logo
M. Anirudhan remembered

M. Anirudhan remembered

The Hindu16 hours ago
Dr. M. Anirudhan remembrance meeting was held here on Tuesday with speakers paying tributes to the industrialist and director of NoRKA Roots, who recently passed away.
Delivering the keynote talk at the meeting, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said he had been maintaining good relations with the founding president of FOKANA (Federation of Kerala Associations in North America), a leading Malayali organisation in North America. He used to accompany the Chief Minister whenever he visited the US. 'During my last visit, he was unable to come due to poor health, and I had visited him in Chicago,' he remembered.
A native of Oachira in Kollam, He was a member of the Loka Kerala Sabha since its beginning and played a key role in coordinating support for Kerala during the COVID-19 period and the floods. Dr Anirudhan was also honoured with the Pravasi Bharatiya Samman.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First unit was to be commissioned by 2025: 14 yrs on, north India's first N-power plant in Haryana still hanging fire
First unit was to be commissioned by 2025: 14 yrs on, north India's first N-power plant in Haryana still hanging fire

Indian Express

time14 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

First unit was to be commissioned by 2025: 14 yrs on, north India's first N-power plant in Haryana still hanging fire

Fourteen years on, north India's first nuclear power plant, the Gorakhpur Haryana Anu Vidyut Pariyojana (GHAVP), the foundation stone for which was laid by former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, remains hanging fire, even though the initial target to commission the first unit was by 2025. Attributing the delay 'primarily to surprises in the soil conditions encountered during construction,' the Union government says the power plant is now slated for commissioning in 2031-32, that too in phased-manner, despite Prime Minister Narendra Modi's push to the nuclear energy sector — increasing the nuclear energy capacity by more than ten-fold by 2047 — in his Independence Day speech. The GHAVP was conceptualised around 2009-10, and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) subsequently identified Gorakhpur village in Haryana's Fatehabad district as a suitable site. Over the next few years, land acquisition, environmental clearances and public consultations were carried out amid some resistance from local farmers. The project formally took off after former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh laid the foundation stone on January 13, 2014. However, despite the ceremonial launch, actual construction was delayed due to administrative hurdles, compensation disputes, and procedural bottlenecks. Between 2014 and 2021, the project saw limited site development, and the Covid-19 pandemic further stalled progress. Major civil construction finally began in 2022, focusing on Phase I, which included two indigenous 700 MW PHWR reactors. But ground preparation challenges and technical issues pushed the timeline, breaching the initial target of commissioning the first unit by 2025. Officials privy to the development on the site say, 'Units 1 and 2 are expected to become operational by 2031, while Phase II (Units 3 and 4) has been projected for completion by 2032. Despite delays, the construction work has picked up pace, and the NPCIL and the Ministry of Power are now closely monitoring the project. Alongside technical development, environmental and community initiatives have also been introduced, including CSR Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities and large-scale tree plantations.' Congress's Rohtak MP Deepender Singh Hooda sought details about this nuclear power project from the government during the ongoing monsoon session of the Lok Sabha. Responding to Hooda's query last week, Union Minister of State for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and Prime Minister's Office Dr Jitendra Singh stated, 'The Gorakhpur Nuclear Power Project comprises of two twin units of 700 MW each, viz. GHAVP1&2 (2X700 MW) and GHAVP-3&4 (2X700 MW). The Government accorded administrative approval and financial sanction for the GHAVP-1&2 in February 2014. Presently, GHAVP-1&2 is under construction and is expected to be completed by 2031-32.' Giving details about the progress of the project, Dr Singh added, 'Excavation activities commenced in the year 2018. The site is a soil site with no hard rock. Therefore, technique of excavation and Ground improvement (GI) using compacted soil cement mix was carried out. This was followed by construction of foundation piles and their qualification. However, confirmatory geo technical investigations indicated some localised weak zones in soil strata. In view of this, a consultant of repute was roped in for resolution of the issue, who carried out comprehensive investigations and submitted recommendations for remediation, which is presently under review by the regulatory authority. The above stated process took significant time, leading to delay in start of construction of the Nuclear Island. However, award of work for equipment, major EPC packages and construction of other main plant building progressed.' About the current status of the project, Dr Singh added, 'In order to streamline the project activities, advance procurement of long manufacturing cycle equipment have been initiated. Accordingly major equipment have been ordered, some of which have also been received at site. All major equipment and works packages like Main Plant Civil Works, Nuclear Piping, Turbine Island, IDCT etc., have been awarded and works are in progress. Constant monitoring of progress of project activities at multiple levels, timely identification of constraints & making necessary mid-course corrections, frequent meetings with vendors/contractors and re-sequencing of construction activities to the extent possible, have also been taken. While work is in progress in the peripheral buildings/structures, the construction activities in the main nuclear island would be taken up in full swing once site specific ground improvement activities are concluded and regulatory clearance is obtained. The delay has been primarily due to surprises in the soil conditions encountered during construction.'

Lining up for take-off: Resumption of direct flights imminent, Indian and Chinese airlines prepare to reclaim market lost in 2020
Lining up for take-off: Resumption of direct flights imminent, Indian and Chinese airlines prepare to reclaim market lost in 2020

Indian Express

time14 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Lining up for take-off: Resumption of direct flights imminent, Indian and Chinese airlines prepare to reclaim market lost in 2020

With Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's recent visit to New Delhi, India and China appear to be one step closer to resuming direct flight connectivity between the two most populous countries in the world. With the exception of the Chinese special administrative region of Hong Kong, India and China have had no direct flights since early 2020, just before COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic. 'Both sides agreed to resume direct flight connectivity between Chinese mainland and India at the earliest, and finalize an updated Air Services Agreement. They also agreed on the facilitation of visas to tourists, businesses, media and other visitors in both directions,' India's Ministry of External Affairs said in a release late Tuesday. Although the two countries have not given a timeline yet on resumption of direct services, the evident signs of a thaw in the India-China relationship—notably at a time when New Delhi's relationship with Washington has hit a few roadblocks—has built the hope that normalisation of air connectivity between India and China is imminent. Direct flight connectivity between India and China was initially suspended due to the pandemic, which had brought much of the international flight operations to a grinding halt globally. As the India-China bilateral relationship soured following the standoff in Eastern Ladakh in 2020 and remained frigid over the subsequent years, direct flights between the two nations did not resume despite air connectivity returning to pre-pandemic levels globally. Resumption of direct flights and normalisation of visa issuances—demands China has been making over the past couple of years—had come up in Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri's discussions with Beijing during his China visit in January. At the time, the two countries had agreed 'in principle' to resume direct flights. In the preceding months, the matter featured in talks between foreign and aviation ministers of the two countries. Chinese and Indian airlines have been keenly watching the developments, and are now preparing for direct flights. Just last week, IndiGo's Chief Executive Officer Pieter Elbers had said that the carrier stands ready to resume direct flights to China as soon as the bilateral arrangements between the two countries allow. Chinese carriers, too, are eager to resume direct services, it is learnt. Lack of direct flights have led to high airfares and long travel times for those flying between India and China. According to industry insiders, airlines—Chinese as well as Indian—have been looking to restart direct flights, as there is high demand for travel between the two countries. Lack of direct air connectivity between India and mainland China, along with stringent visa restrictions, led to airlines from both countries losing out on potential passenger loads, and airlines operating from other Southeast Asian countries cashing in on the opportunity. Passenger traffic between India and China—currently solely through connecting hubs in South and Southeast Asia—is less than half of what it was in 2019. All of it is being catered to by airlines from regions like Singapore, Hong Kong, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam. To be sure, the Hong Kong airport is not exactly considered a Chinese airport due to Hong Kong's special autonomous status and a different visa regime than mainland China. It continues to be the leading connecting hub between India and mainland China. The normalisation of air connectivity between India and China would likely be beneficial for airlines from both countries. However, Beijing appears to believe that Chinese carriers stand to gain more, as they held the dominant share of the direct flight market before the pandemic. This perception likely explains why China has been encouraging India to permit the re-establishment of direct air connectivity and normalise visa issuances for Chinese nationals. Prior to the pandemic, specifically in December 2019, there were 539 scheduled direct flights per month between the two nations, offering a cumulative seat capacity of over 1.25 lakh. Of these, Indian carriers—IndiGo and Air India—accounted for 168 flights, or approximately 31 per cent. The remaining nearly 70 per cent of flights were operated by Chinese airlines, including Air China, China Eastern, China Southern, and Shandong Airlines. Despite this historical dominance, aviation industry observers do not necessarily anticipate that Chinese carriers will maintain such a significant share once direct flight connectivity is re-established. A lot has changed within the Indian aviation sector since 2019. Air India, now privatised and well-capitalised, has ambitions for rapid growth, particularly in the international market. Similarly, IndiGo, India's leading domestic carrier, is now more focused on expanding its international network.

Maria Zakharova and Karoline Leavitt: The Russian vs American battle of narratives through two powerful spokespersons
Maria Zakharova and Karoline Leavitt: The Russian vs American battle of narratives through two powerful spokespersons

Time of India

time37 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Maria Zakharova and Karoline Leavitt: The Russian vs American battle of narratives through two powerful spokespersons

In the complex world of global diplomacy and media, Maria Zakharova and Karoline Leavitt stand out as the commanding voices of Russia and the United States respectively. Each woman represents not just her government's official stance but shapes the information battlefield in a geopolitical rivalry defining the 21st century. Maria Zakharova has been the spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry since 2015, while Karoline Leavitt has served as the White House Press Secretary since 2024. The battle of narratives: Stark contrasts, shared challenges Zakharova and Leavitt symbolize the broader informational and ideological struggle between Russia and the US. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo Zakharova uses confrontational, sometimes theatrical messaging designed to assert Russian strength and resilience in the face of sanctions and international pressure. Her speeches often reflect narratives of defiance and sovereignty. In February 2022, Zakharova mockingly asked Western media when Russia's invasion of Ukraine would begin so she could 'plan [her] vacation' accordingly, ridiculing predictions of an imminent war. Live Events Leavitt represents democratic norms of diplomacy, emphasizing dialogue, coalition-building, and strategic restraint amid provocations. While less publicly controversial than Zakharova, Leavitt had wrongly claimed that Donald Trump actually won the 2020 presidential election and said there was "irregularities and chaos" caused by COVID-19 safety measures. Both spokespeople, however, face similar challenges—navigating a rapidly evolving media landscape where real-time information spread and social media amplify every word, and misinformation blurs lines between fact and perception. Maria Zakharova Born on December 24, 1975, in Moscow to Vladimir Zakharov, a Soviet and later Russian diplomat posted to Beijing, where Maria spent much of her early childhood and mother Irina Zakharova, an art historian. Zakharova graduated in 1998 from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO), specializing in international journalism and oriental studies. Rising steadily in Russia's Foreign Ministry, she became the main spokeswoman in 2015, the Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. She is first woman to lead the department of information and press. Known for her sharp, forceful rhetoric and straightforward approach, Zakharova's comments are strategically crafted not only to defend Russia's position but also to wield influence domestically and globally. Her public statements align closely with Kremlin priorities: opposing NATO expansion, justifying Russia's actions in Ukraine, and criticizing Western sanctions . Her confrontational and theatrical style is designed to rally domestic and allied support and push back against Western narratives. Karoline Leavitt Karoline Claire Leavitt, born August 24, 1997, in New Hampshire, comes from a modest background. Her family owned a small ice cream stand and a used truck dealership. She attended Central Catholic High School in Lawrence, Massachusetts, and later earned a bachelor's degree in politics and communications from Saint Anselm College in 2019. Leavitt interned at Fox News during the 2016 election cycle and served as a presidential writer and assistant press secretary in Donald Trump's first 2024, she became the youngest ever White House Press Secretary. The US agenda, as represented by Leavitt, stresses the promotion of democracy, multilateral cooperation, and measured responses to conflicts. Leavitt's communication style contrasts with Zakharova's fiery rhetoric. She emphasizes measured, diplomatic language, often focusing on engagement and dialogue, particularly regarding contentious issues like the Ukraine war . Leavitt supports a stance of avoiding direct military intervention while promoting security guarantees for allies and diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts. More than just spokespersons Zakharova and Leavitt are more than mere government mouthpieces. They serve as crucial actors in a global drama where narratives influence policy, alliances, and public opinion. Their contrasting styles illuminate how two superpowers perceive and project their values and interests, revealing that in modern geopolitics, battles are won not only through military or economic might but through the power of communication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store