
In a vise of slowing demand and rising costs, small businesses are signaling trouble ahead
Tree trimming season runs 365 days a year in California's temperate climate and that typically means appointments running three weeks in advance for Christopher Altman, enough to keep a staff of five at his Oakland-based business, Trees Company, steadily employed.
But demand cratered in mid-March as national economic sentiment slid in the wake of the Trump administration's trade war, and Altman, 53, is now running on savings and credit and about to cancel his planned home improvements to keep his workers paid, an example of how U.S. growth may be folding in on itself more broadly.
'I think it kind of crept up on me, because I'm so used to having everything just work itself out. I was just waiting for those emails… And they just never came," Altman said of an order flow that as of mid-April was down to a couple days a week. "All of a sudden, next week was empty and I had no leads and I was getting no calls.'
Altman's story could take on broader significance in coming weeks as evidence builds of an economic slowdown coinciding with President Donald Trump's effort to rewire the global economy with tariffs, as households and firms cut spending out of concern for what lies ahead and try to cope with new import taxes that have begun raising supply costs and prices. The full brunt of that effort has not even been felt yet. Trump has put some of his most aggressive trade actions on hold until July, with no certainty about what he will do if his administration fails to negotiate individual deals with up to 90 countries as a substitute for sweeping and steep tariffs on imports from those nations. On Monday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the first of those trade agreements may come this week or next, though a deal with China, the nation's biggest trading partner, appeared to be no closer.
In the meantime economists have upped their odds of a recession this year in what analysts at the Institute of International Finance said recently would be a downturn due to "deliberate policy engineering." Unlike Altman, bow tie manufacturer Beau Ties of Vermont is in the direct line of fire from tariffs that threaten to push prices to prohibitive levels on the Chinese-made fabrics that owner Greg Shugar uses at his factory.
Trump has pushed tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, and while that may be negotiated lower, Shugar said "we will go out of business if the 145% sticks...I can't imagine us lasting more than 6 to 9 months when all my hoarded fabric runs out...The irony of the whole thing is that we are a Made-in-America company who is supposed to benefit from all these tariffs."
UNCERTAINTY DOMINATES
Measures of uncertainty over Trump's first 100 days in office have soared to levels last seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and consumer and business surveys are showing a steady slide in confidence and an erosion of hiring and investment. Trump's polling numbers on the economy, considered a strength coming out of the 2024 election, have slipped: Only 37% of respondents to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll approved of his economic management and three-fourths concerned a recession is coming. The latest twice-quarterly pulse-taking of the economy by the Federal Reserve's 12 regional banks painted a dour landscape of falling demand, projects stalled due to "pervasive" uncertainty, and initial hints of layoffs to come. Shipping industry officials, separately, warn of a sharp downturn developing in U.S.-bound cargo. While slowdown indications are largely limited so far to that kind of "soft data," such information has become increasingly important to policymakers as signaling a shift in the direction of an economy that was on solid footing when Trump took over.
Key updates are due soon: April's jobs report will be released Friday; data on first-quarter economic growth - the first overall scorecard since Trump's inauguration - is due Wednesday, with economists estimating growth at near stall speed. Some hard data is starting to turn as well, including a slower rate of hiring and a lengthening of the average spell of unemployment, a pattern that has "frequently occurred during the onset of recessions," according to recent San Francisco Fed research.
'GOING TO HIT EVERYBODY'
An analysis of economic conditions among small businesses by software firm Intuit estimated that firms with nine or fewer workers cut employment by 3.5% over the first quarter of the year.
Revenue did rise, and recent Census data has shown a still elevated level of business creation, a trend considered a sign of underlying resilience.
But there are concerning signs, said Ufuk Akcigit, a University of Chicago economist who has developed indices of small business hiring and revenue from Intuit's data on about 400,000 firms using the company's software.
Alongside the hiring slowdown, he said, separate data shows a growing gap in credit card usage and payments among small businesses, with firms seemingly caught in a vise of rising input prices and potentially mounting debt.
"Small businesses are really early indicators of what's coming...The top two agenda items - prices and interest rates - are both getting problematic...They are getting into more distressed situations," Akcigit said. On jobs "the trend has been negative for some time and it accelerated when uncertainty started to rise substantially." Damion Love, manager and buyer for Belle Up Boutique, an independent women's clothing store near a commuter rail station in Chicago's Beverly neighborhood, said his immediate concern is inflation. He has been notified by some of the store's clothing brands that wholesale price hikes of at least 10% are likely in the coming months, but a lot depends on the level and duration of Trump's tariffs. While the store sells some clothing lines made in Los Angeles and Chicago, other lower-priced items are made in China and could face taxes that would more than double the cost to import.
"It hasn't hit us yet, but we know it's going to hit everybody," Love said.
The larger concern is how customers will react.
While the 16-year-old boutique's clientele is loyal, he said, "in this economy, everything is about pricing...If a top is $49 and it shoots up to $80, the consumer isn't going to say, 'Oh, it's not your fault.' They're just not going to shop here." In Oakland, Altman spelled out the larger risks if the current outlook becomes the new reality.
"Anxiety has gone to the roof,' he said, 'I have five employees that I need to keep paid, right? Because they have families and because they have bills to pay, they've got rents to pay.'
(Reporting by Howard Schneider Additional reporting by Ann Saphir in San Francisco, David Lawder in Chicago, and Arriana McLymore in New York; Editing by Anna Driver and Dan Burns)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arabian Post
an hour ago
- Arabian Post
AI‑Powered 'RIQ' Sets New Reinsurance Benchmark
Arabian Post Staff -Dubai Abu Dhabi‑based IHC, in collaboration with BlackRock and Lunate, has officially launched Reinsurance Intelligence Quotient—RIQ—a global, AI‑native reinsurance platform headquartered in the Abu Dhabi Global Market. Anchored by over US $1 billion in initial equity, RIQ aims to underwrite more than US $10 billion in liabilities, spanning property and casualty, life, and specialty lines. The platform unites human talent with advanced artificial intelligence to refine risk selection, cost control, underwriting, and customer service. Its AI core provides real‑time insights and precision decision‑making, seeking to optimise capital deployment on a global scale. Registered with the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of ADGM, RIQ is in the final stages of securing full regulatory approval. ADVERTISEMENT The board of directors, chaired by Dr Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, includes notable figures such as Syed Basar Shueb, H E Mohamed Hassan Alsuwaidi, Sofia Abdellatif Lasky, and RIQ CEO Mark Wilson, former leader at Aviva and AIA. The governance structure positions RIQ to balance regional expertise with global vision, leveraging its strategic partners. The initiative builds on a May plan unveiled by IHC, BlackRock, and Lunate to establish an AI‑powered reinsurer targeting US $10 billion in liabilities with over US $1 billion in capital. BlackRock will contribute its Aladdin technology and insurance asset management services, while Lunate brings private and public market investment capabilities. IHC CEO Syed Basar Shueb has emphasised the venture's role in accelerating Abu Dhabi's and the wider region's nascent insurance and capital market ecosystems. 'RIQ is the embodiment of IHC's vision to invest in the next frontier of global financial services,' Shueb stated. Meanwhile, RIQ CEO Mark Wilson described the platform as purpose‑built for a changing market, combining speed and flexibility backed by deep capital. Dr Al Jaber, who also serves as UAE's minister of industry and advanced technology, said the platform would 'connect global capital with high‑growth markets, all from the heart of Abu Dhabi's thriving financial centre'. This reflects a broader strategic push by Abu Dhabi to position itself as a hub for innovative financial services and AI‑driven offerings. Analysts have observed that RIQ's AI‑native architecture could challenge traditional reinsurance models, where legacy systems often hinder real‑time pricing accuracy and capital efficiency. With global risk landscapes evolving due to climate change, cyber threats, and geopolitical instability, the deployment of AI in underwriting and risk transfer represents a notable shift in industry norms. Industry commentators note that IHC, already one of the region's largest investment houses, continues to accelerate its diversification strategy, adding reinsurance to its growing portfolio that spans technology, energy, real estate, healthcare, and food production. Its ability to marshal more than US $455 billion in assets and maintain tight ties to the Abu Dhabi ruling establishment adds strategic depth to RIQ's capital and governance framework. Key trends marking this launch include the convergence of finance and bleeding‑edge technology, a stronger regional emphasis on insurance capacity, and elevated geopolitical importance of financial resilience. RIQ is set to capitalise on these developments, channeling global capital into emerging markets, while establishing Abu Dhabi as a next‑generation centre for financial innovation.


Middle East Eye
8 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack
The US quietly delivered hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before its unprecedented attack on Iran on Friday, Middle East Eye can reveal. The US sent around 300 Hellfire missiles to Israel on Tuesday in a large-scale stock-up of supplies before its attack, and as the Trump administration was saying it was ready to continue engaging Iran in nuclear talks. The transfer of such a large quantity of Hellfires suggests that the Trump administration was well-informed of Israel's plans to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran, two US officials told MEE on the condition of anonymity. The US's delivery of Hellfires or other large quantities of weapons in the lead up to Friday's attack has not been previously reported. The US military helped shoot down Iranian missiles that were headed towards Israel, two US officials told Reuters on Friday. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Hellfires are laser-guided air-to-ground missiles. They would not be useful for Israel to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities, but for precision strikes. Israel's military used more than 100 aircraft in its attack on Friday, which used precision tracking to target senior military officials, nuclear scientists, and command centres. 'There is a time and place for Hellfires. They were useful to Israel,' one senior US defence official told MEE. Israel killed scores of senior Iranian officials and nuclear scientists on Friday. Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran Read More » The dead include: the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Major General Hossein Salami; Major General Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of Iran's armed forces; and Ali Shamkhani, a close aide to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Trump administration knew about Israel's attack plans for months. MEE revealed earlier this month that the CIA was briefed in April and May on Israeli plans to unilaterally attack Iran's nuclear sites. Israel's Target Systems Analysis and battle plan for cyberattacks combined with precision strikes without any direct US involvement 'impressed' the administration. But Trump's behaviour in recent months gave observers, and potentially the Iranians, the impression that he would continue to resist Netanyahu's very public lobbying to go along with strikes. Axios reported on Friday, citing two Israeli officials, that the Trump administration was only 'pretending' to resist Israel's attack plans, but privately did not resist them. Trump has since framed his approach as saying that he gave Iran a 60-day window to agree to a new nuclear agreement with his administration before launching strikes. Israeli media reported the 60-day deadline in March 2025. The Trump administration began talks with Iran on 12 April 2025, and the Israeli attack took place exactly 61 days later. The talks in recent weeks hit a wall over the US's insistence that Iran agree not to enrich any uranium, while Tehran said that preserving its right to a low level of enrichment was a red line. Throughout the negotiations, the Trump administration continued a steady supply of arms and weapons to Israel in recent months, two US officials told MEE. The US did not have to provide public notification of the transfer because it was already approved as part of a $7.4bn arms deal that included bombs, missiles, and related equipment that Congress was notified of in February 2025.


Middle East Eye
10 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Whether with a green light or grudging acceptance, Trump enters war with Iran
After Israel pummelled Iran in an unprecedented attack and the Islamic Republic launched a barrage of missiles targeting Tel Aviv, US President Donald Trump has portrayed himself as above the fray. 'I gave them 60 days and they didn't meet it,' Trump told The New York Post on Friday. 'Today's 61, you know. Today's day 61.' Trump was referencing Israeli media reports from March 2025 that said he had sent Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei a letter laying out a two-month window to agree to a new nuclear deal, or face an attack. The US and Iran held their first round of nuclear talks on 12 April. For two months, Trump used the threat of Israeli strikes as a form of leverage against Iran, as his administration tried to impose an agreement on it that would strip it of all ability to enrich uranium. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters On Friday, Trump answered the question that had been gnawing at diplomats, analysts and even intelligence officials: whether the president of the United States would give the green light to an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear programme. 'Israel struck for many reasons - fear Iran's program might soon enter a zone of immunity; [a] risk ready Israeli prime minister for whom striking Iran was a lifelong mission. But the key was Trump's willingness to green light the attacks - or at least not to say no,' Aaron David Miller, a former State Department Middle East negotiator, wrote on X. CIA briefed on unilateral Israeli attack plans It's clear Trump knew about Israel's plans for some time. Middle East Eye revealed earlier this month that the CIA was briefed in April and May on Israeli plans to unilaterally attack Iran's nuclear sites. Israel's Target Systems Analysis and battle plan for cyberattacks combined with precision strikes without any direct US involvement 'impressed' the administration. But Trump's behaviour in recent months gave observers, and potentially the Iranians, the impression that he would continue to resist Netanyahu's very public lobbying to go along with strikes. Israel's attacks on Iran amount to crime of aggression, legal scholars say Read More » Trump surprised Netanyahu in April when he announced at a White House meeting that he would begin direct talks with Iran on curbing its nuclear programme. In early May, he brushed aside his hawkish national security advisor, Mike Waltz, and then snubbed Netanyahu on a visit to the Middle East. For good measure, Trump even cut a unilateral ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen that left out Israel. On the eve of the Israeli attack, Trump said he did not believe it was 'imminent' but was 'something that could very well happen'. His own Middle East envoy and top negotiator, Steve Witkoff, was set to meet his Iranian counterparts on Sunday in Oman for a sixth round of nuclear talks. The Iranians say they will not attend the talks, but Trump continues to call for a negotiated deal, under the scimitar of Israeli fire. Israel's 'trump card' He warned on Friday of 'even more brutal' attacks to follow and threatened Tehran to 'make a deal…before there is nothing left'. Experts say that despite Trump's call for more negotiations, Netanyahu has effectively torpedoed the diplomatic route. 'Trump's talk of a return to a nuclear deal is likely to be untenable now' - David Schenker, Washington Institute for Near East Policy 'Trump's talk of a return to a nuclear deal is likely to be untenable now,' David Schenker, a former senior official in Trump's first administration and expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told MEE. While Trump has left little doubt that he knew about the strikes, he has been more circumspect on whether they were his preferred outcome. The US is Israel's closest ally and top military backer, but US officials familiar with Israel's plans say the US had little leverage to prevent an Israeli attack, short of the type of full-scale public censure that no US president has ever issued against Israel, like halting all arms sales. 'If Israel faces what it deems an existential crisis, it could, in theory, threaten to use tactical nuclear weapons against Iran,' a former senior Trump administration official told MEE. Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons, but has never publicly acknowledged it. 'Israel can't be compared to Ukraine,' the official added, referring to the other US ally Trump has tried to rein in at war with Russia. Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons after the fall of the Soviet Union. Besides weaponry, one of the US's greatest forms of leverage with its partners is its mastery of intelligence collection, particularly through satellites and intercepting and analysing communications. But Israel has spent decades penetrating the Islamic Republic of Iran and is not dependent on US intelligence there, experts say. 'Look what we saw in Lebanon. Israel has had two primary target sets over the last two decades. One was Hezbollah and the other was Iran,' Schenker told MEE, emphasising how Israel eliminated Hezbollah's senior leadership in 2024 and left the group in disarray. Does Trump trust Israel? Although Trump has tried to frame the Israeli attack as complementing his hard-nosed diplomacy, one Gulf official told MEE they believed the White House was deeply wary of its ally. 'The administration does not view Israel as trustworthy,' the official said. Prem Kumar, who was a senior director for the Middle East and North Africa under the Obama administration, told MEE that Netanyahu had 'sidelined' Trump. What is stopping Israel from bombing Iran's nuclear sites? Read More » 'My sense is that Trump is not pleased with how this ended up. He is trying to use the idea of resuscitating the talks to save face. The idea that the Iranians would resume negotiations is ludicrous. Trump looks weak,' added Kumar, now a Middle East expert at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group advisory. Regardless of whether Trump gave Israel a green light or tacit approval to attack Iran, experts say that he is now tethered to Israel's military campaign. Asked by Reuters on Friday whether he would support the US's closest Middle East ally, he replied: 'We've been very close to Israel," he said. "We're their number one ally by far." "We'll see what happens," he added. The US came to Israel's defence in April and October 2024 when Iran and Israel exchanged direct fire. Tehran choreographed its attack heavily in April and somewhat in October, experts said. The best Trump can hope for is that Israel replicates its success with its takedown of Hezbollah in Lebanon in 2024. The worst outcome is that he brings the US into the very type of Middle East "forever war" he was elected not to.