Western Cape High Court orders scrapping of the 0.5% VAT hike
Despite Enoch Gondongwana's recent announced that the VAT hike has been reversed, the court ruled in favour of the DA and EFF.
National Treasury has been dealt another blow after the Western Cape High Court ordered the scrapping of the 0.5% VAT increase until Parliament passes legislation making Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's decision to reverse the VAT hike an act of Parliament.
The court made the order on Sunday in the DA and EFF's court challenge to have the VAT rate adjustment set aside.
Order
Despite Gondongwana's recent announcement that the VAT hike has been reversed, the court ruled in favour of the DA and EFF.
'The Minister of Finance's announcement on 12 March 2025 made under section 7(4) of the Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991, whereby the Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate was adjusted as follows 'the first 0.5 percentage point increase in the VAT rate will take effect on 1 May 2025 and the second 0.5 percentage point increase will take effect on 1 April 2026', is suspended pending the passing of legislation regulating the VAT rate or the final determination of Part B whichever occurs first.'
In the ruling, the court also overturned the resolution of the National Assembly (NA) adopting the report of the Joint Standing Committee on Finance on the Fiscal Framework and Revenue proposals adopted earlier this month.
'The resolutions of the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces, adopted on 2 April 2025, to accept the report of the Standing Committee on Finance and the Select Committee on Finance, on the 2025 Fiscal Framework, are set aside.'
ALSO READ: DA files supplementary affidavit to block the proposed VAT hike
Court costs
National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza and National Council of Provinces Chairperson Refilwe Mtshweni-Tsipane have also been ordered to pay 50% of the legal costs, including costs to two senior counsel.
The court's order is subject to Part B of the DA's application, which seeks to have the VAT Act declared unconstitutional.
DA affidavits
During the weekend, the DA and EFF filed supplementary papers in the multilayered court case.
In the affidavit, the DA also argued that, even if the High Court sets aside the fiscal framework, which Parliament now agrees it should, it won't prevent the VAT increase from kicking in next week.
'The SA Revenue Service's apparent view to the contrary is plainly wrong. Its advice to vendors – which contradicts the minister's own position – creates further legal confusion,' the DA said in the affidavit.
ALSO READ: Treasury reverses proposed VAT hike, will remain at 15%
EFF affidavit
In their court filing, the EFF expressed 'deep concerns' about the conduct of the Speaker of the National Assembly and parliamentary secretaries, accusing them of entangling Parliament in partisan politics.
The EFF said that South Africa currently has no lawful budget, arguing that the fiscal framework and revenue proposals were adopted through processes that violate the Constitution and the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act.
'The only legitimate and practical way forward is a full reset of the 2025 budget process to re-establish constitutional compliance and fiscal legitimacy,' the EFF asserted.
Vat reversed
The High Court's order comes after Gondongwana's decision to withdraw the VAT increase and also offer the DA an out-of-court settlement in its application.
The VAT rate was scheduled to rise to 15.5% on 1 May, but growing political and public pressure placed Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana under strain to abandon the proposed increase.
Treasury said it will 'consider' other proposals as potential amendments in upcoming budgets.
ALSO READ: EFF calls for resignation of Godongwana amid VAT fiasco
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
Sars launches Project AmaBillions: expect a surge in VAT audits
Discover how Sars' new initiative, Project AmaBillions, is set to increase VAT audits significantly, impacting businesses across South Africa. Learn what steps you can take to ensure compliance and avoid penalties Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers According to recent media reports, Sars has launched a new initiative — Project AmaBillions — as part of its broader strategy to boost revenue collection by an additional R70 billion over the next three years. To support this objective, Sars has reportedly already recruited 500 new staff members, with an additional 1,000 to 1,500 appointments anticipated. While this expanded capacity will enhance Sars' ability to collect, across multiple tax types, Value-Added Tax (VAT) remains an easy target, with a notable increase in VAT-related audits, verifications, and additional assessments already being observed. In this evolving compliance landscape, businesses, particularly those operating in complex or high-risk sectors, are encouraged to revisit their VAT positions and ensure that both legal interpretation and supporting documentation are up to standard. VAT as an Easy Win for Sars The government's recent proposal to raise the VAT rate met significant public resistance and was ultimately shelved. However, the fiscal demands that prompted the proposal remain unchanged. In the absence of a rate increase, an easy target is the enhanced enforcement of existing VAT obligations as a more immediate mechanism to protect the tax base. Given the transactional nature and extensive reach of VAT, it remains one of the most active areas of Sars enforcement, and from a tax collection standpoint, is second only to Personal Income Tax, per Sars' Revenue Announcement for the 2024/25 Financial Year: Except from the 2024/25 Revenue Announcement presentation: Recent trends confirm an increase in audit activity, particularly where VAT positions rely on complex interpretation or are not fully substantiated by documentation. Certain areas are particularly at risk: Input tax deductions , where Sars may challenge the deductibility based on the nature of the underlying expense, its link to taxable supplies, or the quality of supporting invoices; Zero-rated supplies , especially exports, where documentary proof and timing requirements are closely examined; and Apportionment calculations , in cases where businesses make both taxable and exempt supplies, and Sars queries the method used to determine the deductible portion of input VAT. In addition to heightened audit activity, input tax deductions have become increasingly the subject of legal proceedings, with courts being asked to assess whether deductions meet the requirements of the VAT Act. Often, the success or failure of a claim rests both on the commercial reality of the transaction and on whether the taxpayer can demonstrate compliance with the relevant documentary and legal criteria. Discharging the burden of proof As a self-assessment system, VAT places the burden of proof squarely on the taxpayer. Sars does not need to prove a taxpayer is incorrect; rather, it is the taxpayer who must prove that the tax position adopted is correct. Documentary shortcomings that can result in adverse audit findings may include: Incomplete or non-compliant tax invoices; Missing or outdated export documentation; Contracts or agreements that do not support the VAT treatment applied; and A lack of internal policies governing apportionment or exempt supply treatment. Even businesses with reputable systems or historic Sars engagements should not assume automatic compliance. Audit readiness requires continuous alignment with Sars' current expectations and the evolving interpretation of the VAT Act. High-risk for high reward: which businesses are most scrutinised? While all VAT-registered vendors are subject to review, recent enforcement trends suggest that the following types of businesses may be more susceptible to VAT scrutiny, especially in light of the looming 'Project AmaBillions': Exporters of goods and services , particularly where zero-rating is applied; Foreign suppliers of electronic or remote services to South African recipients; Property developers and investors , due to the complexity of VAT on construction, disposals, and mixed-use properties; and Enterprises with substantial input tax deductions or recurring VAT refunds . In these cases, a proactive review of VAT compliance and risk report may assist in identifying and addressing potential exposure, before they are raised by Sars. A Coordinated Tax Debt Collection Strategy 'Project AmaBillions' is more than a revenue slogan — it reflects a deliberate shift by Sars toward coordinated and data-driven enforcement, leading to increased tax revenue collections. This includes the use of Artificial Intelligence tools, targeted audit selection based on risk modelling, and specialised teams focused on high-yield areas such as VAT, High-Net-Worth taxpayers, and Cryptocurrency. With the recruitment of up to 1,500 additional staff, Sars is positioned to expand its enforcement reach significantly over the coming months. Proactive compliance is key While increased audit activity may place pressure on internal finance and tax teams, early intervention and strategic review can help businesses avoid prolonged disputes or unintended liabilities. A targeted VAT review can assist in confirming that: Zero-rated supplies are supported by adequate and compliant documentation; Input tax deductions meet all legal and documentary requirements; Invoicing and contractual frameworks comply with SARS standards; and Internal VAT procedures, including apportionment and record-keeping, are robus t. Early action prevents future exposure Where there is uncertainty around VAT treatment, and businesses find themselves in a potentially precarious position of now facing Sars scrutiny, the best practice is to seek the assistance of a tax professional, ensuring the best compliance strategy is followed. Early assessment can help prevent future challenges, reduce the risk of penalties and interest, and ensure Sars readiness in an increasingly vigilant digitized environment.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
More than R140 million in salaries paid to suspended government employees
National departments paid nearly R51 million to suspended government employees, while provincial departments spent more than R90 million in the 2024/25 financial year. Government has paid more than R140 million in salaries to employees who have been placed on precautionary suspension during the 2024/25 financial year. This is according to public Service and Administration Minister Mzamo Buthelezi, who was accounting to the National Assembly during the Governance Cluster question and answer session on Wednesday. Buthelezi said as of the end of the fourth quarter of the 2024/25 financial year, national departments paid R50 945 064 to the suspended employees while provincial departments spent R90 469 562. The minister was responding to Al Jama-ah member of parliament (MP) Shameemah Salie, who had asked what the current estimated total cost of ghost employees and suspended employees on the payroll of government was. Ghost employee audit still incomplete Salie also asked what work had been done prior to the Budget Speech to recover funds lost from paying fraudulent salaries. Buthelezi said the total cost associated with ghost workers had not yet been determined. 'This cost will only become known once a comprehensive employee verification process across public service has been completed and the financial implications accurately calculated,' he said. 'However, the Department of Public Service and Administration and National Treasury are jointly leading this exercise, and once the report is finalised it will be shared with the relevant parliamentary committee and this house.' Salie further said the issue of ghost workers had been an ongoing battle for decades and had resulted in millions being lost per yearly. ALSO READ: Gauteng health freezes 66 salaries in ghost employee crackdown 'We urge the minister and all relevant departments to ensure an audit across government and to provide frequent feedback on findings surrounding ghost workers, prosecution of and recovery of funds from these entities,' Salie sad. Buthelezi defends 'bloated' public service wage bill ANC MP Pumelele Ndamase asked what the overall impact of ghost workers was, in which departments they were mostly found and whether Buthelezi's department is actually aware of how ghost employees end up being in the employ of the state. The public service is often accused of being bloated, Ndamase said, while simultaneously struggling to meet the demand of South Africans. In response, the minister said while it is widely believed that the public service wage bill is too high, the department has a different view. 'We do have many vacant posts in the department and many departments who are struggling to even employ because they have a shortage of staff members, because the government cannot afford to pay their salaries,' Buthelezi said. 'So, the issue of a bloated public service wage bill is not necessarily the case, but we do appreciate the fact that we view that as such because our economy is not growing at the rate that it should.' He said the challenges of the country's stagnant economic growth had a bearing on the expenditure where public employees are concerned. Thorough investigation With regard to the departments affected by ghost employees, Buthelezi repeated that there were currently no statistics, but the department is engaged in a thorough investigation. Before posing his question, Rise Mzansi's Stanford Makashule Gana Minister said the 'ghost employees' should be referred to appropriately – public servants who 'give themselves more than one salary'. ALSO READ: R6 million in salaries paid to ghost workers in Mpumalanga 'Trigger-happy managers' Gana finally asked if the Buthelezi's department is considering attaching cost orders to managers who are trigger happy and quick to suspend public servants who don't deserve to be suspended. 'As a department, when it comes to managers who simply suspend employees willy-nilly, we have come up with a directive that says whenever there is an employee that is alleged to have committed a particular offence, instead of suspending that person and continuously get a salary, that person must be transferred to another department or unit,' Buthelezi responded. He said he was not aware of public servants earning more than one salary and that the department is putting systems in place to curb wastage. Redundancy audit Heloise Denner, FF Plus MP, asked if the department had considered or assessed the feasibility of implementing an audit to identify redundant posts within the public service in order to reduce costs. In response, the minister said the department is already putting systems in place to deal with redundancy. He said that the departments need to first consult the Department of Public Services and Administration whenever there's a post to fill. '[This is so that] we look into whether or not there is a need for that particular post or if it means they redefine their organogram,' Buthelezi said. '[They must] also consult with National Treasury to see that there are funds available so that we prevent departments from employing people for posts which do not add any value into the system,' he added. NOW READ: 'It's a scam': Mbalula says Prasa's ghost workers saga to be referred for criminal investigations
Mail & Guardian
a day ago
- Mail & Guardian
Malema: Zuma's MK party wants to undermine EFF under the guise of ‘black unity'
EFF leader Julius Malema Economic Freedom Fighters leader Zuma has been advocating for the unification of so-called black parties to challenge the ANC and the On Wednesday Malema said Zuma was being hypocritical, given that his own MK party was founded quite recently (in December 2023). 'If you wanted to call for unity of people, you should have joined the EFF and not formed a parallel organisation,' Malema said outside the home of Malema questioned why the EFF was often the target of such calls for the unification of 'black parties'. 'Why is this unity of black parties only directed at the EFF? They never complain that the 'Every time it's the EFF. We are not going to allow that. You can see it's not black unity; it's an agenda to destroy the EFF. Why are they not giving you a report about black unity with the Parties such as The relationship between the two parties On Wednesday Malema said he would not work with Shivambu and did not want to involve himself in his problems, referring to 'Where was he going? He is not our problem. We are in parliament, we are working in parliament. If he comes into parliament, he will find us rolling,' Malema said of his former second-in-command's fate. 'The parliament now is run by young people; young people are running that thing. If he comes there and thinks he can impose himself on them, they are already ready for him. You can be rest assured that he will not do anything to undermine the superior logic of the EFF in that parliament.' Malema said his party would not be intimidated by the experience Shivambu brings to parliament for the MK party. 'If you are saying this person is going to be a holy spirit and be in every committee and boost the MK's presence in those committees, it's practically impossible,' he said. 'We do our work not because we want to outshine everyone but because we genuinely believe in this work and put a lot of effort into researching what we are going to speak about [in parliament].'
