Seniors score, gamblers get rolled in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Advertisement
The other is a last-minute change to the IRS's treatment of betting losses that has set off howls of protest from gamblers and could squeeze Massachusetts' cut of gaming revenue.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Here's a rundown.
Promises made, promises kept — sort of
As congressional Republicans scrambled to put together a package of tax cuts and spending increases demanded by Trump, they were also under pressure to deliver on their leader's vow to do away with taxes on Social Security income.
It was an impossible order to carry out — and not just because it would blow up the federal budget.
Changes to Social Security aren't allowed under
So, in an adroit bit of budgetary legerdemain, GOP lawmakers instead crafted a tax break specifically for filers 65 and older.
Advertisement
This 'enhanced deduction' — $6,000 for individuals ($12,000 for couples) — is set to expire after Trump leaves office. It comes on top of the standard deduction available to all taxpayers ($15,000 for individuals and $30,000 for couples in 2025), as well as the existing bonus deduction for filers over 65 ($2,000 for an individual, $3,200 for a couple).
There are important caveats:
Congress didn't eliminate taxes on Social Security income; the deduction is a back-door way to reduce seniors' taxable income, including the retirement benefits.
Taxpayers under 65 aren't eligible, even if they receive Social Security.
The full deduction is limited to individuals with taxable income of less than $75,000 ($150,000 for joint filers). It shrinks at higher income levels, disappearing altogether for individuals with taxable income of more than $175,000 ($250,000 for couples).
The temporary change will mostly help middle- and upper-middle class taxpayers,
A losing proposition
Republicans slipped a last-minute change into their bill that lowered the amount of gambling losses that can be used to offset income from winning bets.
The result: Some gamblers could end up owing taxes
Republicans said the change was necessitated by the budget reconciliation rules, the details of which are so arcane they defy my powers to explain.
A longstanding tax provision allowed gamblers to deduct 100 percent of their losing bets, up to the amount of their winnings.
For example, a high roller or professional gambler with $100,000 in losing bets in a year could use that amount to offset up to $100,000 in wagers that paid off.
In the new bill, the deduction limit has been dropped to 90 percent, which in the scenario above would leave the gambler with taxes owed on $10,000 — even though they had no net earnings for the year.
'No one should have to pay taxes on money they didn't win,' Representative Dina Titus, a Nevada Democrat,
Advertisement
Titus is a co-sponsor of the FAIR BET Act, which would permanently restore the 100 percent offset.
Rufus Peabody, a professional sports bettor,
'More likely than not, I would owe more money in taxes than I actually made in 2026 if I continue betting,' Peabody said. 'And so, as it stands, it becomes untenable to be a professional gambler.'
Unless the change is reversed, casinos such as the Encore in Everett and online betting apps including Boston's DraftKings could see a falloff in revenue as gamblers back away.
Massachusetts, which has raked in $2.4 billion in tax revenue since casino and sports betting began in the state, could see its budget take a hit.
As always, Congress giveth and it taketh away.
This time, seniors are happy to take what they can get. Gambler, on the other hand, rolled snake eyes.
Larry Edelman can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
32 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
No time, no lawyer, no rights: ICE memo sparks panic over third-country deportations
Immigrant communities across South Florida are on edge after a newly revealed immigration memo from the Trump administration confirmed that migrants could now be deported to countries other than their own with as little as six hours' notice — even in cases where those countries offer no guarantees of safety. The policy, laid out in a July 9 memo by Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, expands the controversial use of 'third-country deportations.' Immigration lawyers, human rights advocates and families say the rule marks one of the most extreme deportation tactics yet under President Donald Trump's hardline immigration approach. 'It is really chaos, what they are creating,' said Elizabeth Amaran, a Miami-based immigration attorney. 'In practice, it's almost impossible to notify someone in time. Six hours is not enough to prepare any legal defense — it effectively denies people due process.' The Miami area, home to large diasporas from Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Haiti, has emerged as one of the regions most likely to be affected by the policy — and also one of the most politically sensitive. Many immigrants in South Florida are in legal limbo, with pending asylum cases or final orders of removal that haven't been enforced. Under the memo, first reported by the Washington Post, ICE is now authorized to deport non-citizens — including long-term U.S. residents — to third countries with only 24 hours' notice. In 'exigent circumstances,' that window can shrink to six hours, so long as the detainee is given an opportunity to speak with an attorney. In cases where a receiving country has given 'credible diplomatic assurances' that the deportee won't face torture or persecution, ICE can carry out removals without any prior notice to the individual. Legal experts say this amounts to a sweeping removal power with few safeguards and little transparency. 'This falls far short of providing the statutory and due process protections that the law requires,' Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, told Reuters. Her organization is leading a class action lawsuit against ICE in federal court over what it calls unconstitutional deportations. The Trump administration has defended the policy as a necessary tool to accelerate the removal of unauthorized immigrants — including some with criminal records — particularly when their home countries are unwilling to accept them. 'We need to get the worst of the worst out of our country,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Sunday on Fox News. But data and accounts from immigration attorneys paint a different picture. Amaran says the majority of detainees she knows of who are at risk under the policy do not have criminal records. 'Out of 14 people I know of who were detained recently, only three had any record at all,' she said. 'Many have pending asylum claims or other forms of relief. They're being deported before their cases can be heard.' She added that many deportees are being sent to remote areas of Mexico despite not being Mexican nationals — and with no resources to survive. 'According to families I've spoken with, they're bused to remote border areas, given a 15-day temporary permit, and then just left there. No money, no shelter, no plan,' Amaran said. ICE's new memo follows a Supreme Court decision in June that lifted an injunction on third-country deportations. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned the policy would place 'thousands of lives at risk of persecution and torture,' accusing the government of abandoning caution in life-and-death matters.' Since the ruling, the Trump administration has resumed controversial removals. Just last week, eight migrants from countries including Cuba, Sudan and Vietnam were deported to war-torn South Sudan — a nation engulfed in civil conflict. U.S. officials reportedly leaned on five African nations — Liberia, Senegal, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania and Gabon — to accept deportees from other regions, such as Latin America and Southeast Asia. One of the most high-profile cases involves Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident wrongfully deported to El Salvador, despite a court order blocking his removal. After weeks of legal pressure, the Supreme Court returned him to the U.S., only for the Trump administration to threaten a new deportation — this time to an undisclosed third country. While third-country deportations are not new, they were historically rare and limited. Under Trump's first term, the U.S. deported a small number of Salvadorans and Hondurans to Guatemala. The Biden administration, while criticized for its own handling of immigration, struck regional agreements to manage migrant flows — including allowing Mexico to accept thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans under specific terms. What's changed now, advocates say, is both the scale and the speed. The memo requires ICE officers to provide 'reasonable means and opportunity' for a detainee to speak with a lawyer, but Amaran says that's far from reality. 'They say the person can talk to an attorney — but the system to actually make that happen doesn't work. ICE routinely ignores scheduled calls. You can't get a judge to rule on anything in six hours,' she said. 'The deck is completely stacked.'
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dem report: China to seize global advantage from Trump international spending cuts
China will seize influence on the global stage as a result of the Trump administration's major cuts to international spending, according to a report published Monday by the Democratic staff on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), the panel's top Democrat, commissioned the report as a wake-up call to her colleagues over the damage she says will be wrought by President Trump's policies six months into his term. The report comes as the Senate is considering a Trump administration rescissions package that would cut hundreds of billions in foreign funding. It also comes as Congress moves toward appropriations season; the House Appropriations Committee on Monday proposed a 22 percent funding cut for national security, Department of State, and related programs. 'I can't imagine that anybody who has a thoughtful strategy for how to address what's happening in the world would have done the kinds of actions this administration has done,' Shaheen said in a call Monday previewing the report. The report is based on open-source research, official staff travel, meetings with the Trump administration, foreign government officials, U.S. companies and international nongovernmental organizations. 'In private, our allies tell us that Chinese officials are gleeful, characterizing the United States as unreliable,' Shaheen wrote in the opening letter of the report. 'In some cases, China is filling the void we have left behind, buying up now-vacant radio frequencies to broadcast its propaganda to millions. But in many cases, Beijing is doubling down on its own long-term investments — in overseas infrastructure, critical minerals exploitation and exchange programs that bring foreign talent to Chinese universities — all while America withdraws.' The 91-page report covers cuts to foreign aid, economic assistance, democracy initiatives, free media and law enforcement. One case study includes U.S. budget cuts toward Africa and how they will impact efforts to develop the continent's exports of critical minerals. Trump has put a spotlight on Africa in the first six months of his term, brokering a peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda that could provide access to that region's critical minerals; touting $2.5 billion in deals and commitments at the recent U.S.-Africa Business Summit in June; and hosting five West African leaders at the White House in July. But the Democratic report says the Trump administration's gutting of the U.S. Agency for International Development has disrupted tens of millions of dollars in funding for projects complementing the development of infrastructure surrounding critical mineral extraction. It highlighted the Lobito Corridor project, a railway that brings critical minerals from Congo and Rwanda to Angola for shipment across the Atlantic Ocean. China is working on a similar project called the TAZARA Railway, which would connect Tanzania and Zambia and allow for exports of critical minerals across the Indian Ocean. The TAZARA Railway 'includes Chinese political training and other soft power initiatives to export the Chinese Communist Party's authoritarian style of government. Whichever project is successful will dictate whether critical minerals flow towards the Atlantic Ocean and the United States or towards the Indian Ocean and China,' the report warns. The report also highlights the Trump administration's halting of funds for the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) and specifically a $649 million infrastructure project in Indonesia, a Muslim-majority nation and regional leader that maintains ties with both the U.S. and China. The MCC funds projects in poor but stable countries to help drive new investment opportunities for American businesses. While the MCC funds were reinstated, the initial pause 'delayed the launching, opening, evaluation and signing of bids for significant procurements,' the report notes. 'Following consultations with Indonesian counterparts, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Minority Staff also concluded that the pause has damaged America's standing and credibility with leadership in Jakarta,' the report read. Shaheen, a centrist Democrat who has worked with Republicans in the past, is using the report to push GOP colleagues to help reverse cuts or save bipartisan initiatives that are on the chopping block with the Trump administration's rescissions request. 'I think there are some aspects of the report that we talk about where there's a real interest in seeing them continue — the Millennial Challenge Corporation is one of those, again, a Bush initiative that has been very effective,' Shaheen said in response to a question of whether any GOP lawmakers would get behind the report's recommendations. Shaheen also pointed out the Trump administration's request to cut 91 percent of funding for U.S.-led international narcotics and law enforcement programs as standing in direct opposition to the president's commitment to combat the opioid epidemic and proliferation of fentanyl. The report also highlights the administration's termination of funding for international law enforcement to target cyber crime emanating from Southeast Asia. In 2024, Americans suffered $13.7 billion in losses from cyber-related scams, a 66 percent increase from 2023, the report notes. 'I can't imagine that there's any serious strategy that eliminates that kind of international law enforcement activity if you're really serious about addressing what the PRC is doing,' Shaheen said, referring to the People's Republic of China (PRC). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Supreme Court allows deep cuts at Education Department for now
A divided Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the Trump administration to sharply shrink the Education Department, one of the cornerstones of the president's efforts to radically downsize the federal government. The justices lifted a temporary lower-court ruling that prevented Trump officials from slashing about half of the department's more than 4,100 workers and shifting some of its functions to the states and other departments.
