Air India Plane Crash Survivor Faces Scepticism After Video Of Him Getting Out Of Wreckage Emerges
Ramesh, 40, who lives in London with his wife and child, was visiting India with his brother when tragedy struck. His brother Ajay did not survive. The two were on board flight AI171, which crashed shortly after take-off on June 12, hitting a medical school hostel in Ahmedabad.
'I saw that I was alive, so I tried to open my seat belt, and I was able to get out,' Ramesh told Indian state broadcaster Doordarshan TV from his hospital bed. Seated in an emergency row, he said the door was already damaged. 'My seat was broken, the door was broken. I saw an opening, so I just got out.' Scepticism Over Survival
While some have called his survival a miracle, others are still struggling to believe it. After footage emerged showing Ramesh walking from the wreckage with only minor injuries from the crash site, questions quickly flooded online platforms.
'Not having it 1 bit that this guy, the only survivor of the crash has just casually walked out away from that gigantic fireball with black smoke everywhere with 1 scar on his face' one user asked on X. Another wrote, '240 People Died and This Guy Walked Away With a Few Scratches.'
Several commenters speculated whether Ramesh could have been off the plane before impact or involved in some other way. At the same time, some conspiracy theories have even suggested the crash might have had a pre-determined narrative.
What's more, the reported scorching temperature of the crash site, more than 2000 degrees fahrenheit, makes it impossible to believe that Ramesh got out with hardly a scorch mark.
A chilling new video has emerged from the site of the devastating Air India Flight AI-171 crash, showing Vishwash Kumar Ramesh — the sole survivor of the tragedy — walking away from the smouldering wreckage with smoke billowing behind him. pic.twitter.com/Xln3BgmdIr — STELLA (@BrownKhaleesi) June 16, 2025
Others, however, have pushed back, urging people not to jump to conclusions. 'Miracles happen, and sometimes people survive impossible situations,' one comment read.
Despite the speculation, doctors treating Ramesh confirmed he suffered only minor injuries, cuts and bruises, but nothing life-threatening. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who visited the hospital to meet with victims' families, also spoke briefly with Ramesh during his stay. A Gruelling Search for Victims
As Ramesh recovers, the task of identifying victims continues. Officials say 241 of the dead were passengers and crew on board, with dozens more killed inside a medical hostel the plane crashed into shortly after take-off.
The fire that followed the crash reached extreme temperatures up to 1,500°C, according to forensic experts making identification difficult. 'These high temperatures affect the DNA present in various parts of the body,' said H.P. Sanghvi, director of Gandhinagar Forensic Science Laboratory. 'The entire process is being carried out 24/7.'
According to Indian media, 80 victims have been identified so far and the process of handling bodies back to the families have started. Questions Remain Over What Went Wrong
Meanwhile, investigators are now focused on probing the aircraft's black boxes to determine what led to the crash. Ramesh told media that moments after take-off, 'the plane was stuck in the air.'
A mayday call was made by the pilot shortly before the crash, but without flight data and cockpit recordings, it's unclear whether the tragedy was due to mechanical failure, pilot error, or something else. The Missed Flight That Saved a Life
While Ramesh has been making headlines for his near death encounter and miracolous survival, stories of near-misses have also come to light.
Bhoomi Chauhan, 28, was supposed to be on flight AI171 but arrived ten minutes late due to traffic. Initially frustrated at being denied boarding, she is now thankful. 'I told them I'm only ten minutes late... but they did not allow me,' she told the BBC. 'I was very disappointed.' Her frustration has since turned into relief.
Meanwhile, Ramesh is reportedly expected to be released from hospital within days. But while his physical injuries are minor, the emotional trauma remains heavy as he has to now return to London without his brother, carrying the burden of survival.
Originally published on IBTimes UK
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
25-07-2025
- DW
India: Collapsed roof in Rajasthan school kills children – DW – 07/25/2025
Some 40 children, apart from teachers and staff members, were in the school building in India's Rajasthan, when the roof collapsed, killing at least four children. At least four children have been killed and dozens others feared trapped as the roof of a school building collapsed in India's western state of Rajasthan on Friday. The news was reported by local Indian media newspaper Indian Express and television channel NDTV. The incident occured at the Piplodi Government School around 8:30 am, as per NDTV's report. It cited officials saying around 40 children, in addition to teachers and staff members, were inside when the roof of the one-storied building collapsed.
DW
15-07-2025
- DW
Air India crash: Boeing aircraft in the spotlight – DW – 07/15/2025
India and South Korea have ordered comprehensive checks of Boeing aircraft following the Ahmedabad crash which killed 260 people. A preliminary report indicates fuel switches moving to cutoff position just before impact. The US aircraft manufacturer Boeing finds itself in focus of an international controversy once again, with India and South Korea ordering fuel switch inspections for Boeing jets after a 787-8 Dreamliner crashed in Ahmedabad last month. Individual airlines in Japan and Singapore started their own checks as a precaution, according to the Reuters news agency. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The London-bound Boeing jet collided with a structure just minutes after takeoff. The crash killed 19 people on the ground and all but one of the 242 people onboard the aircraft. Indian officials are still trying to determine the cause of the tragedy. However, the nation's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) published a preliminary report this week claiming that the fuel switches for both of the plane's engines moved to the "CUTOFF" position almost immediately after takeoff, starving the engines of fuel. It is not yet known if this was done by one of the pilots or happened due to any mechanical faults. While the 15-page report does not provide a full transcript of the pilots' conversation, the authorities shared a snippet indicating confusion in the cockpit. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," AIIB officials said. The report also notes that fuel switches moved to "RUN" seconds later. One of the engines apparently started cycling toward recovery, while the other continued to struggle. This was not enough to maintain flight and the plane crashed after spending less than a minute in the air. Commenting on the preliminary report, aviation expert Sanjay Lazar who has worked with Air India for 37 years, said that the document "raises more questions" than it provides answers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He also said it was "regrettable" that the full transcript from the cockpit has not been shared with the public. The AAIB-provided note on the pilots' conversation indicates that "either none of them cut it off and it got cut off some other way, or you know, there was some element of subterfuge. So it adds a cloud of mystery over that," he told DW. With the focus of the probe moving onto Boeing's fuel intake controls, Lazar pointed to two directives issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) possibly relating to the issue. The first, non-mandatory directive in 2018 had FAA warning that these fuel switches could have a fault and advising supervisory bodies to check them. The second one in 2022, however, was mandatory — and it focused on engine fire control panel and engine fire control switches. According to Lazar, the FAA said checks were necessary due to reports that foreign object debris "may have been introduced during maintenance or rework" of certain units, with one of the risks associated with it being an "uncommanded activation of the engine fuel shutoff." Air India admitted not following up on the first, non-mandatory directive. It was not immediately clear if the airline took action on the 2022 order. Air India also said its maintenance records for the crashed jet showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2023. However, "the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch," the AAIB said in their preliminary report. In recent days, news agencies reported that Boeing was assuring airlines its fuel switch locks were safe. According to a media reports, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson issued an internal memo on Monday acknowledging that the preliminary AAIB report "provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." "I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Wilson also said all mandatory maintenance and checks were completed on the Boeing aircraft. "There was no issue with the quality of fuel and no abnormality with the take-off roll. The pilots had passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyser and there were no observations pertaining to their medical status," he said in the note. On Tuesday, Singapore Airlines said it had completed the inspection of its 787 fleet, including planes used by its low-cost subsidiary Scoot, and confirmed all were functioning properly. Germany's Lufthansa group also said it rechecked fuel switches on its own 787s in the wake of the Air India crash, and found no faults. Indian officials are due to submit their findings regarding fuel switches by next Monday. The final report on the crash, however, is likely to take a full year or longer. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Meanwhile, the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA India) requested to be included as observers to provide "the requisite transparency" in the official probe. "We feel that the investigation is being driven in a direction presuming the guilt of pilots and we strongly object to this line of thought," ALPA India president Sam Thomas said in a statement issued over the weekend. Whatever the outcome of India's and other probes, the latest Boeing crash is likely to further degrade the already shaky reputation of the US airspace giant. Boeing has been struggling to recover from two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019, both of them involving 737 Max jets. While multiple factors contributed to both tragedies, both of them were linked to the plane's Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), which is designed to automatically push the plane's nose down if it detects a danger of stalling. Between the 2019 crash and the latest incident in India, Boeing aircraft were involved in a series of smaller midair emergencies, such as a door ripping off of an Alaska Airlines 737 Max-9 in January 2024, or a 787 suddenly dropping during flight and leaving some 50 people injured in March 2024. Some two months later, one person died when a Boeing 777 hit turbulence while flying from London to Singapore. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Multiple whilstleblowers have also publicly raised concerns about production issues and alleged safety gaps in Boeing's production process, though achieving clarity on the complaints has proven to be difficult. In March 2024, a Boeing former employee who had recently been giving evidence against the company in a whistleblower suit died of what police later said was a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Weeks later, another whistleblower passed away after a short illness, after coming down with a fast-spreading infection and developing pneumonia.
DW
15-07-2025
- DW
Air India crash: Boeing fuel in the spotlight – DW – 07/15/2025
India and South Korea have ordered comprehensive checks of Boeing aircraft following the Ahmedabad crash which killed 260 people. A preliminary report indicates fuel switches moving to cutoff position just before impact. The US aircraft manufacturer Boeing finds itself in focus of an international controversy once again, with India and South Korea ordering fuel switch inspections for Boeing jets after a 787-8 Dreamliner crashed in Ahmedabad last month. Individual airlines in Japan and Singapore started their own checks as a precaution, according to the Reuters news agency. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The London-bound Boeing jet collided with a structure just minutes after takeoff. The crash killed 19 people on the ground and all but one of the 242 people onboard the aircraft. Indian officials are still trying to determine the cause of the tragedy. However, the nation's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) published a preliminary report this week claiming that the fuel switches for both of the plane's engines moved to the "CUTOFF" position almost immediately after takeoff, starving the engines of fuel. It is not yet known if this was done by one of the pilots or happened due to any mechanical faults. While the 15-page report does not provide a full transcript of the pilots' conversation, the authorities shared a snippet indicating confusion in the cockpit. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," AIIB officials said. The report also notes that fuel switches moved to "RUN" seconds later. One of the engines apparently started cycling toward recovery, while the other continued to struggle. This was not enough to maintain flight and the plane crashed after spending less than a minute in the air. Commenting on the preliminary report, aviation expert Sanjay Lazar who has worked with Air India for 37 years, said that the document "raises more questions" than it provides answers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He also said it was "regrettable" that the full transcript from the cockpit has not been shared with the public. The AAIB-provided note on the pilots' conversation indicates that "either none of them cut it off and it got cut off some other way, or you know, there was some element of subterfuge. So it adds a cloud of mystery over that," he told DW. With the focus of the probe moving onto Boeing's fuel intake controls, Lazar pointed to two directives issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) possibly relating to the issue. The first, non-mandatory directive in 2018 had FAA warning that these fuel switches could have a fault and advising supervisory bodies to check them. The second one in 2022, however, was mandatory — and it focused on engine fire control panel and engine fire control switches. According to Lazar, the FAA said checks were necessary due to reports that foreign object debris "may have been introduced during maintenance or rework" of certain units, with one of the risks associated with it being an "uncommanded activation of the engine fuel shutoff." Air India admitted not following up on the first, non-mandatory directive. It was not immediately clear if the airline took action on the 2022 order. Air India also said its maintenance records for the crashed jet showed that the throttle control module, which includes the fuel switches, was replaced in 2023. However, "the reason for the replacement was not linked to the fuel control switch," the AAIB said in their preliminary report. In recent days, news agencies reported that Boeing was assuring airlines its fuel switch locks were safe. According to a media reports, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson issued an internal memo on Monday acknowledging that the preliminary AAIB report "provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." "I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Wilson also said all mandatory maintenance and checks were completed on the Boeing aircraft. "There was no issue with the quality of fuel and no abnormality with the take-off roll. The pilots had passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyser and there were no observations pertaining to their medical status," he said in the note. On Tuesday, Singapore Airlines said it had completed the inspection of its 787 fleet, including planes used by its low-cost subsidiary Scoot, and confirmed all were functioning properly. Germany's Lufthansa group also said it rechecked fuel switches on its own 787s in the wake of the Air India crash, and found no faults. Indian officials are due to submit their findings regarding fuel switches by next Monday. The final report on the crash, however, is likely to take a full year or longer. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Meanwhile, the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA India) requested to be included as observers to provide "the requisite transparency" in the official probe. "We feel that the investigation is being driven in a direction presuming the guilt of pilots and we strongly object to this line of thought," ALPA India president Sam Thomas said in a statement issued over the weekend. Whatever the outcome of India's and other probes, the latest Boeing crash is likely to further degrade the already shaky reputation of the US airspace giant. Boeing has been struggling to recover from two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019, both of them involving 737 Max jets. While multiple factors contributed to both tragedies, both of them were linked to the plane's Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), which is designed to automatically push the plane's nose down if it detects a danger of stalling. Between the 2019 crash and the latest incident in India, Boeing aircraft were involved in a series of smaller midair emergencies, such as a door ripping off of an Alaska Airlines 737 Max-9 in January 2024, or a 787 suddenly dropping during flight and leaving some 50 people injured in March 2024. Some two months later, one person died when a Boeing 777 hit turbulence while flying from London to Singapore. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Multiple whilstleblowers have also publicly raised concerns about production issues and alleged safety gaps in Boeing's production process, though achieving clarity on the complaints has proven to be difficult. In March 2024, a Boeing former employee who had recently been giving evidence against the company in a whistleblower suit died of what police later said was a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Weeks later, another whistleblower passed away after a short illness, after coming down with a fast-spreading infection and developing pneumonia.
