Major bank doubles down on supersized RBA interest rate cut call: ‘Catch up'
NAB expects the RBA will cut the cash rate by 50 basis points in May, followed by 25 basis point cuts in July, August, November and February. This would take the cash rate down to 2.60 per cent and shave an estimated $526 off monthly repayments for the average $600,000 loan.
NAB chief economist Sally Auld said RBA needs to take policy to a more neutral stance 'relatively quickly'.
RELATED
Commonwealth Bank issues RBA interest rate cut warning for mortgage holders
Tax cuts, HECS debts, Medicare boost: All the major cost-of-living relief coming for millions of Aussies
Centrelink Work Bonus offers $4,000 boost to pensioners'If the RBA knew on 1 April what it knows today, it is likely that the Board would have decided to lower the cash rate by 25 basis points at the last meeting and followed up that easing up with a 25 basis point rate cut in May,' she said.
'There is thus some catch up required to align policy settings with recent developments … Indeed, the RBA has historically shown a willingness to respond quickly to offshore shocks.'
The major bank noted its forecasts would look 'very similar' to how the RBA responded to the Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Auld noted the latest inflation data showed both headline and core inflation were within the RBA's 2 to 3 per cent target band.
'This should ease any lingering concerns the RBA has about the inflationary impact of current labour market dynamics,' she said.
Auld acknowledged the RBA would need to 'shift its thinking on a couple of fronts' for its call to eventuate.
That includes acknowledging the risks to inflation were no longer balanced, taking a "less cautious approach" to policy and showing 'a willingness to act quickly and boldly".
The major bank has revised its GDP forecast down by 25 basis points to 2 per cent and lifted its forecast peak in the unemployment rate from 4.2 to 4.4 per cent.
A 50 basis point rate cut in May would save the average borrower $181 on their repayments based on a $600,000 loan with 25 years remaining, according to Canstar.
A drop of 1.50 per cent by March 2026, as NAB has predicted, would lower repayments by $526 for the same borrower.
Commonwealth Bank, Westpac and ANZ expect the RBA will cut interest rates by the standard 25 basis points in May.
CBA head of Australian economics Gareth Aird said the latest inflation data was 'a touch firmer' than it expected and a May cut, though likely, was 'not a done deal'.
'The case to normalise the cash rate to a more neutral setting remains, but we maintain that the Board will take a gradual approach in cutting rates despite CBA recently downgrading its forecast for the global economy,' he said.
'We retain our base case that the pace of easing is likely to be gradual and we continue to expect one 25 basis rate decrease each quarter in 2025 for an end year cash rate of 3.35 per cent.'
Westpac economist Justin Smirk said the inflation data also exceeded its expectations but had not impacted its base case for a May rate cut.
'Westpac Economics expects three more rate cuts totalling 75 basis points, including one in May, with additional cuts expected in August and November,' he said.
ANZ senior economist Adelaide Timbrell said the trimmed mean inflation data had cleared the way for a 0.25 per cent cut in May.
"We view an RBA rate cut of 25 basis points in May as a near certainty, given the downside risks to global and domestic growth stemming from global trade policy uncertainty and the inflation outcomes over the past two quarters,' she said.
ANZ economists are expecting three cuts in May, July and August.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sign of relief for Aussie homeowners
The Reserve Bank of Australia is expected to announce its third cut in interest rates, after holding its rate in July despite the ongoing ease in inflation. According to a new Finder survey, 91 per cent of economists believe the RBA will cut the cash rate following its two-day meeting, which begins on Monday, with a 25 basis point cut bringing the cash rate down from 3.85 per cent to 3.60 per cent. The cash rate was held firm last month, with RBA governor Michele Bullock explaining the decision was about 'timing rather than direction', and was waiting on more data to confirm the decreasing inflation. At the end of July, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) published its quarterly inflation figures, which fell from 2.4 per cent to 2.1 per cent between March and June. Trimmed inflation, also known as underlying inflation, also dropped from 2.9 per cent to 2.7 per cent. Both headlining and underlying inflation rates are now within the RBA's 2-3 per cent target band, indicating inflation is low enough for the RBA to move forward. Mortgage holders are likely to be the biggest winners if the official cash rate is reduced on Tuesday. A homeowner with a $500,000 mortgage are set to save $2884 per year if the cash rate is passed on in full. Fnder head of consumer research Garahm Cooke said the RBA's failure to cut rates lash month was a disappointment for mortgage holders. 'If the RBA doesn't cut next week, they are risking an all-out attack on their legitimacy in the eyes of many homeowners,' he said. 'Last month's decision to hold shocked the market, and we are now seeing a 90 per cent plus certainty of a cut. With inflation well within the target range, there is no reason to hold. 'Banks will be under intense scrutiny to pass on a cut in full,' he said. Despite the overwhelming majority of economists predicting the fall in interest rates, University of Sydney's Stella Huangfu suggested the RBA should hold out for two reasons. 'First, June quarter trimmed mean annual CPI inflation is still 2.7 per cent, which is high within the 2–3 percentage target band and slightly above the RBA's forecast of 2.6 per cent,' she said. 'Second, the RBA has already cut rates twice this year, giving it scope to pause and assess the impact before moving further,' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants private assets in 401(k)s. How do everyday investors value them?
Imagine walking into a jewelry store where nothing has a price tag, the shelves are locked and you can't return anything the moment you change your mind. That's a bit like what could be coming to your 401(k)s and other workplace retirement plans under a new executive order from President Donald Trump. Amazon documentary exposes 'neglect and pain' in many nursing homes. It's only going to get worse. Medicare will test using AI to help decide whether patients get coverage — which could delay or deny care, critics warn 'I'm tired of corporate America': My wife and I have $1.65 million. I'm 61. Can I retire already? 'Stagflation is coming to the U.S.,' says this economist. Here's what it means for the dollar, bonds and stocks. 'She lives alone': My mother-in-law, 86, gets $1,300 in Social Security. Is that enough to live on? Trump this week signed an executive order that will open the doors for everyday investors to stash their retirement savings in private equity, cryptocurrency, real estate and other alternative assets — a move that echoes a shared interest for some of Wall Street's largest asset managers and private-equity firms, which for years have wanted to tap into the massive collective piggy bank of 401(k)s and other defined-contribution plans. While the move promises ordinary investors access to a potentially high-yield, low-volatility market — at least on paper — once reserved for sophisticated institutions and the ultrawealthy, it also introduces an unprecedented problem for retirement savers: It's nearly impossible to know what you really own — and what it is truly worth. See: Trump's order greenlights crypto in 401(k)s, so why isn't my job on board yet? Unlike stocks on the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq, where shares of companies are openly traded, private equity involves investments in private firms that do not offer shares to the general public. And because private assets aren't traded on public exchanges, the companies and funds behind them are not legally required to disclose detailed financial information to the public. To be sure, private-equity holdings do get valued because fund managers must provide their private clients — usually pension funds, endowments and family offices — with periodic appraisals of the assets they hold. These valuations primarily rely on the so-called mark-to-model pricing method, which assigns values to assets using financial models as opposed to market trading prices. This approach also involves comparable company analysis, projected cash flows and assessments from the management themselves. As a result, the valuations are mostly estimates and often inherently subjective. David Krakauer, senior director of portfolio management at Mercer Advisors, said these valuation methods have to be taken with 'a huge grain of salt,' because investors do not know what these private-market investments are actually worth until they have to sell their positions. 'We've seen that the mark-to-model [pricing method] is very slow to mark things down and very quick to mark things up,' said Jason Kephart, senior principal of multiasset-strategy ratings at MorningStar. 'When markets sell off, the model is slower to react or not as reactionary in general, but when things are doing well, then you'll see prices marked up a bit quicker.' That illiquid nature of private assets is another major challenge, as there's no readily available buyer or seller at any given moment. So even if investors have a valuation and trading prices on paper, they can't quickly convert the investment into cash whenever they want to exit their position. That lack of price transparency and liquidity is exactly what makes private assets tricky for 401(k) investors — who are used to logging in and seeing up-to-the-minute price updates for their holdings, and are able to adjust their portfolio allocations accordingly. Private markets are often known for their relatively low volatility and higher returns compared to public markets — but that is largely because of their illiquid nature, and it doesn't necessarily imply lower risk, according to portfolio managers. The supposedly superlow volatility of private assets does create 'an illusion of diversification, which comes from the valuations not really changing or only changing in a positive direction,' Kephart told MarketWatch in a phone interview on Friday. 'But the small standard deviation of these funds is in no way indicative of the amount of risk investors are taking,' he added. To be sure, Trump's executive order doesn't immediately change policy, but rather serves as directional guidance for government agencies. His order instructs the Labor Department to re-examine its guidance to employers and consult with the Treasury Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other federal regulators, to determine what regulatory changes need to be made to facilitate the goal of expanding private-markets access to 401(k)s. Benjamin Schiffrin, director of securities policy for Better Markets, a nonprofit financial-market watchdog, said Trump's executive order exemplifies the administration's determination to prioritize the interests of Wall Street over the interests of retail investors. 'Let's be clear: Neither 401(k)-plan sponsors or 401(k)-plan participants — regular, hardworking Americans — are asking to replace stocks and bonds in their 401(k)s with risky private assets,' Schiffrin said in a statement shared with MarketWatch on Thursday. 'Instead, the private-funds industry needs a way to get its hands on the $12 trillion in Americans' retirement accounts to boost its profits and make up for the fact that institutional investors are fleeing the private markets due to mediocre returns, higher fees and more risk,' he added. A survey of Americans with retirement accounts found that among those not investing in alternative assets, the leading barrier is 'fear of fraud or scams,' according to data compiled by Lansons, a financial and strategic communications consultancy. Other cited barriers included concerns about the viability of investment platforms, the belief that alternative assets are too new and lack a track record, and not knowing credible companies to invest with. However, more than half of the respondents still thought alternative investments offer an opportunity for larger returns than traditional assets, and they saw 'diversification potential' in alternatives. See: Private-credit ETFs are here. Why your retirement account may be their next target. To be sure, the push to add private securities to 401(k) menus has long been a priority for some of Wall Street's largest asset managers. BlackRock Inc. BLK, the world's largest asset manager, is preparing to offer a 401(k) target-date fund with a 5% to 20% allocation to private investments in the first half of 2026, the company said in a press release in June. Jaime Magyera, head of BlackRock's U.S. wealth-advisory and retirement businesses, told MarketWatch on Friday that 'the access to investments long out of reach' will help ensure millions of Americans build stronger, more diversified portfolios designed to increase savings. Another retirement giant, Empower CA:GWO, which manages around $1.8 trillion in retirement accounts for nearly 19 million Americans, said in May that it would begin offering access to alternative investments — including private equity and private credit — through the retirement plans it oversees. Other retirement-plan providers such as State Street Corp. STT and Voya Financial Inc. VOYA have also announced similar moves this year. It's still uncertain how these private-equity investments will actually function within 401(k) plans when it comes to pricing and trading. But MorningStar's Kephart said there's a lot of 'real-world friction' between what plan sponsors and 401(k) fiduciaries are accustomed to, in terms of fees and transparency — so it could take years before private assets ultimately enter retirement accounts. 'Things are getting tougher': I'm struggling with $145,000 in debt. Should I refinance my 3.5% mortgage? Trump wants private assets in 401(k)s. How do everyday investors value them? My late husband's employer is forcing me to take 10% 401(k) distributions. Help! Millions of student-loan borrowers have no idea how much they're supposed to pay 'This scam stuff is going to get worse': A man approached me in my car — he had a crazy story Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How the ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Affect Social Security Taxes — Here's What It Said
As the 'Big Beautiful Bill' is reportedly tied to proposed sweeping reforms of federal taxation and entitlement programs, many Americans are wondering: What does it mean for Social Security, especially the taxes that fund it? I asked ChatGPT to break down what the Big Beautiful Bill meant for Social Security Taxes — here's what it said. Read Next: For You: What Is the 'Big Beautiful Bill'? Essentially, this bill is aimed at overhauling the tax system, cutting government spending and possibly reforming entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. Trending Now: Could It Affect Social Security Taxes? According to ChatGPT, any major tax overhaul could impact how Social Security is funded in several ways below. Raising or Eliminating the Payroll Tax Cap Currently, only wages up to $168,600 (as of 2024) are subject to the 6.2% Social Security tax. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' proposes eliminating this cap, requiring high earners to contribute more, a change that could extend the life of the Social Security trust fund. Changing the Tax Rate The bill could mean an increase in the Social Security tax rate for workers and employers alike. Even a small rate bump would generate billions in revenue but could face stiff opposition. Means-Testing or Changing Benefit Formulas Instead of raising taxes, the bill may reduce future benefits for high-income retirees or change how cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) are calculated, indirectly affecting how much taxpayers benefit from the system they fund. What Should Workers Expect? The 'Big Beautiful Bill' raises real questions about the future of Social Security funding. If you're a working American, especially under 50, it's smart to stay informed and prepare for potential changes in how much you contribute and what you can expect in return. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact RetireesHow Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Affect Social Security Taxes — Here's What It Said