Younger Australia is facing a loneliness 'epidemic'
One in seven experience persistent loneliness that lasts more than two years.
The findings, from a new national report by Ending Loneliness Together, have prompted warnings loneliness is becoming endemic, exacerbated by digital isolation, rising living costs and a lack of community spaces to connect face-to-face.
"There's a lot of misconceptions that just because young people are so much embedded within the structures of society that they shouldn't feel lonely," says Michelle Lim, scientific chair of Ending Loneliness Together and co-lead author of the A Call for Connection report.
"This is a huge misconception because the way we define loneliness is very much a subjective feeling of the stress that comes up to you when you feel your relationships do not meet your current social needs."
Naoka Cheah was just settling into student life at the University of Melbourne aged 19 when COVID-19 hit, forcing her to return to Malaysia and complete much of her degree remotely.
"I went back thinking it's probably just going to be a few months at most ... not a huge impact. But I was stuck back in Malaysia for more than a year," she says.
"It was a very unreal experience, being apart from your other students, being apart from friends … and also trying to ace those exams and not fail. I think that's something we were all struggling with."
Now 25 and working as a data analyst in Melbourne, Ms Cheah reflects on how her forced isolation also came with unexpected benefits.
"Initially it is a very scary experience but it pushes you to kind of face yourself," she says.
"There's a stigma of loneliness but it's actually very important to then also have that time by yourself … to figure out what you actually love, what you actually hate."
Like many young professionals in a post-COVID world, Ms Cheah now works mostly from home and makes a conscious effort to stay socially connected.
"I'm very lucky to have a team that's very much inclusive and sociable but I will assume not everyone is lucky enough to have that environment," she says.
"It can be very difficult to reach out. That first obstacle could be the hardest thing for people to overcome."
Associate Professor Lim agrees that being alone is not the same as being lonely.
"By definition, young people are not often socially isolated ... they're not actually physically alone ... but they are feeling very lonely," she says.
Digital technology, while offering new ways to connect, is also part of the problem.
"We haven't really introduced good digital literacy, not just for our children but even for us as parents. As parents we model behaviours and with the increases of digital communication, we're not doing a great job ourselves.
"We know we have to be able to get young people to have healthy social relationships in that digital world."
She adds that for some young Australians - particularly those from the LGBTQI community or in regional areas- digital spaces can be essential.
"They say 'I need that digital community because I don't have people around me that are like me'.
So there is a place for it but we haven't quite taught young people how to navigate this very tricky social media world and digital world and how to use it for their benefit."
Darcy Gilmour, a 25-year-old graduate from Canberra, understands this complexity all too well. Hospitalised at age 10 for two years due to rare blood disorders, he says the loneliness he experienced during and after was profound.
"That obviously created a big feeling of isolation," he says.
"It was pretty tough.
"When I went to high school, I was just trying to reintegrate ... it was a big adjustment and I also experienced a lot of loneliness there. It was like being thrown in the deep end."
Despite being constantly surrounded by nurses, classmates and family, he still felt isolated.
"I'd never spend any time actually alone but still had that incredible feeling of loneliness," he explains.
Mr Gilmour says those experiences have given him a deeper understanding of what true connection means.
"If I notice someone else is struggling to make friends, that's also when I can tend to reach out a bit more because I'm able to recognise that pretty easily," he says.
His advice is to be proactive - even when it's hard.
"I've had a lot of times where you're leading up to going to hang out with your friends and you're, like: 'oh, I don't know if I'll enjoy this. I'd rather just stay at home and just relax a bit alone and not stress'," he says.
"But then you go out and you actually have a really good time."
Loneliness isn't just an emotional issue, according to Prof Lim. It has measurable impacts on mental and physical health, especially for those under financial strain or from lower socio-economic backgrounds.
"We are paying costs in other ways," she says.
"We are very good at interventions. We're very good at dealing with problems. We're very good at throwing money at mental health and suicide.
"But we're not very good at preventing these things."
What's needed, Prof Lim says, is systemic change: from digital education in schools to more inclusive public spaces, and support that doesn't fall entirely on individuals or parents.
"This should be a policy that we introduce on that systems level, where we're teaching that very actively in school, and what healthy social interaction can look like," she says.
"We need something more than just relying on parents."
While large-scale solutions are being debated, Prof Lim believes even small moments of connection can make a difference.
"A quick hello, a chance encounter, an act of kindness, a compliment, a shared experience or interest, a new hobby or even a funny story - these small but meaningful interactions matter," she says.
"They spark conversation and help us feel seen and valued."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
32 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
'It's a living nightmare': inside the regional wood fire pollution crisis
Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist: Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist: Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist: Lisa Cunial cannot go for a walk in the beautiful wetland behind her house. A few minutes in the garden and she can't breathe. "Gardening is one of my passions," she tells ACM. "It is such a shame." Ms Cunial has lived in Orange in the NSW Central West for more than 25 years. "I used to live out of town as a kid and wonder why all my friends in town were always sick and had asthma," she said. Every year, winter brings the haze of wood fire smoke and she is "always on the cusp of a reaction". "Your sensitivity to the smoke gets worse". Agricultural burn-offs in the surrounding areas exacerbate the problem. After the bushfire season in 2019, she was diagnosed with Reactive Airways Dysfunction Syndrome (RADS), a type of asthma-like condition that develops after high-level exposure to an irritating substance such as corrosive material, gas, vapour or fumes. "I couldn't breathe," she said. "If I come across wood smoke, it impacts me immediately. I cannot get better." Ms Cunial's story is not unique. ACM has spoken to dozens of people from regional Australia dealing with wood heater pollution. Around 10 per cent of Australians use wood heaters as their main source of heating. For some, they have become a "lifestyle" accessory. But the health effects are dire. Wood heaters emit large amounts of fine particulate matter (known as PM2.5) into the atmosphere. These particulates could reach deep into the lungs, causing respiratory issues and asthma symptoms. NSW Health's former top doctor, Kerry Chant, said wood fire heaters were so detrimental to health that she would consider banning them. "Long-term exposure to particulate pollution, especially finer particles (PM2.5), can cause heart and lung disease while brief exposures can aggravate asthma and worsen pre-existing heart and lung conditions," she said. Children, the elderly, and people with existing health issues were most at risk. NSW Health advises that "instead of using a wood-burning heater in your home, consider using heating alternatives that cause less pollution, such as reverse cycle air-conditioning, flued gas or electric heaters". New modelling from the Centre for Safe Air at the University of Tasmania shows the toll of wood fire heater pollution. The modelling estimated long-term exposure to smoke from wood heaters contributed to 729 premature deaths every year in Australia. In regional and rural locations, where it is colder and more people use wood heaters, emissions are highest. Regional locations take out the top five worst areas for wood fire heater pollution. Find out the emissions for your area: Launceston and Hobart in Tasmania, the Adelaide Hills in South Australia, Armidale in the Central West in New South Wales, and Bunbury in Western Australia top the list for wood-heater pollution. Centre for Safe Air director, professor Fay Johnston, told ACM the modelling found the areas with the most wood heater pollution tend to be "cooler places where wood burning is common and where towns and cities are located in valleys and basins that trap air pollution during winter". The most premature deaths associated with wood heaters, however, tend to be in areas with the highest population densities. "Sydney's basin-shaped topography and high urban density result in over 300 earlier-than-expected deaths every year, more than any other Australian city," Professor Johnston said. Professor Johnston said that many people are surprised by the impact of wood heaters. "When it comes to air pollution, many people think of exhaust pipe emissions from cars and trucks, smoke from coal-fired power stations or hazard reduction burns," she said. "It is often a surprise to learn that the health impacts of wood heaters are much greater than any of these sources of pollution in most Australian towns and cities." Melbourne community advocate for clean air, Arabella Daniel, said wood pollution was behind a raft of neighbourhood disputes. "People exposed to wood smoke often don't get empathy from a neighbour who is burning," she said. "Those who complain can often experience sociopathic revenge behaviour and retaliation." Managing wood smoke pollution is the responsibility of local councils, which were either reluctant to deal with the problem or not resourced to police chimney smoke, she said. "We are stuck without a remedy. We need state and federal laws to protect health." In 2023, the ACT Government announced that it would phase out wood heaters in the territory by 2045. Ms Daniel said it was a welcome step, but the timeline "was absolutely not good enough". "We consider this a public health emergency," she said. "There is very little political will. We need a hero to step up." She wants no new installations of wood heaters and a subsidised phase-out replacement program converting to split systems. Canberra University's Environmental Public Health Professor Sotiris Vardoulakis told ACM that "decisive and rapid policy action" was needed on wood heater pollution in Australian cities and towns. "This is a major public health issue in many ways similar to smoking in public places, which needs to be urgently addressed," he said. Prof Vardoulakis said new installation of wood heaters need to be banned in new and existing properties in urban areas and suburbs. Mandating the removal of wood heaters before a property can be sold would also reduce the number of older wood heaters, he said. Targeted financial incentives also need to be considered, particularly for low-income households. Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council is currently reviewing a draft policy that would restrict the installation of wood heaters in some urban areas. For some, any action comes too late. Tasmanian resident Jane (surname withheld) still lives with the trauma from wood fire heaters. She was living in a rural town in north-west Tasmania when friendly relationships with neighbours turned sour after she approached them about their wood heater. "The situation caused a lot of trauma and despair," she said. "I lost work days because I was so sick." She said the smoke intensity coming into her weatherboard house became "alarming". The council would only act if she provided evidence of 10 minutes of footage of the burning. She went to the EPA in Tasmania, which calculated that the emissions from the heater were at dangerous levels, but the council still would not intervene. "Why does it appear that people with wood heaters have all the rights?" she said. "I understand they are cosy, but they are a significant health compromise. How can the government say on one hand smoking kills, but allow heaters to burn 24 hours a day?" Do you know more? Email the journalist:
The Australian
2 hours ago
- The Australian
US axes mRNA vaccine contracts, casting safety doubts
President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday announced it would terminate 22 federal contracts for mRNA-based vaccines, questioning the safety of a technology credited with helping end the Covid pandemic and saving millions of lives. The announcement, made by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., marks his latest effort to weave vaccine skepticism into the core of US government policy. "We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted," Kennedy said in a statement. The health department's Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) is "terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu," he added. "We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate." The changes affect Moderna's mRNA bird flu vaccine -- a move the company itself disclosed in May -- as well as numerous other programs, including "rejection or cancellation of multiple pre-award solicitations" from pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Sanofi. In total, the affected projects are worth "nearly $500 million," the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said. Certain late-stage projects were excluded from the move "to preserve prior taxpayer investment." "Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them," Secretary Kennedy said. "That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA and investing in better solutions." Since taking office, Kennedy, who spent two decades sowing misinformation around immunization, has overseen a major overhaul of US health policy -- firing, for example, a panel of vaccine experts that advise the government and replacing them with his own appointees. In its first meeting, the new panel promptly voted to ban a longstanding vaccine preservative targeted by the anti-vaccine movement, despite its strong safety record. He has also ordered a sweeping new study on the long-debunked link between vaccines and autism. Unlike traditional vaccines, which often use weakened or inactivated forms of the target virus or bacteria, mRNA shots deliver genetic instructions into the host's cells, prompting them to produce a harmless decoy of the pathogen and train the immune system to fight the real thing. Though in development for decades, mRNA vaccines were propelled from lab benches to widespread use through President Trump's Operation Warp Speed -- a public-private partnership led by BARDA that poured billions into companies to accelerate development. The technology's pioneers, Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman, were awarded the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their work contributing "to the unprecedented rate of vaccine development during one of the greatest threats to human health in modern times." ia/jgc
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Big problem with essential Aussie scheme
Health Minister Mark Butler says he is looking at recommendations to speed up medicine approvals amid pressure from lobbyists both within Australia and in the US. Medicines Australia has repeatedly highlighted that Australia lags behind comparable countries in listing new medicines on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) – a list of federally subsidised medicines. It takes an average of 466 days from when the Therapeutic Goods Administration approves a medicine to when it becomes affordable on the PBS, according to the peak body. This is much longer than in the UK and Canada, for example. The lengthy timeline has also angered the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), which has framed the PBS as a 'non-tariff trade barrier' that harms American companies in representations to the Trump administration. Lengthy PBS listing times is among PhRMA's core criticisms. Mr Butler said on Thursday he would look at Medicines Australia's recommendations to make the 'approvals system quicker'. Powerful pharmaceutical lobbyists in the US have accused Australia of 'freeloading' on the high prices paid by American consumers. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'We're getting an enormous number of new medicining coming on to the market,' he told the ABC. 'We're living through a turbocharged period of discovery bringing more and more new medicine, so making sure that we can assess them and approve them very quickly to get them into patients as quickly as possible is something I've said is a real priority for us this term.' Because the PBS compels drugmakers to negotiate prices with the federal government, PhRMA has accused Australia of 'freeloading' on US-funded research and development. Meanwhile, American consumers pick up the bill, according to the lobby group. 'The medicines industry, understandably, given their interest, want to make prices higher as well, so there will be a bit of a debate about how we do that,' Mr Butler said. 'But I'm very much on the page of getting medicines more quickly into our system, our PBS system. 'It's a terrific system and we're trying to make medicines cheaper at the same time for Australians.' PhRMA has explicitly urged the Trump administration to 'leverage ongoing trade negotiations' to influence Australia's PBS policies. Mr Butler has echoed Anthony Albanese and fellow senior government ministers in ruling out any 'compromise' on the system as part of tariff talks. For the moment, Donald Trump's concern with the sector appears to be largely focused on bringing down prices in the US rather than punishing allies for having cheaper medicines. A RAND Corporation report found that Americans pay nearly four times more than Australians for medicines and about three times more than the average in other developed economies. The answer, according to the US President, is to make pharmaceuticals in the US. In a warning shot to firms, Mr Trump this week threatened to slap tariffs of up to 250 per cent on foreign-made products. With Australian pharma exports to the US worth more than $2bn in 2024, it would hit producers Down Under hard. Exports are mostly blood products and vaccines but also include packaged medicines and miscellaneous products, such as bandages. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals,' Mr Trump told US business news channel CNBC. 'In one year, 1½ years maximum, it's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' He did not say what the initial rate would be, but earlier in the year he said duties on the sector would start from 25 per cent. Mr Trump last week wrote to 17 major pharmaceutical companies demanding they lower their prices for American consumers and bring them in line with prices overseas.
