Bartender arrested for allegedly hiding camera in women's washroom
Watch
A bartender in Las Vegas is accused of hiding a camera in a women's washroom, and also at his own home filming his daughter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. Sheds Light on Dangers of Broadside Collisions in New Legal Insight
In a recent article titled 'What is a Broadside Collision?', the legal team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. ( offers a clear breakdown of one of the most dangerous types of crashes that can occur on Western Pennsylvania roads. The firm's publication highlights how broadside collisions, commonly known as T-bone accidents, present a severe threat to drivers and passengers alike. The article also emphasizes the legal options available to those injured in such incidents, reinforcing the importance of consulting with a Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney. Broadside collisions happen when the front of one vehicle crashes into the side of another, often at intersections. These collisions are particularly hazardous due to the limited structural protection on the sides of vehicles. As explained by the Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney team at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C., the injuries resulting from these crashes are frequently severe and may include brain trauma, spinal damage, and broken bones. 'Broadside collisions are particularly dangerous due to the way the force of impact affects the occupants of the vehicle,' the article states. The firm's analysis of how broadside collisions occur reflects common real-world scenarios: one driver fails to yield, ignores a red light, or makes an improper left turn, placing other vehicles directly in harm's way. These situations, which are all too familiar to a Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney, often lead to confusion about liability. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. discusses how intersections, side roads, parking lots, and merging areas are frequent sites for these crashes. Contributing factors such as distracted driving, speeding, impairment, and fatigue further compound the risk. According to the article, Pennsylvania's modified comparative negligence laws mean that establishing fault can be a determining factor in how much compensation an injured party may receive. A driver who is more than 51% at fault cannot recover damages. This legal structure underscores the necessity for detailed accident investigations, especially when liability is disputed. A Western Pennsylvania car accident attorney is positioned to help gather evidence like traffic camera footage, police reports, and witness statements to support a strong claim. The article also offers a practical look into the insurance claim process following a broadside collision. Pennsylvania's no-fault system requires drivers to carry Personal Injury Protection (PIP), which covers immediate medical costs regardless of fault. However, the right to pursue compensation for pain and suffering depends on whether the injured party selected Full Tort or Limited Tort insurance coverage. While Full Tort permits unrestricted legal claims, Limited Tort restricts non-economic damages unless the injury meets certain criteria. The attorneys at Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. clarify that many injuries stemming from broadside collisions—such as broken bones or brain injuries—often qualify as serious under Pennsylvania's legal definition. Exceptions to Limited Tort, such as accidents involving drunk drivers or injured pedestrians, may also allow additional compensation avenues, regardless of the initial coverage selection. Beyond legal definitions, the article outlines a series of steps for individuals to take following a broadside collision: checking for injuries, calling the police, exchanging information, documenting the scene, seeking medical attention, and notifying insurance providers. Timely medical evaluations are critical, even if injuries are not immediately obvious. Delayed symptoms from concussions or internal trauma are common in these types of crashes. Legal support becomes even more crucial as injured individuals begin to navigate post-collision recovery and potential disputes with insurers. The article emphasizes how legal representation can help challenge blame-shifting tactics from insurance companies and ensure rightful compensation is pursued. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. concludes the article with a clear message: victims of broadside collisions should not face their recovery and legal challenges alone. The firm's experience with car accident cases across Western Pennsylvania allows them to handle the legal process while injured individuals focus on healing. Their advocacy aims to secure compensation that reflects the true extent of physical, emotional, and financial harm caused by serious collisions. Those who have suffered injuries in a broadside crash can find value in the practical, legally-grounded information shared in this article. Early consultation with a trusted legal advisor offers the best opportunity to protect one's rights and move forward with confidence after a traumatic event. About Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.: Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. is a Pennsylvania law firm committed to advocating for individuals harmed in vehicle collisions and other injury-related incidents. The firm handles cases involving car accidents, workplace injuries, medical harm, and more. With a legacy of legal support across Western Pennsylvania, the team provides representation built on diligence, clarity, and a focus on justice. Embeds: Youtube Video: GMB: Email and website Email: lmkelly@ Website:
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Fan hit by concrete at Dodgers game claims he was discriminated against
A New York Yankees fan who was hit by a piece of falling concrete at Dodger Stadium says that he felt 'discriminated against' after the incident. Article content Luis Ricardo Aquino was in his seat during a game last week between the Yankees and Dodgers in L.A. when a softball-sized chunk of concrete hit him in the back. Article content Article content The Mexico City resident said that he initially thought it had been thrown at him by a fan rival – the Yankees and Dodgers met in the World Series last year — however, it was later found to have fallen from the deck above him. Article content Article content Aquino was treated at the stadium for his injuries – which he has now revealed to be a broken rib – and is now speaking out about the incident and what he claims was the initial question he was asked by first responders. Article content Article content 'The first question the police asked me if I had papers, and I said, 'Yes, I am on my visa.' I had to give them my visa and they took it from me. I am angry because I felt discriminated against,' he told KTLA, noting he was fearful of the line of questioning. Article content Aquino also explained why he refused further medical help at the time. Article content 'The paramedics did treat me and checked my vitals, but everything seemed OK,' he said. 'They asked if I wanted to go to a hospital, but this is not my country, so I did not feel comfortable.' Article content While this type of incident at a major league ballpark could invite lawsuits, Aquino said he agreed to not file a complaint over it – in return for some souvenirs. Article content After he returned to his seat following his treatment, Aquino was brought a jersey, some bracelets and a Max Muncy bobblehead. He also said that no one from the team or stadium followed up with him or offered an apology. Article content The Dodgers did take action in one regard – a small section of protective netting was installed under the top deck where the piece of concrete fell from, located between home plate and first base. Article content
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Jury deliberations begin in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial
Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan for his retrial on Wednesday, June 4, 2025 in New York. (Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP) Warning: This story contains graphic details. NEW YORK — Jurors started deliberating Thursday in Harvey Weinstein 's New York sex crimes retrial, tasked with deciding — again — a case that encapsulated the #MeToo movement. The seven-woman, five-man jury is considering two counts of criminal sex act and one count of rape, each relating to a different accuser and a different date. In this case, the criminal sex act charge is the higher-degree felony. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty. Nearly eight years ago, a series of sexual misconduct allegations against the Oscar-winning movie producer propelled the #MeToo movement. Some of those accusations later generated criminal charges and convictions in New York and California. The New York conviction from 2020 was subsequently overturned, leading to the retrial before a new jury and a different judge. Jurors heard more than five weeks of testimony, including lengthy and sometimes fiery questioning of Weinstein's three accusers in the case. Jessica Mann said he raped her in 2013, when she was trying to build an acting career. Miriam Haley accused him of forcibly performing oral sex on her in 2006, when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Kaja Sokola, who wasn't involved in Weinstein's first trial, told jurors that he forced oral sex on her, too, during 2006. At the time, she was a teenage fashion model trying to break into acting. 'They all had dreams of pursuing careers in the defendant's world, the entertainment industry,' prosecutor Nicole Blumberg told jurors in her closing argument Tuesday. She contended that Weinstein let the women think he was interested in their careers when what actually interested him were their bodies, and 'he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they wanted him to or not.' Weinstein chose not to testify. His defense called other witnesses, including some former friends of Sokola's and Mann's. Weinstein's attorneys argued that all three accusers consented to Weinstein's advances because they wanted help with their Hollywood aims. All three stayed on friendly terms with him afterward, a point the defense emphasized. 'It's transactional, folks. Yes, he wants to fool around with them, and yes, they want something from him,' defense lawyer Arthur Aidala said in his summation Tuesday. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named. Jennifer Peltz And Cedar Attanasio, The Associated Press Resources for sexual assault survivors in Canada If you or someone you know is struggling with sexual assault or trauma, the following resources are available to support people in crisis:
