Trump's New Fragrance Doesn't Smell Like Success
Victory 47 for Men promises 'rich, masculine notes with a refined finish,' without actually listing any of the ingredients or its scent profile. Helpfully, early reviews from users at fragrance forum Parfumo describe it as 'oriental-fruity', but score it at just 1.9 out of 10.
Price-wise, at $249 for 3.3FL OZ, it's comparable with mainstays of blockbuster luxe lines, such as Tom Ford Noir Extreme ($240 / 3FL OZ)—but the cachet between the two is likely as far apart as Tom and Donald's politics.
Fragrances might seem like an odd choice for a personal brand that prides itself on plain-talking and masculine tropes, but according to NPD Group data, celebrity fragrances in the US amounted to $148.5 million between August 2022 and 2023—a 30 percent jump on the same period the year before. And while it's not exactly memecoin money, who wouldn't want a piece of that pie when you can leave the grunt work to a third party?
That upper-but-not-quite niche $249 pricing also puts Trump fragrances ahead of the more sophisticated celebrity scent sphere. At one end, names such as Jennifer Lopez and Antonio Banderas have long cluttered pharmacy shelves across the world with their lower-market-end-conquoring offers (think $25 a pop). Stars such as Ariana Grande are next on the ladder, capturing a huge market with candy-sweet bottles that go for $45-$68. Then we have our Rhiannas and Billie Eilishes in the $140 ballpark—affordable luxury.
It's not The Donald's first foray into the world of celebrity stink, of course—back in the misty, pre-presidential days of 2004 we had Donald Trump The Fragrance (courtesy of mid-range powerhouse Estée Lauder), then Success by Trump in 2012, followed by Empire by Trump in 2015 (both by the parent company of Parlux, which produces Billie Eilish's fragrance line).
Of course, this isn't the first time we've wondered what power actually smells like: JFK famously wore both Eight and Bob and Jockey Club during his time in office, but he wasn't licensing his name and 'likeness' to a third party churning out products that he'd likely never purchase himself.
Still, the Trump brand-diffusion plan has caught the eye of fellow authoritarians. Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has his own line of fragrances courtesy of Brazilian beauty brand Agustin Fernandez—though retailing in the distinctly less-premium neighborhood of R$300 (US$50).
Like Melania, Michelle Bolsonaro, former First Lady of Brazil, also got in on the action with the launch of their line in 2024. Perhaps Donald will swap complimentary bottles with Jair, or maybe there's a rare flacon of the Putin-inspired Leaders Number One winging its way over from Russia? The mind—and nostrils—boggle.
As with so much of the product offered on the 'GetTrump' family of websites, the imagery is a masterclass of 'actual product may vary' visualization. More Oscar statuette than bottle (let's not kid ourselves here—the Trump faithful likely aren't really buying this for the fragrance), the golden, youthful T-1000-like figure is perhaps more Eric than Donald? For the ladies' version ('Sophisticated, subtly feminine,' no clue as to what it smells of; 'chypreartig-animal' according to Parfumo), the only concession to femininity is a rose-gold hue to the lower half—you'll still get the stock, gleaming Donalderic homunculus glaring purposefully at you from the dressing table.
Interestingly, the only positive noises about Victory 47 thus far have come from the Fragrantica site (the early visualizations of the bottles are a treat , BTW)—itself somewhat controversial. The site's original review for the 'Fight Fight Fight' cologne was criticized across Reddit for failing to mention any injuries or the actual fatality from the shooting in Pennsylvania, and instead cited Trump's inspiring moment of 'personal courage'.
For those keeping track, in addition to 9 currently available watches (and 11 in pre-order) the current tally of under-licence merch from the GetTrump empire now includes Trump Slides, "Fight Fight Fight' High Tops (Silver) and Trump Landslide Boots.
Sadly, that $5 million Gold Trump Card doesn't actually come with any credit, so Trump superfans will have to max out their regular gold cards if they're going to complete the collection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
15 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyers say he is a changed man. Will that spare him from more time behind bars?
NEW YORK (AP) — In rejecting Sean 'Diddy' Combs' release on bail, a federal judge confronted the hip-hop impresario with a disturbing aspect of his criminal case that his lawyers couldn't deny: his history of violence. Combs' defense lawyers claimed he is a changed man. But Judge Arun Subramanian on Wednesday let the Bad Boy Records founder know that his hopes for freedom soon are slim — even after the jury acquitted him on racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges that could have put him in prison for life. Subramanian's words signaled how he may approach sentencing Combs for his convictions on two lesser prostitution-related charges, which each carry a maximum punishment of 10 years in prison. The judge, citing a now-infamous video of Combs beating a former girlfriend and photographs showing injuries to another ex-girlfriend, made clear that he plans to hold Combs accountable for the years of violence and bullying behavior that were exposed at his eight-week trial. Combs' punishment is Subramanian's decision alone, and the judge will have wide latitude in determining a sentence. While judges often adhere to the federal judiciary's formulaic guidelines meant to prevent disparity in sentences for the same crimes, they are not mandatory. Combs' lawyers want less than the 21 to 27 months in prison that they believe the sentencing guidelines recommend. Prosecutors contend that the guidelines, when properly calculated to include Combs' crimes and violent history, call for at least four to five years in prison. After tentatively setting Combs' sentencing for October, the judge said he is open to a defense request that it happen as soon as possible, with further discussions expected at a conference Tuesday. Combs' violent past keeps him locked up for now Combs, his family and his defense team were overjoyed by the verdict, some of them tearing up at the result. Combs pumped his fist in celebration and mouthed 'thank you' to jurors. He hugged his lawyers and, after the jury exited, fell to his knees in prayer. But, by the end of the day, Combs was deflated — his dream of going home after more than nine months in jail thwarted by a judge throwing his own lawyers' words back in their faces. 'We own the domestic violence. We own it,' Subramanian said, reading from a transcript of Combs lawyer Marc Agnifilo's closing argument to the jury last week. 'If he was charged with domestic violence, we wouldn't all be here having a trial, because he would have pled guilty, because he did that.' The judge noted the jury had seen a video of Combs viciously attacking then-girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel in March 2016. He also noted that another former Combs' girlfriend — a woman who testified under the pseudonym 'Jane' — was left with visible evidence of bruises and injuries after Combs hit her repeatedly in June 2024. That was a few months after federal agents raided two of his homes and 'when he should have known that he needed to stay clean.' The judge said that the beating, which Jane said happened before Combs forced her to have a sexual encounter with a male sex worker, was part of the prostitution-related offenses — violations of the federal Mann Act — that resulted in a conviction. 'This highlights a disregard for the rule of law and the propensity for violence,' he said. Combs is 'working on himself,' lawyer says Agnifilo, who had asked the judge to release Combs on a $1 million bond, insisted to Subramanian that Combs had changed dramatically in the last year. As he pleaded with the judge, Combs sat by his side and scribbled notes on small pieces of paper, occasionally handing them to the lawyer. The attorney said Jane had written a supportive note to get Combs into a domestic violence intervention program. At sentencing, he said, the defense plans to have someone from the program tell the judge how Combs did. 'He is a man who's in the process of working on himself,' the lawyer said. 'He's been a model prisoner.' Agnifilo said Combs had 'been given his life back' by the jury and 'would be nothing short of a fool' to do anything to spoil that. The prospect of a life sentence, the maximum if Combs were convicted of racketeering or sex trafficking, prompted 'all sorts of the darkest conversations one can imagine about what your life could have been and what your life became,' Agnifilo said. But Subramanian was unmoved by what Agnifilo called his 'heart strings' argument. 'Having conceded the defendant's propensity for violence in this way, it is impossible for the defendant to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he poses no danger to any other person or the community,' the judge said. Prosecutors also want violence factored into sentencing Agnifilo indicated the defense will argue at sentencing that Combs' violent acts are not part of the charges for which he was convicted and shouldn't factor into his punishment. Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey made it clear that prosecutors will argue the opposite. Combs is 'an extremely violent man with an extraordinarily dangerous temper,' Comey told the judge Wednesday. He 'has shown no remorse and no regret for his violence toward multiple victims.' Subramanian noted that Combs will be credited for the time he has already served. But by rejecting bail, the judge indicated that he will likely reject a defense request for Combs to be freed in the next year. Witnesses implore judge to keep Combs locked up Deonte Nash, a former stylist for Combs and Cassie who reluctantly testified during the trial, told the judge in a letter that bail would 'send a dangerous message: that wealth and influence can shield someone indefinitely from accountability.' Cassie, through her lawyer, also encouraged Subramanian to keep Combs in jail. 'Ms. Ventura believes that Mr. Combs is likely to pose a danger to the victims who testified in this case, including herself, as well as to the community,' Cassie's lawyer, Douglas Wigdor, wrote.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DNC chair says 'bulls---' on air as Dem frustrations over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' mount
The chairman of the Democratic National Committee let an expletive slip on air when describing President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" on Thursday. Ken Martin, who was elected DNC chair earlier this year, called Trump's bill "bulls---" during an appearance on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." Network censors didn't catch the word as he said it, so it came out clearly during the broadcast. "Don't make no mistake about it. The Democratic Party, we're here to fight. We're here to win, and we're here to make sure that we actually give the American people a sense that their better days are ahead of them, and that this bulls--- bill that they see right now in Congress, that's not going to happen if you put Democrats back in power." It didn't appear to be an accident, as Martin had already described the bill that way on social media. Schumer Forces Name Change For 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Moments Before It Passes Martin made the statements ahead of the final congressional vote on Trump's $3.3 trillion government spending package. At the time, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., had launched into what would be a multi-hour speech on the House floor to delay the vote. Read On The Fox News App Final passage of the bill came on Thursday afternoon after Jeffries yielded the floor. During his TV appearance, Martin savaged Trump's bill and the Republican lawmakers who supported it, calling their actions a "betrayal." "This is one of the biggest betrayals we've seen in recent history, and we're going to remind voters next year – trust me – this is not going to go well for Republicans. And someone said this earlier, they are handing us a gift on a silver platter," he said, noting the potential political capital the Democratic Party could get with the bill's passage. Republican Lawmakers Stand Firm Against Musk's 'Kill The Bill' Assault On Trump's Agenda He continued, arguing that the bill will ultimately "be disastrous for the American people, who are – their lives are going to be shattered and communities are going to be afflicted with a lot of pain over the coming years because of this bill." As he went on, Martin mentioned how his party was galvanized in opposition to the bill and will succeed in the midterm elections against the GOP and Trump administration, which he described as an "authoritarian regime" which has "an unimpeded path to do whatever the hell they want to inflict more pain and damage in this country." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture NBC News correspondent Ali Vitali appeared skeptical of Martin's confidence in the upcoming elections, noting how Democratic figures thought Trump was a "gift" to the party in 2016 until former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's presidential loss. Click To Get The Fox News AppOriginal article source: DNC chair says 'bulls---' on air as Dem frustrations over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' mount
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court enables Trump to resume South Sudan deportation flight
The Supreme Court in an apparent 7-2 decision Thursday ruled the Trump administration can restart plans to deport a group of convicted criminals to the war-torn country of South Sudan who have no ties there. Last month, the high court lifted U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy's injunction that limited the administration from deporting migrants to third countries without giving them sufficient opportunity to raise torture claims. Murphy continued to insist that his subsequent ruling, which found the May South Sudan flight violated the injunction, was still in 'full force.' The administration contended it amounted to open defiance of the justices and asked them to again rebuke the judge. 'The May 21 remedial order cannot now be used to enforce an injunction that our stay rendered unenforceable,' the Supreme Court's unsigned ruling reads, confirming all of Murphy's rulings are void. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented. They rejected the notion that Murphy was at fault, instead pinning the blame on the administration and their colleagues. 'The Court's continued refusal to justify its extraordinary decisions in this case, even as it faults lower courts for failing properly to divine their import, is indefensible,' Sotomayor wrote. She added that the ruling 'clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.' Justice Elena Kagan, the court's third Democratic-appointed justice, said she agreed with the administration this time despite continuing to believe they should've lost before. 'But a majority of this Court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed,' Kagan wrote. Federal authorities have kept custody over the group of eight migrants, who have serious criminal records, on a military base in Djibouti ever since Murphy intervened in May. Though the litigation will continue in the lower courts, Thursday's ruling means that no court injunction is currently blocking the administration from again trying to move the migrants to South Sudan.
