
In a vise of slowing demand and rising costs, small businesses are signaling trouble ahead
But demand cratered in mid-March as national economic sentiment slid in the wake of the Trump administration's trade war, and Altman, 53, is now running on savings and credit and about to cancel his planned home improvements to keep his workers paid, an example of how U.S. growth may be folding in on itself more broadly.
'I think it kind of crept up on me, because I'm so used to having everything just work itself out. I was just waiting for those emails… And they just never came," Altman said of an order flow that as of mid-April was down to a couple days a week. "All of a sudden, next week was empty and I had no leads and I was getting no calls.'
Altman's story could take on broader significance in coming weeks as evidence builds of an economic slowdown coinciding with President Donald Trump's effort to rewire the global economy with tariffs, as households and firms cut spending out of concern for what lies ahead and try to cope with new import taxes that have begun raising supply costs and prices. The full brunt of that effort has not even been felt yet. Trump has put some of his most aggressive trade actions on hold until July, with no certainty about what he will do if his administration fails to negotiate individual deals with up to 90 countries as a substitute for sweeping and steep tariffs on imports from those nations. On Monday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the first of those trade agreements may come this week or next, though a deal with China, the nation's biggest trading partner, appeared to be no closer.
In the meantime economists have upped their odds of a recession this year in what analysts at the Institute of International Finance said recently would be a downturn due to "deliberate policy engineering." Unlike Altman, bow tie manufacturer Beau Ties of Vermont is in the direct line of fire from tariffs that threaten to push prices to prohibitive levels on the Chinese-made fabrics that owner Greg Shugar uses at his factory.
Trump has pushed tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, and while that may be negotiated lower, Shugar said "we will go out of business if the 145% sticks...I can't imagine us lasting more than 6 to 9 months when all my hoarded fabric runs out...The irony of the whole thing is that we are a Made-in-America company who is supposed to benefit from all these tariffs."
UNCERTAINTY DOMINATES
Measures of uncertainty over Trump's first 100 days in office have soared to levels last seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, and consumer and business surveys are showing a steady slide in confidence and an erosion of hiring and investment. Trump's polling numbers on the economy, considered a strength coming out of the 2024 election, have slipped: Only 37% of respondents to a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll approved of his economic management and three-fourths concerned a recession is coming. The latest twice-quarterly pulse-taking of the economy by the Federal Reserve's 12 regional banks painted a dour landscape of falling demand, projects stalled due to "pervasive" uncertainty, and initial hints of layoffs to come. Shipping industry officials, separately, warn of a sharp downturn developing in U.S.-bound cargo. While slowdown indications are largely limited so far to that kind of "soft data," such information has become increasingly important to policymakers as signaling a shift in the direction of an economy that was on solid footing when Trump took over.
Key updates are due soon: April's jobs report will be released Friday; data on first-quarter economic growth - the first overall scorecard since Trump's inauguration - is due Wednesday, with economists estimating growth at near stall speed. Some hard data is starting to turn as well, including a slower rate of hiring and a lengthening of the average spell of unemployment, a pattern that has "frequently occurred during the onset of recessions," according to recent San Francisco Fed research.
'GOING TO HIT EVERYBODY'
An analysis of economic conditions among small businesses by software firm Intuit estimated that firms with nine or fewer workers cut employment by 3.5% over the first quarter of the year.
Revenue did rise, and recent Census data has shown a still elevated level of business creation, a trend considered a sign of underlying resilience.
But there are concerning signs, said Ufuk Akcigit, a University of Chicago economist who has developed indices of small business hiring and revenue from Intuit's data on about 400,000 firms using the company's software.
Alongside the hiring slowdown, he said, separate data shows a growing gap in credit card usage and payments among small businesses, with firms seemingly caught in a vise of rising input prices and potentially mounting debt.
"Small businesses are really early indicators of what's coming...The top two agenda items - prices and interest rates - are both getting problematic...They are getting into more distressed situations," Akcigit said. On jobs "the trend has been negative for some time and it accelerated when uncertainty started to rise substantially." Damion Love, manager and buyer for Belle Up Boutique, an independent women's clothing store near a commuter rail station in Chicago's Beverly neighborhood, said his immediate concern is inflation. He has been notified by some of the store's clothing brands that wholesale price hikes of at least 10% are likely in the coming months, but a lot depends on the level and duration of Trump's tariffs. While the store sells some clothing lines made in Los Angeles and Chicago, other lower-priced items are made in China and could face taxes that would more than double the cost to import.
"It hasn't hit us yet, but we know it's going to hit everybody," Love said.
The larger concern is how customers will react.
While the 16-year-old boutique's clientele is loyal, he said, "in this economy, everything is about pricing...If a top is $49 and it shoots up to $80, the consumer isn't going to say, 'Oh, it's not your fault.' They're just not going to shop here." In Oakland, Altman spelled out the larger risks if the current outlook becomes the new reality.
"Anxiety has gone to the roof,' he said, 'I have five employees that I need to keep paid, right? Because they have families and because they have bills to pay, they've got rents to pay.'
(Reporting by Howard Schneider Additional reporting by Ann Saphir in San Francisco, David Lawder in Chicago, and Arriana McLymore in New York; Editing by Anna Driver and Dan Burns)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
29 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Trump arrives in Alaska for historic summit with Putin
15 Aug 2025 22:40 Anchorage (AFP) US President Donald Trump touched down at a military base in Alaska on Friday for a much-anticipated summit with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin to press for an end to the war in US leader was due to hold face-to-face talks with the Kremlin chief, who was on his first foray onto Western soil since the war started in February 2022. Trump to meet with Putin joined by aides, not aloneTrump no longer plans to meet alone with Putin and instead will be joined by top aides throughout, the White House said. Trump, instead of a previously planned one-on-one meeting, will be joined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff before a larger meeting over lunch that will include other officials, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Air Force One.


Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
Trump's attack on Goldman could prompt watering down of Wall Street's independent analysis
U.S. President Donald Trump's criticism of Goldman Sachs' research on tariff risks could prompt some analysts to water down their research, investors and academics said, an outcome that could leave investors with less reliable information. The reams of research that banks such as Goldman produce are used by institutional investors, such as hedge funds and asset managers, in deciding how to allocate capital. Trump's comments -- in which he lambasted Goldman, its economics team and CEO David Solomon and accused them of making "a bad prediction" -- have triggered a debate on Wall Street about the possible fallout, according to interviews with banking industry sources and investors. At one Wall Street bank, Trump's comments spurred informal conversations among staff, a source familiar with the matter said. The source said they also discussed how to incorporate government data in the wake of Trump's decision to fire the head of BLS, claiming -- without evidence -- that its data had been politicized. Still, the bank was not considering changing the way research operates. "This is going to come down to a person's ability to withstand a barrage of criticism from the Oval Office, and the extent to which these banks provide support for their chief economists," said Dave Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research, who has worked in the economics departments at several banks. "If we notice that research is being watered down ... then we'll know that this has had an effect." Jack Ablin, chief investment strategist at Cresset Capital, said if banks do start self-censoring, smaller investors who do not have the resources to do their own analysis are likely to suffer most. Trump's criticism is his latest attack on corporate America and other institutions, and is a break from historical norms, where presidents have typically avoided calling out private companies and executives for things they do not like. Some companies that have considered passing on tariff costs to customers have faced public criticism, and Trump, who came to politics after running businesses, has intervened directly in private business decisions by making a deal with Nvidia to give a portion of its revenues from sales to China of AI chips to the government. Trump 'certainly is taking a number of steps that diverge from the traditional view of the respective roles of the government and private industry,' said Henry Hu, a securities law professor at the University of Texas. In a social media post earlier this week, Trump said foreign companies and governments were mostly absorbing the cost of his tariffs, counter to Goldman's research. "Given that sell-side Wall Street analyst predictions have been about as accurate as random guessing, small investors will do just fine with the president exercising his First Amendment right about flawed Wall Street research," a White House official told Reuters. On Wednesday, Goldman's U.S. head economist David Mericle defended its research on CNBC, vowing to "keep doing" what the bank considers informative research. Goldman declined requests for further comment. Other major banks, including Wells Fargo, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America and Citigroup, declined to comment. REPUTATIONAL RISKS There has already been evidence of self-censorship. A senior JPMorgan Asset Management investment strategist, Michael Cembalest, earlier this year said during a webinar that he refrained from voicing some of his thoughts on U.S. tariffs publicly. Shortly after Cembalest's comments, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan's CEO, said that he expects analysts to speak their minds. Both Cembalest and the bank declined to comment for this story. Hu said there is a risk involved in even appearing to give way to political pressure. 'Goldman's reputational capital is at stake here,' he said. 'If their views on the economy become biased, and they are shown to be wrong, why would anyone choose Goldman to advise them on anything?' Mike Mayo, banking analyst at Wells Fargo, said independent research is critical for investment bank's reputation. "Investment banks live and die by their reputation and independence. That transcends all other considerations." Wall Street research has long been tightly overseen, one source said, with supervisory analysts reviewing research reports to ensure that language is not inflammatory, emotive or partisan and that reports are objective and cite sources. That person said that if analysts feel unable to speak openly then investors will pay more or take greater risk. Liquidity will suffer and there will be less foreign participation in U.S. markets, the person said. It was large losses by smaller investors that triggered the first major probe of Wall Street research in the aftermath of the dot com stock bubble of the late 1990s. Eliot Spitzer, then New York Attorney General, found that Wall Street analysts had swapped their honest opinions for unwarranted "buy" ratings on companies to help their banks win underwriting and advisory business. The result: a $1.5 billion global settlement payout by Wall Street and lifetime bans for some analysts. It remains to be seen whether the current kerfuffle will have an outsized impact on Wall Street or if it is a storm in a teacup, said Steve Sosnick, market strategist at IBKR. "It does raise a lot of questions," he added.


Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Trump hints at more tariffs, this time on semiconductors and chips
15 Aug 2025 19:25 Washington (dpa) US President Donald Trump has said he will be setting new tariffs on steel, semiconductors and computer chips from next week, though he declined to say what rate would apply. Speaking on a flight to Alaska, where he is set to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin later on Friday, Trump said he would keep the new levies "lower at the beginning" to give companies "a chance to come in and build" in the United States."And if they don't build here, they have to pay a very high tariff, which doesn't work. So they'll come and build," he explained. It comes after Trump last week announced 100% tariffs on Intel chips exported to the US, though he failed to say from when they would he delivers on Friday's pledge to implement levies on chip imports from major suppliers, it is likely to increase prices for US consumers across the board, as the vast majority of chips used in electronic devices are produced in Asia. Trump, whose trade policies have repeatedly triggered market turmoil around the globe since he began imposing sweeping tariffs on a host of trading partners shortly after taking office, had already doubled tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to 50%.