logo
Dems ready more Epstein attacks

Dems ready more Epstein attacks

Politico4 days ago
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— How Epstein could permeate recess town halls — Senate negotiates next week's spending bills — Senate Republicans call for probe into Obama
The Jeffrey Epstein controversy could be hitting town halls across the country as House lawmakers head home over August recess.
Democratic leaders have brushed aside misgivings about dabbling in conspiracy theories to broadly paint the GOP as a party intent on protecting the powerful rather than standing up for the vulnerable.
'It's all connected,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters this week.
'This administration refuses to share the truth and be transparent ... while they are simultaneously working to shut down hospitals and urgent cares and Planned Parenthoods,' said Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, previewing how Democrats would combine Epstein talking points and economic messaging in the coming weeks.
Some Democrats plan to leave Epstein to the wayside during recess, with especially those in purple districts more interested in using their town halls and other events to hammer Republicans over President Donald Trump's tariff and trade agenda, as well as the Medicaid cuts and other provisions in the GOP domestic policy package.
'I don't plan to bring [Epstein] up,' said swing district-Rep. Dave Min. 'It's not something that is top of mind.'
This could be welcome news for Speaker Mike Johnson and House GOP leaders, who took pains to avoid Epstein-related votes in the House this week in an effort to give the administration time over August recess to release any new information on the convicted sex offender.
GOP leaders are also telling rank and file members to use their recess time at home to promote the megabill, hoping their sales pitch for it will counteract the Democratic narrative against it: 'I'm encouraging our people to just talk about it,' NRCC chair Richard Hudson told reporters.
Still, Democrats are making clear the Epstein issue isn't going away, especially after Democrats succeeded in getting enough Republicans to join them in a vote to subpoena the DOJ's entire Epstein file during an Oversight subcommittee markup Thursday.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise in an interview this week said that Republicans are trying to 'expedite' the process of releasing information on Epstein, but acknowledged it depends how quickly the courts respond to Trump administration efforts to unseal grand jury information.
'I don't think anybody can predict what the court's going to do, but we hope that they move quickly,' Scalise said.
Expect House lawmakers to return in September to confront GOP Rep. Thomas Massie's continued push to force a vote on his bipartisan bill to make Epstein materials public. Lawmakers involved also tell Meredith that Rules Committee Republicans are dead set against helping Johnson kill off Massie's bill — for now.
Another post-recess headache that could hit Johnson? Any Rules member will be able to call up a vote on the House floor on a separate, non-binding resolution expressing support for releasing the Epstein files, which the GOP-led panel briefly considered advancing last week. If this happens, it will require Republicans to move to table, or kill, the resolution in the Rules Committee or on the House floor.
TGIF. Email us at nwu@politico.com, meredithlee@politico.com, crazor@politico.com, mmccarthy@politico.com and bguggenheim@politico.com. Follow our live coverage at politico.com/congress.
MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHINGWith help from Jordan Williams
The House is out for August recess.
The Senate is out and will return Monday.
— House Ways and Means will hold field hearings today and Saturday in Las Vegas and Simi Valley, Calif. to sell the GOP's recently-passed 'big, beautiful bill.'
Next week: The Senate will continue to work through appropriations bills and Trump's nominees.
Pro subscribers receive this newsletter with a full congressional schedule and can browse our comprehensive calendar of markups, hearings and other notable events around Washington. Sign up for a demo.
THE LEADERSHIP SUITE
GOP leaders await Bondi's move on Epstein
Johnson, in a CBS interview aired Thursday, claimed House Republicans are united in wanting maximum disclosure on the Epstein files and said there are 'good questions' about how Pam Bondi's Justice Department has handled the matter.
The ongoing saga — now in its third week — is mounting pressure on Trump and his attorney general to produce the Epstein evidence that Bondi said the DOJ had in February. And the president's allies are increasingly voicing concerns that Bondi, who has not yet addressed the controversy in a public setting, has a blind spot for the damage she has caused, Kyle Cheney, Meredith and Erica Orden report.
House GOP leaders have an understanding with the White House that lawmakers will refrain from taking floor action on the matter as the administration works to unseal more documents related to the case — though many rank-and-file Republicans are skeptical.
'[Bondi] has very little time to turn this around,' said one House Republican, granted anonymity to describe the view inside the conference.
Across the Capitol, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is calling on the administration to provide a 'closed-door briefing to all senators' about 'Trump's name appearing in these files and the complete lack of transparency shown to date.' It's the latest in a string of efforts by Democrats to force some action by the administration as the Epstein issue continues to be a thorn in Trump's side.
Senate negotiates appropriations package
Senate GOP leaders are considering grouping three spending bills into a single package before leaving for August recess, Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus and Jennifer Scholtes report. Those bills would fund the VA and military construction projects; the Department of Agriculture and the FDA; and the Departments of Commerce and Justice.
The package, filed Thursday afternoon by Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, would postpone consideration of the bill to fund congressional operations until some later date. That's a shift from the previous plan, but it became a necessity to switch gears after Sen. John Kennedy said he was opposed to the legislative branch funding measure. Senate Appropriations also on Thursday approved bills to fund the Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development, and the Interior Department and EPA. But Senate Majority Leader John Thune is expected to wait to take these up until the fall, already having his hands full with the funding measures that had previously been under consideration for inclusion in the so-called minibus.
'It's a question of, right now can, we get any of these bills into the package,' Thune told Jordain on Thursday.
POLICY RUNDOWN
BOOZMAN CRITICIZES USDA REORG ROLLOUT — Senate Agriculture Chair John Boozman said Thursday that he was 'disappointed' USDA officials didn't consult Congress on a new sweeping reorganization plan, Marcia Brown reports. Boozman's comments come as Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced Thursday that her agency will move most Washington-area staff to Salt Lake City; Fort Collins, Colo.; Indianapolis; Kansas City, Mo.; and Raleigh, N.C.
Boozman told Marcia that he wants to hold a hearing soon to understand USDA leadership's rationale for the move, adding that he has questions about what the relocations would mean for the department's efficiency. USDA employees, granted anonymity to speak freely for fear of reprisals, said in interviews they thought the move would allow USDA leadership to concentrate power in Washington and move potentially dissident voices out to the 'hubs.'
REPUBLICANS CALL FOR SPECIAL COUNSEL PROBE OF OBAMA — Senate Judiciary Republicans John Cornyn and Lindsey Graham are calling for Bondi to appoint a special counsel to investigate former President Barack Obama, his staff and members of his administration. The move comes after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard presented newly declassified intelligence at the White House Wednesday, which she alleged showed that the Obama administration 'knowingly lied' about Russian efforts to sway the 2016 election.
Gabbard's presentation sparked outrage within the Congressional Black Caucus, with CBC Whip Kamlager-Dove leading a letter to Gabbard decrying the director's 'egregious' presentation. The 22 Democratic signers called on Gabbard to resign.
'As Director of National Intelligence, your job is to safeguard truth, not spread propaganda,' the lawmakers wrote. 'Instead, you have abused your position to promote a partisan narrative rooted in conspiracy and discredited claims.'
SENATE TAX WRITERS TALK SECOND RECONCILIATION BILL — Senate Finance member Steve Daines told Benjamin Thursday that he's actively discussing a potential second party-line reconciliation bill with other members of the tax writing committee. Daines said Trump's idea to eliminate capital gains taxes on the sale of primary residences is 'a good idea' and that it should be combined with 'additional tax reform.'
Daines' comments come as Finance Chair Mike Crapo indicated this week that he'd like to look at opportunities across health and tax jurisdictions for year-end legislation, though the Idaho Republican told Benjamin earlier this week he isn't sure yet about Trump's new tax proposal to rid capital gains taxes on houses.
'I gotta think about it,' Crapo said.
Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E:
THE BEST OF THE REST
Sen. Angus King Admits His Vote For Anti-Abortion Judge Was 'A Mistake,' from Jennifer Bendery and Igor Bobic at HuffPost
Republicans plan to use the threat of impeachment as a key midterm issue, from Peter Nicholas, Olympia Sonnier and Julie Tsirkin at NBC
CAMPAIGN STOP
TRUMP ENDORSES WHATLEY — Trump officially endorsed RNC chair Michael Whatley to run for Senate in North Carolina on Thursday night, which Dasha Burns scooped that morning. Whatley will enter the race to replace Sen. Thom Tillis, who announced his retirement last month.
HOCHUL OPEN TO NY REDISTRICTING — Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul is not ruling out a mid-decade redrawing of New York's House lines to benefit her party, as deep red Texas and Ohio move to reshape their maps through redistricting, Nick Reisman reports.
Hochul's office and Jeffries have been in close touch about this possibility since Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced a special legislative session to reshape Texas districts, which would benefit Republicans. The move in New York would almost certainly be hit with legal challenges since state law stipulates redistricting may only be done once a decade, but Hochul is unconcerned.
'All's fair in love and war. We're following the rules. We do redistricting every 10 years,' Hochul said during an event Thursday in Buffalo. 'But if there's other states violating the rules and are trying to give themselves an advantage, all I'll say is, I'm going to look at it closely with Hakeem Jeffries.'
CAUCUS MOVES — House Democrats' Lowering Costs Caucus is rolling out a new framework and planning document to help the party talk about inflation during the August recess. Members of the new coalition are urging Democrats to hold events to blame Republicans for spiking the cost of goods, from coffee to groceries.
JOB BOARD
Misha S. Linnehan is now press secretary for Democratic staff of the Joint Economic Committee. She was most recently deputy press secretary for former Sen. Bob Casey and previously worked for Maine Gov. Janet Mills and the Maine Democratic Party.
Cameron Anders Clark has been promoted to director of operations for Rep. Adam Smith.
Juliette Chandler is now deputy comms director for Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi's Senate campaign. She most recently was digital director and press secretary for Rep. Lori Trahan.
Gigi Powers has been promoted to operations director for the Senate HELP Committee. She most recently was a health research assistant for the committee.
TUNNEL TALK
HOUSEKEEPING UPDATE — A new closed captioning service funded by the Modernization Initiatives Account is now available to every House committee.
Reps. Stephanie Bice and Norma Torres — the chair and ranking member of the subcommittee on Modernization and Innovation, respectively — announced the new service Thursday as part of the panel's effort to make the House more 'accessible to all.'
The captioning service, which has a 98% accuracy rate, allows for real-time captioning on committee room screens during hearings. A committee-specific QR code will allow attendees to access real-time captions on their phones or tablets.
HILL PROGRESSIVES JOIN HOUSE FOOD BOYCOTT — The Congressional Progressive Staff Association is standing in solidarity with the House food workers boycotting the chamber's new food vendors. Only two of the House's seven new subcontractors have agreed to rehire the existing workforce and acknowledge their union-negotiated base pay and benefits.
The boycott includes Starbucks, Pakistani food restaurant CHA Street Food, Jimmy John's, Common Grounds, Java House and PX Tacos.
'We urge staff and allies to consider joining Unite Here's boycott until they commit to rehiring the current unionized workforce,' CPSA posted on X. 'These workers deserve respect, not replacement.'
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
Rep. Jared Golden … Brad Karp … Alex Nguyen of Schumer's office … Andrew Feldman of Feldman Strategies … Kirsten Sutton … Sarah Benzing … Fox News' Katy Ricalde … Daily Mail's Kelly Laco … Ella Gunn … Liz Brown of the Children's Hospital Association … Ducks Unlimited's Parker Williams … Rebecca Gale … Annie Lentz of Rep. Maggie Goodlander's office … Consumer Bankers Association's Billy Rielly … USDA's Jennifer Tiller … CNBC's Karen James Sloan
TRIVIA
THURSDAY'S ANSWER: Jim Weinstein correctly answered that Bud Shuster and his son Bill Shuster held the same House seat (PA-09) and chaired the same committee (Transportation and Infrastructure).
TODAY'S QUESTION, from Jim: When George Washington traveled from New York during a congressional recess in 1789, he started a tradition by visiting the New England states of Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. (Vermont and Maine were not yet states.) Why did he skip Rhode Island?
The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@politico.com.
CORRECTION: Yesterday's trivia had an error; President Truman's daughter was named Margaret. Our apologies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Real Estate Set To Soar After Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill
Real Estate Set To Soar After Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill

Forbes

timea few seconds ago

  • Forbes

Real Estate Set To Soar After Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 04: U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Republican lawmakers, signs the ... More One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. After weeks of negotiations with Republican holdouts Congress passed the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act into law, President Trump's signature tax and spending bill. The bill makes permanent President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts, increase spending on defense and immigration enforcement and temporarily cut taxes on tips, while cutting funding for Medicaid, food assistance and other social safety net programs. (Photo by) The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, is not without its critics. From concerns about ballooning deficits to controversial cuts to Medicaid, many see the legislation as a step backward. However, for those in the commercial real estate industry, the bill is a potential game-changer. New tax provisions offer clarity and long-term stability for developers and investors, setting the stage for what could be the next major boom in the sector. While the provisions of the OBBBA will have significant implications for the entire commercial real estate market, two sectors stand to benefit particularly: low-income multifamily housing and industrial development. A Permanent Boost for Affordable Housing There is a growing housing shortage in the United States, especially in the low-income end of the market. The lack of affordable units drives homelessness, deepens poverty, strains public services, and weakens the economy by limiting workforce mobility and long-term social stability. The OBBBA specifically targets this crisis with the new incentives and provisions to jumpstart development. According to DLP Capital, a private real estate investment company specializing in affordable housing development, the gap between qualified income and actual income has grown to 54.6% from -3.7% since 2021. DLP believes the new incentives will have a significant impact on the market. "The OBBBA may be the most pro-housing CRE legislation in a generation," says DLP's head of growth, Bo Parfet. The OBBBA includes a significant boost to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program, which is the nation's primary tool for creating affordable housing. Before the OBBBA, it operated with annual allocations that were subject to congressional approval and extension. While effective, this approach created uncertainty for long-term project planning and limited states' ability to address the housing shortage with consistent, predictable funding. The OBBBA provides a permanent 12% increase in the annual amount of 9% LIHTC allocations. Another provision created under the OBBBA is the Fast-Track Permitting Fund, which allows developers to pay a fee to expedite federal environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act. This fund is particularly beneficial for low-income housing projects that rely on federal funding or tax-exempt bonds, as it helps reduce delays that often derail or inflate the development costs. By streamlining the approval process, the fund enables affordable housing projects to meet financing deadlines more easily, improve predictability, and bring much-needed units to market more quickly. The hope is that the Fast-Track Permitting Fund will put political and market pressure on states and cities to follow suit, further reducing bottlenecks. The lengthy permitting process is often a deal-killer for developers, and reducing the timeline to construction should improve investment returns. "Multifamily—especially workforce housing—is the clear winner. More deals will move forward, faster," says Parfet. In addition to adjustments to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program and the introduction of the Fast-Track Permitting Fund, changes to opportunity zones are also expected to fuel growth in affordable housing. The Qualified Opportunity Zone program, designed to incentivize long-term investments in low-income communities, was created with a sunset date of December 31, 2026, for capital gain deferral. The OBBBA makes the deferral feature permanent. It also introduces new 10-year designation periods for new zones, starting in 2027, and includes provisions for rural opportunity zones with enhanced benefits. The introduction of rural opportunity zones should help direct capital into underserved rural areas, potentially spurring new industrial and multifamily developments in these regions. Investors who may have been hesitant due to the previous program's limited lifespan will likely re-evaluate Qualified Opportunity Zone projects, leading to new capital flowing into underserved communities and regions. Ben Reinberg, CEO of real estate investment firm Alliance Consolidated Group of Companies, believes the new legislation will re-energize OZ investments. "For long-term investors looking to reduce exposure and amplify yield, OZs just became very relevant again," he says. Massive Incentives For Domestic Manufacturing The Trump administration has made domestic manufacturing a central focus, using tariffs to try to shift supply chains and incentivize production at home. The OBBBA complements that strategy, combining new tax incentives with the renewal of other programs to accelerate industrial development and attract capital back to U.S. soil. The biggest incentive in the bill targets Qualified Production Property. Before the OBBBA, nonresidential buildings, such as factories, were typically depreciated over a lengthy 39-year period. While equipment and other tangible personal property qualified for bonus depreciation, the buildings themselves did not. The OBBBA introduces a new, temporary provision that allows for a 100% immediate deduction of the cost of QPP. To qualify, construction must be completed before January 1, 2029, and the property must be placed in service before January 1, 2031. QPP excludes offices, administrative areas, lodging, and parking within the building. The ability to immediately deduct the cost of eligible manufacturing facilities provides a powerful tax incentive. The QPP provision should stimulate the construction of new factories, assembly plants, and processing facilities across the U.S., encouraging companies to reshore production from overseas or nearshore from other countries to the U.S. The growth of manufacturing facilities should lead to increased demand for other logistics assets such as distribution centers and warehousing. "The opportunity lies in overlooked industrial corridors, characterized by land availability, low regulation, and favorable tax structures," Reinberg notes. "Industrial CRE is the sleeping giant. This bill just woke it up." Permanent 100% bonus depreciation, which allowed businesses to deduct the full cost of eligible qualified property immediately, was also introduced in the OBBBA. The previous law had 100% bonus depreciation phasing down. For property placed in service in 2025, the rate was set at 40%, declining further in subsequent years. The phase-down created urgency for capital expenditures to take advantage of the higher deduction rates. Another positive provision for commercial real estate is the change to the deductibility of interest costs. The previous law restricted the deduction of business interest expense to 30% of adjusted taxable income and excluded the add-back of depreciation and amortization from the calculation, lowering the amount of deductible interest for capital-intensive businesses. The OBBBA permanently amends the calculation for the business interest expense limitation to include depreciation and amortization. By including these expenses in the determination of adjustable taxable income, real estate businesses will generally be able to deduct a larger portion of their business interest expense, increasing cash flow and improving the overall profitability of debt-financed projects. In a higher-interest-rate environment, this change makes borrowing more attractive. The Revival of Commercial Real Estate The OBBBA is undoubtedly positive for the commercial real estate market. By enhancing incentives such as 100% bonus depreciation, LIHTC, fast-track permitting, and opportunity zones, the OBBBA can provide clarity and predictability to investors and developers, ultimately helping to address the affordable housing problem. Meanwhile, the new Qualified Production Property deduction is expected to reinvigorate the industrial market and promote domestic manufacturing. The OBBBA is indeed beautiful, especially for commercial property.

Kevin McCarthy: 'Create Something That Outlives You'
Kevin McCarthy: 'Create Something That Outlives You'

Fox News

timea few seconds ago

  • Fox News

Kevin McCarthy: 'Create Something That Outlives You'

With a staunchly divided Congress, it can be easy for politicians to focus on dominating the other side, rather than compromising, but is that the best way to create lasting change? Former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy is on the podcast today to examine the issues in the modern political landscape, from partisan infighting, the difficulty in electing moderate candidates, and the constant tug-of-war between Republicans and Democrats that often leads us in circles, rather than forward. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit

Analysis: Why it matters that top Republicans are deferring to Trump on a possible Maxwell pardon
Analysis: Why it matters that top Republicans are deferring to Trump on a possible Maxwell pardon

CNN

time12 minutes ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Why it matters that top Republicans are deferring to Trump on a possible Maxwell pardon

Plenty of Republicans are walking a tricky line right now on the Jeffrey Epstein files. But few have walked one as tricky as congressional leadership in recent days. Asked about President Donald Trump potentially pardoning Epstein's convicted sex-trafficking accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell – something Trump conspicuously left the door open to Friday and then again Monday – House Speaker Mike Johnson punted on Sunday. 'Well, I mean, obviously that's a decision of the president,' he told NBC's 'Meet the Press,' adding: 'I won't get in front of him. That's not my lane.' When pressed, the Louisiana Republican relented a bit and said that the idea gave him 'great pause' because of her 'unspeakable crimes' – while again emphasizing that's 'not my decision.' Similarly on Monday, Senate Majority Leader John Thune would not say if Trump should rule out a pardon for Maxwell. 'Well, that's up to him,' the South Dakota Republican told CNN's Manu Raju. 'But it looks to me like she's going to spend a good long time in jail.' Maxwell, who's serving 20 years, is a convicted sex trafficker. Of children. Leadership's message to Trump seemed to be: Please don't do it. But also, just in case you do pardon a sex trafficker of children, I need to cover myself and emphasize that you have the full right to do it. And they weren't the only Republicans to curiously avoid rejecting such a pardon. 'I don't know enough about Maxwell or the conversation to even weigh in on that,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma told CNN's Jake Tapper on Sunday. So why on earth are Republicans treating this seemingly unthinkable maneuver so gently? Would Trump actually do such a thing? And how on earth would that not blow up in his face? It's difficult to see how. And indeed, this prospect seems to work better as a carrot for Maxwell, who met last week with the deputy attorney general, than as a legitimate possibility. You could certainly be forgiven for thinking Trump wants Maxwell to believe she might get a pardon – or other help in her ongoing appeals – even if that's not realistic. The conventional wisdom among some on the left has been that Trump has indeed cued up a Maxwell pardon, ever since his administration made interviewing her its first big move to allay concerns about its handling of the Epstein files. The idea would be that Maxwell will say the things the Trump administration wants – such as clearing the president and/or implicating others – and he rewards her with a pardon. Trump certainly hasn't shied away from controversial pardons before. He has gone to historic lengths to pardon allies. He has granted clemency to virtually all January 6, 2021, defendants – including hundreds who were convicted of assaulting police. But even against that backdrop, pardoning a convicted sex trafficker is on another level. Let's say Trump does it. The idea would apparently be that Maxwell provides Trump and his team enough information that they can change the subject by focusing the conversation on other people she might implicate. (It's worth noting that Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.) But what happens then? Maxwell clearly has a credibility issues and reason to say what helps her in this moment. And that's not just me saying it; it's Trump's own Justice Department, circa 2020, which called her a brazen liar. A pardon would only reinforce the idea that this was some kind of corrupt bargain. About the only way to combat that would be if she gave information that actually panned out. But justice takes a long time to be served. The Justice Department needs time to build cases, and those cases might or might not succeed. Are you really going to pardon her before any of that happens? What happens if the end result is that the only Epstein associate to actually be convicted walks free? It also seems likely that a pardon would only add new fuel to a subject that Trump badly wants to move on from. If other people were implicated, that would create all kinds of threads to be pulled moving forward. That would also inject new life into theories about a possible cover-up. The question would become whether these people were subjects in the various investigations, and whether those leads were followed up. It would also lead to questions about whether other people could be brought to justice, which would make withholding the Epstein files even more difficult for the Trump administration. And that's a very big risk here. Polls show huge numbers of Americans already believe there is some form of a cover-up at play. A Reuters-Ipsos poll this month showed Americans agreed 60-12% that the federal government was 'hiding information' about Epstein's death, and 69-6% that it was hiding information about his clients. That latter belief was overwhelmingly bipartisan, with 82% of Democrats and 62% of Republicans agreeing. These people would have their fears confirmed – and probably would want to know more. And then there is just the 'yuck' factor. Trump's January 6 pardons were highly unpopular; a February Washington Post-Ipsos poll showed Americans opposed the pardons of violent offenders 83-14%. At the same time, the president doesn't seem to have paid much of a price. Those pardons during his first week back in office quickly faded amid a barrage of early Trump maneuvers that competed for the attention of the media and news consumers. But the attack on the US Capitol was also years in the past by that point. People were probably unfamiliar with the many hundreds of defendants, and many Trump supporters had been convinced over many months that these people were railroaded. It just wasn't as much of a political hot potato, even as it was unseemly in most Americans' eyes. It's difficult to see how a Maxwell pardon wouldn't instantly be news for days and weeks, because of how people feel about her crimes and the entire Epstein saga, and because of questions about whether this was some kind of corrupt trade. It would also force GOP lawmakers into some very uncomfortable interviews. (A president indeed has the power to pardon whomever he wants to. That doesn't mean every pardon is morally just.) For all of the MAGA movement's seeming willingness to go along with whatever Trump says, it's hard to see how even much of the base would be okay with all that. The question of whether Trump pardons Maxwell might not even be the right one. A better one might be whether Trump's Justice Department could do something else to help her – such as in her ongoing appeals. Maxwell's legal team has based its appeal around the idea that the 2008 non-prosecution agreement Epstein secured in Florida should have covered Maxwell. To this point, the Trump administration has rejected that argument, saying earlier this month that Maxwell was 'not a party to the relevant agreement.' Perhaps it could change its tune? Even that seems pretty far-fetched, though. While this would be a more limited step, it would still look pretty bad and would lead to all kinds of questions about quid pro quos with a convicted sex trafficker. In the end, this debate seems a whole lot more valuable to Trump in the abstract than in reality. Maxwell didn't just talk to a top Trump appointee in the Justice Department last week, she could soon be testifying to Congress. What better way to guide what she says than to have her believe maybe the administration could do her a solid. Or perhaps this is just another example of Trump's strange commentary about Maxwell – remember 'I wish her well' – and never wanting to rule things out. He loves to keep his options open, even when one of those options seems to be ridiculous. But at least for now, it's apparently significant enough for Republicans to treat it as a real possibility. And that, in and of itself, is shocking.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store