Hawaii is scrambling to fix SNAP food program following $11M fine for errors
The department is asking lawmakers for about $5.46 million — half the amount of the fine — for a new computerized screening system to determine eligibility and benefits amounts for SNAP.
If the state commits that money to improve its accuracy, the federal government may waive the rest of the fine, lawmakers were told. Formerly known as food stamps, SNAP is the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service's food aid program.
Hawaiʻi's payment error rate was about 21% in the 2022 and 2023 federal fiscal years, nearly double the national average for both years, said Scott Morishige, administrator of the Benefit, Employment and Support Services Division for the state Human Services department.
The errors were a combination of underpayments and overpayments of benefits, Morishige told Civil Beat. The Food and Nutrition Service imposed the $10.93 million fine last June, he said.
The department was flooded with applications for SNAP during the pandemic, and the federal government waived many of the normal rules that govern benefits.
Hawaiʻi took full advantage of those waivers, but its error rates escalated as the federal requirements were gradually reinstated in the years that followed, Morishige said.
Problems were aggravated by high turnover among employees responsible for determining eligibility, a state hiring freeze imposed in 2020 by then-Gov. David Ige, and larger-than-normal caseloads for the remaining workers.
The error rates were determined by audits of samples of Hawaiʻi's SNAP caseloads.
Gov. Josh Green's administration has submitted House Bill 1099 for the $5.46 million emergency appropriation so the state can pursue a 'reinvestment option' to resolve the penalty.
A new Department of Human Services computer system called Benefits Eligibility Solution is being developed to replace its current system, which is nearly 40 years old. The $68 million project is scheduled to launch statewide in fall 2026, according to the department.
'Under the terms of the reinvestment option, if the reinvestment results in the payment error rate falling under and remaining below the national average, which is currently 11.68 percent, the State will not be required to pay the remaining fifty percent of the penalty,' DHS Director Ryan Yamane said in written testimony.
research published last year by the University of Hawaiʻi Economic Research Organization.
The administration's request for emergency funding is backed by the Hawaiʻi Appleseed Center for Law and Economic Justice, which pointed out that an estimated 14,000 additional Hawaiʻi families are expected to join the SNAP rolls later this year following a change in state eligibility requirements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
3 hours ago
- Business Wire
SNAP Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Snap Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Snap Inc. ('Snap' or 'the Company') (NYSE: SNAP) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors who purchased the Company's securities between April 29, 2025, and August 5, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), are encouraged to contact the firm before October 20, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Snap concealed the true state of its advertising growth rate from investors. The Company's growth rate fell between quarters from 9% to just 1% due to its execution failure. The Company blamed its advertising slowdown on 'an issue related to our ad platform, the timing of Ramadan and the effects of the de minimis changes. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Snap, investors suffered damages. Join the case to recover your losses The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Sales tax hike dumped in favor of 1% grocery tax by Naperville council
The Naperville City Council reversed course Tuesday on how it would replace the lost income from the soon-to-be-defunct state grocery tax, abandoning plans to increase the city's home rule tax in favor of a local 1% grocery tax. Councilman Benny White, who previously supported increasing the home rule sales tax to compensate for the $6.5 million loss in state grocery tax money, said he had a change of heart after concluding a hike in the sales tax would place a heavier burden on local business owners and those struggling to afford items like diapers and basic cleaning supplies. 'In my opinion, the grocery tax, by keeping it where it is … I think it doesn't affect our residents,' White said. 'I think they're used to paying that particular tax so to have our businesses pick up the slack, I'm struggling with that.' The council had been scheduled to take a final vote on escalating the city's sales tax before a motion was made to swap it with the local grocery tax. Last month, the council voted 5-4 to raise the city's sales tax by 0.25%, which it can do without voter approval because it is a home rule municipality. The tax increase would have applied to restaurant meals and store purchases, including clothing, electronics and personal care products. By increasing the home rule sales tax, the city also would have been required to decrease the downtown food and beverage tax by the same percentage, per a city ordinance. Naperville's current downtown food and beverage tax is 1.75%. Gov. JB Pritzker repealed Illinois' 1% grocery tax last year, saying it hit poorer families harder than others. However, because revenue from the tax goes directly to municipal governments rather than to the state government, towns were granted the ability to levy their own 1% tax on groceries by Oct. 1. Many communities in Illinois have already opted to implement a local grocery tax. Finding a replacement for the state-wide grocery tax is crucial for Naperville, which collects $6.5 million annually from the income source. Naperville Finance Director Raymond Munch said at a previous council meeting that the grocery tax and the home rule sales tax currently bring in about the same amount of revenue, but the local grocery tax is a more stable form of revenue. The vote on reinstating the local grocery tax was 5-4, with Mayor Scott Wehrli and council members Josh McBroom, Nate Wilson and Allison Longenbaugh joining White in voting yes. Council members Ian Holzhauer, Ashfaq Syed, Mary Gibson and Patrick Kelly voted against it. Holzhauer reiterated the same points he made at last month's council meeting, emphasizing that a grocery tax combined with cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) under President Trump's tax bill could harm people who are already struggling. City staff previously noted that SNAP recipients would not feel the effects of the grocery tax, but would see the impact of a home rule sales tax increase. 'There is only so far that we can push that social safety net before it breaks,' Holzhauer said. 'If we have the opportunity to take a vote to make food more affordable for people whose lives just got a lot harder, I think we need to do that.' McBroom, however, argued that the volatility of the home rule sales tax could put people at risk by impacting essential city services should it bring in less money than expected. 'If we're worried about vulnerable people, vulnerable people need police, vulnerable people need fire departments to come to their neighborhood,' McBroom said. 'We are going to have an economic contraction at some point, and that's going to put a future city council in an impossible political position to raise property taxes to pay for our essential services.' McBroom also serves as the liaison to the Naperville Financial Advisory Board, which voted 5-1 in May to recommend the adoption of the grocery tax over increasing the home rule sales tax.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bipartisan effort launches to reintroduce welfare work requirements
(The Center Square) – Reinstating work requirements for some welfare recipients found support across the aisle on Wednesday. It's a notable change after the partisan nature of the debate in recent years: Republicans have long wanted waivers from the mandate, which have been used on and off for the last 20 years, to expire amid fears about prolonged government dependency and fraud. Democrats see the option as economically justified absent a stronger safety net. Without a waiver, able-bodied adults would have to work at least 20 hours a week or spend the equivalent amount of time in a workforce development program. Until the requirement is met, benefits would be limited to three months over a three-year period. Rep. Frank Burns, D-Johnstown, wants to see a return to the 'Welfare to Work' program implemented in 1996 under former President Bill Clinton, which he said incentivized recipients for seeking employment. 'This successful shift in welfare policy showed that improving welfare services can be achieved while lowering costs for taxpayers and increasing employment,' Burns said of his House Bill 1807. The bill, cosigned by Rep. Mark Gillen, a Republican representing a district in Reading, would require able-bodied adults to work or engage with their communities to qualify for Medicaid. 'The intention is to encourage physically and mentally able Medicaid enrollees to find employment, job training, or volunteer opportunities,' Burns said. 'Work and community engagement policies such as this have proven to be successful in several states, with reduced costs and decreases in unemployment.' Welfare expansion has outpaced population growth: Pennsylvania has only gained 700,000 residents since 2000. But the state budget is dominated by this spending that runs through the Department of Human Services. Medicaid spending has ballooned over the last 25 years. The state spent $10.7 billion on 1.3 million residents in 2000, but now, the commonwealth appropriates $47 billion to provide benefits to 3.3 million residents. Though human services eat up a significant chunk of all state budgets, the commonwealth stands out: Pennsylvania's Medicaid expenditures as a percentage of its budget is the highest in the nation, according to an analysis from the Foundation for Government Accountability. Sam Adolphsen, the foundation's policy director, has argued during past legislative hearings that almost half of the commonwealth's beneficiaries on Medicaid are able-bodied adults. During a 2024 legislative hearing, Adelson called it 'fraud by design' when recipients could get in the Medicaid program before the state verified eligibility. Meanwhile, 14,000 people with intellectual and physical disabilities remain on a waiting list for resources. 'That's how you get this robbery of this safety net,' he said. 'If you're stopping fraud and saving money, it's to protect these folks and taxpayers.' For critics of work requirements, it's not that simple. In an analysis from the Urban Institute, able-bodied adults are considered a 'challenging' group to serve. These beneficiaries are more likely to be homeless or live with a mental or physical condition that doesn't qualify as a disability, even though it makes working unrealistic. The research also showed that income decreases for residents who only receive benefits for three months, suggesting that time limits do not encourage employment. Farry has a second proposal, House Bill 1808, that wants to try extended limits for transitioning off benefits in a different program – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. The cash benefits would be reformed through a Clinton-inspired 'Welfare to Work' pilot program, in which recipients will increase employment hours as benefits taper off. The pilot would launch in counties with populations between 90,000 and 209,999, where recipients working 20 hours would receive full benefits for six months. After that, the employer will increase working hours to 30 per week, while the state reduces cash assistance to 70%. After a year, a beneficiary will be expected to work 40 hours a week and transition out of the program entirely. 'This program will encourage companies to hire individuals enrolled on the welfare rolls, helping families to transition to self-sufficiency by providing an incentive to work,' Burns said in the proposal's cosponsorship memo. 'In doing so, businesses will be able to tap into this potential pool of workers.' Democratic Reps. Manuel Guzman and Jim Haddock, as well as Republican Rep. Andrew Kuzma have co-sponsored the bill. Both await consideration in the House Human Services Committee. Anthony Hennen contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
