‘Superman' Scene-Stealer Edi Gathegi Explains How His Mister Terrific Role Atones for a Broken ‘X-Men' Promise
16 years ago, Gathegi was offered the role of Darwin in Matthew Vaughn's X-Men: First Class, and before he ultimately agreed to play the highly adaptable, regenerative mutant, he voiced his concerns about the character's abrupt death midway through the film. For Gathegi, the shocking moment underscored age-old problematic tropes.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Stop, Already, With Superhero Movies Ending With Big, Dumb CG Smash Battles
Box Office: James Gunn's 'Superman' Soars to $22.5 Million in Previews
Dean Cain Worries James Gunn's 'Superman' Is Just Too "Woke"
'I called my agents to say, 'Hey, listen, I have a problem with the fact that this character is the only Black character in the film aside from Zoë Kravitz's character. I am also the only mutant who meets an untimely demise halfway through the film,'' Gathegi tells The Hollywood Reporter in support of Superman's July 11 theatrical release. 'It was 2009 at the time, and I was like, 'Killing the Black guy first is so played out. I can't do this.''
Producers then eased his concerns at the time by making the promise of greener pastures. In other words, Gathegi was given assurances that he'd return in a future X-Men installment based on his character's ability to restore himself.
'They assured us that it was essential for the storytelling in order to motivate the mutants to avenge my [character's] death. They also fully intended to bring my character back as they do in the comics. [Darwin] can't die; he regenerates,' Gathegi recalls. 'So we held onto the hope that they would honor their word. When I didn't come back for X-Men: Apocalypse, I just knew it was done.'
In 2023, Gathegi's reps asked him to send in a self-tape for the part of Mister Terrific/Michael Holt in Gunn's then-upcoming Superman movie. But he initially resisted the idea due to a TV role he'd just landed opposite Robert De Niro, as well as an impending European vacation. He felt it would just be another tape that gets lost in the shuffle. However, he then learned that the DC Studios co-CEO and Superman director was especially eager to see him audition. What Gathegi didn't know was that Gunn had already seen 200 people for the role, and he still hadn't found the right candidate, prompting him to ask his casting director why Gathegi hadn't read for the part yet.
Gathegi and Gunn had known each other in passing for years, and the Kenyan-American actor suddenly remembered a compliment that Gunn had paid him on the red carpet of The Suicide Squad in 2021. So he sent off a self-tape the day before he was set to leave the country, and while he was en route to LAX, Gunn DM'd him to praise his tape, which eventually led to his casting as Mister Terrific.
Gathegi's turn as the suave high-tech superhero and member of the Superman-allied Justice Gang is now being widely regarded as Superman's scene-stealing performance. For Gathegi, his second bite of the superhero apple means so much more when considering how he was treated in Fox's Marvel universe.
'The pendulum has swung in the complete opposite direction. With X-Men: First Class, the message that I received as an actor and as a man of color in this world is you can be the most powerful mutant in the world and they'll never let you reach your full potential,' Gathegi says. 'Whereas with Mister Terrific in Superman, the message that I'm receiving is you can be one of the most intelligent characters in the universe, and you can help save the world. It's a different level of conversation.'
Below, during a recent conversation with THR, Gathegi also discusses some behind-the-scenes details from Superman, as well as an amusing scene with Mister Terrific and David Corenswet's Superman that became the post-credit scene at the eleventh hour.
***
I suppose we should start with your first dalliance in the superhero genre. Did you come out of thinking that it would be your one-and-only shot at being in a superhero film?
It's a bit more complex than that because I thought that I would be returning to that franchise over and over again. I thought that there was potential for a bigger future. It was actually a surprise to never get the call to suit up again.
Was it a last-minute decision that your invulnerable mutant character would make a quick exit?
No, sometimes, with these big movies, you have to say yes to the movie before you've actually read the script. But I was in London after I'd just been offered the role, and they gave me a couple of hours to read the script to determine whether or not I wanted to do it. So I read it, and I called my agents to say, 'Hey, listen, I have a problem with the fact that this character is the only Black character in the film aside from Zoë Kravitz's character. I am also the only mutant who meets an untimely demise halfway through the film.' It was 2009 at the time, and I was like, 'Killing the Black guy first is so played out. I can't do this.'
So there were conversations that happened, and then they assured us that it was essential for the storytelling in order to motivate the mutants to avenge my [character's] death. They also fully intended to bring my character back as they do in the comics. [Darwin] can't die; he regenerates. So we held onto the hope that they would honor their word.
, as Hank McCoy/Beast, also happened to be there for the lead-up to Darwin's demise. Did he reference or make light of that situation at all during the filming of ?
No, because I've moved well beyond that. The run of that particular franchise was X-Men: First Class, X-Men: Days of Future Past, X-Men: Apocalypse and X-Men: Dark Phoenix. And when I didn't come back for X-Men: Apocalypse, I just knew it was done. So I didn't really look back, to be honest with you. I speak about it when people bring it up, but I made peace with this years ago.
I'm surprised Nick didn't bring it up as an icebreaker after all these years.
We actually had a great time filming [X-Men: First Class] in London. We were all young, and we got a per diem. We were also living in these gorgeous apartments while working on a big-budget Hollywood production and living a childhood dream. So it was a very, very exciting and positive experience, but just the way that they handled my character was a fumble.
Well, now you're being regarded as the scene-stealer of . That's quite the second bite of the apple.
The pendulum has swung in the complete opposite direction. With X-Men: First Class, the message that I received as an actor and as a man of color in this world is you can be the most powerful mutant in the world and they'll never let you reach your full potential. Whereas with Mister Terrific in Superman, the message that I'm receiving is you can be one of the most intelligent characters in the universe, and you can make a difference. You can help save the world. It's a different level of conversation.
James Gunn has said that Mister Terrific was the toughest role to cast. He saw 200 people, and one day he asked his casting director why you hadn't read yet. Was that a question you were also asking?
It's a pretty cool story. I went to The Suicide Squad premiere where I met James in earnest. I wouldn't say it was the first time because we'd known each other from various places, but I hadn't seen him in a long time. So he came up to me on the red carpet to tell me what a fan he was of my acting, and I had no clue that he had seen me in anything. I then filed that away and thought, 'James Gunn is a big fan of mine. Maybe we'll have the opportunity to work together one day.'
Then, when my agents called me to make a tape for Superman, I had just been given a role opposite Robert De Niro in a TV show [Zero Day]. And I was like, 'Okay, I've just scratched my itch. I don't need to go out there and try to secure more work.' I was also on my way to Europe for a vacation the following day, so I told my agents that I didn't really have the time or the bandwidth to audition for [Superman]. People think I'm crazy, but the truth is that I was going away and prioritizing my life.
Then I heard that James Gunn was waiting for my tape, and I thought, 'Okay, this tracks because I met him on the [Suicide Squad] red carpet and he likes my work. If he's actually waiting for my tape, that means this director is actually going to watch my tape.' You don't always know who watches your tape. Sometimes, as an actor, you make tapes, and it just feels like they're going out into the void. But this felt like a situation where James was guaranteed to watch it.
So I made a tape and sent it in before I went on my way to Europe. The next day, I was in my Uber headed to LAX, and I looked at my Instagram to see a direct message from James Gunn. He was like, 'Yo, you killed this audition.' And I thought, 'Oh, wow. Now I've got to spend two months in Europe wondering if I'm actually going to be in the new Superman.'
When I was in Milan, I thought, 'If I actually get this job, I'm going to need an outfit for the premiere.' So I bought a suit and a pair of shoes in Milan, and I totally forgot about them until I was doing my fitting. I ended up wearing a different suit, but I remembered that I had those shoes that I bought in Milan before I even booked a job. I'd been sitting on them for two years, and I wore them at the premiere last night.
Did you actually toss and turn the entire time in Europe?
I've arrived at a place in my life where I've learned to prioritize life over career, so, for the most part, I was able to put aside thoughts of this movie while abroad. Now, naturally I was aware that I could potentially be on the cusp of a great opportunity, but I was willing to trust the process and be present with my family. My two-month vacation was then cut short because they did ultimately want to screen-test me, so I flew back early to complete that process.
Did you have to drop out of the De Niro show for ?
I did ultimately have to leave the De Niro project [Zero Day], but it was only because of the strikes pushing the schedules on top of each other. My decision came down to what had the potential for a longer life, and a new DC character in a rebooted universe felt like the right choice. I was a bit bummed because working with De Niro was definitely a bucket-list thing, and I know and love the director, Lesli Linka Glatter.
Once you started filming , is it true that you ultimately scrapped the choices you made on tape and focused on a different take?
The way that James and his wonderfully creative mind works is he dances in the spirit of play. So you're trying different things, you're trying wacky things, and you're trying wild things. You're just opening up this character to all the various possibilities. He then goes into the edit to see what works and what doesn't work. So I found myself doing things that felt very counterintuitive to what I had imagined the character would be. But what I saw on the screen was something closer to what I auditioned with, to be honest with you. It was closer to the version that secured me the job in the first place.
is obviously a very important movie to Warner Bros. and DC Studios. Was the pressure palpable on set?
There obviously is pressure. You're in a genre that has a lot of fans and a lot of eyeballs. You're aware that there's a lot of money being invested in this particular production. There's pressure that you put on yourself to be a good actor and be in service of the story, the text and the director. So you do the work, and you remember the fact that you were chosen and that you're there for a reason. So the best-case scenario is you show up to work confident and you're released of all those other external pressures. You're able to then focus on the work and try to elevate your scene partner, and be present to make interesting choices. So, yes, there's an element of pressure, but the goal is to subdue that.
Superman and the Justice Gang have an alliance, but they have differing philosophies. Superman literally won't hurt a squirrel, but your character is willing to kill if necessary. What did you make of that distinction?
I think that's a film-specific choice. I'll have to go back and look at the comics, but I don't believe that Mister Terrific kills in the comics. He clearly kills the kaiju in this, and while he might kill in the comics, I would say that Mister Terrific and Superman are more alike than they are different. Superman stands for idealism; he's got a code of ethics. And Mister Terrific's motto is 'fair play.' His entire personality is the ethical use of AI, and he disbelieves in abuse of power. He thinks the more power you have, the more empathetic you should become. It shouldn't be the reverse. And Superman is the antidote to 'absolute power corrupts absolutely.'
How surreal was it to look to your left or right and see the Man of Steel fighting alongside you?
Everyone has said it a million times, but people are now getting the chance to watch this movie and experience the perfection that is the casting of David Corenswet as Superman. He embodies him physically, but also in demeanor and so many other ways. It's pretty inspiring. And when I looked at myself in the mirror, I felt like I was looking back at a person who could save the world. So standing next to Superman, there are no words to describe the magic of that.
You got your own action showcase during Terrific's field trip with Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan). What was the highlight of putting that sequence together?
The highlight lies solely and simply in the fact that it was done. It was one of the most arduous things that I've had to do as an actor. I was wearing a leather outfit in the middle of the hottest heat wave on record for that region. We were under the hot sun on a beach with infirm ground, and I was doing this fight choreography over and over again. Some of the moves that we practiced weren't reading on camera, so we had to improvise new adjustments to the choreography on top of everything else that was going on at the time.
There was a moment where I actually wanted to pull James to the side and say, 'Let's scrap the new stuff and stick to the old stuff. I cannot do it.' So I had to take myself away from the set and breathe and give myself a pep talk. And that pep talk went a little like this: 'You're in Superman, dude. This is what you wanted. Get back in there and just hit this choreography.' So that's what I did, and the next take worked. I then thanked God for that little miracle.
Did you actually get to shoot on the Cleveland Guardians' field?
Yeah, those were some pretty hot days too. We were right there. There were a lot of real-world sets that we had access to, and those were the days that shifted my experience because everything up until then was in Atlanta on soundstages. So we didn't really have any prying eyeballs, and we got to work in our own little bubble. But when we got to the cities, it's harder to lock down locations. So that's when the pressure started to kick in, and I became a little bit more aware of the magnitude of what I'm involved in.
You trained with Maria Gabriela De Faria (The Engineer) for six months before the movie started filming, so were you both looking forward to your confrontation on the Guardians' field the entire time?
Yeah, there was a bit of that. We would chit-chat. Gabby is the most bubbly and sweet person. She's become a dear friend, and I love that girl. She totally inspired me because of how hard she was willing to work, and so she was a great counterpoint at the gym. We all knew that it was going to lead up to the Engineer having the ability to kill Mister Terrific when he's vulnerable, and his life is spared through distraction by Superman.
DC and Marvel have always pursued relatively similar storylines, and the movies have explored the debate over making Wakandan tech available to the masses. Is that also a story point that Terrific has had to address?
Yes, he does believe in sharing his technology with the world, and as I touched on, he's overly concerned with the ethical use of AI. He's the kind of brain and the kind of soul and heart that would program a philosophical bug in a killer AI so that the killer AI would start to doubt its own mission to destroy everybody. He believes in the ethical use of AI to that extent.
Terrific is also in the very funny post-credit scene. When you shot that scene, did you know it'd be the post-credit scene?
I did not. It was [originally] part of the movie. I found out that it was going to be in the end credits before the premiere yesterday. James sent me a little message, saying, 'Hey, I know you haven't seen the movie yet, but just to give you a little heads-up so you're not surprised, there's been some changes. That scene is now the post-credit scene.' So when we were at the premiere, everybody in my row was getting up, and I did not let them get up. They were like, 'What's going on?' And I was like, 'There's a post-credit scene.' And then there were whispers, asking, 'Are you sure? Are you sure?' I even started to doubt it myself. I thought, 'Maybe there isn't, and I made all these people wait here for no reason.' But then it happened.
Was there anything else of interest that didn't make the cut?
Yeah, there were some third-act interactions with Krypto that I had a blast filming, and I was looking forward to watching how it all came together. But in watching the movie, I totally understand why it was cut. As a filmmaker, that's what I would've done. So it was done in service of the story, and what we want is the best story to engage the audience in the most complete way.
How much do you know about the future of your character in the DCU? (Note: Following this interview, reported that Gunn is considering a Mister Terrific TV spinoff.)
With regards to me and maybe a lot of other characters, we're just waiting to see what the success of this film will be. But in terms of solid information or direction, it's anybody's guess. There's talk of some things, but as James constantly reminds us, they're never going to rush a project into production that isn't ready, script-wise. So whatever they announce is kind of irrelevant until the writer delivers a shootable draft.
Decades from now, when you reflect on this experience, what day will you likely recall first?
This is probably one of the reasons why I got Superman, but for a couple months leading up to it, I had started to live in a radically present place. Yesterday's premiere marked the two-year anniversary of James, [producer] Peter Safran and [EP] Chantal [Nong Vo] sitting me down and asking me if I wanted to play Mister Terrific. It was two years to the day: July 7th, 2023. So I have been completely present in this entire experience the last two years, and I'm going to remember so many days because so many days are significant to me.
Now that it's over, I'm clearly looking forward to the future. I would love to do more Superman movies and other movies and explore Mister Terrific in different iterations throughout the new DCU. But I will be radically present in whatever my next job is, even if it's outside the DCU.
***Superman is now playing in movie theaters.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
The 40 Best Films About the Immigrant Experience
Wes Anderson's Movies Ranked From Worst to Best
13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
‘Fantastic Four' Underwhelms, ‘Superman' Soars Higher At Box Office
Marvel Studios' summer tentpole The Fantastic Four: First Steps underwhelmed this weekend with just $118 million domestic and $100 million internationally, slightly ahead of what were frankly conservative estimates but realistically behind potential for such a major MCU release. Meanwhile, DC Studios' Superman soars higher at the box office past $500 million, after previously opening higher than Fantastic Four. Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn star in "The Fantastic Four: First Steps." Fantastic Four Misses A Step In a surprise turnabout, it was Superman eating into The Fantastic Four: First Steps' weekend gross, rather than Marvel's summer tentpole acting as a speed bump for DC's cinematic reboot. Superman went from a trajectory toward $550 million to suddenly staring confidently at $600 million or more, if last weekend's upset moral victory is a sign of things to come. It's not a disaster, by any stretch (sorry, pun kind of intended), but a $218 million global bow for Marvel's biggest film of the year is not the champaign-popping result they wanted. Especially not after the previous two MCU releases this year underperformed. Fantastic Four debuting to less than Superman is a bad sign for the MCU in more ways than merely this film's own box office prospects. Marvel 'First Family' is meant to set up the two-part Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars payoff, as well as setting the foundations for a soft reboot of the MCU (with X-Men serving as the other major players in laying the new groundwork). The Fantastic Four: First Steps did come in more than 10% ahead of Superman internationally, and the MCU tends to enjoy good overseas holds. However, overall lower opening weekend global sales combined with the fact Superman is holding far better than expected (particularly with families and younger viewers compared to Fantastic Four's alarming drops among those demographics), means we have to wait to see whether First Steps can match the Man of Steel's stamina. Right now, it appears Superman could wind up flying as high as $630 million, or as low as $590 million, but most likely somewhere north of $600 million at this point. The Fantastic Four: First Steps, on the other hand, might now have the more modest trajectory once anticipated for Superman. There's still a broad range of outcomes, however, because the A- Cinemascore and great 87% 'Certified Fresh" rating from critics via Rotten Tomatoes mean strong positive word-of-mouth just like Superman enjoyed, except Fantastic Four's numbers are actually a bit higher. Which usually spells good news for second and third weekend holds, particularly internationally – again, where the MCU gets most of its money. If Fantastic Four can build upon its lead with foreign audiences and make up lost ground there, it could allow the Marvel film to exceed Superman's international holds (which are still good, make no mistake, but still significantly weaker than domestic) and wind up making more worldwide despite a potentially (probably, to be frank) lower domestic haul than DC Studio's successful superhero revival. Fantastic Four And Family Films My guess is that what we're seeing is part of a much broader trend that's taking place, and it's displacing a lot of previously chart-topping genres and franchises. And it isn't a major surprise, if you follow annual box office charts much. So far this year, the top of the worldwide box office charts is dominated by family movies targeted heavily toward children and parents. China's Ne Zha II purportedly at the very top with $1.9 billion, followed by Lilo & Stitch with a huge $1 billion, A Minecraft Movie at $955 million, Jurassic World: Rebirth with $718 million to date, How to Train Your Dragon at $606 million so far, and then some adult-appealing Mission Impossible - The Final Reckoning closing out at about $595 million and F1 currently at $510 million and still going strong. Only then, at the bottom of the top 10, do we finally see Superman's $503 million gross (so far), Captain America: Brave New World at $415 million, and Thunderbolts with just $382 million. Now, these placements will change eventually, as other upcoming films inevitably bump some of these films from the top 10 box office charts. More important for the moment is that Jurassic World will remain in third place for a while, after it hits roughly $850 million. How to Train Your Dragon and Superman will face off over who has the highest $600+ grand total, with a near-tie possible. The Fantastic Four: First Steps will wind up somewhere in high-$500 millions or the $600 millions. F1 will race its way toward $575 million to perhaps even $600 million Likewise, Zootopia 2 and Avatar: Fire & Ash are both going to wind up high on the top-10 list by the end of the year, with Avatar 3 at the very top and Zootopia 2 almost surely among the top-5. So the final year-end chart will probably look something like this: Notice the top seven spots are dominated by child-leaning family movies, and the two that aren't (Avatar 3 and Jurassic World) are still popular with kids and teens as well as parents. F1 at the bottom is the only true adult drama entry on the list, the other nine being multi-demographic films with large or predominant family attendance, as well as big youth turnout overall. Superheroes are now mostly relegated to second-tier box office status and the bottom of the top-10. And even those impressive numbers for Jurassic World tell another story. Jurassic World: Rebirth is still in the weekend top-three and stomping its way toward maybe $850 million despite lousy audience grades and weak reviews. That's a big number, but it's also a huge comedown from the billion-plus box office of the preceding three chapters in the franchise. Meanwhile, the live-action adaptation of How to Train Your Dragon looks to finish around $625, which is higher than I personally expected (I figured between $500-600 million), and should become the highest grossing entry in the entire franchise, topping its animated predecessors. And of course, both Lilo & Stitch and Minecraft overperformed and are in the elite tier of the year-end box office. Ne Zha II is a whole special story, having made the bulk of its enormous gross in China, and I always have questions about how (*ahem*) accurate the accounting is. That said, it's still clearly a big hit and will get a North American release later this year, so we'll see how that goes. But regardless, it's another example of rekindled surging power of family entertainment at the top of box office charts. While family movies have always been popular and typically pepper the annual box office top-10, superhero cinema and certain other recurring tentpole franchises usually take several of the top-5 and tend to reside in the higher positions of the charts. But aside from rare billion dollar grossers like last year's Deadpool & Wolverine, superhero movies are settling into a lower tier at the box office, in the 'new normal' that sees viewers pickier about what they spend their dollars on, favoring family entertainment and looking for unique adaptations of familiar franchises. With so many superhero films and streaming series, not to mention plenty of animated superhero films and shows as well, parents and families are far less obliged to hit the multiplex for most of these pictures. Instead, they choose to watch them at home later, and reserve their theater seats for those predominantly kid-friendly family films. Unless a superhero film offers something really extra that makes it must-see, or unless it nails the appeal to families with young kids, those crucial family and youth demographics aren't as interested in keeping up in theaters. Binging on the shared-world ahead of major crossovers is easier and more appealing, it seems, and helps more easily work in viewings of the streaming shows. Fantastic Four And Marvel's Future That Marvel can't sustain the mind-boggling levels of success they enjoyed through their Infinity Saga isn't surprising, nor is it a sign of failure on their part. What Marvel is, and what it represents, has evolved and changed now. Marvel is at the 'what now?' point. Conversely, DC Studios has captured audiences' attention by stepping into that place the MCU once occupied with a fresh, fun new world being introduced, and it invites all ages to the party while everybody experiences it for the first time together. Marvel is now setting up their own soft reboot of sorts, but will audiences buy into it? They did with the DCEU's final dying gasps giving way to the newly introduced DCU in Superman, so maybe despite some underperformance for the MCU ahead of their own reset, they could enjoy some boost from the Avengers sequels coming up (although danger of underperforming always exists) and then introduce a whole new MCU that rekindles the sense of newness and joy. But even if both the DCU and MCU experience a new love affair with audiences, I suspect it will still never reach the heights of the Infinity Saga's recurring billion dollar franchise sequels and $2+ billion Avengers 'event' releases. Successful sustainable superhero cinematic universes will probably financially look more like Marvel's Phase One and Phase Two, or DCEU's first set of movies (Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Suicide Squad, Wonder Woman, Justice League), where only the Avengers or major sequels/team-ups score $1 billion and the rest fall in the $500-700 million range. That means budgets will have to get under control, and there will be less releases each year, while streaming spinoffs become more attractive less 'tested' characters. If James Gunn and Peter Safran can guide DC Studios toward tweaking their approach in Superman but otherwise delivering on the potential to give audiences what they experienced with the original MCU build-up and payoff, then they'll be rewarded with solid success that might not quite achieve the Infinity Saga's heights, but will still be enormously successful and popular. And I'm going to say something controversial to some, but here it goes: the more Gunn and Safran make sure the rest of the DCU movies maintain the same appeal to families and kids, the more successful it will be. Dogs? Humor? All-ages fun? Yes, all around. I know everybody wants some idealized world where each franchise director is given exclusive visionary control and every film can be its own thing, but I'm talking about a different level of success that builds a whole DC world around an inclusive 'all fans welcome' approach and pointedly wants to create young fans who will remain fans for decades to come. I agree that a grounded Batman can coexist with a fantastical Superman, but that's easier in the comics than in live action cinema, and crucially there is a difference between what comic book fans' cultural expectations are compared to the much larger mainstream global film audience who are fans of these superheroes. Folks showing up to the Marvel movies responded the way they did because it all was within a shared world and it felt like it. Audiences bring those expectations and subconscious assumptions or judgments with them into the cinema, and it matters for their sense of buy-in. This has become more obvious as we've seen the differences between Marvel's and DC's successes and failures over the years. Superman had an aesthetic and sensibility, as well as tonal balance and sense of humor, that works for superhero movies meant for all audience members. It feels very similar to Sam Raimi's Spider-Man and Spider-Man II, and most of all the director's Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness. We all remember how successful those films were, and I think leaning into that for the overall DC world works extremely well if the family audience appeal is front and center. It's actually not dissimilar to the aesthetics of Zack Snyder's Watchmen movie, which I long said would be an excellent aesthetic template (minus the graphic violence, sex, and profanity) for adapting the DC universe to film in a shared world. Perhaps leaning into Superman's family-friendly aspects most of the time, and allowing for leaning more toward Watchmen for the slightly 'edgier' or darker films like Brave and the Bold (might it eventually be retitled Batman and Robin?), but even that film could use the grittier tone while tilting back the other way by having Robin/Damian as the main character instead of Batman/Bruce. For Marvel, and for The Fantastic Four: First Steps, the evolved aesthetic approach is an interesting introduction to what the potential future of the MCU might look like, with a world growing out of Fantastic Four's history merged with the existence of Mutants and X-Men. It makes sense that when previous superheroes like Iron Man, Captain America, and others are rebooted with new actors, it will happen in a new world with new aesthetic changes to avoid repetition and to allow entirely new approaches and inspirations. At least, I hope that happens, but it depends a lot on the success of Fantastic Four, and on the success of Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars. Let's find out how Fantastic Four: First Steps does through the weekdays as word-of-mouth spreads, and then how strongly it holds – I'm especially interested in what those international figures tell us over the next seven days, because that's where we'll get the best glimpse of Fantastic Four's box office future, and what it might mean for the rest of the MCU's plans. Superman's own numbers will separately tell us whether it's headed for the lower end or higher end of those $600+ expectations.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
People Are Coming To Pedro Pascal's Defense After Some Suspicious Backlash Against Him And Vanessa Kirby
Mom, can you come pick me up? People are being really weird about Pedro Pascal online and it's giving smear campaign. Related: If you have the profound displeasure of still being on X, you may have noticed a number of posts that essentially try to say that Pedro touches his female costars inappropriately as a way to soothe his "anxiety" — with a lot of focus on his Fantastic Four promotional tour with costar Vanessa Kirby. One of the videos of the pair was even flagged for containing an AI distortion. The posts twist what Pedro said about anxiety in a recent Men's Health interview: "I was always one to reach out when I'm facing something that is challenging or making me anxious...I definitely kind of stopped doing that, and instead I'm doomscrolling, or looking for something to watch; looking for different ways to disassociate from the feeling I'm having. And then, when it started to feel so critical, I had to go back to what was always the comfort for me in life, which was engagement in my relationships, my friendships, and conversation and shared experience." Touching, of women or otherwise, was not mentioned. The backlash further devolved into vitriolic, offensive posts about Bella Ramsey, with one post with 255k likes reading, "How come Pedro Pascal never gets anxiety around Bella Ramsey?" Monica Schipper / Getty Images, Travis P. Ball / SXSW Conference & Festivals via Getty Images Related: Similarly, others suggested that Pedro is not physically close with his male costars, which is demonstrably false (if anything, you could argue he is more physical with his male costars). Theo Wargo / Getty Images, Astrid Stawiarz / Getty Images for Netflix, Charley Gallay / Getty Images for Netflix It's actually not the first time similar jabs have been made at Pedro. As Vanity Fair noted, defenders of J.K. Rowling used a clip of Vanessa and Pedro at Comic-Con to suggest something untoward was happening after Pedro criticized the author for her anti-trans views. But Vanessa herself then said of them holding hands at the event, "What happened is we were both incredibly nervous going out in front of thousands of people who love this comic. He wanted me to know that we were in this together, and I found it a lovely gesture and was very glad to squeeze his hand back.' Related: The conversation has seeped onto Instagram, where a quick look at Pedro's comment section reveals a lot of spam-like behavior: Of course, what the "groping" posts fail to acknowledge is that touching in and of itself isn't an issue; it's consent (or lack of it). There's nothing to suggest that Pedro's costars feel anything but comfortable around him. It got to the point where Pedro's fellow Marvel actor, Simu Liu, posted seemingly in defense of him: Related: It's worth noting that the effectiveness of the attacks on Pedro's reputation were quickly questioned by many: Some even speculated that bots might be driving the negative posts: Given that many accounts posting negative things about Pedro contained other sexist or anti-trans content, you might be That's not clear right now, but it's worth noting that Pedro has been outspoken about trans rights and Palestine, and he is firmly against Donald Trump. Now, if only people came to women's defense like this... Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword
Black America Web
2 hours ago
- Black America Web
Beyoncé's Cowboy Carter Tour Wraps As Highest Grossing Country Tour
Source: Brooke Sutton / Getty On Saturday, Beyoncé Knowles-Carter concluded her groundbreaking 32 'Cowboy Carter and the Rodeo Chitlin' Circuit Tour' stop in Las Vegas. The superstar continues to make history as the 'Cowboy Carter' tour becomes the highest-grossing country tour ever. According to numbers reported to Billboard Boxscore, the 'Cowboy Carter' grossed $407.6 million and sold 1.6 million tickets. The multi-Grammy award-winning artist concluded the tour with a bang, with performances at the Allegiant Stadium featuring Shaboozey, Jay-Z and Destiny's Child for surprise performances. Related: Beyoncé's Last Cowboy Carter Concert Brings Destiny's Child Reunion, Jay-Z & Star-Studded Send-Off With the high gross of the 'Cowboy Carter' tour, Beyoncé also becomes the first American artist and female artist to wrap two tours over $400 million. The artist's Act I, 'Renaissance World Tour' grossed approximately $580 million. Billboard reports that the artist joins artists like Coldplay, Ed Sheeran and The Rolling Stones. The 'Renaissance World Tour' still holds the record of being Beyoncé's highest-grossing tour, expanding over 56 tour stops and selling 2.8 million tickets. The 'Cowboy Carter' album also gave Beyoncé her first Album Of The Year award win at the 67th annual Grammy Awards– a win fans have said has been a long time coming. The singer has expressed how her country album was a personal testament to her roots– as a Black woman born and raised in Texas and paying homage to Black country trailblazers like Linda Martell and young country artists like Shaboozey, Tanner Addell, Reyna Roberts, Brittney Spencer and Tiera Kennedy. Source: Emma McIntyre / Getty She expressed that the birth of 'Cowboy Carter' also came about after a 2016 performance at the CMA Awards when she did not feel welcome. Related: The 50 Hottest, Flyest & Sexiest Looks from Beyoncé's 'Cowboy Carter' Tour 'When you are breaking down barriers, not everyone is ready and open for a shift. But when I see Shaboozey tearing the charts up and all the beautiful female country singers flying to new heights, inspiring the world, that is exactly what motivates me,' the superstar said in a previous statement to The Hollywood Reporter . The album, featuring acts like Miley Cyrus, Post Malone and Shaboozey, also did enormously well on the Billboard Country charts, landing at No. 1 on Billboard's Top Country Albums and Americana/Folk Albums and Top Album Sales charts. The success of the 'Cowboy Carter' tour, along with its revolutionary cowboy chic fashion, extraordinary production and important history lessons with Black artists and genres, can break barriers once unknown for Black artists and challenge the status quo in the music industry. SEE ALSO Beyoncé's Cowboy Carter Tour Wraps As Highest Grossing Country Tour was originally published on
