HMRC set to punish UK households who 'didn't realise'
The standard Inheritance Tax rate is 40%. It's only charged on the part of your estate that's above the threshold.
Here is an example: Your estate is worth £500,000 and your tax-free threshold is £325,000. The Inheritance Tax charged will be 40% of £175,000 (£500,000 minus £325,000).
Teachers! Need some inspiration for your next lesson? 📢
Tax Facts is a free #TeacherResource to help pupils aged 8-17 understand the UK tax system.
Visit the link below to download ready to use lesson plans, videos and activity sheets. ⬇️https://t.co/6FsKEfH99P pic.twitter.com/ZvaKzo7683 — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) August 9, 2025
Lorraine Wilson, principal associate in the private wealth team at national law firm Weightmans, warned that ever more people are being dragged into paying the tax "without realising it".
Ms Wilson said: "Someone giving away assets late in life may not realise that gifts made within seven years of death can still be taxed."
Ms Wilson said it is important to take "early action" to get your estate in order and think about your inheritance tax liability.
Recommended reading:
"For those whose wealth is tied up in property or investments, there are structured options like trusts or family investment companies.
"These can help you pass wealth down the generations while keeping some flexibility."
Last year, HMRC collected a record £7.5 billion from IHT. That figure is expected to grow, especially as more people are pulled into the tax bracket simply because of rising property values.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
HMRC to tax pensions of workers who die before pension age
HMRC has now confirmed that death duties will still be charged even if the worker died before they could spend any of their retirement savings. Under current rules that would mean pensions would be taxed at up to 40% if they are part of an estate that exceeds the inheritance tax threshold - currently £325,000. But, as Martin Lewis explained in a video, posted on his Twitter feed, Inheritance Tax is paid by relatively few people: "This is a tax there are so many misunderstandings about. Most people, when they die, their estates will not pay inheritance tax. This is primarily a tax that only affects the most affluent households." Near retirement? There's a huge tax trap to avoid when withdrawing from a pension. This is my simple video analogy but always get 1-on-1 free guidance from PensionWise first. This is just a titbit, watch my full Pension special on: — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) January 29, 2025 And Paul Barham, Tax Partner at Forvis Mazars says that many are using the allowances up until any rule changes to Inheritance Tax (IHT) occur: "Pensions can be a valuable tool when passing down wealth because they sit outside your estate for IHT purposes and as of April 2023, the lifetime allowance has been removed, so there is no limit on how much you can save over your lifetime. "If you have assets inside and out of a pension plan, you'll want to consider when to draw down from your pension and whether to also consider using non-pension assets to meet the full cost of everyday life." He adds: "Inheritance planning is notoriously complex. But there are advantages to starting earlier than you think is necessary. Seek the support of an adviser that you trust and one that you think will have your best interests at heart. While no one really wants to think about the need to pass on wealth, it can be of great benefit to your loved ones to get plans in place early." Recommended reading: Any changes - even if they only hit the wealthiest taxpayers - have not been popular with the Conservatives. Speaking to reporters on the Isle of Wight, leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'Unemployment is up, growth is down, inflation is up, cost of living is putting a real squeeze on people's pockets. 'And it's because of Rachel Reeves's budget last year. I'm very worried about what's going to come in the next budget. 'We're seeing tax rises, even taxes on pensions, as potential solutions'
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Inheritance Tax impact on your family explained as more changes 'being considered'
Inheritance Tax is sometimes paid on the 'estate' of someone that has died, including property, possessions and money - but how exactly does it affect you? Rachel Reeves could be set to introduce more changes to Inheritance Tax, a report claims, including a possible cap on lifetime gifting. Under current rules, if someone lives for more than seven years after making a gift, then this transfer is not subject to Inheritance Tax. If the gift is given three to seven years before your death, then it is taxed on a sliding scale known as "taper relief" which starts at 32%. This cap would limit the amount of money or value of assets an individual can donate, while the Treasury is also said to be looking at potential changes to the "taper relief" for lifetime gifting. A Treasury spokesperson told The Mirror: 'As set out in the Plan for Change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. 'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last Autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of Income Tax, employee National Insurance, or VAT.' The vast majority of families do not end up paying Inheritance Tax when a loved one dies, due to exemptions that are in place. However, there are changes that have already been announced and that will come into force over the next few years, including making it so pensions are subject to Inheritance Tax. What is Inheritance Tax? Inheritance Tax is sometimes paid on the "estate" of someone that has died - this includes property, possessions and money. As we've mentioned above, Inheritance Tax is only due for wealth transferred within seven years of death. Inheritance Tax is also only due if the value of your estate is above £325,000 - although this can actually often be much higher depending on who you leave your estate to. For example, there is no Inheritance Tax to pay when an estate is left to your spouse or civil partner. If you give away your home to your children - this includes adopted, foster or stepchildren, or your grandchildren - then the Inheritance Tax threshold can increase to £500,000. This includes the basic £325,000 allowance, plus an additional £175,000. If you are married or in a civil partnership, any Inheritance Tax allowance that isn't used can be passed on when someone dies. This means a couple can potentially pass on as much as £1million without their estate being subject to Inheritance Tax. If your estate is subject to Inheritance Tax, then the standard rate is 40%. There are ways to reduce how much Inheritance Tax is paid on your estate. Your rate of Inheritance Tax on some assets is reduced from 40% to 36% if you leave at least 10% of the net value after any deductions to a charity in your will. Inheritance Tax changes that have already been announced Inheritance Tax may be due on pensions you inherit from April 2027. At present, if you inherit a pension from someone who died before the age of 75, then there is no tax to pay. If the person dies after the age of 75, then you pay Income Tax when you draw from the inherited pension, as it will be treated as income. But from April 2027, inherited pensions will be subject to Inheritance Tax and included in the "estate" of someone who has died. Death in service payments will not be liable for Inheritance Tax.
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Kemi is wrong, we do need a land value tax
Inheritance tax has long been considered Britain's most hated duty. But in recent years, I think there's been a serious challenger to this opprobrious title: council tax. Year after year, we pay more and more, and receive less and less in return. The system is dated, its invention was rushed and it seems to be a sticking plaster for the mistakes of incompetent councils. In highlighting the miserable state of this tax, Kemi Badenoch is right. The constant rises are cynical, and they are a raid on 'the very people who keep this country going'. But in her recent attack on land value tax – the idea of charging duty proportionally on the land under your home – she has revealed a fatal misunderstanding. When she wrote on Sunday in opposition to the idea, she implicitly stated she believes it is more important whether your ancestors were friends of William the Conqueror, as the former Duke of Westminster said of his landowning wealth, rather than what you do in your own life. Gerald Grosvenor acknowledged that his enormous fortune – he died as the third wealthiest man in the UK – was owed to his forebear, Hugh d'Avranches, being a chum of the invading Norman (along with, of course, centuries of astute management) who divvied up the nation. At its heart, whether it is fairer to pay tax on earned or unearned income is the difference between a land value tax and our current system of income, dividends, capital gains, inheritance and corporation taxes, to name but a few. Most famously proposed by 19th century economist, Henry George, what has become known as the land value tax was an attempt to envision a fairer and more efficient tax system – one based on paying dues for what you did not and cannot create, rather than that which you do. In essence, land is immutable. It was here before us, and will be after us, so who can really claim to be owed economic recompense from it? The house you build upon it, the farm you till, the mine you dig, however, are all derived directly from your ingenuity and effort. We have every right to be rewarded financially for this, and why should anyone else get a penny of our efforts? It is also well evidenced that the more you tax something, the less we bother with that thing. If I'm going to work 50 hours and the Government is taking 25 hours' pay, I may as well just work 40 hours and still take home pay for 20. Of course, everybody loses in this scenario. Land, again, is immutable – tax it, and it's not going anywhere. In fact, to tax land and not the efforts upon it, encourages entrepreneurialism. If you're going to be paying to claim that land over someone else, you better make use of it. Businesses should be profitable, landlords should find tenants and developers should build. Of course, this is much easier said than done. How does one value the land itself rather than the land and the house you've built on it? This is vital to get right. Under this system, remember, your efforts should not incur tax. There is one particular modern day proponent of Georgism who has done plenty of work on this precise issue. Lars Doucet, using his own work and many others', predicts the value of the land in the US to be somewhere between $24tn (£17.8tn) and $44tn. Charge, say, 5pc of the value per year, and that brings in $1.2tn to $2.2tn, or 20pc to 45pc of last year's total tax revenue. Here is my condition, though – to impose a land value tax, a government must remove or reduce other taxes. It cannot be viewed as additional revenue, otherwise the whole system falls apart. Stamp duty is an obvious one to abolish – if you're paying rent on land, there's absolutely no justification for charging additional property taxes. Income tax rates must be dramatically reduced, and inheritance tax should be redesigned. Perhaps we've come too far since William Pitt the Younger to untangle the mess he created with income tax and its endless derivatives, but we owe it to ourselves to dream once in a while. With the Bayeux Tapestry about to return home for the first time in almost a thousand years, perhaps it is time to honour Benjamin Disraeli's one-nation conservatism, and bring an end to a country divided by 'the conquerors and the conquered' depicted in that cloth.
