made in the new German government's coalition agreement – should help keep the economic powerhouse on board.
When it comes to Europe's international commitments, Macron has also stressed that the bloc is only bound to present a midway target for 2035 at COP30 in Belem, and not the 2040 objective. "Let's not strain ourselves," Macron told reporters last week. "If we have [a 2040 target] for Belem, great, but if it takes longer, let's take the time," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
21 minutes ago
- Euronews
France and Spain join fight to tax luxury air travel for climate funds
France and Spain have joined a coalition of countries pushing to tax private jets and premium class flights to raise money for climate action and sustainable development. The two European nations have joined forces with Kenya, Barbados, Somalia, Benin, Sierra Leone and Antigua and Barbuda. The coalition's goal is 'to increase the number of countries applying taxes on airline tickets, including for luxury travel, and to tax private jets based on best practices,' the French Élysée said in a statement. The initiative was launched on the sidelines of a United Nations development summit in Seville on 30 June. How much money could these taxes raise? A recent study commissioned by the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force estimates that taxing private jet fuel worldwide could generate up to €41 billion annually. Adding levies on first- and business-class tickets could bring in nearly €37 billion more. Combined, the coalition's efforts could unlock over €78 billion per year to support climate resilience and sustainable development projects. The study also suggests that an additional, broader levy on commercial jet fuel could push this total to around €187 billion annually. New sources of finance With many richer countries cutting official development aid for poorer nations, some are looking for new sources of finance, including taxing the most polluting industries. Launched at COP28 in November 2023, the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force was set up to explore new kinds of taxation from polluting sectors that could support developing countries to decarbonise and adapt to the impacts of climate change. Laurence Tubiana, co-lead of the Global Solidarity Levies Task Force Secretariat, said that new levies on premium flyers could 'raise vital funds'. 'In the current context, everybody is pessimistic, saying we cannot do anything. Today's announcement is proof that we can make progress,' Tubiana added. French President Emmanuel Macron said at the summit in Seville that after progress had already been made in the shipping industry, this was a 'huge step forward' for the aviation sector. 'Having Spain (in our premium flyers coalition) is very good news, and we need more and more countries,' he added. 'We need those that benefited from globalisation to contribute more to financing.' Macron urged all possible countries to join this "key" international framework. Why target private jets and premium flights? Aviation accounts for more than 2.5 per cent of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, and it remains one of the sectors with the fastest-growing emissions. Private jets are especially polluting. In 2023, they emitted an estimated 19.5 million tonnes of greenhouse gases, according to a study by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) - more than all flights departing London Heathrow that year. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, premium travel has surged. Emissions from private aviation rose by 46 per cent between 2019 and 2023. Premium cabins, including first and business class, have larger seats and more legroom, which means fewer passengers share the emissions from each flight. This drives up the per-passenger carbon footprint dramatically. As a result, first and business class travellers produce up to 3 to 4 times more CO2 per kilometre than those flying economy. 'Flying is the most elite and polluting form of travel, so this is an important step towards ensuring that the binge users of this undertaxed sector are made to pay their fair share,' says Rebecca Newsom, global political lead for Greenpeace International's Stop Drilling Start Paying campaign. A global survey by Greenpeace and Oxfam found that three out of four people support extra taxes on premium flyers because of their outsized impact on the climate.
Euronews
32 minutes ago
- Euronews
Companies warn Commission against restrictive EU cloud criteria
Tech companies and industry groups fear that upcoming rules for cloud providers might be too restrictive for non-European businesses, according to consultation responses filed on the European Commission's AI and Cloud Development Act. The Commission began gathering feedback after it said in April it plans an AI and Cloud initiative, as part of its so-called AI Continent Action Plan, in a bid to help boost the uptake of artificial intelligence tools by companies. When it comes to cloud and computing infrastructure in Europe, the Commission said there is a gap between available capacity and needs in the bloc, given the rising demands stemming from AI. Currently, European companies are heavily reliant on US companies such as Microsoft and AWS. The consultation aims to find a solution for 'the lack of a competitive EU-based offer of cloud computing services at sufficient scale to serve highly critical use cases with particularly high security needs, as found in various economic sectors and the public sector,' the consultation text said. While companies say they support the idea for a stronger European cloud, they question how to define the guidelines for sovereignty. German digital association Bitkom, for example, said the focus should be on freedom of choice, and resilience and diversification. Microsoft echoes the comments saying that 'rather than imposing restrictive policies or measures [...] the EU should focus on diversifying supply chains, [...] this will allow governments and customers to rely on an open and competitive market and to choose from a diverse range of cloud service providers, based on their needs and on objective and risk-based criteria such as governance, risk management, security, transparency and performance.' Software trade group BSA, warned that implementing strict requirements could 'severely restrict the ability of European customers' to choose the services that meet their needs. 'Many European companies currently use non-European cloud providers to have access to technical performance, cost, or service features that are not provided by some European vendors,' it adds. German internet industry group Eco said that measures should be 'shaped transparently and proportionally, it should be ensured that international cloud providers are not excluded on geographical aspects alone.' The Commission received more than 130 submissions – mostly from Germany, Spain and Belgium – to the consultation which closes Thursday. The proposal is set to come out in December. Other Commission consultations that cover the other initiatives of the AI Continent Action Plan – which covers infrastructure, data access, cloud, skills and simplification – are still pending. The plan aims to transform Europe's traditional industries into 'powerful engines of AI innovation and acceleration', as Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced in February in Paris. Meanwhile, the European Parliament is also working on a report, with recommendations to boost technological sovereignty and reduce dependence on non-European technology providers. This could feed into the Commission's work.
France 24
37 minutes ago
- France 24
Ten years after Brazil mine disaster, pollution persists
The 2015 dam collapse which killed 19 people was one of Brazil's worst environmental disasters, with survivors saying the Doce River region north of Rio de Janeiro remains heavily polluted. "The entire ecosystem around the river was destroyed," Marcelo Krenak, a leader of the Krenak Indigenous people, told AFP on the sidelines of a hearing in London held this week. The hearing is part of a large-scale legal action brought by claimants seeking compensation from Australian mining giant BHP -- which, at the time of the disaster, had one of its global headquarters in the UK. "My people, the culture, has always been linked to the river," Krenak said, wearing a traditional headdress with striking blue feathers. "The medicinal plants that only existed in the river are contaminated, the soil is contaminated, so you cannot plant, you cannot use the river water for animals," he added. Following a mega-trial that concluded in March, the claimants now await a decision from the British High Court in the coming weeks regarding BHP's liability for the disaster. The Fundao tailings dam at an iron ore mine in Minas Gerais state was managed by Samarco, co-owned by BHP and Brazilian miner Vale. The High Court is already preparing the second phase of the case to determine potential damages and compensation, which could begin in October 2026 if BHP is found liable. 'Terrible tragedy' The company told AFP that "the recovery of the Doce River, the water quality of which had already returned to pre-dam failure levels, remained a focus". Acknowledging the "terrible tragedy", BHP said it is "committed to supporting Samarco to do what's right by the Brazilian people, communities, organisations, and environments affected by the dam failure". BHP maintains that the compensation agreement it reached last year in Brazil -- worth around $31 billion -- provides a resolution. However, a majority of the 620,000 claimants, including 46 municipalities, argue that they are not sufficiently covered by the deal and are instead seeking around £35 billion ($49 billion) in damages. Krenak said the claimants will at a potential future hearing present "visual evidence, photos and videos of what was done, what caused it, and the damage it is causing to this day". The city of Mariana, one of the areas hardest hit by the disaster, is seeking 28 billion Brazilian real ($5 billion) in compensation. "Our hope is that here in London, the municipality will be heard because, in Brazil, we were not heard," Mayor of Mariana, Juliano Duarte, told AFP. Duarte said he believes the British legal system will hold BHP accountable, which could pressure the company to negotiate directly with the claimants. He said the municipality is "open" to negotiation but "will not accept crumbs like those that were offered in Brazil".
