
Reality hits Mahayuti's Ladki Bahin scheme: 1 million ineligible beneficiaries
It is widely credited as the welfare scheme that ensured the BJP-led Mahayuti's return to power in Maharashtra last year after a debacle in the Lok Sabha elections. However, a scrutiny by the state government has detected that around 885,000 women had claimed more cash doles under the Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana than they were eligible for. The government has also struck off over 2,000 government employees from the list of beneficiaries.After the drubbing in the Lok Sabha elections, the erstwhile Eknath Shinde-led Mahayuti regime had rolled out multiple welfare schemes. The flagship scheme was the Ladki Bahin Yojana, under which over 25 million women from indigent families were given doles of Rs 1,500 per month—a replica of a similar cash benefit scheme for women in neighbouring and BJP-ruled Madhya Pradesh.advertisementOther schemes, such as stipends for apprentices, free visits to pilgrimage centres for senior citizens, and a waiver on the toll levied on passenger cars at the five entry points to Mumbai, served as force-multipliers in the assembly polls.Mahayuti leaders say the Ladki Bahin scheme led to this 'silent' voter segment of women, whose financial and social autonomy is otherwise constrained, voting for them with their feet. During the campaign, Shinde had promised to increase the dole to Rs 2,100 if elected, and the Opposition, unable to come up with a credible counter-narrative, said it would double this to Rs 3,000.
However, financial constraints have held back the Devendra Fadnavis government from increasing the stipend. Disbursements under the scheme, which had some 24.6 million beneficiaries in April, are also under scrutiny.advertisement'We collected and churned around 120 million data sets from departments such as food and civil supplies, women and child development, agriculture, general administration, police and transport to de-duplicate Ladki Bahin beneficiaries,' said a senior official from the state information technology department.'We located 885,000 [women] farmers who were drawing Rs 12,000 annual benefits under the Namo Shetkari Mahasanman Nidhi Yojana (NSMNY). Their benefits under Ladki Bahin will be cut to Rs 6,000 annually. This will save around Rs 1,056 crore every year,' the official added.Farmers who get Rs 1,000 per month under NSMNY will get the difference between this and the Ladki Bahin dole of Rs 1,500, translating into a bracket amount of Rs 500 per month.The official said it was also found that 108,000 beneficiaries were above the age cap of 65 years. The government also identified around 2,289 women who are government employees but benefitting under the scheme, in violation of norms. Cash transfers to them have been stopped.The state government has also received the Union government's nod to link the database of Ladki Bahin beneficiaries with income tax PAN (Permanent Account Number) data and sent a proposal to the Union government. Additionally, it will cross-verify vehicle ownership data available with the state to weed out those with four-wheelers.advertisementAjit Pawar, Maharashtra deputy chief minister and finance minister, admitted that the authorities had not been able to conduct a scrutiny before extending the scheme to women. 'We had little time when the scheme was rolled out. There were just two to three months to go to polls,' he said.Senior Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) leader Sanjay Raut alleged this amounted to fraud and sought Pawar's resignation. 'You (Ajit Pawar) must resign. This is a scam in the finance department. Money from the state exchequer has been looted under your watch,' Raut, a Rajya Sabha MP, charged. He also alleged that men had taken benefit of the scheme intended for women by changing their names.In January, women and child development minister Aditi Tatkare had said that district administrations had received complaints about those with annual incomes above the Ladki Bahin scheme's threshold of Rs 2.5 lakh getting the cash benefit. Some beneficiaries had also come forth and said that since their income had increased above the ceiling, they wanted to voluntarily give up the benefits.Since the Ladki Bahin scheme is restricted to women domiciled in Maharashtra, those married into other states will also be excluded. While those who own a two-wheeler are eligible, there were complaints that some households with four-wheelers had been covered. These complaints had come forth from the Wardha, Palghar, Yavatmal and Nanded districts.advertisementAnother official from the women and child development department said that the list had already been trimmed by around 600,000 beneficiaries. This included those whose applications had been rejected at the field level and those who were taking benefits under welfare schemes such as the Sanjay Gandhi Niradhar Yojana. 'Now, the state government will recover the Ladki Bahin dole from government employees who took these benefits, and also initiate disciplinary action,' the official added.To be eligible for cash aid under the Ladki Bahim scheme, the women should be between 18 and 65 years of age and permanent residents of Maharashtra. Their annual family income should not cross Rs 2.5 lakh. Those employed with the government or owning a four-wheeler are not eligible. While these beneficiaries can receive support from other welfare schemes, the total monthly benefit from all these schemes must not cross Rs 1,500 per month.Subscribe to India Today MagazineTrending Reel
advertisement

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
28 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Funds under Right to Education need not be linked to National Education Policy: Madras HC to Centre
Funds payable by the Union government to state governments under the Right to Education Act need not be linked to the implementation of the National Education Policy, the Madras High Court said on Tuesday, according to Live Law. A bench of Justices GR Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan urged the Centre to release to Tamil Nadu the funds under the Right to Education Act. 'It is true that implementation of the Samagra Siksha Scheme is aligned to NEP 2020, but the obligation under RTE is independent by itself,' Live Law quoted the bench as saying. The Samagra Shiksha scheme, implemented in 2018, is the scheme through which the Union government provides support for elementary and secondary school education. In April, the Union Education Ministry had told the Rajya Sabha that Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal received no funds under the central education scheme for 2024-'25. Data shared in the Upper House by Minister of State for Education Jayant Choudhary showed that while Kerala was allocated Rs 328.90 crore, Tamil Nadu Rs 2,151.60 crore and West Bengal Rs 1,745.80 crore from the Centre for the current fiscal year under the scheme, no funds had been released to these states as of March 27. The halt in funding to Kerala, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal came against the backdrop of these states refusing to comply with the PM Schools for Rising India, or PM SHRI, scheme. The centrally-sponsored scheme aims to upgrade the infrastructure of schools managed by central, state or regional bodies. However, to avail the scheme's benefits, state governments must first sign a memorandum of understanding with the Centre to implement the 2020 National Education Policy. Tamil Nadu has repeatedly expressed opposition to the three-language formula in the National Education Policy. The state government said it will not change its decades-old two-language policy of teaching students Tamil and English. Of the total funds pending to be paid to the state, the Right to Education component amounts to Rs 200 crore, according to The Hindu. On Tuesday, the High Court pointed out that under section 7 of the Right to Education Act, states and the Union government have concurrent responsibility for providing funds to carry out its provisions. 'Therefore, funds payable to the state governments representing the central government share towards discharging the RTE obligations need not be linked to NEP 2020,' said the bench. It also took note that the state government had moved the Supreme Court against the Centre withholding funds under the Samagra Shiksha scheme. 'We are not in a position to issue any binding direction in this regard,' said the bench, urging the Union government to consider delinking the Right to Education component from the Samagra Siksha Scheme. The court was disposing of a public interest litigation petition seeking directions to the Tamil Nadu government to begin admissions under the Right to Education Act for 2025-'26.


Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
D for dope test returns to Punjab politics vocabulary as Ludhiana West bypoll heats up
A demand for legal cultivation of poppy in drug-hit Punjab has triggered a war of words between the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Congress ahead of the high-stakes June 19 Ludhiana West Assembly bypoll, with leaders challenging each other to take dope tests. Making a case in favour of legalisation of poppy cultivation, Ludhiana MP and Punjab Congress chief Amarinder Singh Raja Warring on Sunday said that consumption of poppy was less harmful than synthetic drugs. Ruling out any possibility of meeting the demand, state Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema on Monday demanded Warring undertake a dope test and accused him of 'promoting drug culture'. Cheema also held the previous Congress and Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD)-BJP governments responsible for the 'alarming rise of drug abuse in Punjab'. 'It was during their terms that drugs were sown in Punjab's soil. The AAP government led by Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann is now committed to uprooting this menace,' he said. Warring almost immediately responded and urged Cheema not to politicise the issue. 'I welcome Cheema's suggestion (of me taking a dope test)… I am ready for the test but I will get it done along with Cheema. Before that, CM Mann should also undergo the test… I raised the issue of opium cultivation as the number of deaths due to drug overdose have been on the rise. The cultivation of poppy can put an end to this,' he said. Leader of the Opposition in the Punjab Assembly Partap Singh Bajwa too echoed Warring's views. 'I have been suggesting for a while now that all leaders, starting with the CM, must take the test…' he said. Terming the issue a 'diversionary tactic', state BJP chief Sunil Jakhar said, 'As the bypoll is round the corner, politics is being played over the issue to divert the people from real ones.' The standoff comes amid the Mann government's crackdown on the drug menace to make a 'drug-free Punjab', a pre-poll promise of the AAP. The Punjab Police has filed 11,156 FIRs under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act between April 1, 2022, and February 28, 2023. The Punjab and Haryana High Court in January 2023 also weighed in on the issue. 'The lives of citizens are being destroyed due to the selling of these banned substances… There is an alarming spike in the number of people buying and selling these contraband in the country, especially in Punjab, which needs to be controlled in an effective manner so as to minimise the said offence, if not to eradicate,' the court held, while hearing the anticipatory bail plea of a person accused of peddling drugs. In March 2023, then Punjab Health Minister Balbir Singh told the Assembly that the number of individuals grappling with addiction stood at 10 lakh. Now new to Punjab's politics Incidentally, demanding testing for drugs is not new in Punjab's politics. In 2018, with former CM Amarinder Singh at the helm, state minister Tripat Rajinder Singh Bajwa had demanded dope tests for all government employees after several people died of drug overdose. As employee unions demanded that leaders take the test first, several MLAs and ministers volunteered for it, before the government took a call. First to get himself tested for drugs was Punjab AAP chief and then Sunam MLA Aman Arora. Tripat Bajwa himself took a dope test and was followed by a few MLAs, including then Speaker Rana K P Singh. In 2015, a similar demand was put forward by the then Opposition Congress, which demanded SAD and BJP ministers undergo the test after then DSP Jagdish Singh Bhola, an alleged drug kingpin, was nabbed. The upcoming bypoll, necessitated after sitting AAP MLA Gurpreet Gogi 'accidentally' shot himself to death in January, has turned into a prestige battle for the AAP as it comes close on the heels of its drubbing in the February Delhi Assembly polls, where party bigwigs including party chief Arvind Kejriwal and former Delhi deputy CM Manish Sisodia lost. The Congress is also going all out to wrest the seat from the AAP. The AAP has fielded Rajya Sabha MP Sanjeev Arora for the bypoll. He will be up against former minister Bharat Bhushan Ashu of the Congress, the Akali Dal's Parupkar Singh Ghumman and Jiwan Gupta of the BJP.


India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Why Mamata invoked PoK as Modi govt's ‘missed opportunity'
West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, on June 10, questioned the Narendra Modi government's handling of national security following the terror strike in Kashmir's Pahalgam and suggested that India had missed a rare strategic opportunity to take control of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) during the subsequent military offensive.'There was a need to teach them a lesson; and we salute the bravery of our armed forces. India had an opportunity to take control of PoK,' Mamata said in the legislative mincing words in holding the Centre accountable for the April 22 Pahalgam attack, she said: 'The Pahalgam attack is the result of the Centre's callousness. Why were no security forces or police personnel present at the site?' She also took a swipe at the prime minister, remarking that 'PM Modi is only busy advertising himself', and accused the BJP of 'trying to politicise the valour of the armed forces'.Mamata unequivocally praised the armed forces for their precision strikes inside Pakistan. Her government moved a resolution in the legislative assembly condemning the Pahalgam massacre and hailing India's military response. Though the resolution conspicuously omitted the term 'Operation Sindoor', it recorded the assembly's 'gratitude and appreciation for the coordinated efforts of the Indian armed forces in destroying major terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan and PoK'.advertisement 'This House strongly condemns this brutal attack [in Pahalgam] and at the same time salutes the discipline, dedication and courage shown by different wings of the Indian armed forces in combatting terrorist activities and safeguarding the sovereignty of the nation,' the resolution stated, also acknowledging the 'extraordinary display of unity, compassion and resilience' by the people of Jammu and Kashmir in the aftermath of the tragedy. Mamata also questioned why the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack hadn't been apprehended comments, especially her assertion about PoK and criticism of the Centre's diplomatic failure, gained attention. 'Not sure if our international diplomacy is having issues. Pakistan received loans from the IMF (International Monetary Fund) instead of being cornered globally,' she said, expressing doubt over India's ability to isolate Pakistan on the world the resolution was passed unanimously, it drew sharp criticism from the BJP. Party leader Agnimitra Paul questioned the omission of the term 'Operation Sindoor' in the official resolution. 'What kind of appreciation is this when the name Operation Sindoor hasn't even been mentioned in the resolution?' she asked, implying political double accused Mamata and the Trinamool Congress of posturing for international audiences. 'On the one hand, she is sending Abhishek Banerjee in the all-party delegation. He, while abroad, is painting a good picture that the Trinamool Congress is with the central government and our prime minister. However, the moment he comes back to India, he begins to demean and abuse our PM. Under whose leadership was all of this achieved?' she BJP's counterattack extended to Leader of the Opposition in the assembly Suvendu Adhikari, who accused the Trinamool Congress of failing to maintain consistency in its stance. While Adhikari's remarks were not included in the assembly proceedings, his party's criticism made clear that the political fallout of the Pahalgam attack and its military aftermath was far from Trinamool MLAs moved a breach of privilege motion against Adhikari for allegedly making defamatory remarks outside the assembly and claiming that Mamata Banerjee had 'praised Pakistan' more eloquently than Pakistan prime minister Shehbaz Sharif. Ministers, including Chandrima Bhattacharya and Sovandeb Chattopadhyay, signed the motion, with Firhad Hakim expected to join in. Assembly speaker Biman Banerjee confirmed receipt and may refer it to the privilege committee. Earlier, Adhikari had been suspended in February for unparliamentary the debate continues over how the government had handled the April 22 terror strike and Pakistan thereafter, Mamata's speech in the legislative assembly has shifted attention to strategic questions about India's foreign policy, domestic security gaps, and the Centre's 'missed opportunities' in leveraging military momentum for long-term geopolitical to India Today Magazine