What is diabetes mellitus? Michelle Trachtenberg's cause of death revealed
Two months after her death, "Gossip Girl" star Michelle Trachtenberg's cause of death has been revealed.
On Wednesday, the New York City medical examiner's office released a statement with cause and manner of death of the 39 year old. The cause? Complications of diabetes mellitus. The manner was determined to be natural.
Before this announcement, Trachtenberg's cause of death was listed as "undetermined".
Trachtenberg was well known for her big and small screen performances since she started acting at age 3. She started in multiple movie and television rolls including, "Harriet the Spy", "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", "The Adventures of Pete and Pete" and more.
Here's a look at the disease that killed her and the symptoms others should look out for.
Diabetes mellitus is the full name for what is commonly just referred to as diabetes. The disease is characterized by inadequate control of glucose levels in a person's blood, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
There are multiple different types of diabetes, with the most prevalent being Type 2.
According to the Cleveland Clinic, around 37.3 million people in the United States have diabetes, with Type 2 diabetes being the most common form, representing 90% to 95% of all diabetes cases.
Diabetes is often characterized with increased thirst, but that isn't the only symptom people should be looking for, according to the Cleveland Clinic. Here's the range of symptoms people could have with diabetes:
Increased thirst (polydipsia) and dry mouth
Frequent urination
Fatigue
Blurred vision
Unexplained weight loss
Numbness or tingling in your hands or feet
Slow-healing sores or cuts
Frequent skin and/or vaginal yeast infections
If anyone is experiencing these symptoms, they should speak to a healthcare provider.
The "Harriet the Spy" star was found dead in a New York City luxury apartment around 8 a.m. Feb. 26, a spokesperson for the New York Police Department previously confirmed to USA TODAY.
Trachtenberg was found unresponsive and unconscious in her unit. EMS responded and found her dead.
USA TODAY contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: What type of diabetes did Michelle Trachtenberg have?Diabetes mellitus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds of CDC workers are reinstated but majority of fired public health staffers left in limbo
Supporters of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstrate outside the center's entrance in Atlanta during a rally in April. These rallies have happened weekly since the mass layoffs first started at the CDC in February. Jill Nolin/Georgia Recorder Fired workers of the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and their supporters are pushing for more public health jobs to be restored after a portion of the center's terminated workforce was reinstated this week. Many of the more than 460 workers reinstated are assigned to the National Center for Environmental Health or the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention, according to the Associated Press. U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced plans to slash 10,000 jobs in late March, including 2,400 jobs at the CDC. The reinstated workers received a two-paragraph memorandum Wednesday from Tom Nagy, chief human capital officer with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, that said they were no longer part of the previously announced reduction in force, according to a copy of the memo obtained by the Georgia Recorder. 'You will not be affected by the upcoming RIF,' the memo says. Emily G. Hilliard, press secretary for the federal agency, did not respond to specific questions about the number of jobs reinstated or which CDC programs were targeted. 'Under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective,' Hilliard said in a statement Thursday. 'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services—whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases.' Sarah Boim, a former communication specialist at the CDC who is a leader of the group Fired But Fighting, said some of the reinstated staffers were already back at work Thursday. Boim said the restored jobs are not enough, but she said she is skeptical that more people will be brought back since the newly reinstated group represents about 20% of the job losses at the CDC – which would mirror what Kennedy said earlier would need to be reversed because of 'mistakes' made by the Department of Government Efficiency. Lawsuits challenging the terminations at the CDC and other federal agencies are also working their way through the courts. Boim said the saga has left laboratory scientists and others sidelined from their work while collecting administrative pay. 'It's mind boggling — the level of inefficiency and chaos that this whole process has sown,' she said. 'I would like people to know that their money was going to pay for people with critical jobs to not do their jobs.' Georgia Democrats who have pressed for the Trump administration to reverse course on the CDC cuts cheered the news Thursday but pressed for more fired CDC workers to be brought back. 'The rehiring of hundreds of dedicated health workers, many of whom call Georgia home, is welcome news for those of us who believe that public health is vital to our wellbeing and safety — not a political game,' U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock said in a statement. Warnock participated in a rally outside the CDC in April. Those rallies have been held every week since the mass layoffs started in February, with one held Tuesday despite the rain after Kennedy fired members of a key vaccine panel. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr's shakeup of vaccine advisory committee raises worries about scientific integrity of health recommendations
On June 11, 2025, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a slate of eight new members to serve on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on national vaccine policy. The announcement, made on the social media platform X, comes two days after Kennedy removed all 17 of the serving committee members. Kennedy called their replacements 'a bold step in restoring public trust' rooted in 'radical transparency and gold standard science.' However, public health experts decried the removals, pointing to Kennedy's promise not to change the committee and warning that the move politicizes its work and undermines its scientific integrity. Health experts have also noted that multiple new committee members appointed on June 11 have voiced anti-vaccine views that are not evidence-based. The Conversation U.S. asked Santosh Kumar Gautam, an expert in global health policy at the University of Notre Dame, to explain how the vaccine committee's guidance has shaped vaccine recommendations for the public, and what the changes might mean for peoples' ability to access vaccines in the future. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, is a panel of experts appointed to advise the CDC on how to use vaccines to protect the health of people in the U.S. The committee's job is to review multiple strands of scientific evidence to recommend which vaccines should be used, who should get them and when they should be given. Its guidance affects vaccine schedules for both children and adults, insurance coverage and public health policy across the country. The committee was formed in 1964 to establish national vaccine policy as federal immunization programs began to expand. It can have up to 19 voting members, who are appointed by the secretary of Health and Human Services. Members are experts in areas such as medicine, public health and immunology. Member usually serve overlapping four-year terms to ensure continuity. All 17 previous members were appointed at different times during the Biden administration. Removing all members of the committee at once is unprecedented. The group also includes nonvoting members from government health agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health. There are also representatives from more than 30 medical and public health organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Physicians. These nonvoting members share useful information and real-world experience such as practical issues in administering vaccines in hospitals, management of vaccine side effects and insights into adverse events. Their input helps the committee make recommendations that reflect both science and practical needs. The committee meets three times a year to review new data on vaccine safety and effectiveness. Its next meeting is scheduled for June 25-27 and is expected to include discussions on COVID-19 and HPV vaccines, with recommendation votes planned for COVID-19 boosters, human papilloma virus and influenza vaccines. The meeting is open to the public and will be telecast live online. The committee makes its recommendations to the CDC by reviewing scientific evidence about a vaccine's safety and efficacy, as well as practical issues, such as how easy a vaccine is to use, how it affects different groups, its side-effects and how it fits into the health system. The recommendations don't just consider whether a vaccine works, but how it can be most effectively deployed to protect the American public from disease outbreaks. The committee looks at data from clinical trials and other research to examine the most recent data on a vaccine's safety, efficacy and use in everyday settings. When new vaccines come out or a change occurs in the way a disease spreads or behaves, the committee often revises its advice. It also responds to public health emergencies such as recent measles outbreaks in the U.S. The committee has made many updates over time. It changed flu shot guidance when new strains appeared. It lowered the recommended age for the HPV vaccine based on new research. And it adjusted vaccine plans for meningitis to better protect people at higher risk. The committee played a vital role in evaluating vaccine safety and effectiveness and authorizing the use of vaccines for different age groups by reviewing clinical trial data, from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and other vaccine manufacturers. The committee also developed step-by-step guidelines for who should get vaccinated first, based on how likely people were to catch the virus, their risk of serious disease, the type of work they did and whether they came from a population that was historically underserved or at higher risk. It also issued tailored guidance for pregnant and breastfeeding women, immunocompromised people and children and adolescents as more trial data became available. These recommendations shaped vaccine rollout strategies at both national and state levels, guided insurance coverage and influenced COVID-19 vaccination policies in other countries around the world. Although Kennedy promised more transparency, he handpicked the advisory committee's new members without revealing how they were selected. Historically, the body's members are selected after an extensive vetting process that can take two years. The newly appointed members have expertise in psychiatry, neuroscience, epidemiology, biostatistics and operations management. However, several have been linked to vaccine-related misinformation, particularly relating to COVID-19 vaccines, raising concerns about the scientific neutrality of the committee moving forward. For example, Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at MIT Sloan School of Management, has publicly called for suspension of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, claiming they cause serious harm and death in young people – a statement not supported by evidence. Another member, physician and biochemist Robert Malone, made scientifically inaccurate statements about the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. A third member, epidemiologist and biostatistician Martin Kulldorff helped write the Great Barrington Declaration, which opposed lockdowns and argued that people at low risk of severe illness or death should be allowed to contract COVID-19 to build natural immunity – a stance that was heavily debated among health experts. The committee's new makeup and Kennedy's decades-long anti-vaccine stance threaten to erode the integrity of scientific decision-making and commitment to ethical standards in vaccine recommendations. Kennedy's overhaul of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will likely affect how insurers, doctors and the public make decisions about vaccines – and vaccine policy generally. For example, the advisory committee's decisions directly affect which vaccines are covered by health insurance. If a vaccine is not recommended by the committee, many insurance plans, including those under the Affordable Care Act, are not required to cover it. This means families could face out-of-pocket costs, making it harder for children to access routine immunizations. The advisory committee also plays a key role in shaping the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule. Given Kennedy's long-held skepticism about childhood vaccines — including those for measles and polio — some public health experts worry that the newly appointed members could push to revisit or revise vaccine recommendations, especially for newer and more debated vaccines like those for COVID-19 or HPV. States usually base their school entry vaccine requirements on the committee's guidelines, and insurers often use them to determine which vaccines are covered. As a result, shifts in policy to childhood vaccinations could influence both school vaccination mandates and access to vaccines for millions of children. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Santosh Kumar Gautam, University of Notre Dame Read more: RFK Jr. says annual COVID-19 shots no longer advised for healthy children and pregnant women – a public health expert explains the new guidance Unverified reports of vaccine side effects in VAERS aren't the smoking guns portrayed by right-wing media outlets – they can offer insight into vaccine hesitancy Vaccine misinformation distorts science – a biochemist explains how RFK Jr. and his lawyer's claims threaten public health Santosh Kumar Gautam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
WA doctor among those fired in RFK Jr.'s purge of vaccine panel
(Photo by) Dr. Helen Chu gained attention early in the COVID-19 pandemic as her repurposed flu research project identified the first case of coronavirus spreading person-to-person in the United States. She and her colleagues carried out this work in defiance of the federal government. And her efforts to accelerate the pandemic response later earned her a 'Washingtonian of the Year' award from a state leadership board. After a two-year vetting process, the University of Washington scientist landed a spot last year on the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's influential panel of vaccine experts. But on Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired Chu and the 16 other members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. 'I really worry about the health and safety of people in our country and the future of our public health infrastructure,' Chu told reporters Thursday in a call with U.S. Sen. Patty Murray. Kennedy said he wanted to restore trust in a panel he believed was rife with conflicts of interest. And on Wednesday, he named eight replacement members, including several with track records criticizing vaccines. Kennedy himself has a history of promoting skepticism and unfounded theories about vaccines. He came to Olympia in 2019, for example, to advocate against legislation that would have made it harder for parents to opt their children out of the measles, mumps and rubella shot in the middle of a measles outbreak. The medical field largely condemned this week's firings. For over 60 years, the committee has reviewed vaccine efficacy and recommended who should receive which shots. The guidance goes to the CDC director, who usually follows the group's decisions. These recommendations impact what vaccines insurers will cover, as opposed to forcing patients to pay out of pocket. Members typically serve four-year terms. The purge comes on the heels of Kennedy announcing unilaterally that federal health officials would stop recommending COVID vaccines for healthy children and healthy pregnant women. The federal panel is set to meet later this month, with recommendation votes scheduled for several vaccines, including for coronavirus. 'RFK Jr is not just crossing a red line for public health,' said Murray, a Democrat from Washington. 'He is sprinting into dangerous, uncharted territory in support of totally deranged conspiracies, and he is dragging us all along with him.' Chu used the example of a vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, to show the importance of the committee's work, and that it's not just a rubber stamp for immunizations. When reviewing data on the proposed vaccine, the panel found a risk of the rare neurological disorder known as Guillain-Barré Syndrome. So Chu, an infectious diseases professor at the UW, and her fellow members decided to recommend the shot only for older adults at a higher risk of getting severe symptoms from RSV. 'I think this example really illustrates the approach that the ACIP takes, that what we do is rooted in science, and that the decisions we make do not necessarily benefit the companies that have invested heavily to develop these vaccines,' Chu said. 'As a result, ACIP is widely regarded as an international gold standard for vaccine decision making.' Lacking trust in the committee's potential recommendations, Chu advised doctors to turn to groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology for science-based vaccine guidance. She worries that turning the previously 'independent, unbiased' committee into something driven by 'one person's beliefs,' Americans will lose trust in national vaccine policy. This could lead to a patchwork of policies that differ state to state, Chu said. 'Washington state is a place where we have experts and scientists who work together,' she said. 'There are other states where this may not exist, or where they may not choose to recommend vaccines, so that is going to create a lot of chaos.' Murray pleaded with her Republican colleagues in the Senate to tell Kennedy his moves are unacceptable. To get confirmed, Kennedy made concessions to moderate Republicans, namely Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, over how much he would disrupt existing vaccine policy.
