Omada Health IPO signals healthier market, avoids 'down-round' trend
The IPO market is starting to feel healthier.
Omada Health, a 14-year-old company providing virtual care for chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension between office visits, closed its first trading day on Friday at $23 a share, a 21% jump from the IPO price of $19.
The IPO valued the company just above $1 billion (excluding employee options), a figure that's nearly identical to Omada's last private valuation of $1 billion set in its previous VC round. The debut is one of the first among recent IPOs that was not a so-called down-round. Many of the latest public listings, including Hinge, ServiceTitan, and Reddit, priced below their private market highs, though have faired well as public companies.
For founder and CEO Sean Duffy, the successful public offering validates his decision to start a company that he believed the market desperately needed. In 2011, he dropped out of Harvard Medical School after realizing that chronic illness patients required more continuous support than the existing healthcare system delivered.
Before the offering, he owned 4.1% of the company, according to Omada's offering document. Other significant shareholders included Revelation Partners (10.9%), US Venture Partners (9.9%), Andreessen Horowitz (9.6%), and FMR (9.3%).
Duffy told TechCrunch that over his 14-year journey as a founder, he had many harrowing moments.
"I didn't think our series A was going to come together because we were working on this commercial deal that didn't materialize, and that spooked one investor," he said.
"As a young business, something tries to kill you every month," he continued. "And then as the business grows, it turns into like every quarter or six months, year, two years."
One of the recent challenges for many digital health businesses is navigating the "collapse" of the market post-COVID boom. Omada steered through the turbulent times by seeking new, rising markets. It recently expanded its offerings to include diet management support for GLP-1 patients.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: What we know about 'Big Beautiful Bill' banning states from regulating AI for 10 years
Claim: H.R. 1, commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, contains a provision that bans states from regulating artificial intelligence for 10 years. Rating: Context: If the "Big Beautiful Bill" becomes law, states and local governments would be unable to enforce any regulations on AI systems and models involved in interstate commerce for 10 years. There are exceptions for any laws or regulations that facilitate the rollout, operations or adoption of AI models and systems. A budget bill that Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives passed on May 22, 2025, allegedly bans all 50 states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade, according to claims shared on social media in early June. As the Senate prepared to take up H.R. 1, more commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, people online expressed their concerns about the alleged AI-related provisions in the legislation. For example, one X user shared this claim (archived) on June 2, 2025: Similar claims also appeared in Facebook (archived) posts (archived) around the same time. Snopes reviewed the text of H.R. 1 and found a provision that bans states from regulating AI systems "entered into interstate commerce" for 10 years in Section 43201 of the bill. Paragraph (c) in that section outlines the 10-year moratorium on states' AI regulation: (1) In general. – Except as provided in paragraph (2), no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, any law or regulation of that State or a political subdivision thereof limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce. In other words, if the bill becomes law, states and local governments will be blocked from enforcing any regulations on AI systems and models that are involved in interstate commerce for 10 years. The phrase "interstate commerce" broadly refers to business or activity that crosses state lines. But in the context of this bill, the distinction likely doesn't mean much. As a result, we've rated the claim mostly true. The Supreme Court has said activities that happen entirely within one state can still count as interstate commerce if they have a significant enough impact on the national economy, as David Brody, a civil rights and technology legal expert, explained in an article for Tech Policy Press published on May 27, 2025. That means many AI systems would likely be subject to the federal rules if H.R. 1 passes. However, there are some exceptions to the 10-year moratorium on states' AI regulation — notably for any laws or regulations that facilitate the rollout, operations or adoption of AI models and systems, according to the bill text. Snopes reached out to the White House and the office of U.S. Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, who introduced H.R. 1, for comment about the 10-year moratorium on states regulating AI and the purpose of including it in the bill, and is awaiting responses. Multiple Republican lawmakers have voiced support for the 10-year moratorium, with some saying a patchwork of state laws doesn't support innovation and others stressing the importance of a federal approach to AI regulation. But other federal and state lawmakers as well as watchdog groups have strongly opposed the proposed rule over concerns about limiting states' ability to deal with potential harms caused by AI. For example, U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said in an X post on June 3, 2025, that she "did not know about" the section of H.R. 1 that bans states from regulating AI for a decade, adding that she is "adamantly opposed" to the provision. Hundreds of state lawmakers across the political spectrum also signed a letter addressed to the U.S. House and Senate on June 3, 2025, expressing "strong opposition" to the 10-year moratorium on AI regulation. The letter read in part, "The proposed 10-year freeze of state and local regulation of AI and automated decision systems would cut short democratic discussion of AI policy in the states with a sweeping moratorium that threatens to halt a broad array of laws and restrict policymakers from responding to emerging issues." Nearly two weeks earlier, a coalition of advocacy organizations, including Common Sense Media, Fairplay and Encode, also called on congressional leaders to oppose the provision, writing in part that AI companies would have "no rules, no accountability and total control" if it were to take effect. In a letter dated May 21, 2025, the groups wrote: As written, the provision is so broad it would block states from enacting any AI-related legislation, including bills addressing hyper-sexualized AI companions, social media recommendation algorithms, protections for whistleblowers, and more. It ties lawmakers' hands for a decade, sidelining policymakers and leaving families on their own as they face risks and harms that emerge with this fast-evolving technology in the years to come. Discussions about AI companions and possible issues arising from their use have gained prominence in recent months. For example, research from Drexel University in Philadelphia suggests that inappropriate behavior, including sexual harassment, during conversations with AI chatbots is "becoming a widespread problem," the university said on May 5, 2025. Consumer Reports, another advocacy organization, also raised concerns about states being unable to deal with a variety of issues that AI technology poses, including sexually explicit images, audio and video created without a person's consent. Snopes has previously looked into other claims about the "Big Beautiful Bill," including whether it contains a provision allowing the U.S. president to delay or cancel elections. Arrington, Jodey. "Text - H.R.1 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): One Big Beautiful Bill Act." 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025. Brody, David. "The Big Beautiful Bill Could Decimate Legal Accountability for Tech and Anything Tech Touches." Tech Policy Press, 27 May 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025. Cornell Law School. "Commerce Clause." Legal Information Institute, 18 Sept. 2018, Accessed 4 June 2025. Hendrix, Justin. "Transcript: US House Subcommittee Hosts Hearing on 'AI Regulation and the Future of US Leadership.'" Tech Policy Press, 21 May 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025. Open letter from consumer advocacy organizations to congressional leadership. Common Sense Media, 21 May 2025, Accessed 4 June 2025.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Crypto Currents: Strategy buys more bitcoin
As bitcoin, ethereum and other cryptocurrencies get increasing attention from investors, Wall Street and its traditional banks continue to adjust to the shift. Catch up on this week's top stories highlighting the intersection of these old guard and new school areas of finance with this recap compiled by The Fly. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter STRATEGY BUYS MORE BITCOIN: Strategy (MSTR) announced updates on Monday with respect to its at-the-market offering programs and bitcoin holdings. The company purchased 705 bitcoin during the period of May 26 to June 1 at an aggregate purchase price of $75.1M. Strategy now holds 580,955 bitcoin. TRUMP MEDIA FILES REGISTRATION STATEMENT FOR BITCOIN ETF: On Thursday, Trump Media and Technology Group (DJT) announced the filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of the initial registration statement on Form S-1 for the Truth Social Bitcoin ETF. The ETF will hold bitcoin directly and offer its shares to investors, aiming to reflect bitcoin's price performance. will act as the ETF's exclusive bitcoin custodian, prime execution agent and liquidity provider. The launch of the Truth Social Bitcoin ETF is pending effectiveness of the Registration Statement as well as approval of a Form 19b-4 filing with the SEC. Upon launch, the Shares will be listed on NYSE Arca. Yorkville America Digital acts as the sponsor of the ETF. Additionally on Thursday, Trump Media announced it has filed a registration statement on form S-3 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission related to debt and equity subscription agreements recently entered into with approximately fifty investors that yielded approximately $2.3B in total proceeds. The proceeds will be used for the company's creation of a bitcoin treasury and for general corporate purposes. In accordance with registration obligations in the previously-disclosed agreements, the Registration Statement seeks to register for resale by the investors approximately 56M shares of equity and 29M shares underlying convertible notes. Additionally, having recently become form S-3 eligible, Trump Media is taking the customary step of including within the Registration Statement a universal shelf. CEO Devin Nunes said, 'These activities will provide the company with the capital, assets, independence, flexibility, and security we need to fulfill our goals of rapid expansion, guaranteeing a wide array of ways to access the capital markets when it's most advantageous to do so. We're systematically putting in place all the elements we need to grow the company according to our plans, acquire crown jewel assets, and draw more customers and users into the patriot economy.' MAWSON INFRASTRUCTURE APPOINTS INTERIM CEO: In a Thursday regulatory filing, Mawson Infrastructure Group (MIGI) reported it had provided Rahul Mewawalla with notice that termination of his employment as CEO and President of the company for 'Cause', based on conduct specified in the notice, will be considered at a future meeting of the company's Board of Directors, at which the Board will determine whether his conduct constitutes Cause sufficient to terminate Mewawalla in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement. Mewawalla's employment agreement with the company provides for a cure period, which will end on June 14. On June 2, the Board determined to place Mewawalla on administrative leave from his position as CEO and President and appointed Kaliste Saloom to serve as Interim CEO. Saloom has served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since July 1, 2024. HUT 8 INITIATED WITH BUY: On Thursday, Roth Capital initiated coverage of Hut 8 (HUT) with a Buy rating and $25 price target. Hut 8 is transforming into a power-first digital infrastructure platform, with 1.0GW energized, 2.6GW under exclusivity, and long-term growth visibility from bitcoin hosting and high-performance computing colocation, the analyst said. The firm added three HPC sites position the company to benefit from artificial intelligence demand, offering 60%-plus adjusted EBITDA margins. The combination of highly visible colocation agreements in bitcoin and HPC provides Hut 8 a strategic advantage, leading to margin expansion and re-rating potential with strategic execution, contended Roth. ANALYST CALLS GAMESTOP, STRATEGY VALUATION DISPARITY 'BAFFLING': On Thursday, Wedbush reiterated an Underperform rating on GameStop (GME) with a $13.50 price target after the company last week disclosed that it purchased 4,710 bitcoin, 'following the MicroStrategy playbook.' However, Strategy currently trades 1.75-times its bitcoin holdings, while GameStop trades at 2.4-times cash value, suggesting that investors value GameStop's entry into bitcoin at the same premium they assign to Strategy shares, but value GameStop's core operations at $8 per share, the analyst said. The firm added that while it is likely GameStop will convert more of its cash into bitcoin, the disparity in valuation between company and Strategy 'is baffling.' Both companies provide bitcoin investors the ability to use margin to invest in crypto, but GameStop's holdings 'are literally 1% as great as MSTR's,' according to Wedbush. The firm believes GameStop's entry into the trading card business has delivered 'modest success,' but it sees no potential for a rebound in the company's core business. OTHER CRYPTO NEWS: Bitcoin Depot (BTM) price target raised to $6 from $5 at Northland Riot Platforms (RIOT) hires Jonathan Gibbs as Chief Data Center Officer Trump's USD1 (JPM) to offer clients financing against crypto ETFs World Liberty Financial reportedly sends cease-and-desist over memecoin CRYPTO STOCK PLAYS: Publicly traded companies in the space include Bit Digital (BTBT), Coinbase (COIN), Core Scientific (CORZ), Greenidge Generation (GREE), Mara Holdings (MARA), Strategy, Riot Platforms and TeraWulf (WULF). PRICE ACTION: As of time of writing, bitcoin dropped roughly 1% this week to $104,449 in U.S. dollars, according to CoinDesk. Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on MSTR: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Strategy Announces Underwriting Agreement with Barclays World Liberty Financial sends cease-and-desist over memecoin, Bloomberg reports GameStop and Strategy valuation disparity 'baffling,' says Wedbush Stablecoin Issuer Circle (CRCL) Soars 235% in Market Debut JPMorgan to offer clients financing against crypto ETFs, Bloomberg reports Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Trump's DOT Threatens to Pull Funding for California's High-Speed Rail
California's long-promised high-speed train project, first approved in 2008, has hit lots of roadblocks in its development process, and now it may be looking at the end of the road. The Trump administration's Department of Transportation released a report this week that does not paint a pretty picture of the project, and DOT head Sean Duffy has given California just over a month to respond to concerns or face having $4 billion in government funding rescinded, according to Reuters. The threat to cut off California follows a 315-page report published by the Federal Railroad Administration that claims California has missed several deadlines related to the high-speed rail and has failed to identify how it will secure $7 billion in funding to build a segment of rail between Merced and Bakersfield, California, which it needs to secure by next summer in order for the project to move forward. The report concludes, in quite Trumpian language, that California 'conned the taxpayer out of its $4 billion investment, with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time.' The Department of Transportation gave California until mid-July to respond to the report, threatening to terminate federal contracts if it fails to sufficiently address concerns raised in the report. The California High-Speed Rail Authority called the report 'misguided,' according to a report from the Los Angeles Times, and said it will issue a formal response soon. 'We remain firmly committed to completing the nation's first true high-speed rail system connecting the major population centers in the state,' a spokesperson for the agency said. Trump has been on California's ass about the rail project basically since he returned to office. His administration launched a yet-to-be-completed review of a $3.1 billion federal grant to help fund construction back in February, and last month he singled out the project during a joint appearance with Prime Minister Mark Carney of Canada, stating, 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' and 'This government is not going to pay.' The scrutiny from Trump and company isn't exactly a surprise to officials involved in the high-speed rail's buildout, as officials signaled earlier this year that there may be funding shortfalls from the federal government on the horizon. And while plenty of people are frustrated by how long the California rail project has taken to come together and how much it costs, the federal government really is not on the hook for that much of it. Per the LA Times, California has paid for 82% of the project, relying on federal grants for just 18% of funding. While California's high-speed rail has had plenty of issues—mostly inflicted by politics—the 'train to nowhere' label that it often gets hit with no longer matches the picture on the ground. More than 119 miles of rail have been laid between Merced and Bakersfield, and the project is close enough to completion that abandoning it at this point would be more wasteful than finishing it, especially with communities along the route expecting a potential economic boom once it is up and running. But good luck telling that to Trump (and Elon Musk who has opposed it from the beginning).
